Key Points Inclisiran for LDL cholesterol reduction was analyzed post hoc in patients with CKD. Mean percentage LDL cholesterol reduction from baseline was around 50% regardless of eGFR in phase 3 trials. Inclisiran showed sustained and effective LDL cholesterol–lowering in patients across various levels of eGFR values, without new safety findings. Background Lowering LDL cholesterol reduces the risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease in patients with CKD. The efficacy and safety of inclisiran versus placebo in patients without and with CKD were investigated in a post hoc pooled analysis of three phase 3 trials (ORION-9, ORION-10, and ORION-11). Methods Patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia, atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease or its risk equivalent, and elevated LDL cholesterol were randomized 1:1 to subcutaneous inclisiran or placebo on days 1 and 90 and every 6 months thereafter for 540 days. Patients were stratified based on baseline eGFR (by CKD Epidemiology Collaboration equation): ≥90, 60 to <90, 45 to <60, and 15 to <45 ml/min per 1.73 m 2 . Coprimary end points were percentage change in LDL cholesterol at day 510 and time-adjusted percentage change after day 90 and through day 540. Safety was also evaluated. Results Of 3660 patients, 1610 (44%) had eGFR ≥90, 1608 (44%) 60 to <90, 300 (8%) 45 to <60, and 142 (4%) 15 to <45 ml/min per 1.73 m 2 . The mean (95% confidence interval) placebo-corrected percentage changes in LDL cholesterol from baseline at day 510 in patients with eGFR ≥90, 60 to <90, 45 to <60, and 15 to <45 ml/min per 1.73 m 2 were −49.9% (−53.2 to −46.6), −51.2% (−54.4 to −48.0), −54.7% (−62.5 to −47.0), and −44.7% (−57.6 to −31.8), respectively ( P < 0.001); the corresponding mean (95% confidence interval) time-adjusted placebo-corrected percentage changes in LDL cholesterol from baseline after day 90 through day 540 were −48.4% (−50.8 to −46.1), −51.8% (−54.2 to −49.4), −55.6% (−61.0 to −50.2), and −50.4% (−59.3 to −41.5; each P < 0.001). Significant decreases in total cholesterol, apolipoprotein B, non-HDL cholesterol, and lipoprotein(a) occurred in all eGFR groups. Inclisiran was well tolerated without new safety findings. Conclusions Inclisiran demonstrated sustained and effective LDL cholesterol reduction in patients with or at risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, regardless of baseline eGFR as low as 15 ml/min per 1.73 m 2 , without new safety findings. Clinical Trial registry name and registration number: ClinicalTrials.gov, ORION-9 (NCT03397121), ORION-10 (NCT03399370), and ORION-11 (NCT03400800).

BACKGROUND:Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a risk factor for hypertension and some evidence suggests this risk may not be mitigated with positive airway pressure. Low-intensity statin therapy can modestly reduce blood pressure (BP). In this exploratory analysis, we examined if six months of high-intensity statin therapy could lower resting or ambulatory BP in patients with OSA. METHODS:39 patients with OSA (13F, age = 49 ± 9yrs, body mass index = 32.9 ± 4.2kg/m2, apnea-hypopnea index = 22.2 ± 12.4 events/hour) were randomized to high-intensity atorvastatin or placebo. BP was assessed using seated, "office" measurements and in 20-minute intervals over 24 consecutive hours at three timepoints (baseline, three- and six-months post-randomization). Participants maintained a diary denoting sleep and wake times for analysis. Changes (Δ) in BP from baseline were assessed and adjusted for adherence to participants' intervention (atorvastatin or placebo) as well as to their treatment for OSA (yes or no). RESULTS:There were no between-group differences in baseline BP variables (P = .09-.96). At three months, the changes in resting (P = .74-.87), 24 hour mean (P = .54-.96), daytime (P = .70-.96), nor nighttime (P = .74-.96) BP did not differ between groups. Similarly, the changes in resting (P = .23-.92), 24 hour mean (P = .51-.82), daytime (P = .17-.78), and nighttime (P = .51-1.00) BP did not differ between groups following six months of their respective intervention. CONCLUSIONS:Our data suggest that high-intensity atorvastatin does not lower resting or ambulatory BP in patients with OSA relative to a placebo. Thus, it does not appear that atorvastatin is a viable adjunct intervention for BP reduction in patients with OSA. REGISTRATION:URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03308578.

