The development and morphology of vascular plants is critically determined by synthesis and proper distribution of the phytohormone auxin. The directed cell-to-cell distribution of auxin is achieved through a system of auxin influx and efflux transporters. PIN-FORMED (PIN) proteins are proposed auxin efflux transporters, and auxin fluxes can seemingly be predicted based on the—in many cells—asymmetric plasma membrane distribution of PINs. Here, we show in a heterologous Xenopus oocyte system as well as in Arabidopsis thaliana inflorescence stems that PIN-mediated auxin transport is directly activated by D6 PROTEIN KINASE (D6PK) and PINOID (PID)/WAG kinases of the Arabidopsis AGCVIII kinase family. At the same time, we reveal that D6PKs and PID have differential phosphosite preferences. Our study suggests that PIN activation by protein kinases is a crucial component of auxin transport control that must be taken into account to understand auxin distribution within the plant.

Proteomes are intricate. Typically, thousands of proteins interact through physical association and post-translational modifications (PTMs) to give rise to the emergent functions of cells. Understanding these functions requires one to study proteomes as "systems" rather than collections of individual protein molecules. The abstraction of the interacting proteome to "protein networks" has recently gained much attention, as networks are effective representations, that lose specific molecular details, but provide the ability to see the proteome as a whole. Mostly two aspects of the proteome have been represented by network models: proteome-wide physical protein-protein-binding interactions organized into Protein Interaction Networks (PINs), and proteome-wide PTM relations organized into Protein Signaling Networks (PSNs). Mass spectrometry (MS) techniques have been shown to be essential to reveal both of these aspects on a proteome-wide scale. Techniques such as affinity purification followed by MS have been used to elucidate protein-protein interactions, and MS-based quantitative phosphoproteomics is critical to understand the structure and dynamics of signaling through the proteome. We here review the current state-of-the-art MS-based analytical pipelines for the purpose to characterize proteome-scale networks.

In Arabidopsis thaliana, the serine/threonine protein kinase oxidative signal‐inducible 1 (OXI1), mediates oxidative stress signalling. Its activity is required for full activation of the mitogen‐activated protein kinases (MAPKs), MPK3 and MPK6, in response to oxidative stress. In addition, the serine/threonine protein kinase Pto‐interacting 1‐2 (PTI1‐2) has been positioned downstream from OXI1, but whether PTI1‐2 signals through MAPK cascades is unclear. Using a yeast two‐hybrid screen we show that OXI1 also interacts with PTI1‐4. OXI1 and PTI1‐4 are stress‐responsive genes and are expressed in the same tissues. Therefore, studies were undertaken to determine whether PTI1‐4 is positioned in the OXI1/MAPK signalling pathway. The interaction between OXI1 and PTI1‐4 was confirmed by using in vivo co‐immunoprecipitation experiments. OXI1 and PTI1‐4 were substrates of MPK3 and MPK6 in vitro. Although no direct interaction was detected between OXI1 and MPK3 or MPK6, in vitro binding studies showed interactions between MPK3 or MPK6 with PTI1‐4. In addition, PTI1‐4 and MPK6 were found in vivo in the same protein complex. These results demonstrate that PTI1‐4 signals via OXI1 and MPK6 signalling cascades.Structured digital abstract PTI1‐4 and OXI1 phosphorylate by protein kinase assay (View interaction) OXI1 physically interacts with PTI1‐4 by two hybrid (View interaction) MPK6 physically interacts with PTI1‐4 by anti tag coimmunoprecipitation (View interaction) MPK3 and OXI1 phosphorylate by protein kinase assay (View interaction) MPK6 binds to PTI1‐4 by pull down (View interaction) PTI1‐4 and MPK3 phosphorylate by protein kinase assay (View interaction) OXI1 phosphorylates OXI1 by protein kinase assay (View interaction) OXI1 physically interacts with PTI1‐4 by anti tag coimmunoprecipitation (View interaction) PTI1‐4 and MPK6 phosphorylate by protein kinase assay (View interaction) PTI1‐4 physically interacts with AGC2‐3 by two hybrid (View interaction) OXI1 binds to PTI1‐4 by pulldown (Viewinteraction) MPK6 and OXI1 phosphorylates by protein kinase assay (View interaction) MPK3 binds to PTI1‐4 by pull down (View interaction) PTI1‐4 physically interacts with AGC2‐2 by two hybrid (View interaction) OXI1 physically interacts with PTI1‐1 by two hybrid (View interaction) PTI1‐4 binds to OXI1 by pull down (View interaction)

