We report two cases of complete remission of uremic calciphylaxis in hemodialysis patients despite continued use of vitamin K antagonists (VKAs). These cases highlight the potential of a multimodal treatment approach including rheopheresis as a promising therapy when VKA discontinuation is not feasible. Both patients presented with severe calciphylaxis while on VKAs for mechanical mitral valve replacement. They received intensive multimodal treatment, including daily hemodialysis, intravenous sodium thiosulfate, calcimimetics, phosphate binders, opioid analgesics, and plastic surgery evaluation. In addition, rheopheresis was initiated twice weekly for four months, during which VKAs were maintained. Rheopheresis frequency was then gradually reduced. Complete wound healing was achieved within seven months. Both patients subsequently underwent parathyroidectomy for tertiary hyperparathyroidism. To our knowledge, these are the first reported cases of full remission of calciphylaxis without VKA discontinuation. A multimodal, multidisciplinary treatment strategy may represent an effective approach for high-risk anticoagulated patients.

Abstract Background and Aims Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is associated with an increased risk of cognitive impairment. In several models of CKD in rodents, we highlighted that CKD was associated with cognitive impairment and increased blood-brain barrier (BBB) permeability, quantified using 99mTc-DTPA scintigraphy imaging (SPECT/CT). BBB permeability was both correlated with cognitive impairment and with indoxyl sulfate (IS) levels. Inactivation of Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor (AhR), receptor of the IS, protected the CKD mouse from the IS-induced BBB permeability. The objective of the BREIN study is to confirm the existence of an increased BBB permeability in humans with CKD. Method The prospective cohort study BREIN (NCT04328415) prospectively included patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD), and healthy volunteers (Ctrl) matched in age (±5 years), gender, and educational level to a patient. In patients and volunteers, BBB permeability was quantified by brain 99mTc-DTPA SPECT/CT performed by a senior nuclear physician and as percentage of injected activity (%IA). A battery of neuro-cognitive tests was performed, serum uremic toxins accumulation and AhR activation were assessed in all participants. Results 15 ESKD patients and 14 healthy volunteers were included. In ESKD patients had higher BBB permeability compared to controls: 0.29 0.07 vs. 0.14 0.06%IA, p < 0.0001. ESKD patients displayed lower MoCA score: 22.0 ± 5.0 vs. 27.3 ± 2.8, p = 0.008, impaired short-term memory (doors test): 12.5 ± 3.4 vs. 16.5 ± 3.4, p = 0.009, higher Beck depression score 8.1 ± 9.1 vs. 2.7 ± 3.4, p = 0.046, and slightly more daily cognitive complaints: 42.5 ± 29.3 vs. 29.8 ± 14.0 p = 0.153. ESKD patients displayed higher IS levels (2.8 ± 2.3 mmol/L vs. 0.9 ± 0.7 mmol/L, p = 0.006) and AhR activation (37.5 ± 17.8% vs. 24.7 ± 10.4%, p = 0.027). In ESKD patients, no significant correlation was found between BBB permeability and scores in cognitive tests, or serum uremic toxins levels. Conclusion This study confirms that ESKD patients display an increased BBB permeability compared to matched healthy volunteers, as well as cognitive and impairment. Association with uremic toxins and cognitive impairment needs to be assessed in larger cohorts.