KEY POINTS:Inclisiran for LDL cholesterol reduction was analyzed post hoc in patients with CKD. Mean percentage LDL cholesterol reduction from baseline was around 50% regardless of eGFR in phase 3 trials. Inclisiran showed sustained and effective LDL cholesterol-lowering in patients across various levels of eGFR values, without new safety findings. BACKGROUND:Lowering LDL cholesterol reduces the risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease in patients with CKD. The efficacy and safety of inclisiran versus placebo in patients without and with CKD were investigated in a post hoc pooled analysis of three phase 3 trials (ORION-9, ORION-10, and ORION-11). METHODS:Patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia, atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease or its risk equivalent, and elevated LDL cholesterol were randomized 1:1 to subcutaneous inclisiran or placebo on days 1 and 90 and every 6 months thereafter for 540 days. Patients were stratified based on baseline eGFR (by CKD Epidemiology Collaboration equation): ≥90, 60 to <90, 45 to <60, and 15 to <45 ml/min per 1.73 m 2 . Coprimary end points were percentage change in LDL cholesterol at day 510 and time-adjusted percentage change after day 90 and through day 540. Safety was also evaluated. RESULTS:Of 3660 patients, 1610 (44%) had eGFR ≥90, 1608 (44%) 60 to <90, 300 (8%) 45 to <60, and 142 (4%) 15 to <45 ml/min per 1.73 m 2 . The mean (95% confidence interval) placebo-corrected percentage changes in LDL cholesterol from baseline at day 510 in patients with eGFR ≥90, 60 to <90, 45 to <60, and 15 to <45 ml/min per 1.73 m 2 were -49.9% (-53.2 to -46.6), -51.2% (-54.4 to -48.0), -54.7% (-62.5 to -47.0), and -44.7% (-57.6 to -31.8), respectively ( P < 0.001); the corresponding mean (95% confidence interval) time-adjusted placebo-corrected percentage changes in LDL cholesterol from baseline after day 90 through day 540 were -48.4% (-50.8 to -46.1), -51.8% (-54.2 to -49.4), -55.6% (-61.0 to -50.2), and -50.4% (-59.3 to -41.5; each P < 0.001). Significant decreases in total cholesterol, apolipoprotein B, non-HDL cholesterol, and lipoprotein(a) occurred in all eGFR groups. Inclisiran was well tolerated without new safety findings. CONCLUSIONS:Inclisiran demonstrated sustained and effective LDL cholesterol reduction in patients with or at risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, regardless of baseline eGFR as low as 15 ml/min per 1.73 m 2 , without new safety findings. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRY NAME AND REGISTRATION NUMBER:ClinicalTrials.gov, ORION-9 ( NCT03397121 ), ORION-10 ( NCT03399370 ), and ORION-11 ( NCT03400800 ).

AIM:To evaluate whether the effect of inclisiran to lower LDL-C varied by background lipid-lowering therapy (LLT). METHODS:In ORION-10 and ORION-11 Phase 3 trials, patients (N=3178) with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) or ASCVD risk equivalents were randomized 1:1 to receive inclisiran or placebo on Day 1, Day 90, and 6-monthly thereafter. In this pooled post hoc analysis, patients were stratified by baseline combination therapy (statin plus ezetimibe [n=214; 6.7%]), monotherapy (statin [n=2711; 85.3%] or ezetimibe [n=54; 1.7%]), or neither LLT (none [n=199; 6,3%]) into therapy groups with/without other LLT. Stratification by baseline statin intensity was also performed (N=3155). Relative and absolute changes in LDL-C were assessed. RESULTS:Mean (±SD) baseline LDL-C was 2.7 mmol/L (±1.0), 2.6 mmol/L (±0.9), 3.7 mmol/L (±1.7), and 4.1 mmol/L (±1.5) among patients receiving combination, statin, ezetimibe, or neither LLT, respectively. In these categories, mean (95% confidence interval [CI]) time-adjusted, placebo-corrected percentage change in LDL-C after Day 90 to Day 540 with inclisiran were -57.0% (-63.8, -50.1), -51.5.% (-53.4, -49.7), -50.5.% (-59.6, -41.5), and -43.1% (-48.7, -37.6); corresponding absolute changes were -1.5 mmol/L (-1.7, -1.3), -1.3 mmol/L (-1.4, -1.3), -1.7 mmol/L (-2.0, -1.4), and -1.7 mmol/L (-1.9, -1.5). CONCLUSION:Sustained and effective LDL-C lowering with inclisiran was observed irrespective of background LLT treatment. Inclisiran was overall well tolerated with all background LLT treatments, consistent with its established safety profile.

