PURPOSE:External beam radiation therapy (EBRT) alone for early stage, medically inoperable non-small cell lung cancer (MILC) can produce local disease control and sometimes cure. We have previously reported that higher EBRT doses result in improved disease control and, for patients with tumors > or =3.0 cm, improved survival. This report describes the impact of dose escalation with endobronchial brachytherapy boost during or following EBRT upon local disease control. METHODS AND MATERIALS:Medical records of 404 patients with MILC treated with radiotherapy alone were reviewed. Thirty-nine patients received a planned endobronchial brachytherapy boost during or following a course of EBRT. A matched-pair analysis of disease control and survival was performed by matching each brachytherapy patient to 2 EBRT patients from a reference group of the remaining patients. RESULTS:Endobronchial brachytherapy boost significantly improved local disease control over EBRT alone (58% vs. 32% at 5 years). The local control benefit for brachytherapy was found to be limited to patients with T(1-2) disease or tumors < or =5.0 cm. Among these patients treated with endobronchial boost, EBRT doses of > or =6500 cGy were necessary to optimize local disease control. No overall survival differences were observed at 3 years. Excess toxicity with brachytherapy was not observed. CONCLUSION:Endobronchial brachytherapy boost enhances local disease control rates in MILC treated with EBRT. Local control outcome is optimized when radical EBRT doses are used in conjunction with brachytherapy.

Purpose: For patients who are medically unable to tolerate a surgical resection for technically resectable non-small-cell lung carcinoma, radiation therapy is an acceptable alternative. We report on the effect of achieving local control of the primary tumor on survival end-points, and analyze factors that may influence local control.Methods and Materials: We reviewed the records of 152 patients with medically inoperable non-small-cell lung carcinoma treated at our institutions. All patients had technically resectable lesions and no evidence of metastatic disease. Treatment was delivered using megavoltage irradiation to doses ranging from 45 to 75 Gy.Results: For patients with tumors 3 cm or less, locally controlling the tumor significantly improved survival (p = .0371). Patients with Tl tumors had a higher probability of survival and disease-free-survival than patients with larger tumors if the primary tumor was locally controlled, but this survival advantage disappeared if the tumor was not controlled. Overall, patients with smaller tumors had a lower incidence of distant spread, but this association was maintained only when the primary tumor was controlled (36 month risk of 10%, 23%, and 57% for tumors < 3 cm, 3-4.9 cm, 5 cm or greater, respectively, p = .0027). For patients whose tumors were not controlled, there was no significant difference in the risk of distant dissemination by tumor size. Higher radiation doses influenced local control and metastatic spread. We observed no influence of the initial field size in the risk of local control and in the probability of survival.Conclusion: Radical radiation therapy is an effective treatment for small (T1 or < 3 cm) tumors when treated to doses of 65 Gy or more, and should be offered as an alternative to surgery in elderly or infirm patients. New therapeutic strategies to improve the local control rate should be considered for larger tumors, through the use of hyperfractionated treatment, endobronchial ''boost'' irradiation, and sensitizing chemotherapy agents.