Abstract Background. Currently, sexual orientation data is not collected, nor is the language to study sexual orientation data defined by any national cancer database. Due to this limitation, little is known about breast cancer (BC) disparities in sexual minority women (SMW) despite several studies showing increased lifestyle risk factors. Our objective was to study this question in the All of Us database. Methods. We analyzed data from the All of Us research program, a national open enrollment database that registers diverse subjects through associated healthcare electronic medical records and collects survey data. We aimed to compare risk factors, as well as preventative and procedural healthcare utilization differences between SMW and straight women (StW) as they relate to BC care. Results were expressed as odds ratios (OR) with a 95% confidence interval [CI]. Results. Of 229,917 cisgender women who answered the sexual orientation question, 27,302 (11.9%) selected “non-straight orientation, prefer not to answer, or skipped” and thus were defined as SMW. In total, 6,905 (3.0%) women had received a BC diagnosis, including 423 (6.1%) SMW. SMW were less likely to have a BC diagnosis than StW (OR 0.48 [0.43-0.53]). Among all women, there were significant differences in frequency and types of visits and procedures performed. SMW women were less likely to undergo annual history and physical examination (0.79 [0.73-0.85]), mammography (0.61 [0.53-0.69]), and breast biopsy (0.55 [0.41-0.72]), as well as being less likely to undergo breast surgeries (mastectomy 0.53 [0.30-0.93]; lumpectomy 0.53 [0.38-0.74]). Survey data revealed differences in several lifestyle factors that relate to BC risk development. While StW were more likely to answer yes to being an “alcohol participant” (0.79 [0.77-0.82]), SMW reported higher rates of alcohol intake on a daily, weekly, and monthly basis, as well as being more likely to consume 6 or more drinks in one sitting. SMW also showed significantly increased history of smoking/nicotine usage. There were also significant differences in healthcare access and utilization: StW were more likely to receive health advice from a primary care provider (0.65 [0.65-0.69]), while SMW were more likely to utilize urgent and emergency care (1.44 [1.34-1.54]). SMW were also more likely to report being unable to afford care (1.82 [1.72-1.93]), medication (1.69 [1.61-1.76]), specialty care (1.98 [1.89-2.08]), and follow-up care (1.85 [1.75-1.95]), as well as to delay care due to cost concerns about the copay (2.13 [2.02-2.23]), deductible (1.64 [1.56-1.73]), paying out of pocket (1.70 [1.63-1.77]) or because they were nervous (2.80 [2.69-2.91]). SMW reported being more likely to experience healthcare discrimination based on questions about healthcare provider interactions (Table 1). Conclusions.Although likelihood of a breast cancer diagnosis in the All of Us database is significantly higher in StW than SMW, discrimination, lack of access, and underutilization of preventative and screening services by SMW likely creates an underrepresentation of the true number of SMW with BC. Further studies on characteristics at diagnosis, treatments, and survival are needed to address how these disparities affect BC outcomes in SMW. Table 1: Survey answers among sexual minority women (SMW) compared to straight women (StW) reporting on discrimination from healthcare provider interactions in the All of Us database. SMW: sexual minority women; StW: straight women; OR: odds ration; Lower 95 CI: lower 95% confidence interval; Upper 95 CI: upper 95% confidence interval; Sig. *: statistically significant with p < 0.05; OR>1: SMW most likely to answer; OR <1 StW most likely to answer. Citation Format: Lucas Houser, Collin Dougherty, Sean Figy, Jessica Maxwell, Juan Santamaria-Barria. Breast Cancer Care Disparities in Sexual Minority Women: An Analysis of the National Institutes of Health All of Us Research Program [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO2-09-11.

Mentors: Sean C. Figy, Marius C. Florescu Program: General Surgery Type: Original Research Background: Over 65% of patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) utilize arteriovenous fistulas (AVF) for hemodialysis. The increasing incidence of co-morbid ESRD and obesity (BMI >35kg/m2) precludes patients from kidney transplantation and underscores significant long-term access needs. Compared to traditional superficialization techniques for overlying adiposity, liposuction is minimally-invasive and well-tolerated, allowing for earlier fistula utilization with a lower complication profile. We present a practical solution to deep hemodialysis access in 14 patients undergoing liposuction for AVF superficialization. Methods: Patients with well-matured but difficult-access fistulas due to adiposity were selected. Pre-operative ultrasound mapped fistulas, and adiposity superficial and lateral to the fistula were marked ( Figure 1A & 1B) and infiltrated with Klein tumescent solution. Liposuction with Mercedes and spatula-tipped cannulas was completed in cross-hatched fashion ( Figure 1C & 1D). Intra-operative ultrasound confirmed cannula positioning and measured fistula depth. A palpable thrill remained present throughout superficialization. Cannulation began 4-weeks post-operatively. Results: Mean access depth pre-operatively was 10.9mm (8–15mm), immediately postoperative was 7mm (6–9mm), and at 4-weeks was 5.3mm (4–8mm). Thirteen fistulas were successfully accessed following liposuction superficialization. Average usable access length was 12.7cm (10–15cm) following surgery. All patients discharged home following surgery. There were no postoperative infections or hemorrhage. Conclusion: Early experience with liposuction for superficialization of deep hemodialysis access is promising. It offers an innovative solution to an ever-growing problem, and the possibility of improved outcomes and quality of life for patients living with ESRD and obesity. Our experience shows this is a safe and effective superficialization technique to increase patient eligibility, enable successful and early cannulation, while decreasing recovery time.

