OBJECTIVES:The objectives of this study were to compare fatigue in a large multinational SSc cohort with general population data and identify associated sociodemographic, lifestyle and SSc disease factors. METHODS:Scleroderma Patient-centered Intervention Network Cohort participants completed the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-29 v2.0 fatigue domain. T-scores were compared with the USA general population (mean = 50; s.d. = 10). Multivariable linear regression was used to assess associations with sociodemographic, lifestyle, and disease-related variables. RESULTS:Among the 2385 participants [mean age 54.9 (s.d. = 12.6) years, 87% female, 38% dcSSc], the mean fatigue T-score was 54.6 (s.d. = 11.0); 438 (18%) reported mild fatigue, 641 (27%) moderate fatigue, and 180 (8%) severe fatigue. Fatigue was independently associated with sociodemographic factors age [-0.10 points per year, (95% CI -0.14, -0.07)], male sex [-1.67 points, (-2.96, -0.37)], non-married status [0.97 points (0.04, 1.89)] and country [reference USA; France -2.35 points (-3.48, -1.21) and UK 2.38 points (0.80, 3.97)], and lifestyle factors smoking [4.16 points (2.52, 5.80)], alcohol consumption [-0.18 points per drink per week (-0.28, -0.07)] and BMI [0.34 points per unit (0.27, 0.42)]. Fatigue was associated with disease-related factors, including gastrointestinal involvement [4.21 points (2.99, 5.43)], digital ulcers [1.51 points, (0.25, 2.77)], moderate small joint contractures (1.41 points [0.13, 2.69]), RA [4.34 points (2.37, 6.31)] and SS [1.89 points (0.23, 3.55)]. When pain was included in the model, its association was large [2.19 points (2.03, 2.34)], and interstitial lung disease was also associated [1.21 points (0.42, 2.00)]. CONCLUSION:In people with SSc, fatigue scores were substantially higher than in the general population and associated with multiple disease factors, including gastrointestinal involvement, several painful disease manifestations, and lung involvement.

OBJECTIVES:To compare physical function in systemic sclerosis (SSc, scleroderma) to general population normative data and identify associated factors. METHODS:Scleroderma Patient-centered Intervention Network Cohort participants completed the Physical Function domain of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Version 2 upon enrolment. Multivariable linear regression was used to assess associations of sociodemographic, lifestyle, and disease-related variables. RESULTS:Among 2385 participants, the mean physical function T-score (43.7, SD = 8.9) was ∼2/3 of a standard deviation (SD) below the US general population (mean = 50, SD = 10). Factors associated in the multivariable analysis included older age (-0.74 points per SD years, 95% CI -0.78 to -1.08), female sex (-1.35, -2.37 to -0.34), fewer years of education (-0.41 points per SD in years, -0.75 to -0.07), being single, divorced, or widowed (-0.76, -1.48 to -0.03), smoking (-3.14, -4.42 to -1.85), alcohol consumption (0.79 points per SD drinks per week, 0.45-1.14), BMI (-1.41 points per SD, -1.75 to -1.07), diffuse subtype (-1.43, -2.23 to -0.62), gastrointestinal involvement (-2.58, -3.53 to -1.62), digital ulcers (-1.96, -2.94 to -0.98), moderate (-1.94, -2.94 to -0.93) and severe (-1.76, -3.24 to -0.28) small joint contractures, moderate (-2.10, -3.44 to -0.76) and severe (-2.54, -4.64 to -0.44) large joint contractures, interstitial lung disease (-1.52, -2.27 to -0.77), pulmonary arterial hypertension (-3.72, -4.91 to -2.52), rheumatoid arthritis (-2.10, -3.64 to -0.56) and idiopathic inflammatory myositis (-2.10, -3.63 to -0.56). CONCLUSION:Physical function is impaired for many individuals with SSc and is associated with multiple disease factors.

