Vertebral hemangiomas (VHs) are common, benign angiomatous lesions of the spine with an incidence rate of 10% to 12% in the population. VHs have a characteristic appearance on imaging; however, a subset demonstrate atypical features that resemble more sinister pathologic processes, such as malignant neoplasms or metastatic disease. We report a case of an atypical VH that was initially thought to be a metastasis in a 75-year-old patient with a newly diagnosed pulmonary nodule. Our goal is to highlight the key findings of VHs on various imaging modalities that can potentially help minimize unnecessary investigations or interventions.

BACKGROUND The Canada Lymph Node Score (CLNS) uses 4 sonographic criteria to predict the risk of malignancy in lymph nodes during endobronchial ultrasound. The CLNS may play a role in identifying targets for biopsy or rebiopsy during invasive mediastinal staging for lung cancer. However the CLNS has not yet been prospectively validated in routine clinical practice. METHODS CLNSs for each lymph node biopsied during endobronchial ultrasound were prospectively captured for 1 year (2019). The CLNS and the presence of malignancy in each node were compared. Univariate binary logistic regression was completed for each ultrasonographic feature and multivariate logistic regression model. RESULTS CLNSs and diagnostic pathology results were available for 367 lymph nodes. Incidence of malignancy increased with higher scores. Scores double dagger 3 were significantly associated with malignancy (specificity, 84.4%; positive likelihood ratio, 4.0). Area under the curve was 0.76, indicating a good ability of the model to predict presence or absence of malignancy. Nodes scoring < 2 and negative on computed tomography and positron emission tomography were malignant in 10.1%. CONCLUSIONS The CLNS correlates with the presence or absence of malignancy in thoracic lymph nodes and may serve as an adjunct to currently available methods of invasive and noninvasive mediastinal staging. The CLNS may be most helpful in selecting which nondiagnostic lymph nodes require rebiopsy. There is a significant risk of a false-negative result even with a score of 0, and using a combination of low CLNSs and negative conventional radiology to obviate the need for any initial biopsy remains to be studied in prospective trials. (Ann Thorac Surg 2023;115:1456-62) (c) 2023 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons

Mesothelioma in situ is a recently described precursor to invasive mesothelioma. Thus far, all cases in the literature have involved one pleural cavity or the peritoneal cavity. We describe a patient with biopsy-proven mesothelioma in situ involving both pleural cavities and the peritoneal cavity. Genetic analysis results revealed that the patient had a BAP1 germline mutation. This is the first report of mesothelioma in situ involving multiple body cavities and raises a question of whether such patients will all have BAP1 germline mutations.

BACKGROUNDThe phenomenon of lung cancer stigma has been firmly established in the literature. However, studies have predominantly focused on patients with advanced disease, whose experiences may differ from patients with earlier stage, surgically resectable lung cancer and an improved prognosis.PURPOSEThe objective of the study was to examine the stigma experienced in a Canadian population with early-stage, resectable lung cancer.METHODSPatients with newly diagnosed lung cancer were enrolled at a tertiary thoracic surgery clinic. The 25-item Lung Cancer Stigma Inventory (LCSI) was self-administered by patients to quantitatively measure experiences of lung cancer stigma. LCSI results informed the development of a semi-structured focus group and individual interviews.RESULTSOf the 53 participants completing the survey, 38 (72%) met established LCSI score threshold, indicating a clinically meaningful level of stigma. No significant relationship was found between total LCSI scores and any demographic variable. Analysis of qualitative data revealed multiple themes related to experiences of lung cancer stigma. The major themes were classified into four categories: impact of the association between lung cancer and smoking, societal attitudes and assumptions, personal choices in relation to diagnosis, and experiences related to care.CONCLUSIONSA surgical population of patients with predominantly early-stage lung cancer experienced lung cancer stigma at a high incidence and a level similar to previously studied populations with more advanced disease. The qualitative results support the quantitative findings that respondents experienced more internal stigma than either perceived stigma from others or constrained disclosure related to their diagnosis.

Background. Delays in care negatively affect patients with potentially resectable thoracic malignant diseases. The Alberta Thoracic Oncology Program established an automatic referral process for patients with chest computed tomographic (CT) scans suggestive of malignant disease. The objective of this study was to determine whether automatic referral was associated with decreased time to referral or differences in the quality of referral information received. Methods. A single-center retrospective review of patients referred to a Canadian tertiary thoracic surgical center was performed. The time between the CT scan and the date of referral was calculated, and the type of information provided with the referral was tabulated. Automatic and traditional referral groups were compared using the Student t test, the Mann-Whitney U test, and multivariable analysis. Results. A total of 689 patients met inclusion criteria, and 405 of these patients were automatic referrals. Average time to referral was shorter in the automatic referral group (4.7 days vs 23.6 days; P < .001). Only 2 automatic referrals took longer than 30 days, compared with more than 25% of traditional referrals. Automatic referrals were always associated with a shorter time for referral on subgroup analysis of lung nodules, different referring physician types, and patient location. There was no difference between referral types in the number of referral data provided to the center. Conclusions. Automatic referrals for patients with potential thoracic malignant disease have a significant beneficial impact on delays in care, and this could result in improved outcomes, such as decreased upstaging and improved survival. This was not associated with a decrease in the amount of information provided with the referral. Thus, automatic referrals may streamline patient care without compromising quality. (C) 2020 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons

Background. For lung cancer surgery, a narrative operative report is the standard reporting procedure, whereas a synoptic-style report is increasingly utilized by healthcare professionals in various specialties with great success. A synoptic operative report more succinctly and accurately captures vital information and is rapidly generated with good intraobserver reliability. The objective of this study was to systematically develop a synoptic operative report for lung cancer surgery following a modified Delphi consensus model with the support of the Canadian thoracic surgery community.Methods. Using online survey software, thoracic surgeons and related physicians were asked to suggest and rate data elements for a synoptic report following the modified Delphi consensus model. The consensus exercise-derived template was forwarded to a small working group, who further refined the definition and priority designation of elements until the working group had reached a satisfactory consensus.Results. In all, 139 physicians were invited to participate in the consensus exercise, with 36.7%, 44.6%, and 19.5% response rates, respectively, in the three rounds. Eighty-nine elements were agreed upon at the conclusion of the exercise, but 141 elements were forwarded to the working group. The working group agreed upon a final data set of 180 independently defined data elements, with 72 mandatory and 108 optional elements for implementation in the final report.Conclusions. This study demonstrates the process involved in developing a multidisciplinary, consensus-based synoptic lung cancer operative report. This novel report style is a quality improvement initiative to improve the capture, dissemination, readability, and potential utility of critical surgical information. (C) 2014 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons