Introduction  Septic arthritis (SA) constitutes a pressing orthopedic emergency characterized by acute, non-traumatic joint pain. Timely diagnosis and intervention are imperative to avert complications such as chondrolysis and systemic sepsis. The etiology is predominantly hematogenous, necessitating an integrated approach involving surgical and microbiological modalities. Shoulder aspiration and microbiological analysis play pivotal roles in guiding treatment, especially when positive findings prompt more aggressive therapeutic strategies. This study aims to elucidate the nuanced clinical and epidemiological characteristics of septic arthritis in both native and prosthetic joints within a singular institutional cohort over a decade. Methods  This retrospective case series analysis spanned a 10-year period, focusing on non-prosthetic shoulder joints from January 2012 to July 2021. In this timeframe, only 183 aspirations were performed and sent to the microbiology department for analysis, including cultures, microscopy, and antibiotic sensitivity tests for positive cultures. The study delved into the microbiological profile of infections, encompassing gram stain, culture positivity rates, identification of microorganisms, and antibiotic susceptibility patterns. Additionally, the incidence of primary joint infections with resistant strains, particularly methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), was scrutinized. Statistical analysis utilized the SPSS program version 20.0 (IBM Inc., Armonk, New York), with a significance level set at 5%. The project, registered with the trust's clinical audit department (Reg #5372), adhered to the Declaration of Helsinki and good clinical practice guidelines. Data collection involved extracting non-identifiable patient modifiers from the laboratory database bank into Excel spreadsheets. Results  The study included 183 patients, with 108 (59%) females and 75 (41%) males. The average age was 76.2±16.5 years. Among them, 138 (75.4%) reported pain, and 15 (8.2%) had a body temperature over 37.8°C. Lab results showed a mean white blood cell count of 11.6±4.5 and an average C-reactive protein level of 121.7±102.1. Leucocytosis (>11,000 WBC) was seen in 82 (44.8%) cases. Elevated C-reactive protein (CRP; >10 mg/dl) was found in 136 (74.3%) patients. Synovial fluid analysis revealed no crystals in 91.3% of cases. Microbial resistance analysis showed 19 strains resistant to co-trimoxazole and 11 to erythromycin. Among co-trimoxazole-resistant strains, 73.7% were Staphylococcus aureus, a statistically significant association (p<0.001). Conclusion The evolving sensitivity patterns of microbes in septic arthritis underscore the necessity to reassess empirical antibiotic therapy. Subsequent joint damage resulting from infection can result in substantial disability.

BACKGROUND:Cauda equina syndrome (CES) is an uncommon condition that occurs due to compression of the terminal portion of the spinal cord. Early recognition and intervention in CES are crucial for an improved prognosis. Delayed diagnosis and action may lead to irreversible adverse effects, i.e., permanent disability, and in some circumstances can lead to litigation.AIM:The aim of this quality improvement project (QIP) was to identify areas for improvement and expedite the management of suspected CES patients presenting to the hospital.MATERIAL AND METHODS:This was a retrospective study in which patients admitted to the Poole district hospital were analyzed in three groups with more than 50 patients in each subset group. The first group was audited from 1st October 2020 to 27th November 2020; a re-audit on the second group of patients was done from 1st June 2021 to 16th July 2021; the third group was re-audited from 1st of January 2022 to 31st of March 2022.RESULTS:There were a total of 168 patients in all audit groups, of whom 71% were female. The mean time from getting triaged to having an MRI improved from 13hrs 54mins to 10hrs 39mins. The total inpatient length of stay (LOS) of less than 24 hours was 28% in the first cycle and improved to 54.4% by the third cycle of the audit. Eight patients exhibited a diagnosis of cauda equina syndrome (CES) and were sent to the tertiary care center.CONCLUSIONS:This quality improvement project identified delays in requesting the MRI for the diagnosis of CES and was addressed by ED booking the scans directly. This, in turn, reduced the length of stay in the hospital for patients who did not have cauda equina syndrome.

