ABSTRACT A comparison between the CHIRON RIBA hepatitis C virus (HCV) processor and manual systems was performed by using 88 specimens repeatedly reactive by the second-generation HCV enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) (HCV 2.0 ELISA) and 111 random specimens from volunteer donors. For the second-generation RIBA HCV strip immunoblot assay (SIA) (RIBA HCV 2.0 SIA), test results correlated strongly between the manual and the automated runs (kappa value, 0.937). For the RIBA HCV 3.0 SIA, the correlation of the test results was also high (kappa value, 0.899). Among the specimens with positive results by RIBA HCV 2.0 and 3.0 SIAs, there was a very strong concordance of the test results between the manual and the automated runs with regard to the reactive bands. Nine samples had discordant results between the manual and the automated runs; this was probably attributable to increased variability in antigen scores close to the cutoff values for both tests. Run-to-run and within-run testing by the CHIRON RIBA HCV Processor System showed a very low rate of conflicting values. In conclusion, the CHIRON RIBA HCV Processor System is capable of performing RIBA HCV 2.0 and 3.0 SIAs accurately with minimal operator involvement. In addition, the CHIRON RIBA HCV Processor System shows excellent reproducibility, with the potential for operator-to-operator and site-to-site variability being greatly reduced. Our data indicate that this novel methodology may be very useful for supplemental anti-HCV testing of specimens repeatedly reactive by ELISA in routine clinical assessments and epidemiologic evaluations.

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) is known for its geneticheterogeneity and has been classified into six major genotypes based on phylogenetic analysis ( 1. Simmonds P Variability of hepatitis C virus. Hepatology. 1995; 21: 570-583 Crossref PubMed Google Scholar ). The diverse genetic heterogeneity also translates into variations of the encoded viral proteins, which may impact on virologic behavior, host-virus interaction, and the viral epitopes recognized by the host B and T cells.

BACKGROUND There are few data concerning the epidemiology of H. pylori in patients on chronic haemodialysis (HD) treatment. These surveys concerned small populations and were made with ELISA technique. However, ELISA-based assays do not differentiate between strains of H. pylori that are associated with ulcers. Recent literature reports that formation of ulcers correlates strongly with the expression of cytotoxin-associated protein (CagA) and vacuolating cytotoxin (VacA) of H. pylori. METHODS A novel serological test (RIBA H. pylori strip immunoblot assay (SIA)) has been recently introduced, it uses the H. pylori lysate (Lys) along with two additional purified recombinant antigens derived from CagA and VacA of H. pylori. AIM To study the epidemiology of H. pylori using RIBA H. pylori SIA among chronic HD patients and blood donors as a control group. In addition, the activity of H. pylori was analysed by immunoblot technique in a group of patients with documented ulcers and normal renal function. RESULTS The prevalence of antibody towards H. pylori among HD patients, blood donors, and patients with documented ulcers was 56% (127/228), 53% (84/158), and 100%, (21/21) respectively; the difference was significant (P=0.0001). The frequency of anti-H. pylori-positive individuals was significantly higher in patients with documented ulcers than HD patients and blood donors, 21/21 (100%) vs 211/386 (55%), P=0.0001. The frequency of antibody to H. pylori in the HD population was significantly associated with race (P= 0.005); no relationship between anti-H. pylori antibody and numerous demographic, biochemical, and clinical features of patients was seen. The frequency of antibodies against virulent strains of H. pylori in HD patients and blood donors with H. pylori was 60% (76/127) and 61% (51/84) respectively; it was 86% (18/21) among individuals with documented ulcers. No significant difference among these three groups occurred. CONCLUSIONS The frequency of antibody towards H. pylori by RIBA H. pylori SIA was high both in HD patients and blood donors; patients with documented ulcers and normal renal function had significantly higher frequency of anti-H. pylori antibody. The anti-H. pylori antibody rate among HD patients was strongly associated with race. The prevalence of antibody against virulent strains of H. pylori did not change among HD patients and control groups. Studies in large cohorts of HD patients with documented peptic ulcer disease are in progress.

