(Abstracted from Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2017;212:119–125) In case of malposition, both rotational forceps (RF) and manual rotation (MR) followed by direct forceps are used to perform rotational operative vaginal birth (OVB), but evidence regarding the safest and most effective method to assist birth in such cases is still unclear. Although higher rates of complications were reported with the use of RF in the past, in recent times it has been associated with high rates of successful vaginal birth and lower rates of adverse outcomes than alternative modes of birth.

Introduction Performing a pelvic examination is a core skill for all medical undergraduates. The use of hybrid simulation, manikin with patient actress, to attain technical and communication skills competencies and to improve the quality of care we offer women, has not been compared to other teaching methods before. Outcome measures were technical skills, communication skills and confidence in completing a pelvic examination. Methods A cluster randomised control trial was conducted over an academic year. Forty-eight medical students who completed an 8-week obstetrics and gynaecology attachment were recruited. Clusters were randomly assigned for initial training on hybrid or manikin only models and attended an end of attachment Objective Structured Clinical Assessment. Results Outcome data were received for 43/48 students (89.5%). Following the objectively structured clinical examination, the hybrid trained cohort had higher technical scores (mean 23 (95% CI 20.1 to 25.8) vs 16.7 (CI 14.7 to 18.6); mean difference 6.3, CI 3.0 to 9.6) and communication skills scores (mean 22.6 (CI 21.2 to 23.8) vs 15.9 (CI 14.4 to 17.3); mean difference 6.7, CI 4.8 to 8.5) compared to the manikin only trained participants. Confidence in undertaking future pelvic examinations were similar in the control and intervention groups; (p=0.10, r=0.18). Conclusions This study demonstrates the value of hybrid simulation compared to manikins alone in improving the short-term acquisition of competence in simulated pelvic examinations at an undergraduate level. Future research should focus on whether hybrid models lead to long-term acquisition of skill and comparison of these models with other innovative methods such as clinical teaching associates.

Introduction Good interprofessional teamworking is essential for high quality, efficient and safe clinical care. Undergraduate interprofessional training has been advocated for many years to improve interprofessional working. However, few successful initiatives have been reported and even fewer have formally assessed their educational impact. Methods This was a prospective observational study of medical and midwifery students at a tertiary-level maternity unit. An interprofessional training module was developed and delivered by a multiprofessional faculty to medical and midwifery students, including short lectures, team-building exercises and practical simulation-based training for one obstetric (shoulder dystocia) and three generic emergencies (sepsis, haemorrhage, collapse). Outcome measures were interprofessional attitudes, assessed with a validated questionnaire (UWE Interprofessional Questionnaire) and clinical knowledge, measured with validated multiple-choice questions. Results Seventy-two students participated (34 medical, 38 midwifery). Following training median interprofessional attitude scores improved in all domains (p<0.0001), and more students responded in positive categories for communication and teamwork (69–89%, p=0.004), interprofessional interaction (3–16%, p=0.012) and interprofessional relationships (74–89%, p=0.006). Scores for knowledge improved following training for medical students (65.5% (61.8–70%) to 82.3% (79.1–84.5%) (median (IQR)) p<0.0001) and student midwives (70% (64.1–76.4%) to 81.8% (79.1–86.4%) p<0.0001), and in all subject areas (p<0.0001). Conclusions This training was associated with meaningful improvements in students’ attitudes to teamwork, and knowledge acquisition. Integrating practical tasks and teamwork training, in authentic clinical settings, with matched numbers of medical and non-medical students can facilitate learning of both why and how to work together. This type of training could be adopted widely in undergraduate healthcare education.

