We use an econometrically-estimated multi-region, multi-sector general equilibrium model of the world economy to examine the effects of using a system of internationally-tradable emissions permits to control world carbon dioxide emissions. We focus, in particular, on the effects of the system on flows of trade and international capital. Our results show that international trade and capital flows significantly alter projections of the domestic effects of emissions mitigation policy, compared with analyses that ignore international capital flows, and that under some systems of international permit trading the United States is likely to become a significant permit seller, the opposite of the conventional wisdom.
We use an econometrically estimated multi-region, multi-sector general equilibrium model of the world economy to examine the effects of the tradable emissions permit system proposed in the 1997 Kyoto protocol, under various assumptions about that extent of international permit trading. We focus, in particular, on the effects of the system on international trade and capital flows. Our results suggest that consideration of these flows significantly affects estimates of the domestic effects of the emissions mitigation policy, compared with analyses that ignore international capital flows.
We use an econometrically estimated multi-region, multi-sector general equilibrium model of the world economy to examine the effects of the tradable emissions permit system proposed in the 1997 Kyoto protocol, under various assumptions about that extent of international permit trading. We focus, in particular, on the effects of the system on international trade and capital flows. Our results suggest that consideration of these flows significantly affects estimates of the domestic effects of the emissions mitigation policy, compared with analyses that ignore international capital flows.
We use an econometrically estimated multi-region, multi-sector general equilibrium model of the world economy to examine the effects of the tradable emissions permit system proposed in the 1997 Kyoto protocol, under various assumptions about that extent of international permit trading. We focus, in particular, on the effects of the system on international trade and capital flows. Our results suggest that consideration of these flows significantly affects estimates of the domestic effects of the emissions mitigation policy, compared with analyses that ignore international capital flows.
We use an econometrically estimated multi-region, multi-sector general equilibrium model of the world economy to examine the effects of the tradable emissions permit system proposed in the 1997 Kyoto protocol, under various assumptions about that extent of international permit trading. We focus, in particular, on the effects of the system on international trade and capital flows. Our results suggest that consideration of these flows significantly affects estimates of the domestic effects of the emissions mitigation policy, compared with analyses that ignore international capital flows.
publishes book reviews and information on relevant conferences.It also encourages the submission of reviews on topics of interest to its readers, with the objective of presenting a critical survey of the work done so far and suggesting directions for further research.Altogether, the journal can be counted a success.It provides an excellent forum for the interchange of ideas between those scientists and engineers who, although working in different disciplines, have a common interest in the phenomena associated with transport in porous media.
Journal Article REVIEWS Get access Montesquieu magistrat. By JEAN DALAT. I. Au Parlement de Bordeaux. II. L'homme en lutte avec ses contradictions. (Archives des lettres modernes, nos. 132 and 139). (Archives Montesquieu, nos. 3 and 4). Paris: Minard. 1971, 1972. 122, 111 pp. 16 F each. ROBERT SHACKLETON ROBERT SHACKLETON OXFORD Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar French Studies, Volume XXIX, Issue 2, April 1975, Pages 199–200, https://doi.org/10.1093/fs/XXIX.2.199 Published: 01 April 1975
Journal Article REVIEWS Get access The Anatomy of a Scientific Institution. The Paris Academy of Sciences, 1666–1803. By ROGER HAHN. Berkeley, Los Angeles, London: University of California Press. 1971. xiv + 433 pp. £5.70. ROBERT SHACKLETON ROBERT SHACKLETON OXFORD Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar French Studies, Volume XXIX, Issue 1, January 1975, Pages 84–85, https://doi.org/10.1093/fs/XXIX.1.84 Published: 01 January 1975
Library Planning for Automation Edited By Allen Kent. (Based on the proceedings of a conference held at the University of Pittsburgh, June 2–3, 1964.) Pp. ix + 195. (Washington, D.C.: Spartan Books, Inc.; London: Macmillan and Co., Ltd., 1965.) 52s. net.
MONTESQUIEU'S CORRESPONDENCE Get access ROBERT SHACKLETON ROBERT SHACKLETON OXFORD Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar French Studies, Volume XII, Issue 4, October 1958, Pages 324–345, https://doi.org/10.1093/fs/XII.4.324 Published: 01 October 1958
Journal Article REVIEWS Get access MONTESQUIEU: De l'esprit des loix. Texte établi et présenté par JEAN BRETHE DE LA GRESSAYE. (Les Textes français). Paris: Société Ies Belles Lettres. 1950. Tome premier. cxxx + 322 pp. R. SHACKLETON R. SHACKLETON OXFORD Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar French Studies, Volume VI, Issue 1, January 1952, Pages 74–76, https://doi.org/10.1093/fs/VI.1.74 Published: 01 January 1952
Journal Article MONTESQUIEU IN 1948 Get access ROBERT SHACKLETON ROBERT SHACKLETON OXFORD Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar French Studies, Volume III, Issue 4, October 1949, Pages 299–323, https://doi.org/10.1093/fs/III.4.299 Published: 01 October 1949
Journal Article MONTESQUIEU, BOLINGBROKE, AND THE SEPARATION OF POWERS Get access ROBERT SHACKLETON ROBERT SHACKLETON OXFORD Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar French Studies, Volume III, Issue 1, January 1949, Pages 25–38, https://doi.org/10.1093/fs/III.1.25 Published: 01 January 1949