e23029 Background: Underrepresentation of older adults (≥65 years) in clinical trials may limit important evidence for regulatory and clinical decision-making. Prior FDA analysis1 demonstrated underrepresentation of older adults in oncology clinical trials. With recent efforts to encourage inclusion of older adults, we evaluated representation in clinical trials using updated data. Methods: This analysis used patient-level data from pivotal trials supporting approvals of new drugs and biologics, and expanded indications from 2010-2020 for cancers with high incidence in the U.S. population and older adults: breast (BC), colorectal (CRC), non-small cell lung (NSCLC), prostate (PC), chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), and multiple myeloma (MM). Age distribution of trial participants compared to incident cases from the NCI SEER Program was analyzed using the Enrollment to Incidence Ratio (EIR). For each cancer-age group, EIR is the percentage of trial participants divided by percentage of incident cases. Previously established EIR categories of < 0.8, 0.80-1.20, and > 1.2 indicate under-, adequate, and over-representation, respectively. Results: The analysis included 86000 participants in 152 trials. Adults >65 yrs were underrepresented in BC trials. Adults >75 yrs were underrepresented in BC, CRC, NSCLC, CML, and MM trials (Table 1). Conclusions: Despite slight variation across cancers, adults >75 yrs appeared to be underrepresented in clinical trials, excepting PC. Given heterogeneity in the natural history by cancer site, incidence may not best represent age distribution of the intended use population for all trials. Further evaluation using prevalence as a comparator may provide additional insights. Additionally, results may be affected by clinical factors such as stage; however, comparison is limited by SEER data element availability. Planned sensitivity analyses such as stratification by drug class and line of therapy may further elucidate enrollment patterns. References: Singh H, Kanapuru B, Smith C, et al: FDA analysis of enrollment of older adults in clinical trials for cancer drug registration: A 10-year experience by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Journal of Clinical Oncology 35:10009-10009, 2017. [Table: see text]

Nilotinib is a second-generation BCR-ABL tyrosine kinase inhibitor for the treatment of Philadelphia chromosome-positive chronic myeloid leukemia in both adult and pediatric patients. The pharmacokinetics (PK) of nilotinib in specific populations such as pregnant and lactating people remain poorly understood. Therefore, the objectives of the current study were to develop a physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model to predict nilotinib PK in virtual drug-drug interaction (DDI) studies, as well as in pediatric, pregnant, and lactating populations. The nilotinib PBPK model was built in PK-Sim, which is part of the free and open-source software Open Systems Pharmacology. The observed clinical data for the validation of the nilotinib models were obtained from the literature. The model reasonably predicted nilotinib concentrations in the adult population; the DDIs between nilotinib and rifampin or ketoconazole in the adult population; and the PK in the pediatric, pregnant, and lactating populations, although in the latter 2 populations plasma concentrations were slightly underestimated. The ratio of predicted versus observed PK parameters for the adult model ranged from 0.71 to 1.11 for area under the concentration-time curve and 0.55 to 0.95 for maximum concentration. For the DDI, the predicted area under the concentration-time curve ratio and maximum concentration ratio fell within the Guest criterion. The current study demonstrated the utility of using PBPK modeling to understand the mechanistic basis of PK differences between adults and specific populations, such as pediatrics, and pregnant and lactating individuals, indicating that this technology can potentially inform or optimize dosing conditions in specific populations.

