Study Design: The metabolic pathways of most xenobiotics and endogenous compounds can be divided into phase 1 (oxidative, reductive, and hydrolytic) and phase 2 (glucuronidation, sulfate conjugation, glycine and glutathione conjugation, and acetylation and methylation) processes. Oxidative metabolism by the cytochrome P450 system has been intensively investigated compared with glucuronidation and other conjugation pathways. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the disposition of olanzapine or risperidone in healthy volunteers with and without coadministration of the uridine diphosphoglucuronate-glucuronosyltransferase inhibitor probenecid. We hypothesized that olanzapine disposition would be altered as a result of decreased glucuronidation, whereas risperidone disposition would be relatively unaffected.Methods: Our objective was to investigate whether this interaction would occur in 12 healthy volunteers, aged 22 to 42 years, who participated in a single-dose, randomized, 4-period, double-blind, crossover study receiving a single dose of either 5 mg olanzapine or 1 mg risperidone with and without 500 mg probenecid (8 doses over 4 days). Multiple blood samples were analyzed by means of liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry or HPLC to assess the 48-hour time course of risperidone and olanzapine. Urine was assayed for free and glucuronidated drugs.Results: When olanzapine was administered with probenecid, statistically significant differences were observed between plasma pharmacokinetic parameters compared with olanzapine administered alone (maximum concentration, P < .05; area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to 24 hours, P < .01). Clearance was not significantly different between the treatment phases. Risperidone pharmacokinetic parameters were not significantly different (all parameters, P > .05).Conclusion: Inhibition of uridine diphosphoglucuronate-glucuronosyltransferase appeared to influence the disposition of olanzapine but not risperidone. Phase 2 metabolism may significantly influence the disposition of antipsychotic drugs and may be an important aspect of the variability in metabolism, participation in drug-drug interactions, and clinical response to some antipsychotic agents.

Olanzapine is an atypical antipsychotic medication indicated for the treatment of schizophrenia and other manifestations of psychotic illness. Common side effects include somnolence, constipation, weight gain, and postural hypotension. The authors report a case of hypotension accompanied by bradycardia in a normal, healthy volunteer participating in an olanzapine pharmacokinetic study following a single 5 mg dose. A venous catheter allowed for serial blood sampling of olanzapine concentrations before, during, and after the adverse event. The subject experienced a rapid absorption of the drug and higher than anticipated maximum plasma concentrations. This case suggests that atypical antipsychotics, although generally better tolerated than conventional agents, may still result in untoward reactions that may be partially due to individual differences in drug absorption and metabolism.

The selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) paroxetine, sertraline, and fluoxetine have varying degrees of potency in inhibiting the hepatic cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2D6 enzyme. However, the time course for maximum inhibition to occur or for inhibition to dissipate when dosing is discontinued, requires clarification. In an open label, parallel group study of 45 healthy volunteers, the time course of CYP2D6 inhibition of the above SSRIs was evaluated. Subjects were randomized to receive paroxetine at 20 mg/day for 10 days; sertraline at 50 mg/day for 3 days, followed by sertraline at 100 mg/day for 10 days; or fluoxetine at 20 mg/day for 28 days. CYP2D6 activity was assessed using the dextromethorphan metabolic ratio (DMR) on antidepressant days 5 and 10 for sertraline and paroxetine and at weekly intervals for fluoxetine. Following SSRI discontinuation, calculation of a CYP2D6 inhibition half-life (t(1/2)inh) revealed the time course of fluoxetine inhibition (t(1/2)inh = 7.0 +/- 1.5 days) to be significantly longer than either paroxetine (t(1/2)inh = 2.9 +/- 1.9) or sertraline (t(1/2)inh = 3.0 +/- 3.0) (p < 0.01), but the latter were not significantly different from each other (p > 0.05). Time for the extrapolated DMR versus time log-linear plots to return to baseline was significantly different between fluoxetine (63.2 +/- 5.6 days) and both paroxetine (20.3 +/- 6.4 days) and sertraline (25.0 +/- 11.0 days) (p < 0.01), making the rank order (from longest to shortest) of time for CYP2D6 inhibition to dissipate: fluoxetine > sertraline >or= paroxetine. Differences between mean baseline DMR values and measured values obtained after drug discontinuation for each drug group became nonsignificant on discontinuation day 5 for both paroxetine and sertraline and on discontinuation day 42 for fluoxetine. These data define the time course of a persistent effect that fluoxetine, sertraline, and paroxetine have on CYP2D6 following drug discontinuation and should be considered when initiating therapy with a CYP2D6 substrate.

