Background: Carotid injuries secondary to a penetrating mechanism of trauma can present immediately, weeks, or even years after the initial injury. Although uncommon, these injuries are associated with significant morbidity and mortality. We present two cases of delayed presentation of carotid injury after penetrating neck trauma, both of which were managed surgically. Case report: A 57-year-old male presented with a symptomatic left facial artery pseudoaneurysm two weeks after sustaining a Zone III laceration at angle of mandible. He underwent successful left neck exploration and repair of pseudoaneurysm with complete resolution of his symptoms post-operatively. A 33-year-old female with a history of penetrating right neck trauma repaired primarily 10 years prior in Russia presented with new onset left upper extremity weakness and tingling. Outpatient diagnostic workup revealed a right common carotid aneurysm which was repaired with a polytetrafluoroethylene interposition graft. The patient was discharged without residual neurologic deficits. She represented several years later with neurologic symptoms and an occluded graft. She underwent successful ligation of her graft and was discharged with complete resolution of her symptoms. Conclusion: Penetrating carotid injuries can manifest in an immediate or delayed fashion. Computerized tomographic angiography appears to be an appropriate diagnostic tool. Once diagnosed, either endovascular or surgical repair may be valid treatment options.

Physicians who perform colonoscopy should consider appendicitis in the differential diagnosis of post procedure abdominal pain. Diagnostic laparoscopy is a safe adjunct for evaluation in patients with suspected perforation after colonoscopy. It is important that all physicians be aware of this complication to ensure prompt diagnosis and intervention.

Introduction Emergency department (ED) discharge is appropriate for patients with minor traumatic injuries. The objective of this study is to determine if use of a trauma checklist increases identification of patients with minor trauma who are safe for discharge. Methods Data were collected on trauma patients evaluated between 1 April 2015 and 31 January 2016 in two groups before and after introduction of a trauma checklist. The two groups were compared using age, mechanism of injury, and Injury Severity Score (ISS) using unpaired Student t-tests and Fisher’s exact test. Results A total of 841 trauma patients were included; 197 prior to the introduction of the checklist and 644 afterwards. Following the implementation of the trauma checklist, significantly more patients were discharged from the ED (18.2% vs. 7.6%, p = 0.0004). Discharged patients in the pre- and post-checklist groups had similar ISS (1.93 ± 1.49 vs. 1.87 ± 1.90, p = 0.90) and were of similar age (35.27 ± 11.06 vs. 41.99 years ± 18.20, p = 0.17). There was no increase in ‘bounce-backs’ to the ED in the post checklist group despite a significantly higher rate of discharge. Conclusion Use of a trauma checklist allows for better identification of those trauma patients who are safe to discharge from the ED and widespread use may decrease healthcare costs.

As the population within the USA ages, the number of hip fractures seen yearly in the emergency department is expected to rise. According to the NEXUS criteria, many of these patients receive computerized tomographic scan (CT) evaluation of the cervical spine because a hip fracture may constitute a distracting injury. The objective of this study is to determine if an isolated hip fracture constitutes a distracting injury which requires imaging of the cervical spine.

INTRODUCTION:The National Emergency X-Radiography Utilization Study (NEXUS) criteria have been criticized due to the presumed unreliability of the clinical exam in elderly patients. The objective of this study was to determine if the NEXUS criteria can be safely applied to this vulnerable group of patients. METHODS:596 trauma patients over the age of 65 were enrolled in a prospectively designed study between April 1, 2015 and October 1, 2016. The study was designed to encourage the use of the NEXUS criteria for all trauma patients including the elderly. NEXUS-negative patients (n = 226) were defined as individuals fulfilling none of the low risk criteria. The specificity and sensitivity of the NEXUS criteria were calculated based on any cervical spine injuries which were missed in NEXUS-positive patients (n = 129) who met one or more criteria. RESULTS:Out of the 596 included elderly patients, 355 patients underwent computed tomography (CT) of the cervical spine. 129 patients were NEXUS-positive and in this group ten nonoperative cervical spine injuries were detected. There were no NEXUS-positive patients who did not undergo CT scans of the cervical spine. No cervical spine injuries were detected in the 226 NEXUS-negative patients. In elderly patients, the NEXUS criteria had a sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 100%. CONCLUSION:The NEXUS criteria have been criticized in prior literature as less sensitive in elderly patients. Based on the current study, the use of the NEXUS criteria may lead to decreased radiation exposure and healthcare costs allowing for better allocation of resources for patients who warrant imaging of the cervical spine.

