BACKGROUND:The safety net policy for kidney after lung transplant (KALT), implemented in the US on June 29, 2023, allows lung transplant (LT) candidates with acute kidney injury, with or without underlying chronic kidney disease, to undergo LT alone with the potential for renal recovery. This may decrease the need to list for simultaneous lung-kidney transplant (SLKT). RESEARCH QUESTION:What was the change in kidney transplant (KT) and LT practice patterns after the safety net policy? Are the outcomes of KALT better than SLKT? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS:Using the United Nations Organ Sharing registry, we identified patients listed for SLKT or KALT through December 31, 2024. KALT was classified as early (≤ 365 days after LT) or late (> 365 days after LT). The cohort was also divided into safety net or before safety net eras. The primary outcome variable was the risk of delisting from the KT waitlist for deterioration or death, and the secondary outcome was 1-year after LT mortality. RESULTS:Among 1,941 patients, 300 (15.4%), 135 (7%), and 1,506 (77.6%) were listed for SLKT, early KALT, and late KALT, respectively. Since the safety net policy, there has been a decrease in the proportion of SLKT and an increase in early KALT, with a shorter KT waitlist time (94 vs 330 days; P < .001). Listing in the safety net era was associated with decreased odds of being delisted from KT (adjusted OR, 0.34; 95% CI, 0.19-0.60; P < .001). SLKT had a higher after LT mortality (22.1% vs 3.2% vs 0%; P < .001) and after KT mortality (21.5% vs 12.5% vs 7.57%; P < .001) at 1 year compared with early and late KALT, respectively. INTERPRETATION:Our results show that since the safety net policy's introduction, SLKT has decreased, whereas early KALT has increased, with better short-term outcomes and reduced delisting; however, survivorship bias may influence these findings. Prospective studies are needed to further compare SLKT and KALT outcomes in the current era.

Prehabilitation with Impella 5.5 offers hemodynamic support while allowing early mobilization, yet its overall effect on post-transplant recovery remains unclear. The aim was to assess recovery during Impella 5.5-supported prehabilitation and determine its association with early post-heart transplant outcomes, including a potential dose-response relationship with ambulatory activity. We conducted a single-center retrospective cohort study of adults bridged to transplant with Impella 5.5 between April 1, 2022 and September 30, 2024. Daily walking distance, recorded by nursing staff, served as the intervention. Primary outcome was postoperative hospital length of stay (LOS); the secondary outcome was time to extubation. Fine-Gray competing-risk models, adjusted for age, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score, New York Heart Association (NYHA) class, and days of Impella support, assessed associations. Longitudinal recovery trajectories were analyzed with linear mixed-effects models incorporating restricted cubic splines. Among 82 eligible patients, 65 met the inclusion criteria. Patients who walked farther during Impella 5.5 support in the intensive care unit (ICU) had shorter hospital stays and were taken off the ventilator sooner after transplantation. The overall recovery peaked during the first 2-3 weeks of support, with smaller recovery thereafter, indicating that most functional recovery occurred early during prehabilitation.

