OBJECTIVE: Meningiomas arising primarily within the internal auditory canal (IAC) are notably rare. By far the most common tumors that are encountered in this region are neuromas. We report a series of eight patients with meningiomas of the IAC, analyzing the clinical presentations, surgical management strategies, and clinical outcomes. METHODS: The charts of the patients, including histories and audiograms, imaging studies, surgical records, discharge letters, histological records, and follow-up records, were reviewed. RESULTS: One thousand eight hundred meningiomas were operated on between 1978 and 2002 at the Neurosurgical Department of Nordstadt Hospital. Among them, there were 421 cerebellopontine angle meningiomas; 7 of these (1.7% of cerebellopontine angle meningiomas) were limited to the IAC. One additional patient underwent surgery at the Neurosurgical Department of the International Neuroscience Institute, where a total of 21 cerebellopontine angle meningiomas were treated surgically from 2001 to 2003. As a comparison, the incidence of intrameatal vestibular schwannomas during the same period, 1978 to 2002, was 168 of 2400 (7%). There were five women and three men, and the mean age was 49.3 years (range, 27–59 yr). Most patients had signs and symptoms of vestibulocochlear nerve disturbance at presentation. One patient had sought treatment previously for total hearing loss before surgery. No patient had a facial paresis at presentation. The neuroradiological workup revealed a homogeneously contrast-enhancing tumor on magnetic resonance imaging in all patients with hypointense or isointense signal intensity on T1- and T2-weighted images. Some intrameatal meningiomas showed broad attachment, and some showed a dural tail at the porus. In all patients, the tumor was removed through the lateral suboccipital retrosigmoid approach with drilling of the posterior wall of the IAC. Total removal was achieved in all cases. Severe infiltration of the facial and vestibulocochlear nerve was encountered in two patients. There was no operative mortality. Hearing was preserved in five of seven patients; one patient was deaf before surgery. Postoperative facial weakness was encountered temporarily in one patient. CONCLUSION: Although intrameatal meningiomas are quite rare, they must be considered in the differential diagnosis of intrameatal mass lesions. The clinical symptoms are very similar to those of vestibular schwannomas. A radiological differentiation from vestibular schwannomas is not always possible. Surgical removal of intrameatal meningiomas should aim at wide excision, including involved dura and bone, to prevent recurrences. The variation in the anatomy of the faciocochlear nerve bundle in relation to the tumor has to be kept in mind, and preservation of these structures should be the goal in every case.

OBJECTIVE Elevation of the lateral orbital rim and zygomatic arch during an orbitozygomatic craniotomy requires a bone cut across the zygoma, which commonly extends into the lateral edge of the inferior orbital fissure. The zygomaticofacial foramen has been identified as a superficial landmark for the cut that extends into the inferior orbital fissure. This study examined the usefulness of the zygomaticofacial foramen during orbitozygomatic craniotomy. METHODS One-hundred two dry hemicrania were used in this study. The zygomaticofacial foramen was considered to be related to the inferior orbital fissure when it was located on the zygoma in the area between lines extending in the medial-to-lateral direction along the long axis of the fissure and crossing the anterior and posterior ends of the lateral edge of the fissure. RESULTS The zygomaticofacial foramen varied from being absent to representing as many as four small openings. A single foramen was observed in one-half of the specimens. Of the 115 zygomaticofacial foramina, 93 were related to the inferior orbital fissure. Among the 51 specimens with a single foramen, 49 foramina met the criteria for being related to the inferior orbital fissure; in those cases, there would have been no difference in the amount of bone resected using the inferior orbital fissure or the zygomaticofacial foramen as the landmark for the zygomatic cut. CONCLUSION The zygomaticofacial foramen was a reliable landmark for locating the inferior orbital fissure and making the cut across the zygoma in only 50% of the specimens.