e13779 Background: There are an estimated 4.4 million Indian Americans (Asian Indian), constituting 1.35% of the United States (US) population. Indian Americans enrolled in clinical trials are identified under the broad race category of Asian which includes Asians within the US and outside of US (Ex-US). Although cancer is the leading cause of death for Asians in US, they are under-represented in cancer clinical trials. Enrollment of Asian patients from India (API) in multiregional oncology clinical trials may provide important data regarding intrinsic and extrinsic factors impacting the etiology of cancer as well as response to anti-cancer treatment in Indian Americans. Common cancers reported amongst Asians in US are breast, prostate, colorectal, and lung, and in India are breast, head and neck, cervical and lung. Methods: We analyzed data from ~96,000 patients in 164 cancer therapeutic trials that led to an FDA approval for breast, prostate, colorectal, lung, liver, gastric, head and neck and cervical cancer indications from 2010-2022, and identified country for enrollments for all Asians. Results: Descriptive statistics of Asian patients enrolled within US, Ex-US and from India enrolled in breast, prostate, colorectal, lung, liver, gastric, head and neck, and cervical cancer trials that led to an FDA approval from 2010-2022 are summarized (Table). Enrollment of Asian patients within US was ≤1% (except liver and cervical cancer), from India was ≤2.1% of all Asians enrolled outside of US and ≤0.7% of all enrolled patients. Conclusions: It is difficult to accurately characterize the exact number of Indian Americans enrolled but are likely under-represented in cancer clinical trials leading to FDA approval.Sponsors should collect more granular information regarding enrollment of Asian patients in clinical trials. Enrollment of patients from India is extremely low relative to the population size. Efforts to increase enrollment of Indian Americans as well as patients from India in oncology clinical trials can bolster the evidence that supports FDA drug approval and its applicability to Indian Americans. [Table: see text]

11026 Background: About 6% and 0.3% of the total United States (US) population identify as Asian or NHPI alone, respectively. The most commonly diagnosed cancers among AA & NHPI in the US are breast, prostate, lung, thyroid, and colorectal. Liver, gastric, and head and neck cancers occur in higher rates in AA & NHPI vs. non-Hispanic White. Enrollment of Asian & NHPI patients in multiregional cancer clinical trials may provide additional data regarding intrinsic and extrinsic factors (e.g., diet, infections, environmental exposures) impacting the etiology of cancer. We investigated enrollment trends of NHPI and Asian (within and outside of US) patients in cancer clinical trials that led to an FDA approval from 2010-2022. Methods: We analyzed data from ~98,000 patients in 171 cancer therapeutic clinical trials that led to FDA approvals for breast, prostate, lung, thyroid, colorectal, liver, gastric, and head and neck cancer indications from 2010-2022. Separate race categories of Asian and Native Hawaiian and other Pacific Islander were used. Results: Descriptive statistics of NHPI and Asians within and outside of US enrollment in breast, prostate, lung, thyroid, colorectal, liver, gastric, and head and neck cancer trials that led to an FDA approval from 2010-2022 are summarized in the table. Enrollment of Asian patients in the US was <1% (except for liver cancer) and NHPI patients was <0.2%. Conclusions: Although cancer is the leading cause of death for AA & NHPI, AA & NHPI are under-represented in cancer clinical trials, especially when data are further disaggregated into enrollment of NHPI and Asians within and outside of the US. Cancer etiology may vary in Asians in the US vs. Asia due to different intrinsic/extrinsic risk factors, underscoring the importance of enrolling more AA & NHPI into clinical trials to expand the evidence supporting drug approvals in the US and to advance health equity through clinical trial diversity. [Table: see text]

The discovery and development of anticancer drugs for pediatric patients have historically languished when compared to both past and recent activity in drug development for adult patients, notably the dramatic spike of targeted and immune-oncology therapies. The reasons for this difference are multifactorial. Recent changes in the regulatory landscape surrounding pediatric cancer drug development and the understanding that some pediatric cancers are driven by genetic perturbations that also drive disparate adult cancers afford new opportunities. The unique cancer-initiating events and dependencies of many pediatric cancers, however, require additional pediatric-specific strategies. Research efforts to unravel the underlying biology of pediatric cancers, innovative clinical trial designs, model-informed drug development, extrapolation from adult data, addressing the unique considerations in pediatric patients, and use of pediatric appropriate formulations, should all be considered for efficient development and dosage optimization of anticancer drugs for pediatric patients.

Supplementary Table 1 contains FDA's screening algorithm for capillary leak syndrome (CLS).

Cancers affecting pregnant women include breast cancer, melanoma, thyroid cancer, cervical cancer, lymphomas, and leukemias. The medical management of cancer during pregnancy with molecularly targeted oncology drugs remains quite challenging, with knowledge gaps about the drugs' safety and efficacy due to exclusion of pregnant women from cancer clinical trials, discontinuation of individuals who become pregnant during clinical trials, and limited information on appropriate dosing of molecularly targeted oncology drugs during pregnancy. Physiological changes occur during pregnancy and may result in alterations in the absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion of drugs used in pregnant women. Physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling that incorporates physiological changes induced by both the cancer disease state and pregnancy has the potential to inform dosing of molecularly targeted oncology drugs for pregnant women, improve our understanding of the pharmacokinetic changes associated with pregnancy in patients with cancer, facilitate the design of potential studies of molecularly targeted oncology drugs in pregnant women to support dosing recommendations, and provide model-informed pharmacokinetic data to support regulatory decision making.

