Introduction The jejunal mucosa is permeable to sodium and consumption of low sodium fluids by patients with short bowel syndrome and jejunostomy can lead to high stoma output, sodium depletion and dehydration. The optimum solution for absorption in the jejunum contains u003e100 mmol/l sodium and glucose as there is coupled absorption of water sodium and glucose. 1,2 For this reason patients are encouraged to sip around 1000 ml/day of a glucose saline solution and restrict all other fluids to 3 Two preparations are commonly used: St Marks Solution (SMS) (2.5g sodium bicarbonate, 20g glucose and 3.5g sodium chloride per 1000ml water + flavour) and double strength Dioralyte (DSD) (10 sachets per 1000 mls). Patients often find these unpalatable and compliance is low often resulting in dehydration and the need for IV fluids with associated complications. Many patients also report a preference for hot drinks. Meat extracts such as Bovril contain u003e 100mmol/l sodium when made up as per manufacturer’s instructions and the addition of glucose to these has the potential to make a savoury electrolyte solution that can be made up in small quantities and sipped while warm. Method 1000ml of DSD and SMS were made up. Two separate 1000ml portions of Bovril were made up by adding 60g Bovril concentrate to each 1000ml hot water giving a sodium content of 100mmol/l. 20g glucose powder was added to one portion and 20g glucose polymer added to the other. The drinks were coded A-D. 8 healthy volunteers were provided with 50ml samples and asked to sip each drink. They were asked to score them out of ten for palatability, with ten being the most palatable and 0 being the least palatable. Results Conclusion The two savoury drinks scored highest for palatability and could therefore provide an alternative to the existing solutions. They could also be used in combination with these to give more variety and a choice of hot and cold drinks. Glucose polymer is rapidly broken down to glucose and has a theoretical advantage over glucose through being less sweet although this was not demonstrated in this small study. Further investigation of savoury electrolyte drinks in jejunostomy patients is warranted. Disclosure of interest None Declared. References Nightingale JMD, et al . Oral salt supplements to compensate for jejunostomy losses: comparison of sodium chloride capsules, glucose electrolyte solution, and glucose polymer electrolyte solution. Gut, 1992;33:759–761. Fordtran JS, et al . The mechanism of sodium absorption in the human small intestine. J Clin Invest 1968;47:884. Nifghtingale J, Woodward JM; On behalf of the Small Bowel Nutrition Group of the BSG. Guidelines for the management of patients with a short bowel. http://www.gut.bmjjournals.com, 2006.
Introduction The jejunal mucosa is permeable to sodium and consumption of low sodium fluids by patients with short bowel syndrome and jejunostomy can lead to high stoma output, sodium depletion and dehydration. The optimum solution for absorption in the jejunum contains >100 mmol/l sodium and glucose as there is coupled absorption of water sodium and glucose.1,2For this reason patients are encouraged to sip around 1000 ml/day of a glucose saline solution and restrict all other fluids to <500 m/day.3Two preparations are commonly used: St Marks Solution (SMS) (2.5g sodium bicarbonate, 20g glucose and 3.5g sodium chloride per 1000ml water + flavour) and double strength Dioralyte (DSD) (10 sachets per 1000 mls). Patients often find these unpalatable and compliance is low often resulting in dehydration and the need for IV fluids with associated complications. Many patients also report a preference for hot drinks. Meat extracts such as Bovril contain > 100mmol/l sodium when made up as per manufacturer’s instructions and the addition of glucose to these has the potential to make a savoury electrolyte solution that can be made up in small quantities and sipped while warm. Method 1000ml of DSD and SMS were made up. Two separate 1000ml portions of Bovril were made up by adding 60g Bovril concentrate to each 1000ml hot water giving a sodium content of 100mmol/l. 20g glucose powder was added to one portion and 20g glucose polymer added to the other. The drinks were coded A-D. 8 healthy volunteers were provided with 50ml samples and asked to sip each drink. They were asked to score them out of ten for palatability, with ten being the most palatable and 0 being the least palatable. Results Conclusion The two savoury drinks scored highest for palatability and could therefore provide an alternative to the existing solutions. They could also be used in combination with these to give more variety and a choice of hot and cold drinks. Glucose polymer is rapidly broken down to glucose and has a theoretical advantage over glucose through being less sweet although this was not demonstrated in this small study. Further investigation of savoury electrolyte drinks in jejunostomy patients is warranted. Disclosure of interest None Declared. References Nightingale JMD, et al. Oral salt supplements to compensate for jejunostomy losses: comparison of sodium chloride capsules, glucose electrolyte solution, and glucose polymer electrolyte solution. Gut, 1992;33:759–761. Fordtran JS, et al. The mechanism of sodium absorption in the human small intestine. J Clin Invest 1968;47:884. Nifghtingale J, Woodward JM; On behalf of the Small Bowel Nutrition Group of the BSG. Guidelines for the management of patients with a short bowel. http://www.gut.bmjjournals.com, 2006.
BACKGROUND:The therapeutic effect of enteral nutrition in Crohn's disease (CD) and the epidemiological associations between diet and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) implicate diet in IBD causation. There is little evidence, however, to support specific dietary changes and patients often receive contradictory advice.AIM:To review the literature on the impacts of diet on IBD causation and activity to produce guidance based on 'best available evidence'.METHOD:Review of Medline, Embase and Cochrane databases from 1975 to 2012 using MeSH headings 'crohn's disease' 'ulcerative colitis' 'enteral' 'diet' 'nutrition' 'fatty acid' and 'food additives'.RESULTS:Enteral nutrition with a formula-defined feed is effective treatment for CD, but approximately 50% of patients relapse within 6 months of return to normal diet. There is no direct evidence of benefit from any other specific dietary modification in CD, but indirect evidence supports recommendation of a low intake of animal fat, insoluble fibre and processed fatty foods containing emulsifiers. Foods tolerated in sustained remission may not be tolerated following relapse. Some evidence supports vitamin D supplementation. In ulcerative colitis (UC), evidence is weaker, but high intakes of meat and margarine correlate with increased UC incidence and high meat intake also correlates with increased likelihood of relapse.CONCLUSIONS:There is little evidence from interventional studies to support specific dietary recommendations. Nevertheless, people with IBD deserve advice based on 'best available evidence' rather than no advice at all, although dietary intake should not be inappropriately restrictive. Further interventional studies of dietary manipulation are urgently required.