Jambhekar, Amani MD; Lindborg, Ryan MD; Chan, Vincent; Fulginiti, Adriana; Fahoum, Bashar H. MD, FACS; Rucinski, James MD Author Information

Head trauma is a common occurrence in trauma patients. Due to the significant morbidity and mortality from a missed intracranial bleed, many physicians feel pressured to order unindicated CT scans of the head. The objective of this study was to determine if an educational intervention can reduce unnecessary CTs of the head.

Jambhekar, Amani MD; Lindborg, Ryan MD; Chan, Vincent; Rucinski, James C. MD, FACS; Fahoum, Bashar MD Author Information

Background Carotid injuries are infrequent following blunt traumatic injury but can have potentially devastating neurologic consequences. We present a case of a 31-year-old male with right common carotid transection after blunt trauma to the neck. Case report A 31-year-old male with no notable medical history presented as a trauma level one activation after riding his bicycle into an open car door causing a Zone II laceration of his right anterior neck. The patient was hemodynamically normal, had an intact airway and had no neurologic deficits on evaluation in the trauma bay. He underwent a computed tomography angiogram of his neck which revealed a focal dissection of the right common carotid artery causing a 70%–80% luminal narrowing suspicious for a grade II injury. The patient was taken to the operating room for exploration of his neck laceration. He was found to have a grade V injury with complete transection of the right common carotid artery through the intima and media with intact adventitia. The arterial injury was repaired with polytetrafluoroethylene interposition graft. Perioperatively, the patient was started on dual antiplatelet therapy. He recovered uneventfully without neurologic deficits. Conclusion Complete transection of the common carotid artery following blunt trauma is rarely reported. Based on a review of the literature regarding blunt carotid injuries, it is reasonable to repair such injuries with prosthetic graft followed by either systemic anticoagulation or dual antiplatelet therapy.

Background and Objectives: Prior studies have established a 1.7–4.33% readmission rate for laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG), a rate that falls within the reported range for other bariatric procedures. The current report describes the incidence of 30-day readmission after primary LSG procedures performed at a single bariatric center of excellence (COE) and examines factors that may be associated with readmission. Methods: Data on 343 consecutive LSG operations performed from February 2010 to May 2014 by a single surgeon (PG) were analyzed. Patients readmitted within 30 d were compared to the remaining patients by using Student's t test for continuous variables and the χ2 test for categorical variables. Results: All LSGs were completed laparoscopically with no conversions to open procedures. There were no reoperations, leaks, perioperative hemorrhages, or mortalities. Twelve patients (3.5%) were readmitted; 1 was readmitted twice. There were no identified risk factors for readmission, including patient demographics, comorbidities, and perioperative factors. Notably, 7 (7%) readmissions occurred in the initial 100 patients and 5 (2%) in the remaining 243 patients (P = .04). Clinical pathways were modified after the initial 100 patients; routine contrast esophagograms were no longer performed, and a 1-day routine postoperative stay was adopted. Operative time also decreased from 94.2 ± 23.8 to 78.2 ± 20.0 min (P < .001). Conclusions: Readmission rates after LSG remain in a range similar to those described for other laparoscopic bariatric procedures. Larger prospective studies are needed to identify patterns of complications and readmissions in patients undergoing LSG that may differ from other bariatric procedures.

Jambhekar, Amani MD; Maselli, Amy MD; Chan, Vincent; Lindborg, Ryan MD; Laskey, Daniel MD; Rucinski, James C. MD, FACS; Fahoum, Bashar MD Author Information

Laparoscopic bariatric stapling procedures (LBSP), namely laparoscopic Roux Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) and laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) remain the most commonly performed bariatric operations in the United States. One of the most severe complications of LBSP remains staple line and anastomotic leaks. Postoperative routine gastrografin swallow contrast radiograms (RGSCR) are frequently recommended and performed with the hope to detect and treat these complications early, thus reducing morbidity. Our study examines the benefit of RGSCR after LBSP.