BACKGROUND:Elbow arthroplasty (EA) is an established technique for the treatment of select distal humeral fractures, yet little data exists regarding the safety and outcome of EA in the presence of an open distal humeral fracture where the risk of periprosthetic infection is an even greater concern. We hypothesized that EA does not carry an increased risk of infection or other postoperative complications when performed for simple open distal humeral fractures. METHODS:Seventeen patients underwent total EA (n = 9) or hemiarthroplasty (n = 8) for an open distal humeral fracture. The open fracture component was classified according to the Orthopaedic Trauma Society system as "simple" or "complex." Outcome measures collected included the Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS), range of motion, complications, and reoperations. Patients who underwent primary débridement and implantation were compared with those who underwent preliminary débridement procedures and subsequent staged arthroplasty. A systematic review of the existing literature was performed to analyze other reported cases and contextualize our findings. RESULTS:The mean follow-up was 46 months (range, 12-138 months). All fractures were multifragmentary and intra-articular. Sixteen patients had a "simple" open fracture and 1 had a "complex" fracture. The overall mean MEPS was 83 (range, 30-100; standard deviation ± 17), with a mean flexion-extension arc of 96°. Patients who underwent primary débridement and implantation demonstrated a higher mean flexion arc (116° vs. 79°, P = .02) than those who underwent staged arthroplasty. The mean MEPS was not significantly different between the groups (90 vs. 78, P = .12). Complications included asymptomatic ulna component loosening (n = 1), joint instability (n = 1), and symptomatic heterotopic ossification (n = 3). There were no deep or superficial infections recorded. CONCLUSION:EA is safe and effective when performed for simple open distal humeral fractures. Primary débridement and implantation may offer functional benefits over a staged approach.

Background: Coronal shear fractures of the capitellum and trochlea are relatively uncommon and can be challenging to treat because of variable articular comminution and poor bone stock. Classification is valuable to help guide surgical decision making and prognosis. The aim of this study was to present a large series of coronal shear fractures treated according to the Modified Dubberley Classification System (MDCS). Methods: Forty-five patients with a coronal shear fracture were followed up (12-93 months, mean: 28 months) after surgical intervention. Fractures were classified according to the MDCS by 3 observers, and outcome data collected included Oxford elbow score (OES), visual analog pain score (VAS), range of motion, complications, and radiographic findings. Results: There were 10 type 1, 12 type 2, 8 type 3, and 15 type 4 fractures. There were 26 subtype B fractures (posterior comminution). A total of 37 patients underwent open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) and 8 primary arthroplasty. The median OES and VAS were 43(16-48) and 2 (0-9), respectively. Median flexion extension arc was 125 degrees (range, 70 degrees-140 degrees). There was no significant difference in OES, VAS, or range of motion according to fracture type (types 1-4), subtype (type a or b), or treatment method (arthroplasty vs. ORIF). The overall complication and reoperation rates were 31% and 33%, respectively. A total of 75% of complications occurred in type 3 and 4 fractures, and there was a nonsignificant trend toward higher complication rate in type B fractures than type A fractures (34% vs. 16%, P = .19). Patients with a type B fracture who underwent screw-only fixation had a significantly lower OES and higher complication rate compared with when they had combined plating with screws (OES, P = .03; complications P = .04) and compared with when an arthroplasty was performed (OES, P = .05; complications P = .04). Conclusion: Consistently good outcomes can be achieved by classification and management according to the MDCS. It is recommended that type B fractures undergo combined plate and screw fixation and that type 4 fractures should be considered for arthroplasty because of the higher risk of complications with ORIF. Crown Copyright (C) 2021 All rights reserved.