Relative regional brain blood flow was measured in 23 clinically depressed adults by using ECD SPECT at baseline and again during actual prefrontal transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) following 5 daily sessions of TMS. TMS over prefrontal cortex caused increased activity in cortex directly under the stimulation (inversely correlated with distance from scalp to cortex) and decreased activity in remote regions (anterior cingulate and anterior temporal poles). High-frequency rTMS (20 Hz) caused more relative flow immediately below the TMS coil than did low-frequency rTMS (5 Hz). Confirming the hypotheses tested, repeated daily TMS over the prefrontal cortex in medication-free depressed adults appears to change both local and remote blood flow in a manner that may also depend on the frequency of stimulation and coil to outer cortex distance.

Cognitive impairments are cardinal features of schizophrenia and predictors of poor vocational and social outcome. Imaging studies with verbal fluency tasks (VFT) lead some to suggest that in schizophrenia, the combination of a failure to deactivate the left temporal lobe and a hypoactive frontal lobe reflects a functional disconnectivity between the left prefrontal cortex and temporal lobe. Others have theorized that an abnormal cingulate gyrus modulates such fronto-temporal connectivity. Thus addition of a cognitive enhancing medication to current antipsychotic therapy might improve functionality of networks necessary in working memory and internal concept generation. To test this hypothesis, we serially measured brain activity in 6 subjects on stable atypical antipsychotics performing a VFT, using BOLD fMRI. Measurements were made at baseline and again after groups were randomized to receive 12 weeks of donepezil (an acetylcholinesterase inhibitor) and placebo in a blind cross-over design. Donepezil addition provided a functional normalization with an increase in left frontal lobe and cingulate activity when compared to placebo and from baseline scans. This pilot study supports the cingulate's role in modulating cognition and neuronal connectivity in schizophrenia.

A prospective antidepressant drug interaction surveillance program was established and collected data for over 4 years in Charleston, SC (Charleston Antidepressant Drug Interactions Surveillance Program, CADISP). One hundred and seventy patients were enrolled. The plasma concentrations and/or clinical effects of drug combinations were monitored in psychiatric patients who received therapy with a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) or one of the other newer antidepressants (nefazodone, venlafaxine) when combined with other drugs metabolized by the cytochrome P-450 (CYP) enzyme system. Patient data were evaluated to estimate the occurrence and significance of antidepressant-induced metabolic drug interactions. Plasma drug concentrations in the presence and absence of treatment with an antidepressant served as the primary assessment variable. Contrary to the hypothesis that pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions occur but go undetected, little evidence was found for occultly occurring drug interactions with newer antidepressants. The presence of commonly predicted drug interactions was documented. These data do not eliminate the need for caution when prescribing antidepressants with the potential for causing metabolic interactions, but do help allay the fear that such interactions are highly prevalent and routinely hazardous.

Cognitive impairment in multiple domains is common in patients with schizophrenia and may be a powerful determinant of poor functional ability and quality of life. We report a double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over study of donepezil augmentation in a schizoaffective disorder patient stabilized on olanzapine pharmacotherapy. The patient showed significant improvements in several cognitive measures and increased activation of prefrontal cortex and basal ganglia on functional MRI during the donepezil augmentation. In addition, the donepezil augmentation resulted in a reduction of depressive symptoms and in significant improvements in functional abilities and quality of life. Further studies of donepezil augmentation of neuroleptics in schizophrenia are warranted.

The effects of the herb St. John's wort (Hypericum perforatum), a purported antidepressant, on the activity of cytochrome P-450 (CYP) 2D6 and 3 A4 was assessed in seven normal volunteers. Probe substrates dextromethorphan (2D6 activity) and alprazolam (3 A4 activity) were administered orally with and without the co-administration of St. John's wort. Urinary concentrations of dextromethorphan and dextrorphan were quantified and dextromethorphan metabolic ratios (DMRs) determined. Plasma samples were collected (0–60 hrs) for alprazolam pharmacokinetic analysis sufficient to estimate tmax, Cmax, t12 and AUC. Validated HPLC methods were used to quantify all compounds of interest. No statistically significant differences were found in any estimated pharmacokinetic parameter for alprazolam or DMRs. These results suggest that St. John's wort, when taken at recommended doses for depression, is unlikely to inhibit CYP 2D6 or CYP 3A4 activity.

