The NMR and EPR spectra of two bisimidazole and three bispyridine complexes of tetraphenylchlorinatoiron(III), [(TPC)Fe(L)2]+ (L = Im-d4, 2-MeHIm, 4-Me2NPy, Py, and 4-CNPy), have been investigated. The full resonance assignments of the [(TPC)Fe(L)2]+ complexes of this study have been made from correlation spectroscopy (COSY) and nuclear Overhauser enhancement spectroscopy (NOESY) experiments and Amsterdam density functional (ADF) calculations. Unlike the [(OEC)Fe(L)2]+ complexes reported previously (Cai, S.; Lichtenberger, D. L.; Walker, F. A. Inorg. Chem. 2005, 44, 1890-1903), the NMR data for the [(TPC)Fe(L)2]+ complexes of this study indicate that the ground state is S = 1/2 for each bisligand complex, whereas a higher spin state was present at NMR temperatures for the Py and 4-CNPy complexes of (OEC)Fe(III). The pyrrole-8,17 and pyrroline-H of all [TPCFe(L)2]+ show large magnitude chemical shifts (hence indicating large spin density on the adjacent carbons that are part of the pi system), while pyrrole-12,13-CH2 and -7,18-CH2 protons show much smaller chemical shifts, as predicted by the spin densities obtained from ADF calculations. The magnitude of the chemical shifts decreases with decreasing donor ability of the substituted pyridine ligands, with the nonhindered imidazole ligand having slightly larger magnitude chemical shifts than the most basic pyridine, even though its basicity is significantly lower (4-Me2NPyH+ pKa = 9.7, H2Im+ pKa = 6.65 (adjusted for the statistical factor of 2 protons)). The temperature dependence of the chemical shifts of all but the 4-Me2NPy bisligand complexes studied over the temperature range of the NMR investigations shows that they have mixed (dxy)2(dxz,dyz)3/(dxzdyz)4(dxy)1 electron configurations that cannot be resolved by temperature-dependent fitting of the proton chemical shifts, with an S = 3/2 excited state in each case that in most cases lies at more than kT at room temperature above the ground state. The observed pattern of chemical shifts of the 4-CNPy complex and analysis of the temperature dependence indicate that it has a pure (dxzdyz)4(dxy)1 ground state and that it is ruffled, because ruffling mixes the a(2u)(pi)-like orbital of the chlorin into the singly occupied molecular orbital (SOMO). This mixing accounts for the negative chemical shift of the pyrroline-H (-6.5 ppm at -40 degrees C) and thus the negative spin density at the pyrroline-alpha-carbons, but the mixing is not to the same extent as observed for [(TPC)Fe(t-BuNC)2]+, whose pyrroline-H chemical shift is -36 ppm at 25 degrees C (Simonneaux, G.; Kobeissi, M. J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans. 2001, 1587-1592). Peak assignments for high-spin (TPC)FeCl have been made by saturation transfer techniques that depend on chemical exchange between this complex and its bis-4-Me2NPy adduct.
A series of bis-axially ligated complexes of iron(III) tetramesitylporphyrin, TMPFe(III), tetra-(2,6-dibromophenyl)porphyrin, (2,6-Br2)4TPPFe(III), tetra-(2,6-dichlorophenyl)porphyrin, (2,6-Cl2)4TPPFe(III), tetra-(2,6-difluorophenyl)porphyrin, (2,6-F2)4TPPFe(III), and tetra-(2,6-dimethoxyphenyl)porphyrin, (2,6-(OMe)2)4TPPFe(III), where the axial ligands are 1-methylimidazole, 2-methylimidazole, and a series of nine substituted pyridines ranging in basicity from 4-(dimethylamino)pyridine (pK(a)(PyH(+)) = 9.70) to 3- and 4-cyanopyridine (pKa(PyH+) = 1.45 and 1.1, respectively), have been prepared and characterized by EPR and 1H NMR spectroscopy. The EPR spectra, recorded at 4.2 K, show "large g(max)", rhombic, or axial signals, depending on the iron porphyrinate and axial ligand, with the g(max) value decreasing as the basicity of the pyridine decreases, thus indicating a change in electron configuration from (d(xy))2(d(xz),d(yz)3 to (d(xz),d(yz))4(d(xy))1 through each series at this low temperature. Over the temperature range of the NMR investigations (183-313 K), most of the high-basicity pyridine complexes of all five iron(III) porphyrinates exhibit simple Curie temperature dependence of their pyrrole-H paramagnetic shifts and beta-pyrrole spin densities, rho(C) approximately 0.015-0.017, that are indicative of the S = 1/2 (d(xy))(2)(d(xz),d(yz))(3) electron configuration, while the temperature dependences of the pyrrole-H resonances of the lower-basicity pyridine complexes (pK(a)(PyH(+)) < 6.00) show significant deviations from simple Curie behavior which could be fit to an expanded version of the Curie law using a temperature-dependent fitting program developed in this laboratory that includes consideration of a thermally accessible excited state. In most cases, the ground state of the lower-basicity pyridine complexes is an S = 1/2 state with a mixed (d(xy))2(d(xz),d(yz))3/(d(xz),d(yz))4(d(xy))1 electron configuration, indicating that these two are so close in energy that they cannot be separated by analysis of the NMR shifts; however, for the TMPFe(III) complexes with 3- and 4-CNPy, the ground states were found to be fairly pure (d(xz),d(yz))4(d(xy))1 electron configurations. In all but one case of the intermediate- to low-basicity pyridine complexes of the five iron(III) porphyrinates, the excited state is found to be S = 3/2, with a (d(xz),d(yz))3(d(xy))1(d(z)2)1 electron configuration, lying some 120-680 cm(-1) higher in energy, depending on the particular porphyrinate and axial ligand. Full analysis of the paramagnetic shifts to allow separation of the contact and pseudocontact contributions could be achieved only for the [TMPFe(L)2]+ series of complexes.