Background: The treatment of cancer during pregnancy remains challenging with knowledge gaps in drug dosage, safety, and efficacy due to the under-representation of this population in clinical trials. Our aim was to investigate physiological changes reported in both pregnancy and cancer populations into a PBPK modeling framework that allows for a more accurate estimation of PK changes in pregnant patients with cancer. Methods: Paclitaxel and docetaxel were selected to validate a population model using clinical data from pregnant patients with cancer. The validated population model was subsequently used to predict the PK of acalabrutinib in pregnant patients with cancer. Results: The Simcyp pregnancy population model reasonably predicted the PK of docetaxel in pregnant patients with cancer, while a modified model that included a 2.5-fold increase in CYP2C8 abundance, consistent with the increased expression during pregnancy, was needed to reasonably predict the PK of paclitaxel in pregnant patients with cancer. Changes in protein binding levels of patients with cancer had a minimal impact on the predicted clearance of paclitaxel and docetaxel. PBPK modeling predicted approximately 60% lower AUC and Cmax for acalabrutinib in pregnant versus non-pregnant patients with cancer. Conclusions: Our results suggest that PBPK modeling is a promising approach to investigate the effects of pregnancy and cancer on the PK of oncology drugs and potentially inform dosing for pregnant patients with cancer. Further evaluation and refinement of the population model are needed for pregnant patients with cancer with additional compounds and clinical PK data.

In January 2023, the FDA granted accelerated approval to pirtobrutinib for the treatment of adult patients with relapsed or refractory mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) after at least two lines of systemic therapy, including a Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor. Approval was based on BRUIN, a single-arm study of pirtobrutinib monotherapy in patients with B-cell malignancies. Efficacy was based on independent review committee-assessed overall response rate (ORR) supported by durability of response in 120 patients with relapsed or refractory MCL who had received a prior BTK inhibitor and received the approved pirtobrutinib dosage of 200 mg once daily. The ORR was 50% [95% confidence interval (CI), 41-59], and the complete response rate was 13% (95% CI, 7-20), with an estimated median duration of response of 8.3 months. The most common nonhematologic adverse reactions were fatigue, musculoskeletal pain, diarrhea, edema, dyspnea, pneumonia, and bruising. Warnings and Precautions in labeling include infection, hemorrhage, cytopenias, atrial arrhythmias, and second primary malignancies. Postmarketing studies were required to evaluate longer-term safety of pirtobrutinib and to verify the clinical benefit of pirtobrutinib. This article summarizes key aspects of the regulatory review, including the indication statement, efficacy and safety considerations, and postmarketing requirements.

First-in-human studies are limited to patients with serious diseases for which no curative therapies are available to ensure that the benefits outweigh the risks. However, many patients receive medications that are either victims or perpetrators of drug-drug interactions as part of standard of care. This commentary discusses the current challenges and approaches to safely develop these drugs in patients that require concomitant medications that are potentially either victims or perpetrators of drug-drug interactions.

On September 1, 2020, the FDA granted approval for oral plete remission (CR) or complete remission with incomplete blood and who are not able to complete intensive curative therapy. Approval was based on improvement in overall survival using CC-486 300 mg daily in a 2 weeks on/2 weeks off schedule in 0.86; P 1/4 0.0009) in the randomized trial CC-486-AML-001 (QUAZAR) in adults >= 55 years old with AML in CR/CRi who

In January 2021, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved crizotinib for pediatric patients 1 year and older and young adults with relapsed or refractory systemic anaplastic large cell lymphoma (sALCL). This is the first approval for pediatric sALCL. Approval was based on a single-arm trial of crizotinib monotherapy that included 26 patients, aged 1-20 years, with previously treated sALCL. Efficacy was based on centrally assessed objective response rate (88%) and duration of response. Herein, we highlight unique aspects of the regulatory review, including extension of the indication to young adults, postmarketing safety, and dose optimization strategies.