ABSTRACT A heteroduplex tracking assay (HTA) was developed for genetic analyses of the hepatitis C virus (HCV) using single-stranded probes from the core (C)/E1 region. Nucleotide sequencing of reverse transcriptase (RT)-PCR products from 15 Italian dialysis patients confirmed the specificity and accuracy of the HTA genotyping method, which identified 5 of 15 (33.3%) 1b, 7 of 15 (46.7%) 3a, and 3 of 15 (20%) type 2 infections. The genotypes of an additional 12 HCV antibody-positive blood donors from different geographical locations were also in agreement with the genotypes determined by the Inno-LiPA HCV II kit (Innogenetics) and/or restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP). Isolates which had between 35 to 40% nucleotide divergence from control subtype 1a, 1b, 2a, 2b, or 3a standards could be typed. Surprisingly, HTA detected one 1b-2 coinfection which was missed by DNA sequencing. Three samples that were designated non-2a or 2b type 2 by HTA were found to be type 2a by both RFLP and direct nucleotide sequencing of the 5′ untranslated region. The genetic distance between patient type 2 and control 2a, 2b, and 2c isolates indicated that a new subtype was present in the population being studied. Serotyping (RIBA serotyping strip immunoblot assay kit) of 23 dialysis patients showed that the genotype could be determined in 6 of 8 (75%) C/E1 RT-PCR-negative and 15 of 23 (65.2%) RT-PCR-positive samples, indicating that the two tests complement each other.

To develop a rapid antibody test for Sin Nombre hantavirus (SNV) infection for diagnosis of hantavirus pulmonary syndrome (HPS) in field settings where advanced instrumentation is not available, a strip immunoblot assay bearing four immobilized antigens for SNV and a recombinant nucleocapsid protein antigen of Seoul hantavirus (SEOV) was prepared. The SNV antigens included a full-length recombinant-expressed nucleocapsid (N) protein (rN), a recombinant-expressed G1 protein (residues 35 to 117), and synthetic peptides derived from N (residues 17 to 59) and G1 (residues 55 to 88). On the basis of the observed reactivities of hantavirus-infected patient and control sera, we determined that a positive assay requires reactivity with SNV or SEOV rN antigen and at least one other antigen. Isolated reactivity to either viral rN antigen is indeterminate, and any pattern of reactivity that does not include reactivity to an rN antigen is considered indeterminate but is unlikely to represent hantavirus infection. Fifty-eight of 59 samples from patients with acute SNV-associated HPS were positive according to these criteria, and one was initially indeterminate. Four of four samples from patients with HPS due to other hantaviruses were positive, as were most samples from patients with SEOV and Puumala virus infections. Of 192 control serum samples, 2 (1%) were positive and 2 were indeterminate. Acute SNV infection was distinguishable from remote SNV infection or infection with hantaviruses other than SNV by the presence of G1 peptide antigen reactivities in the former. The strip immunoblot assay shows promise for the detection of SNV antibodies early in the course of HPS.

Summary. Hepatitis C virus testing has evolved from a simple enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) to complex molecular tests including qualitative and quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) as well as multiple methods to determine geno and serotypes. Serotyping assays have been described and are being further refined to aid describing the epidemiology of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection and may have a role in predicting response treatment. This study describes the concordance between two serotyping assay systems, a recombinant immunoblot assay Chiron RIBATM Strip Immunoblot Assay (SIA) and a more competitive ELISA peptide assay, using PCR as the standard. Serotype was successfully determined in 144/202 (71%) patients by the Murex ELISA assay and 179/202 (89%) by the Chiron strip immunoblot assay (SIA) assay (P < 0.001). Concordance between restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) and the Murex assay was 139/144 (97%) between RFLP and the Chiron SIA was 171/179 (96%) and between the Murex and Chiron SIA was 136/144 (94%). These assays provided a reliable, simple, and rapid method of determining HCV serotype.

