Rapid, noninvasive imaging strategies, especially multidetector spiral CT and CT angiography (CTA) as well as gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography (MRA), have facilitated early diagnosis of splanchnic venous thrombosis, a potentially lethal cause of intestinal ischemia. Single breath-hold volumetric acquisitions permit superior temporal and contrast resolution while eliminating motion artifact and suppressing respiratory misregistration. Increased spatial resolution is aided by thinner slice collimation. These cross-sectional imaging techniques are becoming a preferred noninvasive alternative to conventional selective mesenteric angiography with delayed imaging for venous evaluation and should be considered the primary diagnostic modalities for evaluating patients with high clinical suspicion of nonsurgical mesenteric ischemia.

Mesenteric venous thrombosis is an uncommon but potentially lethal cause of bowel ischemia. Several imaging methods are available for diagnosis, each of which has advantages and disadvantages. Doppler ultrasonography allows direct evaluation of the mesenteric and portal veins, provides semiquantitative flow information, and allows Doppler waveform analysis of the visceral vessels; however, it is operator dependent and is often limited by overlying bowel gas. Conventional contrast material-enhanced computed tomography (CT) allows sensitive detection of venous thrombosis within the central large vessels of the portomesenteric circulation and any associated secondary findings; however, it is limited by respiratory misregistration, motion artifact, and substantially decreased longitudinal spatial resolution. Helical CT and CT angiography, especially when performed with multi-detector row scanners, and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging, particularly gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography, enable volumetric acquisitions in a single breath hold, eliminating motion artifact and suppressing respiratory misregistration. Helical CT angiography and three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography should be considered the primary diagnostic modalities for patients with a high clinical suspicion of mesenteric ischemia. Conventional angiography is reserved for equivocal cases at noninvasive imaging and is also used in conjunction with transcatheter therapeutic techniques in management of symptomatic portal and mesenteric venous thrombosis.

The use of noncontrast helical CT (NHCT) to assess patients with acute flank pain and hematuria for potential urinary tract stone disease was first reported in 1995. After several years of experience with the technique, sensitivity and specificity of NHCT has proven to be better than intravenous urography for evaluating ureteral stones. NHCT imaging findings for urinary calculi and the differential diagnosis are discussed in this article. Various extraurinary diseases found while using NHCT in searching for stone disease are addressed and illustrated. As experience with the use of NHCT has increased, clinicians have broadened the indications for this technique, which has a lower charge than standard CT, beyond the specific evaluation of urinary colic. This indication creep has increased the number of NHCT examinations ordered. It has also reduced the rate of stone positivity and increased the diagnostic yield for extraurinary disease.

OBJECTIVE:The radiologist and oncologist are often confident that biopsy will confirm their suspicion of recurrent disease, but a biopsy is performed to confirm the histologic diagnosis before beginning or altering therapy. We have examined data to determine how often the biopsied lesion represents recurrent disease from the primary tumor or is an instance of new cancer, and whether recurrent disease can be predicted.MATERIALS AND METHODS:We reviewed the medical and imaging records of 253 patients who underwent CT-guided biopsy of an abdominal or pelvic lesion between 1993 and 1996. Sixty-nine of the 253 patients had a previously diagnosed primary tumor and were being examined for possible tumor recurrence or metastasis. The images of these 69 patients were analyzed to determine if the pattern of disease was typical of recurrence or metastasis.RESULTS:In 55 of the 69 patients, the pattern was judged to be typical of metastatic or recurrent disease. Biopsy confirmed this suspicion in all 55 patients. In 14 of the 69 patients, the pattern of spread was judged not to be typical of recurrence or metastasis. These 14 patients were found to have a new primary tumor (n = 4), benign processes (n = 2), and recurrences (n = 8).CONCLUSION:Of the patients for whom radiographic findings suggested recurrence, we found no patients in whom a new primary tumor would have been missed if biopsy had been avoided. Data should now be acquired prospectively to determine whether it may be prudent to make treatment decisions on the basis of imaging findings alone, without histologic confirmation.

The purpose of this pictorial review is to facilitate recognition and understanding of calcifications seen on conventional radiographs of the abdomen. Calcifications can be categorized by organ system and location in the abdomen. Both common and rare calcifications in the urinary tract, liver, gallbladder, spleen, pancreas, adrenal glands, digestive tract, genital tract, peritoneal cavity, and retroperitoneum are illustrated. Abnormal calcifications in the urinary tract are subcategorized by kidneys, ureters, bladder, and urethra. The density, shape, size, margins, pattern, position, and mobility of calcifications are emphasized for differential diagnoses.

Purpose: Our goal was to analyze those factors contributing to the error rate in the interpretation of abdominal CT scans at an academic medical center.Method: From a total of 694 consecutive patients (329 male, 365 female), we evaluated the error rates of interpreting abdominal CT studies. The average patient age was 54 years. All abdominal CT studies were reviewed by three to five CT faculty radiologists on the morning after the studies were performed. The error rate was correlated with reader variability, the number of cases read per day, the presence of a resident, inpatient versus outpatient, organ systems, etc. The chi(2)-test was used for statistical analysis.Results: A total of 56 errors were found in the reports of 53 patients (overall error rate = 7.6%). Of these errors, 19 were judged to be clinically significant and 7 affected patient management. A statistically significant difference in error rates was noted among the five faculty radiologists (3.6-16.1%, p = 0.00062). No significant correlates between error rates and any of the other variables could be established.Conclusion: The primary determinant of error rates in body CT is the skill of the interpreting radiologist.

