PURPOSE To evaluate the safety and efficacy of fludarabine plus rituximab in treatment-naive or relapsed patients with low-grade and/or follicular non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS This was an open-label, single-arm, single-center phase II study enrolling 40 patients. During the first week of the study, patients received two infusions of rituximab 375 mg/m2 administered 4 days apart. Seventy-two hours after the second infusion of rituximab, patients received the first of six cycles of fludarabine chemotherapy (25 mg/m2/d for 5 days on a 28-day cycle). Single infusions of rituximab were administered 72 hours before the second, fourth, and sixth cycles of fludarabine, and two infusions of rituximab were given 4 weeks after the last cycle of fludarabine. Treatment duration was 26 weeks. RESULTS An overall response rate of 90% (80% complete response rate) was achieved in the intent-to-treat population. Similar response rates were seen in treatment-naive and previously treated patients. The median duration of response has not been reached at 40+ months. The median follow-up time in this study is 44 months (range, 15 to 66 months). In patients positive for the 14;18 translocation in blood and/or marrow at enrollment, molecular remission was achieved in 88% of cases, with patients remaining negative for up to 4 years to date. Hematologic toxicity was manageable, and except for a 15% incidence of herpes simplex/zoster infections, infectious complications were rare. Nonhematologic toxicities were minimal. CONCLUSION Rituximab plus fludarabine was well tolerated and associated with an excellent complete response rate, including molecular remissions, in patients with low-grade or follicular lymphoma.

A proposed model of thrombopoietin (TPO) regulation is that of a constitutive production of TPO with circulating levels being predominately regulated by changes in platelet and megackaryocyte mass. Using a pharmacodynamic (PD) approach, the authors examined the validity of this model for patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) undergoing dose-intensive postinduction chemotherapy (HDT). TPO and platelet values were assayed weekly in AML patients undergoing HDT. A parsimonious dynamic model was then applied to these experimental data. The results (1) support the proposed model of TPO regulation, (2) model and quantify the effects of HDT on the megakaryocyte compartment, (3) characterize variables not amenable to direct measurement, and (4) have clinical utility as this model predicted that TPO given after HDT would not have a significant effect on platelet recovery, a finding borne out in clinical trials. This model provides information relevant to the interpretation of clinical trials of hematopoietic growth factors.

This retrospective cohort study of 462 consecutive adult allogeneic and autologous blood or marrow transplantation (BMT) patients compared the incidence of hepatic veno-occlusive disease (VOD) after BMT with three prophylactic regimens. Patients receiving heparin (Hep), heparin + prostaglandin E1 (Hep + PGE1) or low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) as a prophylactic VOD regimen were compared to a historical cohort receiving no VOD prophylaxis. Of 462 BMT patients, VOD was diagnosed in 22% (31 of 142) of the no prophylaxis group, 11% (11 of 104) of the Hep, 12% (13 of 110) in the Hep + PGE1 and 4% (four of 106) of the LMWH group ( P = 0.0002). VOD was the primary cause of death in 20% (12 of 59). By multivariate logistic regression, independent risk factors for developing VOD were: no VOD prophylactic regimen, unrelated allogeneic BMT, Karnofsky performance score (KPS) <80 and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) ⩾50 U/l. There was no increase in the rate of death due to hemorrhagic events or VOD in any prophylaxis group compared to the control group. Prospective randomized trials of Hep vs LMWH vs placebo are warranted to assess the efficacy of heparin compounds in the prevention of VOD. Bone Marrow Transplantation (2001) 27, 627–633.

Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) infection is an important cause of respiratory mortality in immunosuppressed patients, including bone marrow transplant (BMT) recipients. The presence of lower respiratory tract infection and infection in the pre-engraftment phase of BMT is believed to confer a poor prognosis. Three patients who underwent allogeneic BMT at our institution developed RSV pneumonia over 1 year post BMT, with the underlying disease in remission. All three were hypoxic with extensive pulmonary disease at presentation. Treatment consisted of aerosolized ribavirin and intravenous immune globulin with successful clearing of viral shedding and excellent clinical outcomes. RSV infection is probably less severe in the late post-BMT period, but needs to be considered early in the differential diagnosis of pulmonary infiltrates in this patient population. Bone Marrow Transplantation (2001) 27, 1071–1073.

