This randomized, controlled clinical trial examined the impact of a web-based weight loss intervention on diet quality. Furthermore, it was investigated whether corresponding changes in diet quality were associated with changes in measures of cardiovascular risk profile. Individuals with a body mass index (BMI) of 27.5 to 34.9 kg/m2 and an age of 18 to 65 y were assigned to either an interactive and fully automated web-based weight loss program focusing on dietary energy density (intervention) or a non-interactive web-based weight loss program (control). Examinations were performed at baseline (t0), after the 12-week web-based intervention (t1), and after an additional 6 (t2) and 12 months (t3). Based on a dietary record, the Healthy Eating Index-NVS (HEI-NVS) was calculated and analyzed using a robust linear mixed model. In addition, bootstrapped correlations were performed independently of study group to examine associations between change in HEI-NVS and change in dietary, anthropometric, and cardiometabolic variables. A total of n = 153 participants with a mean BMI of 30.71 kg/m2 (SD 2.13) and an average age of 48.92 y (SD 11.17) were included in the study. HEI-NVS improved significantly in the intervention group from baseline (t0) to t2 (p = 0.003) and to t3 (p = 0.037), whereby the course was significantly different up to t2 (p = 0.013) and not significantly different up to t3 (p = 0.054) compared to the control group. Independent of study group, there was a significant negative association between change in HEI-NVS and dietary energy density. A higher total score in HEI-NVS did not correlate with improvements in cardiovascular risk profile. The interactive and fully automated web-based weight loss program improved diet quality. Independent of study group, changes in HEI-NVS correlated with changes in energy density, but there was no association between improvements in HEI-NVS and improvements in cardiovascular risk profile.

BACKGROUND:The high proportion of people with overweight and obesity has become a worldwide problem in recent decades, mainly due to health consequences, such as cardiovascular diseases, neoplasia, and type 2 diabetes mellitus. Regarding effective countermeasures, the digitization of health services offers numerous potentials, which, however, have not yet been sufficiently evaluated. Web-based health programs are becoming increasingly interactive and can provide individuals with effective long-term weight management support.OBJECTIVE:The purpose of this randomized controlled clinical trial was to evaluate the effectiveness of an interactive web-based weight loss program on anthropometric, cardiometabolic, and behavioral variables and to compare it with a noninteractive web-based weight loss program.METHODS:The randomized controlled trial included people who were aged between 18 and 65 years (mean 48.92, SD 11.17 years) and had a BMI of 27.5 to 34.9 kg/m2 (mean 30.71, SD 2.13 kg/m2). Participants (n=153) were assigned to either (1) an interactive and fully automated web-based health program (intervention) or (2) a noninteractive web-based health program (control). The intervention program focused on dietary energy density and allowed for dietary documentation with appropriate feedback on energy density and nutrients. The control group only received information on weight loss and energy density, but the website did not contain interactive content. Examinations were performed at baseline (t0), at the end of the 12-week intervention (t1), and at 6 months (t2) and 12 months (t3) thereafter. The primary outcome was body weight. The secondary outcomes were cardiometabolic variables as well as dietary and physical activity behaviors. Robust linear mixed models were used to evaluate the primary and secondary outcomes.RESULTS:The intervention group showed significant improvements in anthropometric variables, such as body weight (P=.004), waist circumference (P=.002), and fat mass (P=.02), compared with the control group over the course of the study. The mean weight loss after the 12-month follow-up was 4.18 kg (4.7%) in the intervention group versus 1.29 kg (1.5%) in the control group compared with the initial weight. The results of the nutritional analysis showed that the energy density concept was significantly better implemented in the intervention group. Significant differences in cardiometabolic variables were not detected between the 2 groups.CONCLUSIONS:The interactive web-based health program was effective in reducing body weight and improving body composition in adults with overweight and obesity. However, these improvements were not associated with relevant changes in cardiometabolic variables, although it should be noted that the study population was predominantly metabolically healthy.TRIAL REGISTRATION:German Clinical Trials Register DRKS00020249; https://drks.de/search/en/trial/DRKS00020249.INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID):RR2-10.3390/ijerph19031393.