OBJECTIVE:Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a rare, chronic autoimmune disorder associated with disability, diminished physical function, fatigue, pain, and mental health concerns. We assessed minimal detectable changes (MDCs) of the Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI), Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-29 Profile version 2.0 (PROMIS-29v2.0) domains, and Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ)-8 in people with SSc. METHODS:Scleroderma Patient-Centered Intervention Network Cohort participants completed the HAQ-DI, PROMIS-29v2.0 domains, and PHQ-8 at baseline assessments from April 2014 until August 2023. We estimated MDC95 (smallest change that can be detected with 95% certainty) and MDC90 (smallest change that can be detected with 90% certainty) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) generated via the percentile bootstrapping method resampling 1,000 times. We compared MDC estimates by age, sex, and SSc subtype. RESULTS:A total of 2,571 participants were included. Most were female (n = 2,241; 87%), and 38% (n = 976) had diffuse SSc. Mean (±SD) age was 54.9 (±12.7) years and duration since onset of first non-Raynaud phenomenon symptom was 10.8 (±8.7) years. MDC95 estimate was 0.41 points (95% CI 0.40-0.42) for the HAQ-DI, between 4.88 points (95% CI 4.72-5.05) and 9.02 points (95% CI 8.80-9.23) for the seven PROMIS-29v2.0 domains, and 5.16 points (95% CI 5.06-5.26) for the PHQ-8. MDC95 estimates were not materially different across subgroups. CONCLUSION:MDC95 and MDC90 estimates were precise and similar across age, sex, and SSc subtype groups. HAQ-DI MDC95 and MDC90 were substantially larger than previous estimates of HAQ-DI minimal important difference from several small studies. Minimally important differences of all measures should be evaluated in large studies using anchor-based methods.

Objective: A previous study using Scleroderma Patient -centered Intervention Network (SPIN) Cohort data identified five classes of people with systemic sclerosis (also known as scleroderma) based on patient -reported somatic (fatigue, pain, sleep) and mental health (anxiety, depression) symptoms and compared indicators of disease severity between classes. Across four classes ("low", "normal", "high", "very high"), there were progressively worse somatic and mental health outcomes and greater disease severity. The fifth ("high/low") class, however, was characterized by high disease severity, fatigue, pain, and sleep but low mental health symptoms. We evaluated resilience across classes and compared resilience between classes. Methods: Cross-sectional study. SPIN Cohort participants completed the 10 -item Connor -Davidson -Resilience Scale (CD -RISC) and PROMIS v2.0 domains between August 2022 and January 2023. We used latent profile modeling to identify five classes as in the previous study and multiple linear regression to compare resilience levels across classes, controlling for sociodemographic and disease variables.

Objective The objectives were to (1) compare satisfaction with social roles and activities in a large multinational systemic sclerosis (SSc) cohort to general population normative data and (2) identify sociodemographic, lifestyle and SSc disease factors associated with satisfaction with social roles and activities.Methods Participants in the Scleroderma Patient-centered Intervention Network Cohort completed the Patient Reported Outcomes Information System Version 2 satisfaction with social roles and activities domain questionnaire. Multivariable regression was used to assess associations with sociodemographic, lifestyle and disease factors.Results Among 2385 participants, mean satisfaction with social roles and activities T-score (48.1, SD=9.9) was slightly lower than the US general population (mean=50, SD=10). Factors independently associated with satisfaction were years of education (0.54 per SD, 95% CI 0.14 to 0.93); non-White race or ethnicity (−1.13, 95% CI −2.18 to –0.08); living in Canada (−1.33, 95% CI −2.40 to –0.26 (reference USA)) or the UK (−2.49, 95% CI −3.92 to –1.06); body mass index (−1.08 per SD, 95% CI −1.47 to –0.69); gastrointestinal involvement (−3.16, 95% CI −4.27 to –2.05); digital ulcers (−1.90, 95% CI −3.05 to –0.76); moderate (−1.62, 95% CI −2.78 to –0.45) or severe (−2.26, 95% CI −3.99 to –0.52) small joint contractures; interstitial lung disease (−1.11, 95% CI −1.97 to –0.25); pulmonary arterial hypertension (−2.69, 95% CI −4.08 to –1.30); rheumatoid arthritis (−2.51, 95% CI −4.28 to –0.73); and Sjogren’s syndrome (−2.42, 95% CI −3.96 to –0.88).Conclusion Mean satisfaction with social roles and activities is slightly lower in SSc than the general population and associated with multiple sociodemographic and disease factors.