Background. In chronic intermittent hemodialysis, heparin is the standard anticoagulant as is the use of acid-containing dialysate. Regional anticoagulation (RA) with a calcium-free, citrate-containing dialysate has been developed. We compared RA using a calcium-free, citrate-free dialysate, routinely used in our center, versus systemic heparinization. Methods. In a retrospective, observational, single-center, crossover study, we examined 15 patients undergoing chronic hemodialysis who were at high risk of bleeding and temporarily unable to use heparin. These patients received temporary treatment with RA involving calcium-free and citrate-free dialysate. We compared the dialysis session success rates during two distinct periods: standard heparinization and RA procedure with a calcium-free and citrate-free dialysate. Results. In our study of 15 patients on chronic hemodialysis which compared 30 RA sessions versus 28 heparin-based anticoagulation session, we observed a 100% success rate with a median session duration of 240 min in both RA and heparin groups. No early extracorporeal circulation (ECC) loss was reported. However, we noted significant differences in the post-dialysis ECC thrombosis scores, with higher Global Thrombosis Index (GTI) and higher membrane coagulation scores in the RA group (P < .007 and P < .02, respectively). No hypocalcaemia or hypercalcemia symptoms occurred. Median post-filter ionized calcium levels were 0.32 (0.29-0.39) mmol/L at 30 min and median patient ionized calcium levels was 1.19 (1.135-1.28) mmol/L at 60 min. No significant difference in per-dialysis arterial blood pressure was observed between groups. Conclusion. Our study evaluated the RA approach using a calcium-free, citrate-free acetate dialysate in a chronic hemodialysis center and found it effective. Although an acid-free dialysate was not used in this study, our findings suggest it could be the next frontier in the evolution of advanced dialysis techniques.

In patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and in animal models of CKD, the transcription factor Aryl Hydrocabon Receptor (AhR) is overactivated. In addition to the canonical AhR targets constituting the AhR signature, numerous other genes are regulated by this factor. We identified neuronal pentraxin 1 (NPTX1) as a new AhR target. Belonging to the inflammatory protein family, NPTX1 seems of prime interest regarding the inflammatory state observed in CKD. Endothelial cells were exposed to tryptophan-derived toxins, indoxyl sulfate (IS) and indole-3-acetic acid (IAA). The adenine mouse model of CKD was used to analyze NPTX1 expression in the burden of uremia. NPTX1 expression was quantified by RT-PCR and western blot. AhR involvement was analyzed using silencing RNA. We found that IS and IAA upregulated NPTX1 expression in an AhR-dependent way. Furthermore, this effect was not restricted to uremic indolic toxins since the dioxin 2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) and the tryptophan photoproduct 6-formylindolo[3,2-b]carbazole (FICZ) do the same. In CKD mice, NPTX1 expression was increased in the aorta. Therefore, NPTX1 is a new target of AhR and further work is necessary to elucidate its exact role during CKD.

Hemodialysis (HD) patients are at risk for severe COVID-19 and cannot comply with social distancing. SARS-COV2 seroprevalence in French patients and caregivers after the first wave of COVID-19 is unknown. SeroCOVIDial is a prospective study conducted between June and December 2020. SARS-COV2 seroprevalence was evaluated by a rapid serological test (BIOSYNEX) in HD patients and caregivers, and the presence or not of anti-SARS-COV2 neutralizing or non-neutralizing antibodies in patients was also determined by ELISA and seroneutralization. In June 2020, 451 HD patients and 238 caregivers were included. Overall SARS-COV2 seroprevalence was 8.4% (patients) and 6.7% (caregivers), and was 87.1% (patients) and 90.0% (caregivers) in participants with a previously documented SARS-COV2 infection. Overall seroprevalence reached 13.8% (patients) and 12.6% (caregivers) following the second epidemic wave. During the follow-up, 38 (8.4%) patients died (9 of COVID-19). Among the 44 (10.6%) patients who became infected, only two were seropositive at M0. The levels of anti-SARS-COV2 antibodies decreased over time in patients and caregivers. The BIOSYNEX test showed 82.9% sensitivity and 97.7% specificity. Prevalence of anti-SARS-COV2 antibodies was low in HD patients and caregivers after the first epidemic wave but rose after the second wave. A rapid serological test showed good performances and could be useful for future monitoring of anti-SARS-COV2 antibodies.