Aims: It is important to understand the rate of complications associated with the increasing burden of revision shoulder arthroplasty. Currently, this has not been well quantified. This review aims to address that deficiency with a focus on complication and reoperation rates, shoulder outcome scores, and comparison of anatomical and reverse prostheses when used in revision surgery. Methods: A Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) systematic review was performed to identify clinical data for patients undergoing revision shoulder arthroplasty. Data were extracted from the literature and pooled for analysis. Complication and reoperation rates were analyzed using a meta-analysis of proportion, and continuous variables underwent comparative subgroup analysis. Results: A total of 112 studies (5,379 shoulders) were eligible for inclusion, although complete clinical data was not ubiquitous. Indications for revision included component loosening 20% (601/3,041), instability 19% (577/3,041), rotator cuff failure 17% (528/3,041), and infection 16% (490/3,041). Intraoperative complication and postoperative complication and reoperation rates were 8% (230/2,915), 22% (825/3,843), and 13% (584/3,843) respectively. Intraoperative and postoperative complications included iatrogenic humeral fractures (91/230, 40%) and instability (215/825, 26%). Revision to reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA), rather than revision to anatomical TSA from any index prosthesis, resulted in lower complication rates and superior Constant scores, although there was no difference in American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores. Conclusion: Satisfactory improvement in patient-reported outcome measures are reported following revision shoulder arthroplasty; however, revision surgery is associated with high complication rates and better outcomes may be evident following revision to reverse TSA. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2021;2(8):618–630.

Clavicle fractures comprise approximately 3% of all adult fractures and there is evidence that the incidence is increasing. Fractures of the lateral and middle third of the clavicle present distinct challenges in both surgical fixation techniques and clinical outcome, as such they should be recognised as separate clinical entities. Despite conflicting evidence, most studies indicate that superior clinical results are found in patients with united clavicle fractures rather than those that go onto non-union. Furthermore there is level-1 evidence that operative treatment of clavicle fractures leads to significantly increased rates of union. Despite these findings, significant controversy still exists on which patients would benefit from primary fixation and those who could successfully be managed non-operatively. We present an evidence-based review of clavicle fracture management including surgical indications, techniques, and results.

Advertisements are commonplace in orthopaedic journals and may influence the readership with claims of clinical and scientific fact. Since the last assessment of the claims made in orthopaedic print advertisements ten years ago, there have been legislative changes and media scrutiny which have shaped this practice. The purpose of this study is to re-evaluate these claims.

Purpose The function of the infrapatella fat pad (IFP) is debated, but it is thought to have a biomechanical and biological role. Removal of the IFP during total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remains a matter of surgeon preference. This study sought to establish if removal of the IFP during TKA affected patient outcome.Methods Excision of the IFP (not removed, partially excised, or fully excised) and outcome data (Oxford knee Score (OKS) and EQ-5D) were recorded for 1,401 patients (1,417 TKA). There were no differences in the pre-operative scores between the groups.Results OKS and EQ-5D one-year postoperatively demonstrated significantly (p < 0.05 ANOVA) improved total scores with preservation of the IFP. Patients with the IFP preserved had significantly better OKS associated with rising from a chair, pain, limping, giving way, and pain interfering with work.Conclusions This study suggests that preservation of the fat pad during TKA is associated with improved outcome. Surgeons routinely undertaking excision of the IFP should reflect whether this is clinically indicated and consider limiting IFP resection, if possible.

The impact factors (IF) of orthopaedic journals is an important component in determining the future of orthopaedic research funding. We aim to characterise the trend in journal IF over the last decade and draw comparisons with other surgical specialties. We conducted an analysis of impact factors from Journal Citation Reports between 2000 and 2010. Between 2000 and 2010 the number of orthopaedic journals increased from 24 to 41, more than any other surgical specialty and the mean IF increased from 0.842 to 1.400. Journals printed in the English language had a significantly higher IF in the year 2010 (1.64 vs. 0.33, p = 0.01) than those printed in other languages. English language journals published in the US had significantly higher mean 2010 IF (1.932 vs. 1.243, p = 0.025) than those published in Europe, and this had changed compared with 2000 mean IF (0.978 Vs. 0.704, p = 0.360). Orthopaedics was ranked sixth out of 11 surgical subspecialties in 2000 but dropped to seventh out of 11 in 2010. The quality of orthopaedic journals has significantly increased over the last decade and this has been accompanied by a rise in mean IF. It is important that orthopaedics continues to improve the quality of research, which may help orthopaedic researchers secure funding in the future.