Objective:To evaluate if cardiac troponin values predict poor outcomes in COVID-19 patients across the range of patients of different sex and age. Methods:We examined high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT) levels in 1,050 severely ill hospitalized COVID-19 patients who had hs-cTnT data available and participated in the Expanded Access Program for convalescent plasma study during the first wave (April-August 2020) of the COVID-19 pandemic. Results:We observed a continuous relationship between hs-cTnT levels and mortality in hospitalized males and females with COVID-19. This finding was present regardless of sex or age. Conclusion:These data indicate the prognostic ability of hs-cTnT to predict mortality in hospitalized COVID-19 patients across all relevant patient groups. Clinical Trials registration number:NCT04338360.

Despite concerns about potential side effects, based both on historical experience with plasma products and more recent concerns about contemporary use of plasma, COVID-19 convalescent plasma has been shown to be a very safe product. Research early in the COVID-19 pandemic documented-among the very large population of convalescent plasma recipients in the US Convalescent Plasma Study component of the FDA-authorized Expanded Access Program-that the overall risk profile was no different than that seen for fresh frozen plasma, a product used routinely in medical practice. The safety of CCP was further demonstrated using real-world evidence, pragmatic trials, and formal randomized trials. The rates of all serious adverse events were very low, an especially impressive finding in light of the fact that nearly all safety data came from the use of COVID-19 convalescent plasma in patients who were hospitalized, were older, and/or had significant co-morbid cardiopulmonary and metabolic disorders. The well-known complications of blood and plasma transfusions-transfusion-associated circulatory overload and transfusion-related acute lung injury-were found with no higher incidence than with standard use of blood and plasma, nor was there evidence for antibody-dependent enhancement or increased incidence of thromboembolic events. The comprehensive safety profile derived from studies enrolling hundreds of thousands of recipients of COVID-19 convalescent plasma across the world should allay safety fears about the rapid deployment of convalescent plasma in future pandemics.