Web-based lifestyle interventions are a new area of health research. This randomized controlled trial evaluated the effectiveness of an interactive web-based health program on physical fitness and health. N = 189 healthy adults participated in a 12-week interactive (intervention) or non-interactive (control) web-based health program. The intervention provided a web-based lifestyle intervention to promote physical activity and fitness through individualized activities as part of a fully automated, multimodal health program. The control intervention included health information. Cardiorespiratory fitness measured as maximum oxygen uptake (VO2max) was the primary outcome, while musculoskeletal fitness, physical activity and dietary behavior, and physiological health outcomes were assessed as secondary outcomes (t0: 0 months, t1: 3 months, t2: 9 months, t3: 15 months). Statistical analysis was performed with robust linear mixed models. There were significant time effects in the primary outcome (VO2max) (t0–t1: p = 0.018) and individual secondary outcomes for the interactive web-based health program, but no significant interaction effects in any of the outcomes between the interactive and non-interactive web-based health program. This study did not demonstrate the effectiveness of an interactive compared with a non-interactive web-based health program in physically inactive adults. Future research should further develop the evidence on web-based lifestyle interventions.

Web-based lifestyle interventions have attracted considerable research interest. Available evidence on such interventions suggests health-promoting effects, but further research is needed. Therefore, this study aims to investigate short-, medium-, and long-term health effects of a web-based health program (“TK-HealthCoach”, TK-HC) offered by a national statutory health insurance fund (Techniker Krankenkasse, TK). The study comprises two randomized controlled clinical trials to evaluate the health goals “Increasing Fitness” (Fclin) and “Losing and Maintaining Weight” (Wclin). A total of n = 186 physically inactive (Fclin) and n = 150 overweight or obese (Wclin) adults will be randomly assigned to a 12-week interactive (TK-HC) or non-interactive web-based health program using permuted block randomization with a 1:1 allocation ratio. Primary outcomes include cardiorespiratory fitness (Fclin) and body weight (Wclin). Secondary outcomes comprise musculoskeletal fitness (Fclin), physical activity and dietary behavior, anthropometry, blood pressure, blood levels, and vascular health (Fclin, Wclin). All outcomes will be measured before and after the 12-week intervention and after a 6- and 12-month follow-up. Additionally, usage behavior data on the health programs will be assessed. Linear mixed models (LMMs) will be used for statistical analysis. Findings of this study will expand the available evidence on web-based lifestyle interventions.

Numerous weight-loss interventions promoting healthy and weight-reducing eating behavior have been developed over the past years. To evaluate the effectiveness of such interventions for eating behavior change, short, validated and sensitive instruments are needed. In this study series, we developed and validated a new outcome measure to assess health-conscious and weight-controlling eating behavior for the evaluation of weight-loss interventions. The preliminary version of the German eating behavior scale (Skala zumErnährungsverhalten [SEV]) included 40 items. Three studies were conducted to (a) reduce the preliminary item pool, (b) investigate structural validity and internal consistency using exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses (EFA, CFA), as well as McDonald's ω, and (c) test construct validity with physiological and behavioral parameters. Responsiveness to change was also assessed after a 12-week weight-loss intervention. EFA indicated a two-factor solution with health-conscious (hc-EB) and weight-controlling eating behavior (wc-EB) as subscales, CFA confirmed the two-factor solution with acceptable model fit. Internal consistencies of both subscales were also acceptable to good (hc-EB: ω = 0.88; wc-EB: ω = 0.78). Significantly small to moderate correlations to the Healthy Eating Index (r = 0.51) as well as blood glucose (r = 0.31), blood lipids (r = 0.23), and vascular age (r = 0.31) were found, supporting the construct validity of the SEV and its subscales. Both subscales detected intervention-related changes in eating behavior among subjects of a weight-loss intervention with Standardized Response Means of 0.52 and 0.67, indicating good responsiveness of the SEV. In sum, findings provide evidence that the SEV is a valid and responsive measure to assess health-conscious and weight-controlling eating behavior.