Objective Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a rare, chronic, autoimmune disorder associated with disability, diminished physical function, fatigue, pain, and mental health concerns. We assessed minimal detectable changes (MDCs) of the Health Assessment Questionnaire‐Disability Index (HAQ‐DI), Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System‐29 Profile version 2.0 (PROMIS‐29v2.0) domains, and Patient Health Questionnaire‐8 (PHQ‐8) in SSc. Methods Scleroderma Patient‐centered Intervention Network Cohort participants completed the HAQ‐DI, PROMIS‐29v2.0 domains, and PHQ‐8 at baseline assessments from April 2014 until August 2023. We estimated MDC95 and MDC90 with 95% confidence intervals (CI) generated via the percentile bootstrapping method resampling 1000 times. We compared MDC estimates by age, sex and SSc subtype. Results A total of 2,571 participants were included. Most were female (N = 2,241; 87%), and 38% (N = 976) had diffuse SSc. Mean (SD) age was 54.9 (12.7) years and duration since onset of first non‐Raynaud phenomenon symptom 10.8 (8.7) years. MDC95 estimate was 0.41 points (95% CI: 0.40 to 0.42) for the HAQ‐DI, between 4.88 points (95% CI: 4.72 to 5.05) and 9.02 points (95% CI: 8.80 to 9.23) for the 7 PROMIS‐29v2.0 domains, and 5.16 points (95% CI: 5.06 to 5.26) for the PHQ‐8. MDC95 estimates were not materially different across subgroups. Conclusion MDC95 and MDC90 estimates were precise and similar across age, sex and SSc subtype groups. HAQ‐DI MDC95 and MDC90 were substantially larger than previous estimates of HAQ‐DI minimal important difference from several small studies. Minimally important differences of all measures should be evaluated in large studies using anchor‐based methods.

Introduction/objective: We investigated (1) work status changes during COVID-19, (2) financial resource adequacy, (3) preferences for work requirements (e.g. remote, workplace, mixed) and (4) work requirements versus preferences, among people with systemic sclerosis. Methods: This was a cross-sectional study of participants in the Scleroderma Patient-centered Intervention Network COVID-19 Cohort, which enrolled participants from the ongoing Scleroderma Patient-centered Intervention Network Cohort and externally in April 2020. In August 2022, participants completed questions on work status, financial well-being using the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau Financial Well-Being Scale, work requirements and work requirement preferences. Results: A total of 298 participants with systemic sclerosis were included. Mean age was 58.6 years (SD = 11.4). There were 101 (34%) participants working at the start of the pandemic and still working in August 2022, 179 (60%) not working at the start of the pandemic and still not working, 10 (3%) who stopped working after April 2020 and 8 (3%) who started working. Mean financial well-being did not change from April 2020 to August 2022 (difference: 0.2 points; 95% confidence interval: −1.1 to 0.7). Working participants (N = 109) preferred flexible work requirements (N = 34, 31%) or working entirely remotely (N = 32, 29%), but most were required to work entirely at a workplace (N = 35, 32%) or combined workplace and remotely with a fixed schedule (N = 31, 28%). Conclusion: Work status and financial well-being did not change substantively among people with systemic sclerosis during the pandemic. Flexible work policies may support people with systemic sclerosis to work.