BACKGROUND:Daily management to shield chronic dialysis patients from SARS-CoV-2 contamination makes patient care cumbersome. There are no screening methods to date and a molecular biology platform is essential to perform RT-PCR for SARS-CoV-2; however, accessibility remains poor. Our goal was to assess whether the tools routinely used to monitor our hemodialysis patients could represent reliable and quickly accessible diagnostic indicators to improve the management of our hemodialysis patients in this pandemic environment.METHODS:In this prospective observational diagnostic study, we recruited patients from La Conception hospital. Patients were eligible for inclusion if suspected of SARS-CoV-2 infection when arriving at our center for a dialysis session between March 12th and April 24th 2020. They were included if both RT-PCR result for SARS-CoV-2 and cell blood count on the day that infection was suspected were available. We calculated the area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic curve.RESULTS:37 patients were included in the final analysis, of which 16 (43.2%) were COVID-19 positive. For the day of suspected COVID-19, total leukocytes were significantly lower in the COVID-19 positive group (4.1 vs. 7.4 G/L, p = 0.0072) and were characterized by lower neutrophils (2.7 vs. 5.1 G/L, p = 0.021) and eosinophils (0.01 vs. 0.15 G/L, p = 0.0003). Eosinophil count below 0.045 G/L identified SARS-CoV-2 infection with AUC of 0.9 [95% CI 0.81-1] (p < 0.0001), sensitivity of 82%, specificity of 86%, a positive predictive value of 82%, a negative predictive value of 86% and a likelihood ratio of 6.04.CONCLUSIONS:Eosinophil count enables rapid routine screening of symptomatic chronic hemodialysis patients suspected of being COVID-19 within a range of low or high probability.

Abstract Background Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is an emerging infectious disease, related to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection. Few data are available in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Methods We conducted an observational cohort study of COVID-19 patients at 11 dialysis centres in two distinct districts of France to examine the epidemiological and clinical characteristics of COVID-19 in this population, and to determine risk factors of disease severity (defined as a composite outcome including intensive care unit admission or death) and mortality. Results Among the 2336 patients enrolled, 5.5% had confirmed COVID-19 diagnosis. Of the 122 patients with a follow-up superior to 28 days, 37% reached the composite outcome and 28% died. Multivariate analysis showed that oxygen therapy on diagnosis and a decrease in lymphocyte count were independent risk factors associated with disease severity and with mortality. Chronic use of angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) (18% of patients) was associated with a protective effect on mortality. Treatment with azithromycin and hydroxychloroquine (AZT/HCQ) (46% of patients) were not associated with the composite outcome and with death in univariate and multivariate analyses. Conclusions COVID-19 is a severe disease with poor prognosis in patients with ESRD. Usual treatment with ARBs seems to be protective of critical evolution and mortality. There is no evidence of clinical benefit with the combination of AZT/HCQ.

Background. Cytomegalovirus (CMV) antiviral drug resistance constitutes an increasing challenge in transplantation. Foscarnet is usually proposed when resistance for ganciclovir is suspected, but its use is limited by its nephrotoxicity. Case Presentation. We report a case of multiresistant CMV disease in a kidney transplant recipient. Foscarnet was prescribed after ganciclovir treatment failure in a patient with two mutations in the UL97 viral gene. Foscarnet induced biopsy-proven kidney crystal precipitation that resulted in severe acute transplant failure and nephrotic syndrome. Despite a large decrease in immunosuppression, CMV disease was not controlled and a salvage therapy with Brincidofovir (BCV), which is an oral lipid conjugate of cidofovir with limited nephrotoxicity, was attempted. Clinical and virological remission was observed after a 21-day course of BCV, despite mild and reversible liver toxicity. However, a new relapse could not be effectively cured by BCV due to a new mutation in the UL54 gene, which is known to confer resistance to cidofovir. A new course of foscarnet finally resulted in prolonged CMV remission. Herein, we present a review of foscarnet nephropathy cases in solid-organ transplanted patients. Conclusions. This unique case highlights the potential benefit of BCV use during resistant CMV infection, although mutations in the UL54 gene may limit its therapeutic efficacy. These findings need to be confirmed in clinical trials.