Personal behavior patterns, such as unhealthy diet and lack of physical activity, lead to the development of overweight and obesity. These are associated with other comorbidities, reduced quality of life, premature frailty and increased mortality. Personalized web-based interventions are promising in inducing behavioral change leading to effective reductions in body weight at relatively low costs. However, the long-term effects have not been thoroughly investigated. This work evaluates the effectiveness of web-based interactive weight loss coaching and compares it to a non-interactive web-based health program. Therefore, a randomized controlled trial (RCT) was implemented, measuring primary and secondary outcomes at four time points (program start; end of the 12-week-program; 6 months after program end, 12 months after program end). The net sample covered 1499 subjects in the intervention group and 1492 in the control group. On average, the IG was 43 years old (±13.6), 80.1% male, and had 86.4 kg body weight (±16.1) at baseline. The CG was 42.7 years old (±13.9), 79.5% male and had a mean body weight of 86.1 (±15.7). Multilevel analyses with fixed effects were carried out both from the perspective of an intention-to-treat (ITT) and a complete cases approach (CCA). In sum, our adjusted models suggest a weight loss of 0.4 kg per time point. At the end of the program, significant differences in weight loss in % to baseline (delta M = 1.8 in the CCA) were observed in favor of the intervention group. From a long-term perspective, no superiority of the intervention group in comparison to the control group could be found. More intensive use of the program was not statistically associated with higher weight loss.

OBJECTIVE To analyze the cognitive mediation processes of an effective psychological group-based intervention promoting physical activity (based on motivational and volitional theories; MoVo-LISA) and to test for different underlying intervention mechanisms in the adoption and maintenance phase of physical activity behavior change. METHOD In an RCT, N = 202 patients with coronary heart disease were randomly allocated to the group-based MoVo-LISA intervention or a control group (treatment-as-usual). Primary outcome was physical activity (in minutes per week, significant group differences: posttreatment: d = 1.03; 12-months follow-up: d = .57). Potential mediator variables were self-efficacy, outcome expectations, intention strength, self-concordance, action planning and barrier management. A mediation analysis of longitudinal data in SPSS AMOS v.24 was conducted. RESULTS The intervention was successful in modifying most of the examined cognitive variables in the adoption and/or the maintenance phase, with exception of self-concordance. Intention strength and self-concordance were significant predictors of behavior change in both phases. Findings suggest that the observed intervention effects on physical activity behavior were only partially mediated through the motivational variables self-efficacy and outcome expectation. CONCLUSIONS The results contribute to opening "the black box" of processes behind an intervention and show that intervention effects of MoVo-LISA are partially mediated through the specified cognitive variables. The relevance of motivational variables (intention strength and self-concordance) in the adoption and maintenance phases is highlighted in this study and leads to relevant intervention design implications. Nevertheless, the differentiation of the two phases might help to improve intervention programs through a stronger focus on those cognitive parameters that are critical at a certain point in the behavior change process. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

Blended care interventions combine therapeutic guidance with digital care. Current research results show the promising role of the blended care approach in clinical care. This new way of delivering health care could have the potential to effectively promote physical activity in different public health settings. The aim of the systematic review is to investigate the varieties of intervention characteristics of blended care interventions to promote physical activity in terms of structure, behavior change goals, behavior change techniques, and effectiveness of blended care interventions compared to a control group. We searched for randomized controlled trials published from 2000 to March 2021 in MEDLINE, CINAHL, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, SPORTDiscus, PsycINFO, and Web of Science according to the PRISMA guidelines. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration tool. Study characteristics, intervention characteristics, and outcome data were extracted. Furthermore, the effect size on the outcome of physical activity was examined or calculated. In total, the number of reports identified from the database searches was 4828. Of these, 25 studies were included in the review, with a total of 5923 study participants. Results indicated that the characteristics of blended care interventions showed a high heterogeneity. The combinations of therapist-guided interventions and digital interventions allowed the identification of specific subgroups, but they varied in length (range 8–52 weeks, SD 16.6), intensity, and the combination of the components. The most used combination of blended care interventions to promote physical activity was the combination of one-on-one meetings via telephone and Web-based interventions. Motivational models of behavior change were used most frequently as underlying theoretical foundations. Certain behavior change techniques were used consistently across the individual components, e.g., “problem solving” in the therapist-guided component and “feedback on behavior” in the digital component. Considering the effect size of blended care interventions compared with control groups, most studies showed a small effect. It can be concluded that blended care interventions have potential to promote physical activity. In the future, further high-quality studies should investigate which type of blended care intervention is effective for which target group. Additionally, insights are required on which intervention characteristics are most effective, taking into account new evidence on behavior change. Registration This systematic literature review was registered in PROSPERO ( CRD42020188556 ).

