While FT-IR spectrophotometers have clear advantages over dispersive instruments in throughput and signal averaging, the same design elements that give these advantages can produce more complicated and severe sources of radiometric error in FTIR spectra compared to their dispersive counterparts. However, the high signal-to-noise ratio and good measurement repeatability afforded by FT-IR spectrophotometers are sometimes misinterpreted as low absolute radiometric uncertainty. While the complete radiometric characterization of even one FT-IR instrument is an ambitious long-term goal, it should be possible for users to both understand and reduce the various sources of radiometric error through the use of standard and diagnostic samples appropriate to the measurements of interest.

A cryogenic radiometer device, intended for use as part of an electrical-substitution radiometer, was measured at low temperature. The device consists of a receiver cavity mechanically and thermally connected to a temperature-controlled stage through a thin-walled polyimide tube which serves as a weak thermal link. With the temperature difference between the receiver and the stage measured in millikelvin and the electrical power measured in picowatts, the measured responsivity was 4700 K/mW and the measured thermal time constant was 14 s at a stage temperature of 1.885 K. Noise analysis in terms of Noise Equivalent Power (NEP) was used to quantify the various fundamental and technical noise contributions, including phonon noise and Johnson-Nyquist noise. The noise analysis clarifies the path toward a cryogenic radiometer with a noise floor limited by fundamental phonon noise, where the magnitude of the phonon NEP is 6.5 fW/√Hz for the measured experimental parameters.

The pre-launch characterization and calibration of remote sensing instruments should be planned and carried out in conjunction with their design and development to meet the mission requirements. The onboard calibrators such as blackbodies and the sensors such as spectral radiometers should be characterized and calibrated using SI traceable standards. In the case of earth remote sensing, this allows inter-comparison and intercalibration of different sensors in space to create global time series of climate records of high accuracy where some inevitable data gaps can be easily bridged. The recommended best practice guidelines for this pre-launch effort is presented based on experience gained at National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) and National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) programs over the past two decades. The currently available radiometric standards and calibration facilities at NIST serving the remote sensing community are described. Examples of best practice calibrations and intercomparisons to build SI (international System of Units) traceable uncertainty budget in the instrumentation used for preflight satellite sensor calibration and validation are presented.

We have built and tested a transition edge sensor which monitors temperature change by measuring magnetic flux expulsion from a superconducting element. Flux change is sensed by a dc superconducting quantum interference device coupled to the element using a flux transformer in a gradiometer arrangement. The operating temperature of the sensor can be varied by application of moderate magnetic fields to the superconducting core, using an integrated solenoid. With a Sn core at 3.58 K, the thermometer has demonstrated a noise level of 2.25 nK/Hz1/2. We estimate that such a sensor will allow femtowatt sensitivity of an absolute cryogenic radiometer presently under development.

We report on initial measurements of the low-temperature thermal properties of a device that is similar to the experimental apparatus used for absolute cryogenic radiometry (ACR) within the Low Background Infrared Radiometry (LBIR) facility at NIST. The device consists of a receiver cavity mechanically and thermally connected to a temperature-controlled stage through a thin-walled polyimide tube which serves as a weak thermal link. In order to evaluate the functionality of the device for use in a cryogenic radiometer, we measured the thermal resistance and thermal time constant of the system within the temperature range of 1.8 - 4.4 K. The measured thermal resistance and thermal time constant at 1.883 K were 2400 ± 500 (K/mW) and 24 ± 6 (s). This value for the thermal resistance should result in about an order-of-magnitude increase in radiometer sensitivity compared with the present ACR within LBIR. Although the sensitivity should increase by about an order-of-magnitude, the measured time constant is nearly unchanged with respect to previous ACRs within LBIR, due to the reduced dimensions of the receiver cavity. Finally, the thermal conductivity inferred from the measured thermal resistance and geometrical parameters was computed, with an average value of 0.015 (W/m-K), and compared with other measurements of polyimide from the literature.

The NIST role in supporting our Nation's climate research is described. The assembly of climate data records over decadal time scales requires assimilating readings from a large number of optical sensors deployed in space and on the Earth by various nations. NIST, in partnership with NASA and NOAA, develops and disseminates the calibration tools and standards to ensure that the measurements from these sensors are accurate, comparable, and tied to international standards based on the SI system of units. This effort helps to provide confidence that the small decadal changes in environmental variables attributed to climate change are not an artifact of the measurement system. Additionally, it ensures that the measurements are physics based and thus comparable to climate models.

The Low Background Infrared (LBIR) facility at the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) has performed ten radiance temperature calibrations of low-background blackbodies since 2001, when both the calibration facility and method of calibrating blackbodies were significantly improved. Data from nine of these blackbody calibrations are presented, showing a surprisingly large spread in blackbody performance. While some blackbodies performed relatively well, in no case did the measured radiance temperature agree with the temperature sensors in the blackbody core to within 0.3 K over the entire operating temperature range of the blackbody. Of the nine blackbodies reported, five showed temperature errors greater than 1 K at some point in their operating temperature range. The various sources of uncertainty, such as optical geometry and detector standard uncertainty, are presented with examples to support the stated calibration accuracy. Generic blackbody cavity design features, such as cavity thermal mass, cavity volume and defining aperture placement are discussed and correlated with blackbody performance. Data are also presented on the performance of the absolute cryogenic radiometers (ACRs) that are used as detector standards in the calibration of blackbodies. Recent intercomparisons of all the LBIR ACRs with a trap detector calibrated against the NIST primary optical power measurement standard show that ACRs used to calibrate blackbodies are suitable detector standards and contribute less than 0.02% uncertainty (k = 1) to radiance temperature measurements of the blackbody cavities.

A second-generation absolute cryogenic radiometer (ACR II) was developed for use at the Low Background Infrared calibration facility at the National Institute of Standards and Technology. The need for spectral calibrations of very sensitive [D* = 10(14) cm (Hz)1/2W(-1)] infrared detectors necessitated the use of a cryogenic infrared monochromator and a more sensitive radiometer. The improved low-power performance of the ACR II compared with the older absolute cryogenic radiometer (ACR) has also made it useful as the primary standard for the calibration of cryogenic blackbody sources that are used as low-power infrared sources. The responsivity of the new radiometer's receiver is 210 K/mW with a type A (random component) standard uncertainty of at most 7 pW when making power measurements of less than 10 nW. The original ACR has a responsivity of 29 K/mW and has a type A standard uncertainty of approximately 100 pW when making a similar low-noise-power measurement. Other properties of the radiometers are also described and compared.

[This corrects the article on p. 439 in vol. 108.].

The full potential of current remote sensor technology is limited by the inability to correct biases once an exo-atmospheric remote sensor becomes operational. Even when the calibration is traced to the International System of Units, SI, and the instrument is performing within the operational envelope wherein it is calibrated, the problem exists and a Space Metrology Program is a potential solution to the problem. This paper discusses such a program, suggests a feasibility study to address the issues and recommends a plan of action.Any operational instrument has a bias and reducing the magnitude of the bias can only be accomplished when an adequately accurate standard is accessible by the instrument while the instrument is in its operational environment. Currently the radiometric flux from the sun, the moon and the stars is inadequately accurate SI to provide a standard that is consistent with the remote sensor state-of-the-art technology. The result is data that is less accurate than it could be often leading to confusing and conflicting conclusions drawn from that data. Planned remote sensors such as those required to meet future program needs (e.g. the United States National Polar-Orbiting Operational Environmental Satellite System (NPOESS) and the proposed international Global Earth Observation Program) are going to need the higher accuracy radiometric standards to maintain their accuracy once they become operational. To resolve the problem, a set of standard radiometers on the International Space Station is suggested against which other exo-atmospheric radiometric instruments can be calibrated. A feasibility study for this program is planned.

Remote sensor data reported as being traceable to the Systeme International d'Unites (SI) implies certain principles are followed to evaluate the uncertainty with which the data are reported. Unless these principles are followed to evaluate the uncertainty, remote sensor results will continue to be misinterpreted frequently. The demand for higher accuracy, remote sensor data mandates improvements in the way data quality is assessed and communicated within the remote sensing community. It is essential data be SI traceable for the results to have meaning scientist-to-scientist and programme-to-programme. A procedure for data to be reported as SI traceable is discussed. A case study is presented to illustrate the problems when data are reported without following the procedure to establish SI traceability. Another case study illustrates the scope of the effort necessary to report data SI. This paper also cites the SI base units as maintained by the Bureau International des Poids et Mesures (BIPM). To know the principles were followed to establish data uncertainty gives full meaning to the statement: the results are reported to be SI traceable.