BACKGROUND:Inclisiran administration twice-yearly (after initial and 3-month doses) effectively reduces low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) in patients on maximally tolerated statins with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), risk equivalents, or heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia. OBJECTIVES:In this study, the authors sought to evaluate whether inclisiran is superior as monotherapy over placebo and ezetimibe in reducing LDL-C in a primary prevention population without ASCVD. METHODS:VICTORION-Mono (V-Mono), a 6-month, randomized, double-blind, multicenter, placebo- and active-comparator controlled phase 3 trial, assessed inclisiran monotherapy in adult participants (aged 18-75 years) without prior ASCVD, diabetes, or familial hypercholesterolemia, with a fasting LDL-C of 100-190 mg/dL and 10-year predicted ASCVD risk of <7.5% according to pooled cohort equation, who were not receiving any lipid-lowering therapy. Participants were randomized (2:1:1) to inclisiran, ezetimibe, or placebo. The primary endpoint was percentage change in LDL-C from baseline, and key secondary endpoints included absolute change in LDL-C and percentage change in proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) from baseline to day 150. The study did not evaluate twice-yearly inclisiran dosing beyond the first 180 days. Safety was also assessed. RESULTS:Overall, 350 participants were randomized (n = 174, 89, and 87 to inclisiran, ezetimibe, or placebo, respectively) and received the assigned treatments. The study included a diverse population: 62.6% of participants were female, 10.6% were Black or African American, and 39.7% were Hispanic/Latino. Mean participant age was 46.1 years, mean baseline LDL-C level was 135.4 mg/dL, mean body mass index was 29.8 kg/m2, and median 10-year predicted ASCVD risk score was 2.2%. The mean percentage change in LDL-C from baseline at day 150 for placebo was 1.4%, for ezetimibe -11.2%, and inclisiran -46.5%. The difference in the change from baseline with inclisiran vs placebo was -47.9% and vs ezetimibe was -35.4% (both P < 0.0001). Inclisiran treatment also demonstrated favorable improvements in other lipid and lipoprotein(a) levels. Inclisiran was well tolerated, with no new safety concerns. CONCLUSIONS:V-Mono demonstrates for the first time that in patients not receiving lipid-lowering therapy, inclisiran as monotherapy, is superior to both placebo and ezetimibe in reducing LDL-C levels over a 6-month follow-up period and was well tolerated. These findings are consistent with previous observations in statin-treated patients. (Efficacy and Safety of Inclisiran as Monotherapy in Patients With Primary Hypercholesterolemia Not Receiving Lipid-Lowering Therapy [VICTORION-Mono]; NCT05763875).

Background: COVID-19 convalescent plasma (CCP) is obtained from people recently recovered from COVID-19 and contains viral-neutralizing antibodies. Because such treatment is safe and effective against SARS-CoV-2, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has recently authorized the use of CCP for COVID-19 patients with immunodeficiencies. Currently available CCP is a ″hybrid″ product with antibodies from individuals who had both infection and vaccination (vaccine-boosted CCP). In this context, there is growing interest in CCP treatment outcomes in specific groups of immunocompromised patients. Specifically, B-cell depleted patients are at risk of not producing antibodies after either infection or vaccination. Hence, B-cell depleted patients are conceivably among those who would benefit the most from CCP. We thus conducted a systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis to assess characteristics associated with 60-day survival in B-cell depleted patients transfused with CCP. Methods: The last search was April 2nd, 2024, and included all studies using CCP in B-cell depleted patients. Whenever not available in the publication, we requested individual participant data from corresponding authors of eligible studies. Risk of bias was assessed using Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Tools. Data were analyzed using conditional logistic regression. Results: We describe individual patient data extracted from 85 studies and synthesized into a cohort of 570 patients. The overall 60-day survival rate was 86.5%. Of patients with information available, 70.1% achieved SARS-CoV-2 clearance, and 64.3% had clinical improvement within 5 days of CCP transfusion. After controlling for age, sex, calendar year of infection and World Health Organization (WHO) disease severity, we found a significant association between 60-day survival and days since last anti-CD20 dose (OR=1.16 per 10-day increase; 95% CI 1.04 to 1.29; p=0.007) and transfusion of vaccine-boosted CCP (OR=9.49; 95% CI 2.01 to 44.82; p=0.005), but not with concomitant remdesivir treatment (OR=1.31; 95% CI 0.66 to 2.61; p=0.440). Discussion: Our study is limited to individual participant data analysis, with a majority of the studies included being case series and case reports. Overall survival in our cohort of B-cell depleted patients was consistent with prior meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials on survival of immunocompromised patient transfused with CCP (~84%). A novel finding from this analysis is that vaccine-boosted CCP with a presumably higher content of neutralizing antibodies is associated with a high survival benefit. Registration: The protocol for this systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42024516513) on March 1st, 2024. ### Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest. ### Clinical Protocols ### Funding Statement The authors report no funding beyond support from their home institutions. ### Author Declarations I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained. Yes The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below: The study used openly available participant data from included studies. The study was determined by the Mayo Clinic Institutional Review Board as exempt. I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals. Yes I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance). Yes I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable. Yes All data presented in the study are available upon reasonable request to the authors.