An undecasubstituted chloroiron corrolate, octamethyltriphenylcorrolatoiron chloride, (OMTPCorr)FeCl, has been synthesized and studied by X-ray crystallography and (1)H and (13)C NMR spectroscopy. It is found that, although the structure is slightly saddled, the average methyl out-of-plane distance is only 0.63 Angstroms, while it is much greater for the dodecasubstituted porphyrinate analogue (OMTPP)FeCl (1.19 Angstroms) (Cheng, R.-J.; Chen, P.-Y.; Gau, P.-R.; Chen, C.-C.; Peng, S.-M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 2563-2569). In addition, the distance of iron from the mean plane of the four macrocycle nitrogens is also smaller for (OMTPCorr)FeCl (0.387 Angstroms) than for (OMTPP)FeCl (0.46 Angstroms). The (1)H and (13)C NMR spectra of (OMTPCorr)FeCl, as well as the chloroiron complexes of triphenylcorrolate, (TPCorr)FeCl; 7,13-dimethyl-2,3,8,12,17,18-hexaethylcorrolate, (DMHECorr)FeCl; 7,8,12,13-tetramethyl-2,3,17,18-tetraethylcorrolate, (TMTECorr)FeCl; and the phenyliron complex of 7,13-dimethyl-2,3,8,12,17,18-hexaethylcorrolate, (DMHECorr)FePh, have been assigned, and the spin densities at the carbons that are part of the aromatic ring of the corrole macrocycle have been divided into the part due to spin delocalization by corrole --> Fe pi donation and the part due to the unpaired electron present on the corrole ring. It is found that although the spin density at the beta-pyrrole positions is fairly similar to that of (TPCorr)FeCl, the meso-phenyl-carbon shift differences delta(m) - delta(p) are opposite in sign of those of (TPCorr)FeCl. This finding suggests that the radical electron is ferromagnetically coupled to the unpaired electrons on iron, rather than antiferromagnetically coupled, as in all of the other chloroiron corrolates. The solution magnetic moment was measured for (OMTPCorr)FeCl and found to be mu(eff) = 4.7 +/- 0.5 micro(B), consistent with S = 2 and ferromagnetic coupling. From this study, two conclusions may be reached about iron corrolates: (1) the spin states of chloroiron corrolates are extremely sensitive to the out-of-plane distance of iron, and (2) pyrrole-H or -C shifts are not useful in delineating the spin state and electron configuration of (anion)iron corrolates.