On September 22, 2021, the Food and Drug Administration approved ruxolitinib for the treatment of chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) after the failure of one or two lines of systemic therapy in adult and pediatric patients 12 years and older. Approval was based on Study INCB 18424-365 (REACH-3; CINC424D2301; NCT03112603), a randomized, open-label, multicenter trial of ruxolitinib in comparison to best available therapy (BAT) for the treatment of corticosteroid-refractory cGVHD occurring after the allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. A total of 329 patients were randomized 1:1 to receive either ruxolitinib 10 mg twice daily (n = 165) or BAT (n = 164). BAT was selected by the investigator prior to randomization. The overall response rate through Cycle 7 Day 1 was 70% (95% CI, 63-77) in the ruxolitinib arm, and 57% (95% CI, 49-65) in the BAT arm. The median duration of response, calculated from first response to progression, death, or initiation of new systemic therapies for cGVHD, was 4.2 months (95% CI, 3.2-6.7) for the ruxolitinib arm and 2.1 months (95% CI, 1.6-3.2) for the BAT arm; and the median time from first response to death or initiation of new systemic therapies for cGVHD was 25 months (95% CI, 16.8-not estimable) for the ruxolitinib arm and 5.6 months (95% CI, 4.1-7.8) for the BAT arm. Common adverse reactions included anemia, thrombocytopenia, and infections. Given the observed response rate with durability, the clinical benefit of ruxolitinib appears to outweigh the risks of treatment for cGVHD after the failure of one or two lines of systemic therapy.

Cancer remains the leading cause of death from disease in children. Historically, in contrast to their adult counterparts, the causes of pediatric malignancies have remained largely unknown, with most pediatric cancers displaying low mutational burdens. Research related to molecular genetics in pediatric cancers is advancing our understanding of potential drivers of tumorigenesis and opening new opportunities for targeted therapies. One such area is fusion oncoproteins, which are a product of chromosomal rearrangements resulting in the fusion of different genes. They have been identified as oncogenic drivers in several sarcomas and leukemias. Continued advancement in the understanding of the biology of fusion oncoproteins will contribute to the discovery and development of new therapies for childhood cancers. Here we review the current scientific knowledge on fusion oncoproteins, focusing on pediatric sarcomas and hematologic cancers, and highlight the challenges and current efforts in developing drugs to target fusion oncoproteins.

On April 10, 2020, the FDA approved selumetinib (KOSELUGO, AstraZeneca) for the treatment of pediatric patients 2 years of age and older with neurofibromatosis type 1 who have symptomatic, inoperable plexiform neurofibromas. Approval was based on demonstration of a durable overall response rate per Response Evaluation in Neurofibromatosis and Schwannomatosis criteria and supported by observed clinical improvements in plexiform neurofibroma–related symptoms and functional impairments in 50 pediatric patients with inoperable plexiform neurofibromas in a single-arm, multicenter trial. The overall reponse rate per NCI investigator assessment was 66% (95% confidence interval, 51–79) with at least 12 months of follow-up. The median duration of response was not reached, and 82% of responding patients experienced duration of response ≥12 months. Clinical outcome assessment endpoints provided supportive efficacy data. Risks of selumetinib are consistent with MAPK (MEK) inhibitor class effects, including ocular, cardiac, musculoskeletal, gastrointestinal, and dermatologic toxicities. Safety was assessed across a pooled database of 74 pediatric patients with plexiform neurofibromas and supported by adult and pediatric selumetinib clinical trial data in cancer indications. The benefit–risk assessment for selumetinib in patients with inoperable plexiform neurofibromas was considered favorable.

Our research supported the dose selection recommendations for adolescents in the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Guidance on Inclusion of Adolescent Patients in Adult Oncology Clinical Trials. The FDA Guidance states that for drugs administered as a flat dose in adults and data showing no clinically meaningful effect of body size on drug exposure and toxicity in adults, a minimum body weight threshold may need to be defined to prevent adolescents who have a lower body weight from exceeding adult exposures. Our review of adult population pharmacokinetic analyses of new molecular entities approved for oncology between January 2015 and March 2021 suggested that 40 kg (the approximate median body weight of a 12-year-old) is generally the lower end of the body weight range that has no clinically relevant effect on drug pharmacokinetics or safety. The minimum body weight threshold and selection of an appropriate dose for adolescents in relevant adult oncology clinical trials should ultimately be determined based on available data on pharmacokinetics or pharmacodynamics of the investigational drug with consideration of body size effect on drug exposure, toxicity, and efficacy data (if available), the therapeutic index of the drug, and dose- and exposure-response relationships in adults.

