Family Court ReviewVolume 16, Issue 2 p. 11-17 ATTITUDES OF ATTORNEYS TOWARD DIVORCE ISSUES* Patrick C. McKenry, Patrick C. McKenry **Patrick C. McKenry is assistant professor of family relations and human development, Ohio State University. He received his Ph.D. from the University of Tennessee and was a post-doctoral fellow in child and family development at the University of Georgia. He serves as an associate editor of The Family Coordinator.Search for more papers by this authorMargaret S. Herrman, Margaret S. Herrman Margaret S. Herrman is a research associate, School of Social Work, University of Georgia. She received her Ph.D. from Emory University in sociology, concentrating in social psychology and conflict resolution. Her current research activities include family conflict resolution during divorce, community attitudes toward obscenity, and community conflict prevention.Search for more papers by this authorRuth E. Weber, Ruth E. Weber Ruth E. Weber is an associate professor, School of Social Work, University of Georgia. She received her DSW from Case Western Reserve University. She serves as editor for social gerontology, Journal of Gerontology, and is principal investigator on the Divorce Mediation Project, funded by the Robert Sterling Clark Foundation.Search for more papers by this author Patrick C. McKenry, Patrick C. McKenry **Patrick C. McKenry is assistant professor of family relations and human development, Ohio State University. He received his Ph.D. from the University of Tennessee and was a post-doctoral fellow in child and family development at the University of Georgia. He serves as an associate editor of The Family Coordinator.Search for more papers by this authorMargaret S. Herrman, Margaret S. Herrman Margaret S. Herrman is a research associate, School of Social Work, University of Georgia. She received her Ph.D. from Emory University in sociology, concentrating in social psychology and conflict resolution. Her current research activities include family conflict resolution during divorce, community attitudes toward obscenity, and community conflict prevention.Search for more papers by this authorRuth E. Weber, Ruth E. Weber Ruth E. Weber is an associate professor, School of Social Work, University of Georgia. She received her DSW from Case Western Reserve University. She serves as editor for social gerontology, Journal of Gerontology, and is principal investigator on the Divorce Mediation Project, funded by the Robert Sterling Clark Foundation.Search for more papers by this author First published: September 1978 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.174-1617.1978.tb00778.xCitations: 2 * This research was supported by a grant from the Robert Sterling Clark Foundation. ‡ We wish to express our deep appreciation to Mr. O.J. Coogler, J.D. for his able and valuable assistance with this research project. AboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onEmailFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat BIBLIOGRAPHY Bass, H. L. and Rein, M. L., Divorce or marriage: A legal guide. Englewood Cliffs , NJ : Prentice-Hall, 1976. Google Scholar Brown, E. M., Divorce counseling. In D. H. L. Olson (Ed.), Treating relationships. Lake Mills , Iowa : Graphic Publishing Company, 1976. Google Scholar Carter, H. and Glick, P. C., Marriage and divorce: A social and economic study. Cambridge , Mass. : Harvard University Press, 1976. 10.4159/harvard.9780674493605 Google Scholar Cavanagh, R. C. and Rhode, D. L. The unauthorized practice of law and divorce: An empirical analysis. Yale Law Journal, 1976, 86, 104–177. 10.2307/795809 Google Scholar Coogler, O. J. Structured mediation in divorce settlements. Atlanta , Georgia : Family Mediation Association, 1977. Google Scholar Druckman, J. M. and Rhodes, C. A. Family impact analysis: Application to child custody determination. The Family Coordinator, 26, 451–458. Google Scholar Eisler, R. T. Dissolution: No-fault divorce, marriage, and the future of women. New York : McGraw-Hill, 1977. Google Scholar Hughes, D. An examination of the contents of divorce settlements in Fulton County, Georgia. Unpublished Masters Thesis, School of Social Work, University of Georgia, 1978. Google Scholar Johnson, W. D. Divorce, alimony, support, and custody: A survey of judges attitudes in one state. The Family Law Reporter, 1976, 3, 4001–4012. Google Scholar Kresel, K., Lopez-Morillas, M., Weinglass, J. and Deutsch, M., “ Professional intervention in divorce: A summary of the views of lawyers, psychotherapists, and clergy.” Unpublished manuscript, Department of Psychology, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey, 1978. Google Scholar Mazur-Hart, S. F. and Berman, J. J. Changing from fault to no-fault divorce: An interrupted time series analysis. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 1977, 7, 300–312. Google Scholar O'Gorman, H. J. Lawyers in matrimonial cases. New York : Free Press, 1963. Google Scholar Rose, V. and Price-Bonham, S. Divorce adjustment: A woman's problem. The Family Coordinator, 1973, 22, 291–297. 10.2307/582612 Web of Science®Google Scholar Citing Literature Volume16, Issue2September 1978Pages 11-17 ReferencesRelatedInformation