Objective: To test a novel set of pelvic trainers for realism and construct validity. Methods: Seven models of the female pelvis were studied. Participants performed speculum and bimanual examinations, documented their findings, and recorded opinions of the models in a structured questionnaire. Results were analyzed by participant grade (inexperienced and experienced). Results: Twenty-six inexperienced and 24 experienced gynecologists participated. Experienced doctors were more likely to correctly identify the uterus corresponding to 16 weeks of gestation (P < 0.001), the large fibroid uterus (P = 0.01), and uterine anteversion (P = 0.04). Identification of the uterus containing a small fibroid, the uterus corresponding to 10 weeks of gestation, and an adnexal cyst was low overall (<35%) and not significantly different between the groups. Correct identification of cervical findings (ectropion and polyp) was high in both groups (65%-88%). Experienced doctors were more consistent with 17 (71%) reporting the same correct finding on a repeated model, compared with 8 (31%) inexperienced doctors. Forty-nine (98%) doctors completed the structured questionnaire, 36 (73%) of whom felt the models were realistic. Conclusion: The models were found to be realistic and have construct validity. Senior participants were consistent at correctly identifying most abnormalities. The models may be useful for pelvic examination training; further testing is required regarding their ability to aid learning of clinical and communication skills. (C) 2014 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Poor teamwork results in preventable morbidity and mortality for mothers and babies. Suboptimal communication and lack of leadership cost not only lives but also money that is diverted from clinical care to insurance and litigation. Avoidable harm is usually not the result of staff failing their duty of care, it is the result of poor training failing hard-worked staff. A few simple teamwork and leadership behaviours can make a huge difference to outcome and experience for women and their companions, yet they are often missing from maternity care. Recent research has identified the problems and solutions, including the best way to train maternity teams to make a palpable difference. We describe simple yet evidence-based methods to improve teams and leaders.

Medical errors and adverse events are alarmingly frequent in hospital. A systematic review has found that one in eleven patients suffer at least one adverse event during their hospital stay.1de Vries E.N. Ramrattan M.A. Smorenburg S.M. Gouma D.J. Boermeester M.A. The incidence and nature of in-hospital adverse events: a systematic review.Qual Safe Health Care. 2008; 17: 216-223Crossref PubMed Scopus (1071) Google Scholar Many of these events have minor consequences but about one in fourteen are fatal. The emergency setting is particularly prone to errors and adverse events,2Gokhman R, Seybert AL, Pharmpus P, Darby J, Kane-Gill SL. Medication errors during medical emergencies in a large, tertiary care, Academic Medical Center. Resuscitation (2011), doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2011.10.001.Google Scholar relating to the time-critical, high-impact decision making that is required of the emergency responders, often made up of an ad-hoc team. In this edition Ornato et al.3Ornato J, Peberdy MA, Reid R, Feeser R, Dhindsa H. Impact of resuscitation system errors on survival from in-hospital cardiac arrest. Resuscitation, doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2011.09.009.Google Scholar present a study of the impact of errors made during in hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) resuscitations in the United States. They analysed information from 118,387 IHCA cases, using the National Registry of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation database and identified resuscitation errors in approximately one third of cases. Unsurprisingly the outcomes for this group of patients with recognised errors were significantly worse: they had lower rates of return of spontaneous circulation, 24-h survival and survival to discharge compared to the group with no such errors. In line with previous work, the authors found that the specific errors associated with poor outcome included delays in executing critical actions and in administering essential medication. Observational data from national registries such as these cover large populations but their validity is limited by the quality of the available information and the process used to obtain it. This study relied upon hand written resuscitation notes compiled by the emergency team and reviewed by a data abstractor, who was not blinded to patient outcome. Documentation is a vital part of any medical emergency, however, notes are inevitably retrospective and recall of events occurring during emergencies can be poor, even immediately following the event.4Catchpole K. Hadi M. Simulation provides a window on the quality and safety of the system.Resuscitation. 