Background As Gender Affirming Top Surgery (GATS) has become more common, educational resources have increased. To ensure healthcare accessibility, a better understanding of preferred platforms and comprehension of these resources is crucial. This study aimed to: determine commonly used resources for GATS patients of varying ages and assess the difficulty of each resource. Methods A public survey seeking perceptions on educational resource utilization related to GATS was administered to gender diverse individuals. Responses with reported gender identity and age were grouped by age. Online resources were categorized into institutional websites, plastic surgery (PRS) journals, YouTube (YT), internet forums, and educational websites. Perceived difficulty and objective readability of sample text from each category was compared using validated scales. Univariate analyses were performed. Results A total of 464 respondents were included, with over half aged 18 to 25, one third aged 25 to 34, and 13.8% aged 35 and older. The youngest cohort had lower education, were less likely to have undergone top surgery, and more often favored non-expert resources. When comparing readability, non-expert resources such as YT and internet forums had lower grade levels compared to institutional websites and PRS journals(all p-values ≤ 0.01). Conclusion Educational preferences and perceived difficulty of resources related to GATS differed significantly by patient age. Overall YouTube and internet forums were popular patient resources and rated as easier to understand by both objective and subjective measures. In order to improve the accessibility of high-quality healthcare information, improving the readability of expert-created resources is essential.

Surgical chest masculinization procedures, especially gender-affirming top surgery (GATS), are becoming increasingly prevalent in the USA. While a variety of surgical techniques have been established as both safe and effective, there is limited research examining ideal aesthetic nipple appearance and incision scar pattern. This study employs patient images to understand the public’s perception on top surgery outcomes when adjusting for BMI ranges and Fitzpatrick skin types. Images from RealSelf modified via Adobe Photoshop depicted various scar types and nipple-areolar complex (NAC) sizes/positions. A Qualtrics survey was distributed utilizing Amazon Mechanical Turk. Statistical analysis was performed through JMP Pro 17 for ordinal and categorical values, with a p value less than or equal to 0.05 statistically significant. A moderately sized and laterally placed NAC was preferred. A transverse scar that resembles the pectoral border between the level of the inframammary fold and pectoral insertion was deemed most masculine and aesthetic. Majority of results demonstrated that this is unaffected by Fitzpatrick skin types. Increased BMI images impacted public preferences, as a nipple placed farther from the transverse incision (p = 0.04) and a transverse scar position closer to the IMF was preferred in higher BMI patients. An understanding of the most popular NAC and scar choices, as well as how these factors may differ when considering a Fitzpatrick skin type or BMI categorization was attained. This validates the importance of patient-centered approach when employing surgical techniques in GATS. Future studies intend to obtain reports from actual patients considering GATS. This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each submission to which Evidence-Based Medicine rankings are applicable.

BACKGROUND:There has been a greater focus in recent literature proposing air to be a superior medium to saline in tissue expanders. This study aims to review the literature and assess the quality of data on the efficacy and safety of air as an alternative medium to saline in tissue expanders, in the setting of postmastectomy two-stage reconstruction.METHODS:A systematic review regarding air inflation of tissue expanders was conducted using PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science. The methods followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Three reviewers separately performed data extraction and comprehensive synthesis.RESULTS:A total of 427 articles were identified in our search query, of which 11 met the inclusion criteria. Three pertained to inflation with room air, and eight pertained to inflation with CO2 using the AeroForm device. They were comparable to decreased overall complication rates in the room air/CO2 cohort compared to saline, although statistical significance was only observed in one of five two-arm studies. Investigating specific complications in the five two-arm studies, significantly lower rates of skin flap necrosis were only observed in two CO2-based studies. Studies rarely discussed other safety profile concerns, such as the impacts of air travel, radiation planning, and air extravasation beyond descriptions of select patients within the cohort.CONCLUSION:There is insufficient evidence to suggest improved outcomes with room air inflation of tissue expanders. Further work is needed to fully characterize the benefits and safety profiles of air insufflation before being adopted into clinical practice.

Chest masculinization surgery is an increasingly common procedure and has offered significant benefits to the gender diverse community. Although major complications are an infrequent occurrence in chest masculinization surgery, they may still impact surgical success.While the long-term success of chest masculinization surgery has been examined through patient-reported outcome measures, there is no study that has assessed the association between complications and patient-reported outcomes. In this study, patients who underwent double incision or periareolar mastectomies for chest masculinization by a single surgeon were surveyed. Demographic, operative, and postoperative variables were obtained from medical records. The BODY-Q and SCAR-Q modules (Q-Portfolio.org) were used to assess postoperative patient-reported outcomes. There were 151 survey responders (43% response rate), 132 without complications and 19 with complications. No significant differences in patient-reported outcomes were noted when comparing the groups with and without complications. While some providers may be reluctant to offer chest masculinization to patients they deem high-risk for complications, patients and providers should be assured that complications do not significantly impact patient satisfaction.Lay SummaryGender-affirming chest masculinization surgery is increasingly common. We investigated the impact of complications on patient-reported outcomes in chest masculinization. Patients and providers should be assured that complications do not significantly impact patient satisfaction.

Background Plastic and reconstructive surgeons are often presented with reconstructive challenges as a sequela of complications in high-risk surgical patients, ranging from exposure of hardware, lymphedema, and chronic pain after amputation. These complications can result in significant morbidity, recovery time, resource utilization, and cost. Given the prevalence of surgical complications managed by plastic and reconstructive surgeons, developing novel preventative techniques to mitigate surgical risk is paramount. Methods Herein, we aim to understand efforts supporting the nascent field of Preventive Surgery, including (1) enhanced risk stratification, (2) advancements in postoperative care. Through an emphasis on four surgical cohorts who may benefit from preventive surgery, two of which are at high risk of morbidity from wound-related complications (patients undergoing sternotomy and spine procedures) and two at high risk of other morbidities, including lymphedema and neuropathic pain, we aim to provide a comprehensive and improved understanding of preventive surgery. Additionally, the role of risk analysis for these procedures and the relationship between microsurgery and prophylaxis is emphasized. Results (1) medical optimization and prehabilitation, (2) surgical mitigation techniques. Conclusion Reconstructive surgeons are ideally placed to lead efforts in the creation and validation of accurate risk assessment tools and to support algorithmic approaches to surgical risk mitigation. Through a paradigm shift, including universal promotion of the concept of "Preventive Surgery," major improvements in surgical outcomes may be achieved.