The NMR and EPR spectra of a series of pyridine complexes [(OEC)Fe(L)2]+ (L = 4-Me2NPy, Py, and 4-CNPy) have been investigated. The EPR spectra at 4.2 K suggest that, with a decrease of the donor strength of the axial ligands, the complexes change their ground state from (d(xy))2 (d(xz)d(yz))3 to (d(xz)d(yz))4 (d(xy))1. The NMR data from 303 to 183 K show that at any temperature within this range the chemical shifts of pyrrole-8,17-CH2 protons increase with a decrease in the donor strength of the axial ligands. The full peak assignments of the [(OEC)Fe(L)2]+ complexes of this study have been made from COSY and NOE difference experiments. The pyrrole-8,17-CH2 and pyrroline protons show large chemical shifts (hence indicating large pi spin density on the adjacent carbons which are part of the pi system), while pyrrole-12,13-CH2 and -7,18-CH2 protons show much smaller chemical shifts, as predicted by the spin densities obtained from molecular orbital calculations, both Hückel and DFT; the DFT calculations additionally show close energy spacing of the highest five filled orbitals (of the Fe(II) complex) and strong mixing of metal and chlorin character in these orbitals that is sensitive to the donor strength of the axial substituents. The pattern of chemical shifts of the pyrrole-CH2 protons of [(OEC)Fe(t-BuNC)2]+ looks somewhat like that of [(OEC)Fe(4-Me2NPy)2]+, while the chemical shifts of the meso-protons are qualitatively similar to those of [(OEP)Fe(t-BuNC)2]+. The temperature dependence of the chemical shifts of [(OEC)Fe(t-BuNC)2]+ shows that it has a mixed (d(xz)d(yz))4 (d(xy))1 and (d(xy))2 (d(xz),d(yz))3 electron configuration that cannot be resolved by temperature-dependent fitting of the proton chemical shifts, with a S = 5/2 excited state that lies somewhat more than 2kT at room temperature above the ground state; the observed pattern of chemical shifts is the approximate average of those expected for the two S = 1/2 electronic configurations, which involve the a-symmetry SOMO of a planar chlorin ring with the unpaired electron predominantly in the d(yz) orbital and the b-symmetry SOMO of a ruffled chlorin ring with the unpaired electron predominantly in the d(xy) orbital. A rapid interconversion between the two, with calculated vibrational frequency of 22 cm(-1), explains the observed pattern of chemical shifts, while a favoring of the ruffled conformation explains the negative chemical shift (and thus the negative spin density at the alpha-pyrroline ring carbons), of the pyrroline-H of [TPCFe(t-BuNC)2]CF3SO3 (Simonneaux, G.; Kobeissi, M. J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans. 2001, 1587-1592). Peak assignments for high-spin (OEC)FeCl have been made by saturation transfer techniques that depend on chemical exchange between this complex and its bis-4-Me2NPy adduct. The contact shifts of the pyrrole-CH2 and meso protons of the high-spin complex depend on both sigma and pi spin delocalization due to contributions from three of the occupied frontier orbitals of the chlorin ring.
(Monooxooctaethylchlorinato)iron(III) chloride, (oxo-OEC)FeCl, 1, has been investigated by X-ray crystallography and by 1H NMR spectroscopy. Its bis(imidazole-d4) complex has been studied by multidimensional 1H NMR and EPR spectroscopies, and the results are compared to those for the bis(Im-d4) complex of (octaethylchlorinato)iron(III) chloride, (OEC)FeCl, 2. EPR and NMR results show that both [(oxo-OEC)Fe(Im-d4)2]Cl and [(OEC)Fe(Im-d4)2]Cl are low-spin Fe(III) complexes with (d(xy))2 (d(xz),d(yz))3 electronic ground states, both at 4.2 K (EPR spectra) and at ambient temperatures utilized for solution NMR studies. The pattern of chemical shifts of the pyrrole-CH2 and meso protons are similar, with the 8,17-carbons having the largest and the 12,13-carbons having the smallest spin densities in each case, except that [(OEC)Fe(Im-d4)2]Cl has a slightly wider range of pyrrole-CH2 chemical shifts and more resonances are observed for [(oxo-OEC)Fe(Im-d4)2]Cl due to its lower symmetry. Full proton resonance assignments for both complexes have been made from COSY, NOESY, and NOE difference experiments.