2011; 82: 1375-1376Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (3) Google Scholar Documentation proformas can improve the completeness of records but not necessarily the accuracy.5Crofts J. Bartlett C. Ellis D. Fox R. Draycott T. Documentation of simulated shoulder dystocia: accurate and complete?.BJOG. 2008; 115: 1303-1308Crossref PubMed Scopus (41) Google Scholar It could be argued that errors in this study were more likely to be under rather than over reported which would decrease its power, but not bias the results. Further descriptive data to compare the two groups such as pre-morbid conditions that might have had a significant effect on survival, as well as analysis of the spread of errors across participating hospitals would also have been interesting to collate. Despite these limitations, these findings are difficult to challenge and deserve analysis and debate. In particular, similar to other researchers6Høyer C.B. Christensen E.F. Eika B. Junior physician skill and behaviour in resuscitation: a simulation study.Resuscitation. 2009; 80: 244-248Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (28) Google Scholar, 7Arshid M. Lo T.-Y.M. Reynolds F. Quality of cardio-pulmonary resuscitation (CPR) during paediatric resuscitation training: time to stop the blind leading the blind.Resuscitation. 2009; 80: 558-560Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (34) Google Scholar the authors3Ornato J, Peberdy MA, Reid R, Feeser R, Dhindsa H. Impact of resuscitation system errors on survival from in-hospital cardiac arrest. Resuscitation, doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2011.09.009.Google Scholar highlight the role that poor leadership and teamwork might have had in the resuscitation system errors. However, there was no significant association between the broad leadership categories recorded and IHCA survival. A possible reason for this lack of association is the subjective way leadership was assessed and recorded. It has been shown that it is not simply the knowledge, skills and attitudes of leaders (or in fact of other team members) that affect teams' ability to manage catastrophic medical emergencies efficiently,8Siassakos D. Draycott T.J. Crofts J.F. Hunt L.P. Winter C. Fox R. More to teamwork than knowledge, skill and attitude.BJOG. 2010; 117: 1262-1269Crossref PubMed Scopus (57) Google Scholar it is the way teams apply these to practice through teamwork.9Siassakos D. Fox R. Crofts J.F. Hunt L.P. Winter C. Draycott T.J. The management of a simulated emergency: better teamwork, better performance.Resuscitation. 2011; 82: 203-206Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (67) Google Scholar Specifically, there are certain leader and team member behaviours associated with improved team efficiency in performing critical actions and administering critical drugs in simulated10Siassakos D. Bristowe K. Draycott T. et al.Clinical efficiency in a simulated emergency and relationship to team behaviours: a multisite cross-sectional study.BJOG. 2011; 118: 596-607Crossref PubMed Scopus (104) Google Scholar or real-life11Siassakos D. Bristowe K. Hambly H. et al.Optimising teamwork and communication with patient obstetric emergencies: a multicentre mixed-methods study.in: 9th RCOG international scientific meeting, Athens, Greece, September2011Google Scholar catastrophic emergencies. Coaching individuals and teams to adopt these behaviours within an evidence-based, multiprofessional team training and safety programme12Siassakos D. Crofts J.F. Winter C. Weiner C.P. Draycott T.J. The active components of effective training in obstetric emergencies.BJOG. 2009; 116: 1028-1032Crossref PubMed Scopus (146) Google Scholar could improve care13Fernandez Castelao E. Russo S.G. Cremer S. et al.Positive impact of crisis resource management training on no-flow time and team member verbalisations during simulated cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a randomised controlled trial.Resuscitation. 2011; 82: 1338-1343Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (58) Google Scholar, 14Draycott T.J. Crofts J.F. Ash J.P. et al.Improving neonatal outcome through practical shoulder dystocia training.Obstetr Gynecol. 2008; 112: 14-20Crossref PubMed Scopus (395) Google Scholar, 15Draycott T. Sibanda T. Owen L. et al.Does training in obstetric emergencies improve neonatal outcome?.BJOG. 2006; 113: 177-182Crossref PubMed Scopus (419) Google Scholar, 16Siassakos D. Hasafa Z. Sibanda T. et al.Retrospective cohort study of diagnosis-delivery interval with umbilical cord prolapse: the effect of team training.BJOG. 2009; 116: 1089-1096Crossref PubMed Scopus (161) Google Scholar and outcomes14Draycott T.J. Crofts J.F. Ash J.P. et al.Improving neonatal outcome through practical shoulder dystocia training.Obstetr Gynecol. 2008; 112: 14-20Crossref PubMed Scopus (395) Google Scholar, 15Draycott T. Sibanda T. Owen L. et al.Does training in obstetric emergencies improve neonatal outcome?.BJOG. 2006; 113: 177-182Crossref PubMed Scopus (419) Google Scholar, 16Siassakos D. Hasafa Z. Sibanda T. et al.Retrospective cohort study of diagnosis-delivery interval with umbilical cord prolapse: the effect of team training.BJOG. 2009; 116: 1089-1096Crossref PubMed Scopus (161) Google Scholar for high-consequence emergencies such as cardiac arrest. Historically teamwork has had little emphasis in resuscitation training17Walker S. Brett S. McKay A. Lambden S. Vincent C. Sevdalis N. Observational skill-based clinical assessment tool for resuscitation (OSCAR): development and validation.Resuscitation. 2011; 82: 835-844Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (67) Google Scholar however, the latest European and American Resuscitation Guidelines recommend that teamwork and non-technical skills should be included in training in order to improve resuscitation and outcomes.18Soar J. Monsieurs K.G. Ballance J.H.W. et al.European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2010 Section 9 Principles of education in resuscitation.Resuscitation. 2010; 81: 1434-1444Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (129) Google Scholar, 19Mancini M.E. Soar J. Bhanji F. et al.Part 12: Education, Implementation, and Teams: 2010 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations.Circulation. 2010; 122: S539-S581Crossref PubMed Scopus (102) Google Scholar These guidelines do not recommend a specific type of teamwork training. Crew Resource Management (CRM) programmes, widely acclaimed in the aviation industry, have been translated into medical team training in varied settings, with limited success to date. Participants of such programmes often report a positive reaction to training, however, this may not translate into improved clinical outcomes and safety;20Salas E. Wilson K.A. Burke C.S. Wightman D.C. Does crew resource management training work? An update, an extension, and some critical needs.Hum Factors. 2006; 48: 392-412Crossref PubMed Scopus (250) Google Scholar further research is needed.13Fernandez Castelao E. Russo S.G. Cremer S. et al.Positive impact of crisis resource management training on no-flow time and team member verbalisations during simulated cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a randomised controlled trial.Resuscitation. 2011; 82: 1338-1343Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (58) Google Scholar CRM style training in the Emergency Department has been associated with reduced clinical error rates in one multicentre study.21Morey J.C. Simon R. Jay G.D. et al.Error reduction and performance improvement in the emergency department through formal teamwork training: evaluation results of the MedTeams project.Health Serv Res. 2002; 37: 1553-1581Crossref PubMed Scopus (720) Google Scholar However, the generalisability of this observation is uncertain as there was at unit level both self-selection for intervention, and self-observation of errors by internal assessors. Change in practice should be grounded in research and developed in conjunction with practicing clinicians.22Siassakos D. Fox R. Hunt L. et al.Attitudes toward safety and teamwork in a maternity unit with embedded team training.Am J Med Qual. 2011; 26: 132-137Crossref PubMed Scopus (45) Google Scholar, 23Snell A.J. Briscoe D. Dickson G. From the inside out: the engagement of physicians as leaders in health care settings.Qual Health Res. 2011; 21: 952-967Crossref PubMed Scopus (37) Google Scholar Andersen et al.24Andersen P.O. Jensen M.K. Lippert A. Østergaard D. Identifying non-technical skills and barriers for improvement of teamwork in cardiac arrest teams.Resuscitation. 2010; 81: 695-702Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (145) Google Scholar interviewed a range of doctors and nurses in their role as Advanced Life Support instructors in order to identify the perceived barriers for improvement of teamwork in cardiac arrest teams.25Andersen P.O. Jensen M.K. Lippert A. Østergaard D. Klausen T.W. Development of a formative assessment tool for measurement of performance in multi-professional resuscitation teams.Resuscitation. 