Thiotepa (TT) has not been reported to cause cardiomyopathy, whereas cyclophosphamide (Cy)-related cardiomyopathy is well characterized. To search for cases of acute onset cardiomyopathy associated with TT, we retrospectively reviewed 171 patients who received TT-containing conditioning regimens for blood or marrow transplantation (BMT). Nine of 171 patients (5.3%) developed clinical congestive heart failure in the post-BMT period. The median time to onset of heart failure was 15 days after BMT (range 5-30). The median pre-BMT left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was 50% (range 42-65%) as determined by two-dimensional echocardiogram, or gated blood pool scan. At the time of cardiomyopathy onset, LVEF was 30%. Six patients died of causes unrelated to heart failure. All affected patients who developed congestive heart failure following administration of TT had some evidence of cardiac dysfunction prior to transplantation. Significant risk factors for the development of cardiomyopathy included low pre-BMT-LVEF and female sex--particularly in females receiving allogeneic transplantation. The incidence of congestive heart failure with TT-containing regimens was similar to the incidence using other regimens with and without Cy. The mean time to clinical evidence of TT-associated cardiomyopathy was longer than the mean time reported with Cy. We recommend caution in using high-dose TT-containing regimens for patients with histories of cardiac dysfunction.

An observational study was conducted at 18 transplant centers in the United States and Canada to characterize the platelet recovery of patients receiving myeloablative therapy and stem cell transplantation and to determine the clinical variables influencing recovery, determine platelet utilization and cost, and incidence of hemorrhagic events. The study included 789 evaluable patients transplanted in 1995. Clinical, laboratory, and outcome data were obtained from the medical records. Variables associated with accelerated recovery in multivariate models included (1) higher CD34 count; (2) higher platelet count at the start of myeloablative therapy; (3) graft from an HLA-identical sibling donor; and (4) prior stem cell transplant. Variables associated with delayed recovery were (1) prior radiation therapy; (2) posttransplant fever; (3) hepatic veno-occlusive disease; and (4) use of posttransplant growth factors. Disease type also influenced recovery. Recipients of peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) had faster recovery and fewer platelet transfusion days than recipients of bone marrow (BM). The estimated average 60-day platelet transfusion cost per patient was $4,000 for autologous PBSC and $11,000 for allogeneic BM transplants. It was found that 11% of all patients had a significant hemorrhagic event during the first 60 days posttransplant, contributing to death in 2% of patients. In conclusion, clinical variables influencing platelet recovery should be considered in the design and interpretation of clinical strategies to accelerate recovery. Enhancing platelet recovery is not likely to have a significant impact on 60-day mortality but could significantly decrease health care costs and potentially improve patient quality of life.

The receptor for megakaryocyte growth and development factor (MGDF), also known as thrombopoietin, has recently been cloned. MGDF stimulates platelet production and maturation both in vitro and in vivo. MGDF may thus have a role in attenuating the thrombocytopenia associated with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and its therapy. However, there is concern that MGDF might induce AML blast proliferation and thereby increase the risk of treatment failure. To address this concern, we studied the expression of c-mpl mRNA and c-Mpl protein by blasts from AML patients. In addition we examined the in vitro effect of MGDF as well as the combined effect of MGDF and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) or stem cell factor (SCF) on leukemic blast proliferation, recruitment into S-phase, induction of programmed cell death and activation of signal transducers and activators of transcription (STAT) proteins. Our results demonstrate that blasts from a substantial proportion of cases of AML express the receptor at either the mRNA or protein level. Moreover, the function of the MGDF receptor was demonstrated by activation of STAT proteins following exposure to MGDF. Nevertheless, blast proliferation in response to MGDF was rare, and the proliferative effect of MGDF was less than that of G-CSF or SCF. Furthermore, MGDF did not prevent programmed cell death induced by cytarabine. Finally, there appeared to be no correlation between receptor expression by AML blasts and functional response to MGDF. Based on these data, it would appear that clinical trials of MGDF may be undertaken safely in patients with AML.

PURPOSE:c-mpl, the human homolog of v-mpl, is the receptor for thrombopoietin. Given that c-mpl expression carries an adverse prognosis in myelodysplastic syndrome and given the prognostic significance of expression of other growth factor receptors in other diseases, we attempted to determine whether c-mp/mRNA expression is a prognostic factor in acute myeloid leukemia (AML).PATIENTS AND METHODS:We analyzed bone marrow samples from 45 newly diagnosed AML patients by reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction.RESULTS:Samples from 27 patients (60%) expressed c-mpl mRNA (c-mpl+); their clinical and laboratory features were compared with those of the 18 patients without detectable levels of c-mpl(c-mpl-). No significant differences in age, sex, leukocyte count, French-American-British subtype, or karyotype group were found. c-mpl+ patients more commonly had secondary AML (41% v 11%; P = .046) and more commonly expressed CD34 (67% v 12%; P = .0004). There was no significant difference in complete remission (CR) rate. However, c-mpl+ patients had shorter CR durations (P = .008; median, 6.0 v > 17.0 months). This was true when only de novo AML patients were considered and when controlling for age, cytogenetics, or CD34 expression. There was a trend toward shorter survival in c-mpl+ patients (P = .058; median, 7.8 v 9.0 months).CONCLUSION:These data suggest that c-mpl expression is an adverse prognostic factor for treatment outcome in adult AML that must be considered in the analysis of clinical studies using thrombopoietin in AML.