BACKGROUND:Raynaud's phenomenon is the earliest and most common systemic sclerosis manifestation. Episodes can be triggered by cold exposure and ambient temperature changes. Small studies have found that Raynaud's phenomenon outcomes were associated with season. We aimed to map the degree that differences in ambient temperature are associated with Raynaud's phenomenon outcomes across the temperature spectrum. METHODS:People with Raynaud's phenomenon secondary to systemic sclerosis in the Scleroderma Patient-centered Intervention Network Cohort completed past-week Raynaud's phenomenon severity assessments (0-10 numerical rating scale) at enrolment and longitudinally at 3-month intervals. Mean daily temperature and feels like temperature, which incorporates wind chill and humidity, for the week before each assessment were extracted for each participant from a weather site close to the participant's recruiting centre via the Iowa Environmental Mesonet. We used linear mixed models with basis splines to flexibly model non-linear changes in Raynaud's phenomenon severity across the temperature spectrum. People with lived experience of systemic sclerosis contributed to the study design and interpretation. FINDINGS:Between April 15, 2014 and Aug 1, 2023, we included data on 20 233 Raynaud's phenomenon severity assessments from 2243 participants. 1964 (88%) of 2243 participants were women, 279 (12%) were men, and 1813 (82%) were White. Mean age was 54·8 (SD 12·7) years. The maximum predicted Raynaud's phenomenon severity score was 6·8 points (95% CI 5·6-8·1), which occurred at -25°C. Severity scores decreased minimally from -15°C to 5°C (0·05-0·21 points per 5°C difference), then decreased in larger steps between 5°C and 25°C (0·37-0·54 points per 5°C difference). The minimum predicted score was at 25°C (2·6 points [95% CI 2·5-2·7]). Scores increased at temperatures above 25°C to 3·5 points (3·0-4·1) at 35°C and 5·6 points (4·5-6·8) at 40°C. Results were similar for feels like temperature. INTERPRETATION:Raynaud's phenomenon severity is worst at very cold temperatures but also increases with very warm temperatures, presumably due to air conditioning. Clinical management and Raynaud's phenomenon intervention trial designs should consider temperature patterns. FUNDING:Scleroderma Society of Ontario, Scleroderma Canada, Sclérodermie Québec, Scleroderma Manitoba, Scleroderma Atlantic, Scleroderma Association of BC, Scleroderma SASK, Scleroderma Australia, Scleroderma New South Wales, Scleroderma Victoria, the Canadian Institutes of Health Research, the Arthritis Society, the Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research of the Jewish General Hospital, the Jewish General Hospital Foundation, and McGill University.

Objective Some individuals with systemic sclerosis (SSc) report positive mental health, despite severe disease manifestations, which may be associated with resilience, but no resilience measure has been validated in SSc. This study was undertaken to assess the validity, reliability, and differential item functioning (DIF) between English‐ and French‐language versions of the 10‐item Connor‐Davidson Resilience Scale (CD‐RISC‐10) in SSc. Methods Eligible participants were enrolled in the Scleroderma Patient‐centered Intervention Network Cohort and completed the CD‐RISC‐10 between August 2022 and January 2023. We used confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) to evaluate the CD‐RISC‐10 factor structure and conducted DIF analysis across languages with Multiple Indicators Multiple Causes models. We tested convergent validity with another measure of resilience and measures of self‐esteem and depression and anxiety symptoms. We assessed internal consistency and test–retest reliability using Cronbach's alpha and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Results A total of 962 participants were included in this analysis. CFA supported a single‐factor structure (Tucker–Lewis index = 0.99, comparative fit index = 0.99, root mean square error of approximation = 0.08 [90% confidence interval (90% CI) 0.07, 0.09]). We found no meaningful DIF. Internal consistency was high (α = 0.93 [95% CI 0.92, 0.94]), and we found that correlations with other measures of psychological functioning were moderate to large (|r| = 0.57–0.78) and confirmed study hypotheses. The scale showed good 1–2‐week test–retest reliability (ICC 0.80 [95% CI 0.75, 0.85]) in a subsample of 230 participants. Conclusion The CD‐RISC‐10 is a valid and reliable measure of resilience in SSc, with score comparability across English and French versions. image