2010; 81: 703-711Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (50) Google Scholar Other groups have conducted similar research26Cooper S. Cant R. Porter J. et al.Rating medical emergency teamwork performance: Development of the Team Emergency Assessment Measure (TEAM).Resuscitation. 2010; 81: 446-452Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (207) Google Scholar with the hypothesis that highlighting areas of weakness within a team during a resuscitation event will allow constructive feedback, and targeted training. Whereas lessons from flight incidents are useful, improvement in outcomes of medical emergencies might require training based on evidence from experiences of medical emergencies. It is possible that the improvement of teamwork requires approaches that are sophisticated in their development yet simple to apply to practice.11Siassakos D. Bristowe K. Hambly H. et al.Optimising teamwork and communication with patient obstetric emergencies: a multicentre mixed-methods study.in: 9th RCOG international scientific meeting, Athens, Greece, September2011Google Scholar For example, it might be possible to inculcate best leadership and teamwork practices by debriefing after real or simulated events, using simple pragmatic guidance based on robust evidence from mixed-methods research (Table 1).Table 1Leadership: exemplary evidence from simulated and real-life catastrophic emergencies, and relevance to the Resuscitation 2010 Guidelines.IssuesFocus groups 10Siassakos D. Bristowe K. Draycott T. et al.Clinical efficiency in a simulated emergency and relationship to team behaviours: a multisite cross-sectional study.BJOG. 2011; 118: 596-607Crossref PubMed Scopus (104) Google Scholar (real-life experiences of catastrophic emergencies)Content analysis 11Siassakos D. Bristowe K. Hambly H. et al.Optimising teamwork and communication with patient obstetric emergencies: a multicentre mixed-methods study.in: 9th RCOG international scientific meeting, Athens, Greece, September2011Google Scholar (simulated emergency requiring immediate life support)Resuscitation 2010 Guidelines 27Nolan J.P. Soar J. Zideman D.A. et al.European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2010 Section 1. Executive summary.Resuscitation. 2010; 81: 1219-1276Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (1025) Google ScholarLeadership responsibilityLegal responsibility perceived as lying with the senior doctors.Senior doctors behaved like leaders in all 18 simulations they attended.The ultimate responsibility and decision for DNAR (do not attempt resuscitation) rests with the senior doctor. It is wise for this individual to consult others before making the decision.Leadership attributesThe leader needs to have adequate experience to anticipate the possible end to the emergency. The leader must be calm and compassionate.The leader of the resuscitation team will decide when to stop the resuscitation; this should be expressed with sensitivity and understandingEarly declaration of the nature of the emergency was associated with better team efficiency.Leadership behavioursThe leader should stop, stand back, stop momentarily everyone speaking if necessary, and clarify the situation.The pre-shock pause can easily be reduced by having an efficient team coordinated by a leader who communicates effectively.The leader should verbalize the objective of management to the rest of the team.The leader should allocate the critical tasks for each emergency to specific team members, including a specific team member to talk to the patient and/or family.Allocation of critical tasks with closed loop communication and structured handover (e.g. SBAR) were associated with higher team efficiency in the conduct of critical tasks including administration of essential drugsIdentify one person to be responsible for handover to the resuscitation team leader.Use a structured communication tool for handover (e.g. SBAR).It is essential for the doctor to have discussions with close relatives. Open table in a new tab In conclusion, we applaud the study by Ornato et al., and recommend that further research focuses on improving outcomes for patients using findings from real-life emergencies, triangulated with other sources if necessary, to inform better training and development of acute care teams. Dimitrios Siassakos is a registered member of the PROMPT Maternity Foundation, a UK-based charity, and has no financial interest from this association. Sian Edwards received salary from the PROMPT Maternity Foundation from August to November 2011.