Protein phosphorylation in eukaryotes predominantly occurs on serine (Ser) and threonine (Thr) residues, whereas phosphorylation on tyrosine (Tyr) residues is less abundant. Plants lack classic Tyr kinases, such as the epidermal growth factor receptor, that govern Tyr phosphorylation in animals. A long-standing debate questions whether plants have any Tyr-specific kinases and, although several protein kinases with both Ser/Thr and Tyr specificities exist, data supporting the existence of other such kinases are scarce. As we discuss here, mass-spectrometry-based analyses now indicate that Tyr phosphorylation is as extensive in plants as it is in animals. However, careful inspection of available data indicates that these promising mass spectrometry studies have to be interpreted with caution before current ideas on Tyr phosphorylation in plants are revised.

An estimated one-third of all proteins in higher eukaryotes are regulated by phosphorylation by protein kinases (PKs). Although plant genomes encode more than 1000 PKs, the substrates of only a small fraction of these kinases are known. By mass spectrometry of peptides from cytoplasmic- and nuclear-enriched fractions, we determined 303 in vivo phosphorylation sites in Arabidopsis proteins. Among 21 different PKs, 12 were phosphorylated in their activation loops, suggesting that they were in their active state. Immunoblotting and mutational analysis confirmed a tyrosine phosphorylation site in the activation loop of a GSK3/shaggy-like kinase. Analysis of phosphorylation motifs in the substrates suggested links between several of these PKs and many target sites. To perform quantitative phosphorylation analysis, peptide arrays were generated with peptides corresponding to in vivo phosphorylation sites. These peptide chips were used for kinome profiling of subcellular fractions as well as H 2O 2-treated Arabidopsis cells. Different peptide phosphorylation profiles indicated the presence of overlapping but distinct PK activities in cytosolic and nuclear compartments. Among different H 2O 2-induced PK targets, a peptide of the serine/arginine-rich (SR) splicing factor SCL30 was most strongly affected. SRPK4 (SR protein-specific kinase 4) and MAPKs (mitogen-activated PKs) were found to phosphorylate this peptide, as well as full-length SCL30. However, whereas SRPK4 was constitutively active, MAPKs were activated by H 2O 2. These results suggest that SCL30 is targeted by different PKs. Together, our data demonstrate that a combination of mass spectrometry with peptide chip phosphorylation profiling has a great potential to unravel phosphoproteome dynamics and to identify PK substrates.

The formulation of network models from global protein studies is essential to understand the functioning of organisms. Network models of the proteome enable the application of Complex Network Analysis, a quantitative framework to investigate large complex networks using techniques from graph theory, statistical physics, dynamical systems and other fields. This approach has provided many insights into the functional organization of the proteome so far and will likely continue to do so. Currently, several network concepts have emerged in the field of proteomics. It is important to highlight the differences between these concepts, since different representations allow different insights into functional organization. One such concept is the protein interaction network, which contains proteins as nodes and undirected edges representing the occurrence of binding in large‐scale protein‐protein interaction studies. A second concept is the protein‐signaling network, in which the nodes correspond to levels of post‐translationally modified forms of proteins and directed edges to causal effects through post‐translational modification, such as phosphorylation. Several other network concepts were introduced for proteomics. Although all formulated as networks, the concepts represent widely different physical systems. Therefore caution should be taken when applying relevant topological analysis. We review recent literature formulating and analyzing such networks.