Numerous surgical options are available to physicians treating patients with renal adenocarcinoma. In the current clinical setting, imaging plays a key role in determining which options are selected. Newer imaging techniques such as helical CT with CT angiography, MRI, and ultrasound (US) have improved staging capabilities in this patient population. However, to approach staging accuracies recently reported, attention must be paid to proper imaging parameters. This article describes the strengths, limitations, and proper techniques used for staging renal adenocarcinoma with CT, MRI, and US.

Current imaging techniques, especially CT and MR imaging, make accurate preoperative staging of renal cell carcinoma possible. Because surgery provides the only effective therapy and because survival depends on local and distant extent, precise staging is critical for preoperative planning and prognosis. This article reviews the advantages, limitations, accuracy, and pitfalls of each of the imaging approaches to staging renal cell carcinoma, concentrating on CT and MR imaging. This information then is summarized in a suggested overall approach to staging renal cell carcinoma.

Background: The preoperative assessment of depth of invasion of rectal carcinoma is increasingly important as new treatment methodologies are developed. Accuracy of preoperative endorectal MR imaging was therefore compared with that of the endoscopic rectal sonography in determining depth of invasion of rectal carcinomas.Method: From March 1993 to April 1994, 10 consecutive patients with biopsy-proven rectal carcinomas were imaged with both endorectal MR imaging and endoscopic rectal sonography. These two studies were performed an average of 2.7 days apart in each patient. All 10 patients had surgical resection of the rectal carcinoma within days of imaging studies. TNM staging of each malignant lesion was correlated with the imaging reports.Result: Staging accuracy was 80% for endorectal MR imaging and 70% for endoscopic rectal sonography. With MR imaging, one T2 lesion was overstaged and one T3 lesion was understaged. With sonography, two T2 lesions were overstaged and one T3 lesion was understaged. One MR error resulted from misinterpretation. All other staging errors occurred in patients with tumor spread into, but not through, the muscularis propria or with microscopic spread through this layer.Conclusions: Endorectal MR imaging and endoscopic rectal sonography have similar accuracy for assessing depth of invasion of rectal carcinoma. (C) 1997 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Knowledge of the extent of primary colorectal carcinoma at initial diagnosis is critical for proper management of disease. Currently, CT does not have a role in screening for colorectal carcinoma, though promising work on virtual colonoscopy is on the horizon. In patients with proven colorectal carcinoma, accurate prospective noninvasive assessment can identify those who may benefit from preoperative local radiotherapy, hepatic resection or cryoablation, or intra-arterial chemotherapy. CT should be considered complementary to the clinical assessment of colorectal carcinoma and to other modalities, such as barium enema, endorectal ultrasonography, MRI, and immunoscintigraphy. Although limited in evaluation of the primary tumor and local spread, CT has proven useful in assessing patients thought to harbor extensive local or metastatic disease. CT is generally the modality of choice for imaging the postoperative patient. The cross-sectional display of CT clearly depicts the operative bed, particularly after abdominoperineal resection. Baseline examinations should be obtained 2 to 4 months after surgery, with follow-up examinations every 6 to 9 months for 2 years, and yearly studies thereafter. CT-guided biopsies should be performed when findings suggest recurrent carcinoma.

Metastatic adenocarcinoma within an adrenal adenoma: detection with chemical shift imaging.R Y Shifrin, R E Bechtold and E S ScharlingAudio Available | Share

The perirenal space may be involved by disease processes that arise within or outside the perirenal space. Key anatomic details that dictate the features of perirenal processes include the renal capsule, the perirenal septa, the renal fascia, and the conic shape and inferomedial orientation of the perirenal space. Superiorly, the perirenal space is open to the bare area of the liver. The perirenal spaces communicate with one another at the level of the lower lumbar vertebrae. The hallmark of perirenal infection is localized or diffuse gas. Chronic urinoma appears as an encapsulated cystic mass, often aligned parallel with the perirenal space. Fat within an apparent spontaneous hematoma of the perirenal space suggests angiomyolipoma. Renal cell carcinoma, lymphoma, and melanoma are the most common causes of discrete solid masses in the perirenal space; metastases occur due to the characteristic lymphatic and vascular supply of the space. Amyloidosis and fibrosis create a nonspecific rind of soft tissue around the kidneys. Diaphragmatic pseudotumor produces a linear "lesion" in the perirenal space.

The urographic nephrogram is an important indicator of underlying functional and structural renal disease. With expansions in use of cross-sectional imaging, the computed tomographic (CT) nephrogram (ie, contrast material enhancement within the renal parenchyma) has assumed a greater role in the evaluation of urinary tract disorders. Both quantitative and qualitative nephrographic abnormalities are well demonstrated by CT, including global or segmental absence or persistence of the nephrogram, slowed temporal progression, striated pattern, and rim pattern. Global absence is nearly always unilateral and is most often seen with blunt abdominal trauma with renal pedicle injury. Segmental absence is attributable to focal renal infarction, most likely due to arterial emboli. Global persistence, which is much more common than segmental persistence, may be unilateral (caused by renal artery stenosis, renal vein thrombosis, or urinary tract obstruction) or bilateral (due to systemic hypotension, intratubular obstruction, or abnormalities in tubular function). Striated nephrograms may be unilateral or bilateral and are caused by ureteric obstruction, acute pyelonephritis, contusion, renal vein thrombosis, tubular obstruction, hypotension, and autosomal recessive polycystic kidney disease. The rim pattern is most often associated with renal infarction and occasionally with acute tubular necrosis and renal vein thrombosis. Careful evaluation of the CT nephrogram is an integral part of the abdominal CT examination.