In The Netherlands, anti-human T-cell lymphotropic virus type I (HTLV-I) blood donor screening became mandatory in January 1993. Donations reactive in the enzymelinked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) screening test are confirmed with Western blot analysis (WB). Only WB-positive or indeterminate blood donors are notified and retested by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) [1]. In accumulated data of the Dutch Blood Banks, only 2% of donors repeatedly positive in the anti-HTLV-I/II ELISA were WB-positive and all of these were also PCR-positive. However, 75% of the ELISA-positive blood donors have indeterminate WB results. In these cases the ELISA reactivities are nonspecific since all WB-indeterminate donors are negative in PCR [2]. Current WB confirmation thus leads to the notification and often to the deferral of many WB-indeterminate blood donors as well as to high costs for PCR testing, illustrating the need for a more specific serological confirmatory assay. The aim of our study was to evaluate a newly developed anti-HTLV-I/II Recombinant Immunoblot Assay (RIBA) to confirm samples reactive to screening tests with a special emphasis on the ability of this test to resolve WB-indeterminate results in blood donors, without compromising the sensitivity.

Direct sequencing and analysis of viral genomes are definitive methods for identifying various hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotypes. However, HCV genome sequencing methods are cumbersome and unsuitable for analyzing large numbers of clinical samples. We have developed a convenient, reliable, and reproducible RIBA strip immunoblot assay system for determining HCV serotype. Briefly, the assay consists of an immunoblot strip on which there are five lanes of immobilized serotype-specific HCV peptides from the nonstructural (NS-4) and core regions of the genomes of HCV types 1,2, and 3. HCV serotype is deduced by determining the greatest intensity of reactivity to the NS-4 serotype-specific HCV peptide band in relation to the intensity of the human immunoglobulin G internal control bands on each strip. HCV core peptide reactivity is used only in the absence of NS-4 reactivity. We used this assay to successfully serotype a high percentage of sera from well-documented HCV-infected patients. Our serotyping results correlated 99% with the findings from the standard restriction fragment length polymorphism genotyping methods. Less than 5% of the serum samples were untypeable. For a selected group of alpha interferon-treated patients we observed that the nonresponders (76.2%) and a majority of the responders who relapsed (72.2%) had type 2 HCV infection. A small population (n= 8) of complete responders was split 3:4:1 as type 1, type 2, and type 3, respectively. Our data indicate that this new serotyping assay has the potential to be a highly specific and reliable method for typing of HCV infection in patients.

BACKGROUND: Routine screening of blood donations with second‐generation hepatitis hepatitis C virus (HCV) assays has substantially reduced the occurrence of posttransfusion hepatitis. However, following the development of third‐generation assays, several studies indicated that these assays may identify HCV‐infected individuals who are not identified by second‐generation assays.STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: The sensitivity of a third‐generation HCV enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA‐3) was compared with a second‐generation ELISA (ELISA‐2) in a side‐by‐side study of 9936 commercial blood donors. ELISA‐reactive specimens were subjected to supplemental analysis by third‐generation recombinant immunoblot assay and polymerase chain reaction.RESULTS: ELISA‐3 demonstrated greater sensitivity than ELISA‐2, detecting 1 additional recombinant immunoblot assay‐positive specimen per 2000 tested. ELISA‐3 also detected 1 additional HCV‐infectious polymerase chain reaction‐positive unit among approximately 10,000 units screened.CONCLUSION: The incremental sensitivity achieved with ELISA‐3 can be expected to eliminate approximately 20 infectious donations per week among those made by commercial donors in the United States. In accordance with previous studies, most of the improved sensitivity of ELISA‐3 derives from its increased detection of anti‐c33c (NS3), rather than from the inclusion of HCV antigen NS5.