COVID-19 convalescent plasma (CCP) obtained from recently recovered people is safe and effective against SARS-CoV-2. Currently available CCP is a “hybrid” product with antibodies from individuals who had both infection and vaccination (vaccine-boosted CCP). B-cell depleted patients are at risk of not producing antibodies after either infection or vaccination, hence conceivably among those who would benefit the most from CCP. We thus conducted a systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis to assess characteristics associated with 60-day survival in B-cell depleted patients transfused with CCP. The protocol was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42024516513) on March 1st, 2024. The last search was on April 2nd, 2024, and included all studies using CCP in B-cell depleted patients. Whenever not available, we requested individual participant data from corresponding authors of eligible studies. Risk of bias was assessed using Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Tools. Data were analyzed using conditional logistic regression. The overall 60-day survival rate was 86.5% in our cohort of 570 patients (85 included studies). After controlling for age, sex, calendar year of infection and World Health Organization (WHO) disease severity, we found a significant association between 60-day survival and transfusion of vaccine-boosted CCP (OR = 9.49; 95% CI 2.01–44.82; p = 0.005). Overall survival in our cohort of B-cell depleted patients was consistent with prior meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials on survival of immunocompromised patient transfused with CCP (~84%). A novel finding from this analysis is that vaccine-boosted CCP is associated with a high survival benefit.

Addressing pediatric perioperative anxiety Key words: pediatric patient, anxiety, parental presence, stress-diversion activities, anxiolytic medications. Using acupressure to reduce perioperative anxiety in children Key words: acupressure, anxiety, pediatric patient, complementary care interventions, acupressure wristband. Screening for obstructive sleep apnea in pediatric surgical patients Key words: obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), pediatric patient, adenotonsillectomy, screening tool, polysomnography. Assessing fire risk Key words: fire risk assessment, fire prevention, algorithm, cognitive aid, fire triangle.

In the Spring of 2020, the United States of America (USA) deployed COVID-19 convalescent plasma (CCP) to treat hospitalized patients. Over 500,000 patients were treated with CCP during the first year of the pandemic. In this study, we estimated the number of actual inpatient lives saved by CCP treatment in the United States of America based on CCP weekly use, weekly national mortality data, and CCP mortality reduction data from meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials and real-world data. We also estimate the potential number of lives saved if CCP had been deployed for 100% of hospitalized patients or used in 15 to 75% of outpatients. Depending on the assumptions modeled in stratified analyses, we estimated that CCP saved between 16,476 and 66,296 lives. The CCP ideal use might have saved as many as 234,869 lives and prevented 1,136,133 hospitalizations. CCP deployment was a successful strategy for ameliorating the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic in the USA. This experience has important implications for convalescent plasma use in future infectious disease emergencies.

Aims Data describing the long-term efficacy and tolerability of inclisiran are limited. This was explored in ORION-8, an open-label extension of preceding Phase 2 and Phase 3 placebo-controlled and open-label extension trials. Methods and results Following completion of the parent trial, adult patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), ASCVD risk equivalent, or heterozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia received open-label inclisiran twice yearly (after initial and 3-month doses) until Day 990, followed by an end-of-study visit at Day 1080 or >= 90 days after the last dose. The study endpoints included the proportion of patients achieving pre-specified low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) goals [ASCVD: < 1.8 mmol/L (< 70 mg/dL); ASCVD risk equivalent: < 2.6 mmol/L (< 100 mg/dL)], percentage and absolute changes in LDL-C at end-of-study, and safety of inclisiran. Of 3274 patients, 2446 (74.7%) were followed until end-of-study. Mean age was 64.9 +/- 9.9 years, 82.7% (n = 2709) had ASCVD, and mean baseline LDL-C was 2.9 +/- 1.2 mmol/L. Mean cumulative exposure to inclisiran (including parent trials) was 3.7 years; maximum exposure was 6.8 years. With inclisiran, 78.4% [95% confidence interval (CI): 76.8, 80.0] of patients achieved pre-specified LDL-C goals and mean percentage change in LDL-C was -49.4% (95% CI: -50.4, -48.3). No attenuation of LDL-C lowering over time was observed. Treatment-emergent adverse events at injection site (all mild/moderate) occurred in 5.9% of the patients. Inclisiran-associated anti-drug antibodies were infrequent (5.5%) and had no impact on the efficacy or safety of inclisiran. No new safety signals were identified. Conclusion In the largest and longest follow-up to date with >12 000 patient-years exposure, inclisiran demonstrated consistent and effective LDL-C lowering with a favourable long-term safety and tolerability profile.