Administration of growth factors prior to chemotherapy (priming) may reduce myelosuppression and provide an alternative to the use of stem cell support for the delivery of dose-intensive therapy. It is possible, however, that such priming may worsen aplasia, either by recruitment of progenitors into cell cycle and thereby increasing their sensitivity to chemotherapy or by depleting stem cell pools. We performed a Phase I/II trial of sequential interleukin 3 (IL-3)/granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) prior to and following high-dose etoposide and cyclophosphamide to determine the safety and efficacy of priming. IL-3 was given for 7 days, and then G-CSF was given until the WBC count reached a level of 100, 000/microliter or stopped rising. Chemotherapy was started 48 h after the last dose of G-CSF. Sequential administration of IL-3/G-CSF was repeated beginning 36 h after the last dose of chemotherapy. Twenty-five eligible patients with Hodgkin's disease, non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, or breast cancer were enrolled. Priming was generally well tolerated. The median maximum WBC count and absolute neutrophil count achieved was 66,400 and 57,600/microliter, respectively. Significant decreases in platelet counts were seen during priming with 15 patients having a >/=40% decrease from prepriming values. Hematological recovery of study patients was compared to that of an unprimed historical control group (n = 38) treated with the same chemotherapy followed by G-CSF alone. Neutrophil recovery to 500 and 1000/microliter and platelet recovery to >/=50,000/microliter was significantly faster in the study group compared to that of historical controls (P = 0.03, 0.05, and 0.01, respectively). Sequential IL-3/G-CSF given prior to and following high-dose etoposide and cyclophosphamide is safe and is a feasible strategy to compare in prospective randomized trials to patients treated with only postchemotherapy IL-3 and G-CSF and to patients treated with peripheral blood stem cell support.

Macrophage inflammatory protein‐1α (MIP‐1α) is a chemokine that can inhibit the cell cycle progression of both primitive haemopoietic and epidermal progenitor cells. This property could potentially be exploited to attenuate both the myelosuppressive effects of chemotherapy as well as mucositis. We evaluated both the biological and clinical effects of BB‐10010, a genetically engineered variant of MIP‐1α, in patients with malignant lymphoma or breast cancer receiving high‐dose etoposide (VP 3.6 g/m2) and cyclophosphamide (Cy 200 mg/kg). 52 patients were randomized to one of three cohorts. Cohort A received no BB‐10010; cohorts B and C received 10 μg/kg and 100 μg/kg of BB‐10010, respectively. All patients received post‐chemotherapy G‐CSF. BB‐10010 was well tolerated. There were no significant differences between groups in recovery to an ANC > 0.5 × 109/l, 1 × 109/l or 1.5 × 109/l, the number of days with an ANC < 0.5 × 109/l, days to a platelet count >50 × 109/l or 100 × 109/l, or the incidence and severity of mucositis. There was no evidence of any effect of BB‐10010 on colony‐forming cell (CFC) or long‐term culture‐initiating cell (LTC‐IC) mobilization, cycling activity in the marrow or on chemotherapy‐induced changes in CFC or LTC‐IC number both of which were in the normal range by 22 d after completion of the chemotherapy. To our knowledge this is the first report of a myelointensive regimen having no apparent long‐term effect on the LTC‐IC compartment. In summary, BB‐10010 is safe when used in patients receiving high‐dose therapy but has no effect on reducing the toxicity of such therapy.