Introduction Sepsis is a global health priority with nearly 50 million cases annually. Cardiovascular dysfunction is common, frequently manifesting as hypotension that persists despite fluid resuscitation. Most affected patients require the use of intravenous (IV) vasoactive agents, typically necessitating intensive care unit (ICU)-level monitoring, invasive interventions and contributing substantially to healthcare costs. Midodrine, an oral alpha-1 agonist approved for orthostatic hypotension, has increasingly been used off-label as a vasopressor-sparing (reducing IV vasopressor use) strategy in sepsis, despite limited and inconsistent evidence. This pragmatic, randomised, open-label trial evaluates the efficacy and safety of midodrine in patients with sepsis-associated hypotension. We hypothesise that, compared with standard care, midodrine administration will reduce the duration of IV vasopressor use.Methods and analysis A total of 308 adult patients with sepsis-associated hypotension will be enrolled (154 per arm). The intervention group will, in addition to standard of care, receive enteral midodrine 10 mg three times daily. Outcomes will be ascertained pragmatically via electronic health record-based data retrieval and adjudicated by research coordinators blinded to treatment assignment. The primary outcome is time alive and off IV vasopressors in the first 28 days (in hours) after randomisation. Secondary outcomes include cumulative vasopressor exposure; use and duration of central venous access; cumulative fluid balance over the first 48 hours and up to 7 days of ICU stay; ICU and hospital length of stay; and ICU-, hospital-, and organ support-free days through day 28. Safety outcomes include adverse events potentially attributable to midodrine during hospitalisation including acute kidney injury. Primary analyses will follow an intention-to-treat framework, including all randomised participants according to their assigned treatment groups. Primary and secondary outcomes will be compared using a van Elteren test stratified by randomisation factors. A predefined secondary Bayesian analysis of the primary outcome will provide complementary estimates of treatment effect. Safety outcomes will be summarised descriptively without formal between-arm hypothesis testing.Ethics and dissemination The Mayo Clinic Institutional Review Board approved this protocol and required written informed consent from all participants (IRB# 24–0 00 121). Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and international conference presentations.Trial registration number NCT06319248.

The Omicron variant of SARS-CoV-2 is associated with milder symptoms and lower hospitalization and mortality rates than Delta variants, although the impact of Omicron on immunocompromised patients, especially solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients, is still unclear. This study compares the hospitalization rate and outcomes between immunocompromised, immunocompetent, and SOT patients during the Delta and Omicron periods. We included adult patients who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 on PCR or nasopharyngeal antigen test between 26 June 2021 to 8 September 2022, at our institution. A total of 12,401 COVID-19 patients were included, of which 11,055 were immunocompetent, and 1346 were immunocompromised (375 SOT recipients). Throughout the Delta and Omicron outbreaks, immunocompromised patients exhibited higher comorbidities and 30-day hospitalizations, but rates of mechanical ventilation and ICU-level care were like immunocompetent patients. During the Omicron wave, immunocompromised patients had higher unadjusted relative risk estimates (RR = 2.37, 95% CI 1.96–2.87, p < 0.05) than Delta (RR = 1.58, 95% CI 1.24–2.01, p < 0.05), with higher adjusted relative risk for hospitalization in Omicron (RR = 1.50, 95% CI 1.10–2.03, p = 0.01). Analyses show increased hospitalization risk in immunocompromised during the Omicron wave compared to the Delta wave, with no significant difference in hospitalization outcomes. The relative risk of hospitalization for SOT patients was higher in both waves.

Background Ketamine has demonstrated efficacy in treatment-resistant depression, primarily in psychiatric or outpatient populations. Its use in ICU patients remains underexplored, with limited data beyond case reports and small series. This study evaluated the association between subanesthetic ketamine infusions and improvement in depressive symptoms and hemodynamic changes in ICU patients. Methods We conducted a retrospective study of adults admitted to the ICU who received IV ketamine (0.3-0.75 mg/kg over 40 min on three consecutive days) for depressive symptoms. Changes in depressive symptoms were assessed using routine clinical documentation by physicians, nurses, and occupational and physical therapists. Hemodynamic parameters (blood pressure and heart rate) were recorded before and up to 120 min after infusion. The primary outcome was to evaluate depressive symptoms while the secondary outcome was to assess hemodynamic changes post transfusion. Results Thirty-four patients met criteria, including 18 solid organ transplant recipients. Median age was 59 years; 61.8% were male. Ketamine was associated with improvement in apparent sadness (90.0% vs 52.2%, P < .05) and reported sadness (95.0% vs 59.1%, P < .05). In transplant recipients, improvement in apparent sadness remained significant (80.0% vs 41.7%, P < .05). Hemodynamic parameters remained stable; heart rate increased transiently at 15-30 min post-infusion, returning to baseline by 60-90 min. Adverse effects observed were anxiety (12.5%), restlessness and/or agitation (10.4%), and dissociation (8.16%). Conclusion Subanesthetic ketamine improved specific depressive symptoms in critically ill ICU patients without significant hemodynamic instability. These findings support its potential as a rapid-acting antidepressant in the ICU, warranting further prospective trials.