Background Patient-reported symptoms including pain, fatigue, sleep disturbance, anxiety, and depression are among the most common and burdensome symptoms in systemic sclerosis.[1–4] Most research on these symptoms in systemic sclerosis has examined only one symptom at a time, without evaluating the degree to which symptoms co-occur or how sociodemographic and disease-related characteristics are associated with co-occurring symptoms. Objectives We aimed to identify homogenous subgroups, or classes, of individuals with systemic sclerosis who reported similar patterns of anxiety, depression, fatigue, sleep disturbance, and pain symptoms and to evaluate associated sociodemographic and disease-related characteristics. Methods We conducted a multi-center cross-sectional study using data collected at time of enrollment in the ongoing Scleroderma Patient-centered Intervention Network Cohort. Eligible participants completed the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-29 profile. Latent profile analysis was used to identify classes of participants based on patterns of anxiety, depression, fatigue, sleep disturbance, and pain scores. Sociodemographic and disease-related characteristics were compared across classes. Results We identified five distinct classes among 2,212 individuals with systemic sclerosis. Four of the classes were based on increasing levels of symptom severity across all symptoms, from “Low” (n=565, 26%) to “Normal” (n=651, 29%) to “High” (n=569, 26%) to “Very High” (n=193, 9%). Participants in the fifth class, labeled “High Fatigue/Sleep/Pain and Low Anxiety/Depression” (n=234, 11%), had similar levels of fatigue, sleep disturbance, and pain as in the “High” class but low symptoms of anxiety and depression. There were significant trends in sociodemographic characteristics (age, education, race or ethnicity, marital or partner status) and increasing disease severity (diffuse disease, tendon friction rubs, joint contractures, gastrointestinal symptoms) across severity-based groups. Disease severity and sociodemographic characteristics were similar between the “High Fatigue/Sleep/Pain and Low Anxiety/Depression” class and the “High” severity class. Conclusion This is the first study to fully capture the co-occurrence of the most common symptoms in systemic sclerosis and to identify a group of people who appear to have avoided negative mental health outcomes that, for many patients, track closely with their disease severity and symptom levels. Studies are needed to better understand the characteristics of people with systemic sclerosis who are highly resilient and facilitate the implementation of multi-symptom interventions to better manage patient-reported symptoms and improve overall quality of life. References [1]Bassel M, Hudson M, Taillefer SS, Schieir O, Baron M, Thombs BD. Frequency and impact of symptoms experienced by patients with systemic sclerosis: Results from a Canadian national survey. Rheumatology . 2011;50(4):762-767. doi:10.1093/rheumatology/keq310 [2]Richards HL, Herrick AL, Griffin K, Gwilliam PDH, Loukes J, Fortune DG. Systemic sclerosis: Patients’ perceptions of their condition. Arthritis Care Res . 2003;49(5):689-696. doi:10.1002/art.11385 [3]Willems LM, Kwakkenbos L, Leite CC, et al. Frequency and impact of disease symptoms experienced by patients with systemic sclerosis from five European countries. Clin Exp Rheumatol . 2014;32(6 Suppl 86):S-88-93. [4]Thombs BD, Van Lankveld W, Bassel M, et al. Psychological health and well-being in systemic sclerosis: State of the science and consensus research agenda. Arthritis Care Res . 2010;62(8):1181-1189. doi:10.1002/acr.20187 Figure 1. Mean Symptom Domain Scores for Each Group Acknowledgement Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Arthritis Society Canada, Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research of the Jewish General Hospital, Jewish General Hospital Foundation, McGill University, Scleroderma Society of Ontario, Scleroderma Canada, Sclérodermie Québec, Scleroderma Manitoba, Scleroderma Atlantic, Scleroderma Association of BC, Scleroderma SASK, Scleroderma Australia, Scleroderma New South Wales, Scleroderma Victoria, Scleroderma Queensland, National Institute of Nursing Research. Disclosure of Interests None Declared.