PURPOSE:To determine the treatment outcome of standard acute myeloid leukemia (AML)-type chemotherapy in a subset of patients with newly diagnosed myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) compared with that of patients with de novo AML as defined using French-American-British (FAB) criteria. In addition, to determine the pretreatment variables having prognostic significance for treatment outcome in patients with MDS.PATIENTS AND METHODS:Nine hundred seven newly diagnosed patients with no history of cytopenias having a local institutional de novo AML successfully karyotyped and treated on Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) protocols for AML from 1984 to 1992. Thirty-three of the 907 patients were reclassified as having MDS on central pathology review using FAB criteria and form the basis of this analysis.RESULTS:The treatment outcomes for patients with MDS and AML were similar; the complete remission (CR) rate was 79% and 68%, respectively (P = .37); median CR duration was 11 and 15 months, respectively (P = .28); and median survival was 13 and 16 months, respectively (P = .72). For the MDS patients, there were no prognostic variables for CR rate identified. For CR duration, only the Sanz classification had prognostic value. The prognostic factors for survival in a univariate analysis included age, WBC count, Sanz classification, and percent blood blasts. In a proportional hazards analysis of survival, age greater than 60 years and WBC less than 2.6 x 10(9)/L were adverse prognostic factors.CONCLUSION:In patients with no known history of cytopenias who are treated intensively at diagnosis, the FAB distinctions between MDS (refractory anemia with excess blasts and refractory anemia with excess blasts in transformation) and AML appear to have little therapeutic relevance.

Hematopoietic growth factors are being administered to patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) both to shorten the duration of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia and in an attempt to increase cytotoxicity of cell cycle-specific agents. However, limited information is available concerning the effects of growth factors in AML patients. To examine the in vivo effects of recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) on AML cells, laboratory studies were performed before and after a 72-hour intravenous infusion of G-CSF (10 micrograms/kg/d) administered to 28 untreated AML patients. Twenty-seven patients (96%) showed increases in at least one of the following parameters after G-CSF: blood blasts, bone marrow (BM) blasts, leukemia cells in S phase or interphase cells with leukemia- specific markers shown by fluorescence in situ hybridization. The median paired change in absolute blast count was +2.7 x 10(9)/L (P = .0001) after G-CSF, as compared with 0.0 during the 72 hours before initiation of G-CSF. The median percentage of BM leukemia cells in S phase increased from 6.0% to 10.7% after G-CSF (median change, %5.9%; P = .009). Interphase BM cells with trisomy 8 or monosomy 7 increased in 6 of 6 patients with these abnormalities (P = .02) with a median percent increase of 47%. Blood neutrophil counts also increased during G-CSF (median paired change, +2.8 x 10(9)/L; P < .0001). Trisomy 8 or monosomy 7 was shown by fluorescence in situ hybridization in post-G- CSF blood neutrophils from 4 of 6 patients but was also present in neutrophils before G-CSF. We conclude that the percentage of leukemia cells in S phase increases and that leukemia cell populations undergo expansion during short-term administration of G-CSF in almost all AML patients.

Given the limitations of bone marrow transplantation (BMT), alternative approaches to deliver dose-intensive regimens without stem cell support are needed. Administration of hematopoietic growth factors before high-dose chemotherapy (priming) may reduce myelosuppression directly, delaying the onset of neutropenia by expanding the mature neutrophil compartment, and shortening the duration of neutropenia by expanding progenitor cell mass. Priming may also render progenitor populations mitotically quiescent after growth factors are withdrawn, thereby making them less sensitive to the cytotoxic effects of chemotherapy. It is also possible, however, that growth factor priming may worsen aplasia when used with dose-intensive regimens by either depleting early progenitor pools or recruiting progenitor populations into cycle. To determine the safety and hematopoietic efficacy of growth factor priming, 13 patients with hematologic malignancy or breast cancer were treated with granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) (250 micrograms/m2 twice daily subcutaneously) until the white blood cell (WBC) count reached either a plateau or 100,000 cells/microL. Forty-eight hours after the last dose of GM-CSF, chemotherapy was begun using high-dose etoposide and cyclophosphamide. All patients received GM-CSF after chemotherapy. Two patients were withdrawn during GM-CSF priming because they developed urticarial rashes. The maximum median increases in WBC and absolute neutrophil count (ANC) during GM-CSF priming were 7.1- and 4.4-fold, respectively. Only one patient achieved the original target WBC of 100,000/microL. The kinetics of leukocyte expansion were slow; a median of 13 days was needed to reach the maximum WBC. Furthermore, much of the leukocyte expansion was caused by an increase in eosinophils, which would not be expected to accelerate hematopoietic recovery. GM-CSF priming did not appear to have a significant impact on hematopoietic recovery after high-dose etoposide and cyclophosphamide, as there was no significant difference in 1) recovery to an ANC > 500/microL compared to a historical control group that received no growth factor (median of 29 and 30 days, respectively; p = 0.4), 2) number of days with an ANC < 500/microL (median of 19 and 20 days, respectively; p = 0.11), and 3) number of days to an untransfused platelet count > or = 50,000/microL (median 36 and 32 days, respectively; p = 0.23). The failure of GM-CSF priming may be a result of its modest stimulation of hematopoiesis or the expansion of a committed progenitor cell population that is exquisitely sensitive to this regimen.