Arterial thrombosis is a rare, but dreadful complication in microvascular surgery. Here we report on a case of recurrent arterial thrombosis in a latissimus dorsi (LD) free flap used for scalp reconstruction in an 18-year-old woman who sustained a gunshot wound (GSW) to the head. In the immediate postoperative period, internal and external doppler signals to the flap were lost. Emergent surgical exploration revealed arterial thrombosis, which was emergently explored and successfully repaired. Doppler signals were again lost and the flap was emergently explored for a second time. Following revision of the arterial anastomosis, flap perfusion decreased and appeared to correlate with the patient’s blood pressure. After administration of vasopressors to increase the Mean Arterial Pressure (MAP) to a goal of 70 or greater, flap perfusion and doppler signals were consistent. Here we describe a case of successful free flap salvage using both intraoperative and postoperative vasopressors for recurrent arterial thrombosis. Furthermore, vasopressor administration may be beneficial in select patients to maintain adequate flap perfusion in those who demonstrate intraoperative hypotension and no other identifiable causes of flap compromise, as in the present case.

can occur anytime on the floor to hopefully reduce LOS even further.

Introduction: It is estimated that 4 of 10 women in the United States have experienced one or more forms of intimate partner violence (IPV) in their lifetime. The US Preventative Service Task Force recommends that clinicians screen women of reproductive age for IPV and refer women who screen positive to ongoing support services. We aim to identify the perceptions, attitudes, and preparedness of plastic surgeons regarding intimate partner violence. Methods: An IRB approved survey was sent to members of the American Society of Plastic Surgeons. The survey contained three sections: (1) surgeon and practice demographics, (2) surgeon experience with IPV and preparedness of using protocols to screen for IPV, and (3) surgeon attitudes and perception of those experiencing and inflicting IPV. Four follow-up emails were sent to enhance response rate. Results: A total of 107 of 2,535 plastic surgeons responded (4.22% response rate), and 81 (75.7%) of them were men. Most surgeons, 57 (64.0%) respondents, estimate that intimate partner violence is rare (<1 time per year) in their practice while 22 (24.7%) surgeons were unsure of the prevalence. Only 17 (37.8%) surgeons responded that they feel comfortable screening for intimate partner violence while 41 (43.2%) believe that screening protocols are likely to capture patients’ experiences. Most surgeons (71.6%) state they have no established protocol if a patient discloses intimate partner violence. Conclusions: The prevalence of IPV is well understood, but educational efforts and adequate screening protocols are needed within the plastic surgery community to identify and treat patients experiencing intimate partner violence.

BACKGROUND:Syndrome of the trephined (ST) refers to the rare, reversible event of neurological deterioration following craniectomy. ST is also known as "sinking skin flap syndrome" and typically occurs in the weeks to months following operation. The mechanism underlying syndromic onset is poorly understood. Changes to cerebrospinal fluid flow, alteration of temperature-related perfusion, and scarring at the intracranial surgical site have all been proposed. Patients present with a variety of symptoms related to paradoxical increased intracranial pressure. Sometimes falsely attributed as a consequence of the initial cranial insult, ST is more specifically a symptomatic process resulting as direct consequence of the craniectomy procedure. With timely identification and subsequent cranioplasty, the associated neurological dysfunction can be corrected - this rectification being the primary confirmatory feature of the syndrome.CASE:A 59-year-old female was seen with regards to a wound of the temporoparietal scalp, with exposed cranial implant. She had suffered a traumatic brain injury and underwent craniectomy after a motor vehicle accident 10 years prior. Her injury was complicated by necrosis of her cranial bone flap after reimplantation and at least 10 subsequent attempts to reconstruct her wound. When delayed cranial reconstruction was attempted on two separate occasions, the patient suffered severe syndrome of the trephined and required hospitalization for symptoms of impending herniation. Ultimately, she required revision and replacement of titanium mesh and latissimus dorsi free flap for soft tissue coverage of the titanium mesh.CONCLUSION:This case presents a unique surgical challenge in that chronic infection was perpetuated by the replacement of implant material in the wound. Soft tissue reconstruction alone was not possible given the patient's severe ST. Free tissue transfer was required in order to bring vascularized myofascial tissue to prevent recolonization of the newly implanted mesh and allow the cranial wound to heal.

Background The relative value unit system relies on subjective measures of physician input in the care of patients. A payment per unit time model incorporates surgeon reimbursement to the total care time spent in the operating room, postoperative in-house, and clinic time to define payment per unit time. We aimed to compare common general surgery operations by using the total care time and payment per unit time method in order to demonstrate a more objective measurement for physician reimbursement. Study Design Average total physician payment per case was obtained for 5 outpatient operations and 4 inpatient operations in general surgery. Total care time was defined as the sum of operative time, 30 minutes per hospital day, and 30 minutes per office visit for each operation. Payment per unit time was calculated by dividing the physician reimbursement per case by the total care time. Results Total care time, physician payment per case, and payment per unit time for each type of operation demonstrated that an average payment per time spent for inpatient operations was $455.73 and slightly more at $467.51 for outpatient operations. Partial colectomy with primary anastomosis had the longest total care time (8.98 hours) and the least payment per unit time ($188.52). Laparoscopic gastric bypass had the highest payment per time ($707.30). Conclusions The total care time and payment per unit time method can be used as an adjunct to compare reimbursement among different operations on an institutional level as well as on a national level. Although many operations have similar payment trends based on time spent by the surgeon, payment differences using this methodology are seen and may be in need of further review.