Background A healthy lifestyle can help prevent diseases that impair quality of life and lead to premature death. The Techniker health insurance fund offers a comprehensive online health program to support users in achieving their health goals of Increasing Fitness , Losing and Maintaining Weight , or Smoking Cessation . Methods The aim of this study is to test the long-term effectiveness of the web-based TK-HealthCoach with regard to the primary outcomes of increased physical activity, sustainable weight reduction, and smoking abstinence. We are conducting three interconnected, randomized controlled trials (RCT), one for each health goal, within which participants are allocated to an intervention group (interactive online health program) or a control group (non-interactive online health program). The effects of the intervention groups compared to the control groups will be analyzed by multi-level models for change. Participants’ data are captured via online questionnaires before the program starts (baseline t0), again when it ends (t1), and later at two follow-up surveys (t2 and t3); the latter 12 months after t1. We are documenting socio-demographic, health-related, and psychological variables as well as usage behavior data of the programs. According to our sample size calculation, we have to enroll 1114 participants in each Losing and Maintaining Weight and Increasing Fitness RCT and 339 participants in the Smoking Cessation RCT. Additionally, 15–20 participants in the interactive smoking-cessation program will be invited to qualitative telephone interviews with the aim to obtain detailed information concerning utilization, compliance, and satisfaction. The online RCTs’ inclusion criteria are: adults of each gender regardless of whether they are insured with Techniker health insurance fund . Persons with impairments or pre-existing conditions require a medical assessment as to whether the program is suitable for them. Specific exclusion criteria apply to each program/RCT. Discussion We assume that study participants will improve their health behavior by using the offered online health programs and that each health goal’s intervention group will reveal advantages regarding the outcome variables compared to the control groups. Study enrollment started on January 1, 2020. Trial registration German Clinical Trials Register, Universal Trial Number (UTN): U1111-1245-0273 . Registered on 11 December 2019

Objective: Exercise is seen as a possible way to manage stress, yet causal evidence regarding the stress-buffer potential of exercise is still very limited. The present study experimentally tested the stress-buffer hypothesis of exercise by examining whether participation in an aerobic exercise training program reduces the detrimental effects of stress on health. Methods: A total of 149 healthy and insufficiently active men were randomly assigned to a 12-week exercise training intervention, a 12-week relaxation training intervention, or a wait list control group. Health, stress, exercise levels, and physical fitness were assessed before and after the interventions. One hundred and six subjects completed all measurements and were included in the final analyses. Results: As the main result, covariance analyses showed that both intervention programs buffered negative effects of stress on general health and mental health; however, no significant buffer effects for physical health and physical complaints were found. Furthermore, regression analyses provided support for the assumption that the amount of exercise participants engaged in functions as a moderator of the relationship between stress and general health; physical fitness was not found to moderate the stress-health relationship. Conclusions: Overall, the findings present experimental support for the assumption that physical exercise buffers the effects of stress on general and mental health. Remarkably, the same effects were found for the participants of the relaxation training program. Thus, future studies need to further examine the stress-buffering effects of different exercise types as well as the effects of alternative stress-regulative interventions to determine which interventions are the most effective.

Background: Interprofessional education (IPE) for medical and healthcare professions is highly relevant. It increases knowledge and skills, but also helps to foster the development of collaboration, which is essential for optimal patient care. One important aspect of IPE is to better understand profession's individual attitudes and perceptions towards interprofessionalism and the expected roles and skills for future collaboration in the context of patient care. Methods: We offered IPE workshops using a peer assisted learning approach, with the focus on anatomy in the area of the lower back and hip. The workshops were attended by medical and physiotherapy students and consisted of three consecutive training sessions with the topics anatomical prosections, anatomy in vivo and orthopedics testing. We focused on student's attitudes and perceptions regarding the relevance of IPE and their expected skills in interprofessionalism. An established questionnaire was used as an instrument for self-assessment before and after the interprofessional experience. To evaluate for significance, analysis was carried out for all groups on pre-and post-course item mean differences. Results: Pre-post score comparison for all groups combined demonstrated significant increase in terms of perceptions and attitudes for several items related to interprofessionalism and interprofessional skills. Medical and physiotherapy students rated themselves significantly higher for different questionnaire items. Students, who had obtained a professional qualification prior to their current studies, rated themselves significantly higher on certain items compared to those who had not. Conclusions: The results from this brief interprofessional anatomy experience are encouraging. The course led to meaningful improvements in competencies that are highly relevant for effective interprofessional collaboration in the future. Furthermore, identification of differences in professional group perceptions can be useful for development of future IPE workshops. (c) 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier GmbH. CC_BY_NC_ND_4.0

LAY SUMMARY The present study among an all-male sample emphasized the stress-buffering capabilities of regular exercise. While the quality of the diet had a similar effect, assumed double benefits did not appear. Objectives: Engaging in physical activity and exercise have long been shown to have beneficial effects on (psychosocial) stress reactivity. Initial studies could reveal that these positive effects on stress reactivity also exist for a healthy diet. Aim of this study was to examine whether combining a healthy diet and regular exercise can provide additional benefits on psychobiological stress levels. Methods: Forty-two men self-identifying as non-exercisers or regular exercisers between 18 and 30 years were exposed to the Trier Social Stress Test for Groups. Salivary cortisol (sCort) and alpha-amylase (sAA) as biological stress markers, and self-reported momentary stress were repeatedly examined. Questionnaires on regular exercise and dietary intake were completed once. Results: Two-stage hierarchical multiple regressions predicting participants' stress reactivity, i.e. response and recovery, from diet quality, exercise as well as their interaction appeared inconsistent. sCort response was significantly predicted by regular exercise whereas greater sCort recovery was predicted by higher diet quality. In contrast, higher sAA reactivity was predicted by higher diet quality while participants eating less healthy and exercising more showed the most pronounced sAA recovery. None of the other outcome variables was predicted by the interaction. Subjective stress was unrelated to either health behavior. Conclusions: The present examination among an all-male sample emphasized the stress-buffering capabilities of regular exercise and provided initial evidence for a distinct link to healthy diet. Assumed synergistic benefits could, however, not be confirmed. Advances are needed to better understand how individuals profit the most from which behaviors as well as their interactive effects.

Questionnaires to assess physical activity (PA) have served and continue to serve important purposes in both research and practical application as they capture the self-reported aggregation of the individual which is at times complemented with device-based measures. This paper presents an expert consensus on best practices and future directions regarding the use of PA questionnaires (PAQ). The expert panel discussions that informed this manuscript took place during the 2nd International Workshop of the Center for the Assessment of Physical Activity (CAPA), held in Karlsruhe, Germany in July of 2019. Practically, we recommend to identify already existing and published PAQs in order to address a specific research question. To facilitate this, a decision framework (decision guide aide) for selecting a PAQ, consisting of purpose, construct, measurement unit, recall period, population, setting, measurement quality, feasibility/ease of use, and resources is presented. These best practices are discussed to provide some standardization for the field. With regard to future research on PAQs, continued efforts to improve validity, reliability, and sensitivity to change; consider the recall period; incorporate information on or adapt for a specific cultural/ethnic/environmental context; and strategically combine PAQ with other PA assessment methods capitalizing on the advancement of technology, are needed. These recommended future directions are outlined in order to motivate and challenge researchers to continually improve the field of PAQ research.

BackgroundInterventions designed to increase the level of physical activity are crucial in the treatment of patients with musculoskeletal conditions. The psychological group-based intervention MoVo-LISA based on the Motivation-Volition (MoVo) Process Model has been shown to effectively promote physical activity. The aim of this study is to evaluate whether a MoVo-based app (MoVo-App) subsequent to MoVo-LISA during orthopedic inpatient care can support people to increase and maintain their amount of physical activity.Methods/designIn this parallel-group randomized controlled trial, patients with musculoskeletal disorders will be randomized to either (a) a combination of the group-based intervention program MoVo-LISA to promote physical activity plus the MoVo-App or (b) the group-based intervention program alone without the app. The intervention group will receive the MoVo-App after discharge from inpatient rehabilitation. They receive help to increase and maintain their level of physical activity (initiated by the group program) by tracking their health goals, activity plans, major barriers, and barrier management that were developed during the group-based program. We will recruit 224 initially minimally active participants during orthopedic rehabilitation care. Outcomes are assessed at clinic admission; discharge; 6 weeks; and 3 (post-treatment), 6, and 12 months after discharge (follow-up). The primary outcome is sport activity (active/inactive and minutes of activity) at 6-month follow-up. Secondary outcomes are movement activity, cognitive mediators of behavioral change (e.g., self-efficacy, action planning), and health-related variables (e.g., pain intensity, depression). To evaluate intervention effects, linear mixed effects models (both on intention-to-treat basis with an additional per-protocol analysis) will be conducted with each outcome variable and with time as the within-subjects factor and group as the between-subjects factor, along with all two-way interactions and accounting for covariates as fixed effects.DiscussionThis is the first evaluation of the effectiveness of an app in combination with a face-to-face group intervention to promote physical activity. The approach of using an app in addition to an effective face-to-face intervention program, both based on the MoVo model, might sustain positive intervention effects introduced in routine health care.Trial registrationThe trial "A group- and smartphone-based psychological intervention to increase physical activity in patients with musculoskeletal conditions: A randomized controlled trial" is registered at the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform via the German Clinical Studies Trial Register (DRKS), DRKS00014814. Registered on 18 October 2018; URL: https://www.drks.de/drks_web/navigate.do?navigationId=trial.HTML&TRIAL_ID=DRKS00014814.