ABSTRACT Objectives To compare physical function in systemic sclerosis (SSc, scleroderma) to general population normative data and identify associated factors. Methods Scleroderma Patient-centered Intervention Network Cohort participants completed the Physical Function domain of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Version 2 upon enrollment. Multivariable linear regression was used to assess associations of sociodemographic, lifestyle, and disease-related variables. Results Among 2,385 participants, mean physical function T-score (43.7, SD = 8.9) was approximately 2/3 of a standard deviation (SD) below the US general population (mean = 50, SD = 10). Factors associated in multivariable analysis included older age (-0.74 points per SD years, 95% CI -0.78 to -1.08), female sex (-1.35, -2.37 to -0.34), fewer years of education (-0.41 points per SD in years, -0.75 to -0.07), being single, divorced, or widowed (-0.76, -1.48 to -0.03), smoking (-3.14, -4.42 to -1.85), alcohol consumption (0.79 points per SD drinks per week, 0.45 to 1.14), BMI (-1.41 points per SD, -1.75 to -1.07), diffuse subtype (-1.43, -2.23 to -0.62), gastrointestinal involvement (-2.58, -3.53 to -1.62), digital ulcers (-1.96, -2.94 to -0.98), moderate (-1.94, -2.94 to -0.93) and severe (-1.76, -3.24 to -0.28) small joint contractures, moderate (-2.10, -3.44 to -0.76) and severe (-2.54, -4.64 to -0.44) large joint contractures, interstitial lung disease (-1.52, -2.27 to -0.77); pulmonary arterial hypertension (-3.72, -4.91 to -2.52); rheumatoid arthritis (-2.10, -3.64 to -0.56) and idiopathic inflammatory myositis (-2.10, -3.63 to -0.56). Conclusion Physical function is impaired for many individuals with SSc and associated with multiple disease factors. KEY MESSAGES Individuals with systemic sclerosis (SSc) face many challenges that can impact their physical function Levels of physical function in individuals with SSc are impaired compared to the general population Multiple disease factors are significantly associated with worse physical function in SSc

BackgroundNurses play an important role in the management of patients with systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases. Little is known about the effectiveness of nurse-led interventions on patient-reported outcomes in this population. The aim of this systematic review was to examine the evidence of nurse-led interventions in systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases.MethodsUsing the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines, a comprehensive literature search was conducted in PubMed, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, PsycINFO, and Embase for studies published from database inception to September 2022. Studies were included if they were published in a peer-reviewed journal in English and evaluated the effectiveness of a nurse-led intervention using a randomized controlled trial design in adults with a systemic autoimmune rheumatic disease. Screening, full-text review, and quality appraisal were conducted by two independent reviewers.ResultsA total of 162 articles were identified for possible inclusion, of which five studies were included. Four of five studies (80%) were conducted in systemic lupus erythematosus. There was significant variability in the types of nurse-led interventions; the majority included educational sessions and follow up counseling by a nurse (n = 4). The most common patient-reported outcomes were health-related quality of life (n = 3), fatigue (n = 3), mental health (including anxiety and depression) (n = 2), and self-efficacy (n = 2). The duration of the interventions varied from 12 weeks to 6 months. All studies included a nurse with specialized training and education and showed significant improvements in their primary outcomes. The majority of the studies (60%) were considered high methodological quality.ConclusionThis systematic review provides emerging evidence for the use of nurse-led interventions in systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases. Our findings emphasize the important role of nurses in providing nonpharmacological strategies to help patients better manage their disease and improve health outcomes.