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is a tool with antidepressant potential that uses a coil placed on the scalp to produce a powerful magnetic field that directly stimulates only the outermost cortex. MRI scans were obtained in 29 depressed adults involved in an rTMS antidepressant clinical treatment. These scans were analyzed to investigate the effect of distance from coil to cortex on clinical parameters. Longer motor cortex distance, but not prefrontal distance, strongly correlated with increased motor threshold (P<0.01). Clinical antidepressant response did not correlate with either distance. The rTMS antidepressant responders, however, were significantly younger (t=-2.430, P<0.05), and there appears to be a maximum threshold of age and distance to prefrontal cortex for response.

Six adults phenotyped as either extensive (N = 4) or poor (N = 2) metabolizers for cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2D6 were given a 10-mg oral dose of methylphenidate (MPH) on two separate occasions with and without quinidine, a potent CYP2D6 inhibitor. Quinidine had no significant effect on the pharmacokinetics of either MPH or ritalinic acid, its major metabolite, in either group of CYP2D6 metabolizers. These data suggest a lack of involvement of CYP2D6 in the metabolism of MPH. Drugs that are inhibitors of CYP2D6 when taken concurrently with MPH should not affect its plasma concentration.

Numerous acute studies have found that left prefrontal rTMS over several weeks can alleviate the symptoms of depression. Often, in treatment resistant patients, clinical researchers have struggled with how to maintain an antidepressant response following the acute phase, often reinstating medications that were ineffective in initially treating depression. Many have wondered whether intermittent TMS, given less frequently than in the acute trial, might be a maintenance therapy. We are currently conducting an open-label year-long maintenance TMS study in bipolar depressed subjects who have initially responded to TMS in an acute double-blind antidepression treatment trial. To date, 2 subjects have completed either 80 sessions (over one year) or 74 sessions (over 5 months). Both subjects have suffered relapses of their depressions during the maintenance treatments, which have initially re-responded to more intensive daily TMS. We are following TMS non-responders over the same time as a natural control cohort. These 2 cases indicate that maintenance TMS is feasible, and, to date, safe in terms of MRI and neuropsychological effects. However, both of these treatment resistant severely ill subjects have failed to maintain their improved mood when the frequency of TMS sessions has been reduced. Further research is needed and is ongoing, to determine whether TMS has a role as a maintenance antidepressant treatment.

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is a new technology for exploring brain function. With this method, a small electromagnet is placed on the scalp; by activating and deactivating it, nerve cells in the underlying superficial cortex are depolarized. Several studies have found that prefrontal rTMS has potential efficacy in treating depression, and this technology, in addition to being a research tool, may soon play a role in psychiatric practice. Thus, establishing the safety of this technology is important and has been studied insufficiently. The authors performed T1-weighted three-dimensional volumetric magnetic resonance (MR) imaging on 22 depressed adults (15 active, 7 control) before and after they participated in a 2-week double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial of daily left prefrontal rTMS for the treatment of depression (a total of 16,000 stimuli). Seventeen patients also had paired T2-weighted scans. In a blinded manner, MR scans were qualitatively and quantitatively assessed for structural changes. No qualitative structural differences were observed before and after treatment. In addition, volumetric analysis of the prefrontal lobe showed no changes in the 2 weeks of the study. In conclusion, 10 days of daily prefrontal rTMS at these intensities and frequencies does not cause observable structural changes on MR scans in depressed adults.

administered lateral orbitofrontal rTMS to 7 subjects with GAD. On separate days, subjects received right or left high frequency, right or left low frequency, or placebo rTMS in a counterbalanced, single blind, randomized order. Serial self-rated visual analogue scales measuring anxiety and mood were performed. We hypothesized that right high frequency rTMS would increase anxiety whereas right low frequency rTMS would decrease anxiety based on: (1) data suggesting that the orbitofrontal cortex is important in anticipatory anxiety; (2) studies of healthy volunteers and depressed patients as well as a single case report in a GAD patient suggesting that high frequency prefrontal rTMS temporarily increases anxiety, and (3) the theory that high and low frequency rTMS may have opposite effects on brain function. Preliminary analysis reveals that placebo stimulation significantly decreased anxiety during the hour after stimulation. Also, relative to placebo stimulation, a trend exists suggesting that all the active stimulation types were anxiogenic. There did not appear to be a significant difference in anxiety ratings between the active stimulation cells. These results do not support our hypothesis. In fact, they suggest that single session lateral orbitofrontal stimulation may be anxiogenic, regardless of hemisphere or frequency. Pain with the active stimulation cells may have confounded our results.