Objective:The present randomized controlled trial evaluated if a workplace physical activity (PA) program that comprises both a PA component and a psychological coaching component (PA + C) is more effective in changing cognitive determinants of PA than a PA program without coaching component.Design:N = 213 employees were cluster-randomly assigned to two groups: the PA + C group received the MoVo-work intervention, combining a psychological coaching component and a PA component. The PA group received the PA component without psychological coaching.Main Outcome Measures:Strength of goal intention, self-efficacy, outcome expectations, action planning and barrier management were assessed at five time points (before and at the end of the intervention, as well as 6 weeks, 6 months and 12 months after the intervention).Results:After six weeks and one year, respectively, the PA + C group showed significantly higher goal intentions (p= .018) and self-efficacy beliefs (p= .006) than the PA group; and, at a descriptive level, a clear tendency towards better barrier management.Conclusions:The results indicate that a workplace PA program, including psychological coaching, may partially improve the effects of a pure PA program on critical motivational and volitional determinants of PA behavioural change among employees.

Introduction: Pain of the lower back is a frequent symptom and is treated by different health professions. Anatomical as well as clinical knowledge is utmost important for all professions involved in this field. Here, we present a model that brings together an interprofessional team of experts to teach functional and clinical anatomy of the lower spine and hip area to medical and physical therapy students. Methods: Two groups of medical students (n = 60) and physical therapy students (n = 77) were designated to two interprofessional clusters, with each cluster of students participating in three workshops, each lasting 40 min. Workshops were guided by university anatomists, an orthopedic physician and physical therapists, and each provided specialized training, such as the conduction of clinical, orthopedic functional tests, the identification and palpation of anatomical structures and demonstrations of human anatomical joint prosections. A questionnaire, consisting of 18 questions regarding subjective anatomical and clinical knowledge and application of clinical assessment techniques was used as the evaluation tool before and after participation in the course. Furthermore, the amount of knowledge gained from peer group participants from the other profession versus the knowledge gained from the instructors was assessed. Descriptive statistics of data as well as quantitative data analysis was carried out for pre -post analysis. Results: A total of 148 students participated in the pre-course evaluation and self-assessment and 113 students completed the post-course evaluation and self-assessment. 11 of the students, who completed the pre-course evaluation, and five students who completed the post-course evaluation failed to reveal their affiliation and these were only included in the general and corresponding cluster analysis. A final 132 prequestionnaire and 97 post-questionnaire results were included in the analyses due to a likely group response bias. Scores for all combined groups showed an increase in the pre -post evaluation of 11.7% (P<.001). Cluster 1 and 2 (pre -post) score comparisons showed an increase of 13.7% (P<.001) and 8.8% (P <.001) respectively. A subgroup pre -post-questionnaire analysis demonstrated that medical students from both clusters had the highest increase in scores (17.6% and 19.9%) in comparison to their physical therapy counterparts (9.1% and 5.8%) (P<.001). Specifically, medical students profited highly from the anatomy in vivo (palpation) as well as clinical, orthopedic assessment exercises. Sub -question analyses showed that students learned from each other as well as from an interprofessional team of guiding experts/instructors, though mostly from the latter. Conclusions: This course offers an appropriate and effective model that brings together an interprofessional team of experts to teach functional and clinical anatomy to medical and physical therapy students. Study results demonstrated an increase in subject-specific competencies in functional and clinical anatomy of the lower spine and hip. Medical students demonstrated the highest increase in subjective knowledge, especially in regard to clinical examination and assessment, which highlights the usefulness of this course early in the medical education. All students learned from the exchange with interprofessional group members as well as the instructors.