Protein phosphorylation plays a central role in many signal transduction pathways that mediate biological processes. Novel quantitative mass spectrometry-based methods have recently revealed phosphorylation dynamics in animals, yeast, and plants. These methods are important for our understanding of how differential phosphorylation participates in translating distinct signals into proper physiological responses, and shifted research towards screening for potential cancer therapies and in-depth analysis of phosphoproteomes. In this review, we aim to describe current progress in quantitative phosphoproteomics. This emerging field has changed numerous static pathways into dynamic signaling networks, and revealed protein kinase networks that underlie adaptation to environmental stimuli. Mass spectrometry enables high-throughput and high-quality analysis of differential phosphorylation at a site-specific level. Although determination of differential phosphorylation between treatments is analogous to detecting differential gene expression, the large body of statistical techniques that has been developed for analysis of differential gene expression is not generally applied for detecting differential phosphorylation. We suggest possible improvements for analysis of quantitative phosphorylation by increasing the number of biological replicates and adapting statistical tests used for gene expression profiling and widely implemented in freely available software tools.

To ensure appropriate responses to stimuli, organisms have evolved signalling networks that rely on post-translational modifications of their components. Among these, protein phosphorylation has a prominent role and much research in plants has focused on protein kinases and phosphatases, which, respectively, catalyse phosphorylation and dephosphorylation of specific substrates. Technical limitations, however, have hampered the identification of these substrates. As reviewed here, novel mass spectrometry-based techniques have enabled the large-scale mapping of in vivo phosphorylation sites. Alternatively, methods based on peptide and protein microarrays have revealed protein kinase activities in cell extracts, in addition to kinase substrates. A combined phosphoproteomic approach of mass spectrometry and microarray technology could enhance the construction of dynamic plant signalling networks that underlie plant biology.

Most regulatory pathways are governed by the reversible phosphorylation of proteins. Recent developments in mass spectrometry-based technology allow the large-scale analysis of protein phosphorylation. Here, we show the application of immobilized metal affinity chromatography to purify phosphopeptides from Arabidopsis extracts. Phosphopeptide sequences were identified by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS/MS). A total of 79 unique phosphorylation sites were determined in 22 phosphoproteins with a putative role in RNA metabolism, including splicing of mRNAs. Among these phosphoproteins, 12 Ser/Arg-rich (SR) splicing factors were identified. A conserved phosphorylation site was found in most of the phosphoproteins, including the SR proteins, suggesting that these proteins are targeted by the same or a highly related protein kinase. To test this hypothesis, Arabidopsis SR protein-specific kinase 4 (SRPK4) that was initially identified as an interactor of SR proteins was tested for its ability to phosphorylate the SR protein RSp31. In vitro kinase assays showed that all in vivo phosphorylation sites of RSp31 were targeted by SRPK4. These data suggest that the plant mRNA splicing machinery is a major target of phosphorylation and that a considerable number of proteins involved in RNA metabolism may be targeted by SRPKs.

Protein serine/threonine phosphatase 5 (PP5) plays an important role in signal transduction in animal cells, but in plants, knowledge about PP5 is scarce. Here, we describe the isolation of a full-length cDNA encoding tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) PP5 (LePP5) and its expression in Escherichia coli. Biochemical characterization showed that recombinant LePP5 has a low intrinsic protein phosphatase activity. This activity was increased 6- to 10-fold by either removal of the N-terminal tetratricopeptide repeat domain or by addition of fatty acids, indicating that biochemical features specific for PP5 homologs from other species are conserved in tomato. The single-copy LePP5 gene was cloned and shown to encode two mRNA species that arise by alternative pre-mRNA splicing. Similarly, Arabidopsis was found to express two PP5 transcripts, suggesting that alternative splicing of PP5 pre-mRNA is not specific for tomato. Alternative splicing results in a larger transcript containing an additional exon encoding two putative transmembrane domains and, hence, in a larger PP5 isoform. Subcellular fractionation studies on tomato protein lysates indicated that the majority of the 55-kD LePP5 isoform is soluble, whereas the 62-kD isoform is an integral membrane protein. Production of yellow fluorescent protein-PP5 chimeras in plant cells indicated that the 55-kD isoform is localized in both the nucleus and the cytoplasm, whereas the 62-kD isoform is targeted to the endoplasmic reticulum, including the nuclear envelope. Our findings show that alternative splicing generates two LePP5 isoforms with a different subcellular localization.