Abstract Tagraxofusp-erzs (Elzonris, Stemline) is a cytotoxin that targets CD123-expressing cells. On December 21, 2018, FDA approved tagraxofusp-erzs for the treatment of blastic plasmacytoid dendritic cell neoplasms (BPDCN) in adult and pediatric patients 2 years and older. Approval was based on the response rate in a single-arm trial, Study STML-401-0114; the pivotal cohort included 13 patients with treatment-naïve BPDCN who received tagraxofusp-erzs monotherapy. The complete response or clinical complete response (CR/CRc) rate in the pivotal cohort was 54% (95% CI: 25%–81%), and the median duration of CR/CRc was not reached with a median follow-up of 11.5 months (range: 0.2–12.7). In a separate exploratory cohort, a CR/CRc was achieved by 2 (13%) patients with R/R BPDCN. Safety was assessed in 94 patients with myeloid neoplasms treated with tagraxofusp-erzs at the approved dose and schedule. The major toxicity was capillary leak syndrome (CLS), which occurred in 55% of patients and was fatal in 2%. Hepatotoxicity and hypersensitivity reactions were reported in 88% and 46% of patients, respectively. Other common (≥30%) adverse reactions were nausea, fatigue, peripheral edema, pyrexia, and weight increase. A high proportion of patients (85%) developed neutralizing antidrug antibodies. Tagraxofusp-erzs is the first FDA-approved treatment for BPDCN.

Abstract On November 21, 2018, the FDA approved glasdegib (Daurismo; Pfizer), a small-molecule Hedgehog inhibitor, in combination with low-dose cytarabine (LDAC) for treatment of newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in adults ≥ 75 years or with comorbidities that preclude use of intensive induction chemotherapy. Evidence of clinical benefit came from Study BRIGHT AML 1003, a randomized trial comparing glasdegib+LDAC with LDAC alone for treatment of newly diagnosed AML in 115 patients either ≥ 75 years old or ≥ 55 years old with preexisting comorbidities. Efficacy was established by improved overall survival (OS) with the combination compared with LDAC alone (HR, 0.46; 95% confidence interval, 0.30–0.71; one-sided stratified log-rank P = 0.0002). Median OS was 8.3 months with the combination and 4.3 months with LDAC alone. Common adverse reactions included cytopenias, fatigue, hemorrhage, febrile neutropenia, musculoskeletal pain, nausea, edema, dyspnea, decreased appetite, dysgeusia, mucositis, constipation, and rash. The label includes a boxed warning for embryo-fetal toxicity and a warning for QT interval prolongation. There is a limitation of use for patients with moderate-to-severe hepatic and severe renal impairment; trials studying glasdegib in these patient populations are required as a condition of this approval. See related commentary by Fathi, p. 6015

On May 24, 2019, the Food and Drug Administration approved ruxolitinib for steroid-refractory acute graft-versus-host disease (SR-aGVHD) in adult and pediatric patients 12 years and older. Approval was based on Study INCB 18424-271 (REACH-1; NCT02953678), an open-label, single-arm, multicenter trial that included 49 patients with grades 2-4 SR-aGVHD occurring after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Ruxolitinib was administered at 5 mg twice daily, with dose increases to 10 mg twice daily permitted after 3 days in the absence of toxicity. The Day-28 overall response rate was 57.1% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 42.2-71.2). The median duration of response was 0.5 months (95% CI: 0.3-2.7), and the median time from Day-28 response to either death or need for new therapy for acute GVHD was 5.7 months (95% CI: 2.2 to not estimable). Common adverse reactions included anemia, thrombocytopenia, neutropenia, infections, edema, bleeding, and elevated transaminases. Ruxolitinib is the first drug approved for treatment of SR-aGVHD. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Ruxolitinib is the first Food and Drug Administration-approved treatment for steroid-refractory acute graft-versus-host disease in adult and pediatric patients 12 years and older. Its approval provides a treatment option for the 60% of those patients who do not respond to steroid therapy.