OBJECTIVE:To evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of inclisiran in participants with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) from ORION-10 and ORION-11 stratified by key patient characteristics. PATIENTS AND METHODS:Participants were randomized 1:1 to receive 300 mg inclisiran sodium (284 mg inclisiran) or placebo on days 1, 90, 270, and 450, alongside background lipid-lowering therapy. This pooled, post hoc analysis stratified participants with ASCVD by sex, age, race, kidney function, body mass index, and glycemic status. Co-primary endpoints were percentage changes in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) from baseline to day 510, and after day 90 and up to day 540 (time-adjusted). LDL-C goal attainment and safety were also assessed. RESULTS:This analysis of 2975 participants included: female, n=827; Black, n=213; 75 years of age or older, n=458; obese, n=1474; diabetes, n=1182; and moderate-to-severe chronic kidney disease, n=538. Mean baseline LDL-C levels in the total ASCVD population were balanced between treatment arms (inclisiran, 103.4 mg/dL; placebo, 102.0 mg/dL). With inclisiran, mean placebo-corrected percentage changes in LDL-C from baseline were -51.5% (95% CI, -54.0% to -49.0%) and -52.1% (95% CI, -53.9% to -50.4%) to day 510 and day 540 (time-adjusted), respectively; this was consistent across subgroups. LDL-C less than 55 mg/dL at 1 or more visits was reached by 87.6% of participants receiving inclisiran. The inclisiran safety profile was consistent across subgroups. CONCLUSION:Twice-yearly inclisiran (after initial and 3-month doses) was well-tolerated and provided significant, consistent LDL-C reductions for up to 18 months in participants with ASCVD independent of key patient characteristics (ORION-10 [Inclisiran for Participants With Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease and Elevated Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol]; NCT03399370 and ORION-11 [Inclisiran for Subjects With ASCVD or ASCVD-Risk Equivalents and Elevated Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol]; NCT03400800).

AIMS:To conduct a pooled analysis of Phase 3 trials investigating the efficacy and safety of inclisiran across glycaemic and body mass index (BMI) strata. MATERIALS AND METHODS:Participants were randomized 1:1 to receive 300 mg inclisiran sodium or placebo twice yearly, after initial and 3-month doses up to 18 months, with background oral lipid-lowering therapy. Analyses were stratified by glycaemic status (normoglycaemia, prediabetes, and diabetes) or BMI (<25, ≥25 to <30, ≥30 to <35, and ≥35 kg/m2). Co-primary endpoints were percentage and time-adjusted percentage change in low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol from baseline. Safety was also assessed. RESULTS:Baseline characteristics were balanced between treatment arms and across strata. Percent LDL cholesterol change (placebo-corrected) with inclisiran from baseline to Day 510 ranged from -47.6% to -51.9% and from -48.8% to -54.4% across glycaemic/BMI strata, respectively. Similarly, time-adjusted percentage changes after Day 90 and up to Day 540 ranged from -46.8% to -52.0% and from -48.6% to -53.3% across glycaemic/BMI strata, respectively. Inclisiran led to significant reductions in proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 and other atherogenic lipids and lipoproteins versus placebo across the glycaemic/BMI strata. The proportions of individuals achieving LDL cholesterol thresholds of <1.8 mmol/L and <1.4 mmol/L with inclisiran increased with increasing glycaemic and BMI strata. Across the glycaemic/BMI strata, a higher proportion of individuals had mild/moderate treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) at the injection site with inclisiran (2.8%-7.7%) versus placebo (0.2%-2.1%). CONCLUSION:Inclisiran provided substantial and sustained LDL cholesterol lowering across glycaemic/BMI strata, with a modest excess of transient mild-to-moderate TEAEs at the injection site.