Research: Future research should be aimed at identifying the most efficacious treatments for psychiatric comorbidities among individuals living with EDS+. Division of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA Division of Pediatric Genetics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA Department of Physical Therapy & Athletic Training, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA Division of Gastroenterology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA Clinical Attending at Primary Children’s Hospital, Salt Lake City, UT, USA VA Salt Lake City Health Care System, Salt Lake City, UT, USA Abstract High rates of comorbid chronic pain, anxiety, and mood disorders among individuals with the Ehlers–Danlos syndromes (EDS+) are becoming increasingly recognized, though this complex symptomology remains poorly understood and undertreated. The current project examined whether interoceptive attention regulation is protective against depressive and anxiety symptoms in individuals with suspected EDS+. Data were collected from individuals participating in a transdisciplinary diagnostic visit within an EDS+ specialty consultation clinic. Participants were included in the current analyses (n = 49) if they had complete data on the following measures: the PHQ-8, the GAD-7, the Pain Severity subscale from the West Haven-Yale Multidimensional Pain Inventory, and the Attention Regulation subscale from the Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness. Consistent with expectations, the sample showed high levels of clinically significant anxiety and depressive symptoms. Pain severity ratings were significantly correlated with depressive but not anxiety severity. Moreover, higher levels of perceived interoceptive attention regulation abilities were significantly associated with less severe anxiety and depressive symptoms; however, attention regulation did not moderate the associations of pain with anxiety and depressive symptom severity. Conclusions: The current project replicated recent findings that pain, anxiety, and depression are common in individuals with EDS+. The ability to focus and control somatic attention appears to be protective and a potential target for interventions in EDS+.

BACKGROUND:Sedating antispastic medications and focal therapies like botulinum toxin are the most common therapies for spasticity but are temporary and must be performed continuously for a principally static neurological insult. Alternatively, highly selective partial neurectomies (HSPNs) may reduce focal spasticity more permanently.OBJECTIVE:To quantify the change in spasticity after HSPN and assess patient satisfaction.METHODS:We retrospectively reviewed the records of patients with upper- and/or lower-extremity spasticity treated with HSPN from 2014 to 2018. Only cases with a modified Ashworth scale (MAS) score independently determined by a physical therapist were included. Pre- and postoperative MAS, complications, and patient satisfaction were evaluated.RESULTS:The 38 patients identified (24 male, 14 female; mean age 49 yr) underwent a total of 88 procedures for focal spasticity (73% upper extremity, 27% lower extremity). MAS scores were adjusted to a 6-point scale for evaluation. The mean preoperative and final postoperative follow-up adjusted MAS scores were 3.6 and 1.7, respectively (P < .001), which represents average MAS less than 1+. Positive, neutral, and worse results were described by 91%, 6%, and 3% of patients, respectively. Four patients requested revision surgery. No perioperative complications were encountered.CONCLUSION:This is the first North American series to analyze HSPN for spasticity and the only series based on independent evaluation results. HSPN surgery demonstrated objective short- and long-term reduction in spasticity with minimal morbidity and excellent patient satisfaction.

High rates of comorbid chronic pain, anxiety, and mood disorders among individuals with the Ehlers-Danlos syndromes (EDS+) are becoming increasingly recognized, though this complex symptomology remains poorly understood and undertreated. The current project examined whether interoceptive attention regulation is protective against depressive and anxiety symptoms in individuals with suspected EDS+. Data were collected from individuals participating in a transdisciplinary diagnostic visit within an EDS+ specialty consultation clinic. Participants were included in the current analyses (n = 49) if they had complete data on the following measures: the PHQ-8, the GAD-7, the Pain Severity subscale from the West Haven-Yale Multidimensional Pain Inventory, and the Attention Regulation subscale from the Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness. Consistent with expectations, the sample showed high levels of clinically significant anxiety and depressive symptoms. Pain severity ratings were significantly correlated with depressive but not anxiety severity. Moreover, higher levels of perceived interoceptive attention regulation abilities were significantly associated with less severe anxiety and depressive symptoms; however, attention regulation did not moderate the associations of pain with anxiety and depressive symptom severity. CONCLUSIONS The current project replicated recent findings that pain, anxiety, and depression are common in individuals with EDS+. The ability to focus and control somatic attention appears to be protective and a potential target for interventions in EDS+.