Ethylphenidate was recently reported as a novel drug metabolite in two overdose fatalities where there was evidence of methylphenidate and ethanol coingestion. This study explores the pharmacokinetics of ethylphenidate relative to methylphenidate and the major metabolite ritalinic acid, in six healthy subjects who received methylphenidate and ethanol under controlled conditions. Subjects (three males, three females) received a single oral dose of methylphenidate (20 mg; two 10-mg tablets) followed by consumption of ethanol (0.6 g/kg) 30 min later. Methylphenidate, ritalinic acid, and ethylphenidate were quantified using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Ethylphenidate was detectable in the plasma and urine of all subjects after ethanol ingestion. The mean (+/-S.D.) area under the concentration versus time curve for ethylphenidate was 1.2 +/- 0.7 ng/ml/h, representing 2.3 +/- 1.3% that of methylphenidate (48 +/- 12 ng/ml/h). A significant correlation was observed between the area under the concentration versus time curve of methylphenidate and that of ethylphenidate. In view of the known dopaminergic activity of racemic ethylphenidate, it remains possible that under certain circumstances of higher level dosing, e.g., in the abuse of methylphenidate and ethanol, the metabolite ethylphenidate may contribute to drug effects.

Background: Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is a new technology for noninvasively stimulating the brain, Several studies have suggested that daily stimulation of the left prefrontal cortex with TMS for 2 weeks has probable antidepressant effects. We conducted a parallel-design, double-masked, sham-controlled study to address whether 2 weeks of daily TMS over the left prefrontal cortex has antidepressant activity greater than sham.Methods: Thirty medication-free adult outpatients with nonpsychotic, major depressive (n = 21) or bipolar (n = 9) (depressed phase) disorder who were in a current major depression (Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression [HRSD] 21-item score of >18) were treated each weekday for 2 weeks. Subjects were randomly assigned to receive either daily active (20 subjects) or sham (10 subjects) stimulation. Additionally, the 20 active subjects I were equally divided between slower (5 Hz) andfaster (20 Hz) frequency treatment. Antidepressant response was defined as greater than a 50% improvement in the baseline HRSD,Results: Active TMS resulted in significantly more responders (9/20) than did sham (0/10) (chi (2) = 6.42, p < .01), The number of responders did not differ significantly between the two active cells (3/10 faster and 6/10 slower). Expressed as a percent change from baseline, active TMS subjects had significantly greater improvement on the Beck Depression Inventory as well as the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale than did those who received sham.Conclusions: Daily left prefrontal TMS for 2 weeks significantly reduced depression symptoms greater than did sham, The two forms of active TMS treatment did not differ significantly, (C) 2000 Society of Biological Psychiatry.

OBJECTIVES:Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) affects the brain by non-invasively stimulating the cerebral cortex and inducing electrical currents in neurons. The powerful magnetic field acts as a vector that passes across the scalp and the skull, and then converts into an electrical energy within the brain. Originally used in neurophysiology, TMS has since been applied in a variety of neuropsychiatric conditions, including mood disorders. Imaging studies in mood-disordered patients have pointed to dysfunctional limbic and prefrontal cortex activity. TMS researchers have thus postulated that dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) stimulation might change brain activity both locally and in paralimbic areas through transynaptic connections, and alter mood.METHODS:We will describe the technology of TMS, its applications to date, and explore its mechanisms of action.RESULTS:Several clinical trials have demonstrated TMS effects on mood in health and disease. There is a growing consensus that TMS has antidepressant effects, although little is known about the role played by a variety of stimulation parameters such as the intensity or frequency of stimulation. One study has found an antimanic effect of right prefrontal TMS.CONCLUSION:TMS is relatively safe; however, much more research is needed before TMS can be integrated into routine clinical practice.

Twenty-two depressed adults were scanned with perfusion single-photon computed emission tomography before and after 2 weeks of left perfrontal transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) in a parallel design, double-blind treatment study. At medication-free baseline, across all subjects, blood flow in the bilateral medial temporal lobes, left prefrontal cortex, and caudate significantly declined with increased depression severity. Also at baseline, depressed adults who responded to TMS, compared with nonresponders, showed increased inferior frontal lobe activity. Following treatment, there was an even greater difference in inferior frontal blood flow in responders compared with nonresponders, and the negative baseline correlations between depression severity and limbic and prefrontal blood flow disappeared. These results suggest that in depressed adults, 10 days of prefrontal TMS affects prefrontal and paralimbic activity, which may explain its antidepressant effects.