IntroductionSystemic sclerosis (SSc; scleroderma) is a rare, chronic, autoimmune disease with a high level of burden, a significant impact on the ability to carry out daily activities, and a considerable negative impact on health-related quality of life. Non-pharmacological interventions could be provided to potentially improve mental and physical health outcomes. However, the effectiveness of non-pharmacological interventions on health and well-being among individuals with SSc has not been well established. The proposed living systematic review aims to identify and evaluate randomised controlled trial (RCT) evidence on the effectiveness of non-pharmacological and non-surgical interventions on mental and physical health outcomes and on the delivery of such services in SSc.Methods and analysisEligible studies will be RCTs that examine non-pharmacological and non-surgical interventions aimed at improving health outcomes among individuals with SSc or the delivery of services intended to improve healthcare or support of people with SSc (eg, support groups). All RCTs included in a previous systematic review that sought studies published between 1990 and March 2014 will be evaluated for inclusion. Additional trials will be sought from January 2014 onwards using a similar, augmented search strategy developed by a health sciences librarian. We will search the MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Cochrane Library and Web of Science databases and will not restrict by language. Two independent reviewers will determine the eligibility of identified RCTs and will extract data using a prespecified standardised form in DistillerSR. Meta-analyses will be considered if ≥2 eligible RCTs report similar non-pharmacological interventions and comparable health outcomes. We will conduct a qualitative synthesis for interventions that cannot be synthesised via meta-analysis.Ethics and disseminationWe will post initial and ongoing results via a website, publish results periodically via peer-reviewed journal publication, and present results at patient-oriented events.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42020219914.

BACKGROUND:Pain is one of the most common symptoms affecting patients with systemic sclerosis; however, little is known about the relationship between self-efficacy and pain and changes in pain over time. OBJECTIVES:The purpose of this study was to describe the relationships between self-efficacy and pain in patients with systemic sclerosis, as well as determine whether changes in self-efficacy mediate changes in pain. METHODS:A prospective longitudinal study was conducted using data from the Scleroderma Patient-Centered Intervention Network Cohort. The baseline sample included 1,903 adults, with a trajectory subsample of 427 who completed 3-month assessments across 3 years. Hierarchical (sequential) forward multivariable regression, covarying for participant characteristics, was conducted to determine the association between self-efficacy and patient characteristics on pain outcomes. Trajectory models, covarying for participant characteristics, were used to examine changes in self-efficacy and pain outcomes across time and whether self-efficacy mediated the pain trajectories. RESULTS:Mean time since diagnosis was 9.5 years, with 39.2% diagnosed with diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis. Greater self-efficacy was associated with less pain interference and intensity. Increasing age, female gender, finger ulcers, and small joint contractures were related to greater pain interference and intensity. Esophageal gastrointestinal symptoms were associated with more pain interference. Self-efficacy and pain trajectories remained stable across time, and self-efficacy did not mediate the pain trajectories. DISCUSSION:This study identified self-efficacy, age, gender, finger ulcers, small joint contractures, and esophageal gastrointestinal symptoms as important correlates associated with pain in patients with systemic sclerosis. In addition, this study found that self-efficacy and pain outcomes remained stable over time, providing important insights into the longitudinal pain experiences of patients with systemic sclerosis.

Systemic sclerosis is a rare and incurable autoimmune disease in which patients are challenged with self-managing their disease. Systematic evaluation of the essential self-management intervention components and self-management outcomes is necessary to assess the state of the science of self-management for patients with systemic sclerosis. As such, the purpose of this systematic review was to identify and describe self-management interventions and their impact on self-management outcomes in adults with systemic sclerosis. Studies were included if they contained a self-management intervention, incorporated at least one self-management outcome identified as a common data element by the National Institute of Nursing Research (i.e., patient activation, self-efficacy, self-regulation, global health), and were conducted in adults with systemic sclerosis. Using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines, PubMed, Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature, and Embase were searched from the inception of each database to March 2020, yielding a total of 215 studies. Of these reports, 16 met the inclusion criteria for this review. There was notable variability in the types of self-management interventions and their effects on key self-management outcomes. Self-management interventions focused on improving physical function through rehabilitation programs were the most common interventions (n = 7). The poor methodological quality of the studies included in this systematic review, however, limited the synthesis of and recommendations for self-management interventions in adults with systemic sclerosis. Future research in systemic sclerosis should include key self-management outcomes in larger, more rigorously designed studies to allow for comparisons across studies and to advance the science of self-management.