The EPR and magnetic Mössbauer spectra of a series of axial ligand complexes of tetrakis(2,6-dimethoxyphenyl)porphyrinatoiron(III), [(2,6-(OMe)2)4TPPFeL2]+, where L=N-methylimidazole, 2-methylimidazole, or 4-(dimethylamino)pyridine, of one axial ligand complex of tetraphenylporphyrin, the bis(4-cyanopyridine) complex [TPPFe(4-CNPy)2]+, and of one axial ligand complex of tetraphenylchlorin, [TPCFe(ImH)2]+, where ImH=imidazole, have been investigated and compared to those of low-spin Fe(III) porphyrinates and ferriheme proteins reported in the literature. On the basis of this and previous complementary spectroscopic investigations, three types of complexes have been identified: those having (d xy )2(d xz ,d yz )3electronic ground states with axial ligands aligned in perpendicular planes (Type I), those having (d xy )2(d xz ,d yz )3electronic ground states with axial ligands aligned in parallel planes (Type II), and those having the novel (d xz ,d yz )4(d xy )1electronic ground state (Type III). A subset of the latter type, with planar axial ligands aligned parallel to each other or strong macrocycle asymmetry that yield rhombic EPR spectra, cannot be created using the porphyrinate ligand. Type I centers are characterized by "largegmax" EPR spectra with g>3.2 and well-resolved, widely spread magnetic Mössbauer spectra having A zz /gNμN>680 kG, with A xx negative in sign but much smaller in magnitude thanA zz , while Type II centers have well-resolved rhombic EPR spectra with g zz =2.4–3.1 and also less-resolved magnetic Mössbauer spectra, and usually have A zz /gNμNin the range of 440–660 kG (but in certain cases as small as 180 kG) andA xx again negative in sign but only somewhat smaller (but occasionally larger in magnitude) than A zz , and Type III centers have axial EPR spectra withg┴≈2.6 or smaller and g║<1.0–1.95, but often not resolved, and less-resolved magnetic Mössbauer spectra havingA zz /gNμNin the range of 270–400 kG, andA xx again negative in sign but much smaller in magnitude thanA zz . An exception to this rule is [TPPFe(4-CNPy)2]+, which hasA xx /gNμN=−565 kG, A yy /gNμN=629 kG, and A zz /gNμN=4 kG. A subset of Type II complexes (Type II′) have rhombicities (V/Δ) much greater than 0.67 and A zz /gNμNranging from 320 to 170 kG, withA xx also negative but with the magnitude ofA xx significantly larger than that ofA zz . These classifications are also observed for a variety of ferriheme proteins, and they lead to linear correlations betweenA zz and eitherA xx ,g zz , or V/Δ for Types I and II (but not for A zz versus V/Δ for Type II′). Not enough data are yet available on Type III complexes to determine what, if any, correlations may be observed.
In an attempt to determine the electron configuration of (anion)iron corrolates, i.e., whether they are S = 1 Fe(IV)-corrolate(3-) or S = 3/2 Fe(III)-corrolate(2-*), with antiferromagnetic coupling between the iron and macrocycle electrons to yield overall S = 1, two axial ligand complexes of an iron octaalkylcorrolate have been studied by temperature-dependent magnetic susceptibility, magnetic Mössbauer, and 1H NMR spectroscopy, and the results have been compared to those determined on the basis of spin-unrestricted DFT calculations. Magnetic susceptibility measurements indicate the presence of a noninnocent macrocycle (corrolate (2-*)) for the chloroiron corrolate, with strong antiferromagnetic coupling to the S = 3/2 Fe(III) center, while those for the phenyliron corrolate are not conclusive as to the electron configuration. Temperature- and field-dependent Mössbauer spectroscopic investigations of these two complexes yielded spectra that could be simulated with either electron configuration, except that the isomer shift of the phenyl-iron complex is -0.10 mm/s while that of the chloroiron complex is +0.21 mm/s, suggesting that the iron in the former is Fe(IV) while in the latter it is Fe(III). 1H NMR spectroscopic studies of both axial ligand complexes show large negative spin density at the meso carbons, with those of the chloroiron complex (Cai, S.; Walker, F. A.; Licoccia, S. Inorg. Chem. 2000, 39, 3466) being roughly four times larger than those of the phenyliron complex. The temperature dependence of the proton chemical shifts of the phenyliron complex is strictly linear. DFT calculations are consistent with the chloroiron complex being formulated as S1 = 3/2 Fe(III)-corrolate (2-*) S2 = 1/2, with negative spin density at all nitrogens and meso carbons, and a net spin density of -0.79 on the corrolate ring and positive spin density (+0.17) on the chloride ion and +2.58 on the iron. In contrast, the phenyliron complex is best formulated as S = 1 Fe(IV)-corrolate (3-), but again with negative spin density at all nitrogens and meso carbons of the macrocycle, yet with the net spin density on the corrolate ring being virtually zero; the phenyl carbanion carbon has relatively large negative spin density of -0.15 and the iron +2.05. On the basis of all of the results, we conclude that in both the chloroiron and phenyliron complexes the corrolate ring is noninnocent, in the chloroiron complex to a much larger extent than in the phenyliron complex.
Four chloroiron meso-triphenyl-substituted corrolates have been synthesized and studied by 1H NMR spectroscopy. As in the case of the β-pyrrole-octaalkylcorrolatoiron chloride complexes studied previously [Inorg. Chem. 39 (2000) 3466], these complexes were also found to be S=3/2 Fe(III) corrolate(2−) π-cation radical species, where the macrocycle radical electron is antiferromagnetically coupled to the metal electrons to give an overall S=1 complex. This conclusion is based upon the large alternating-sign contact shifts observed for the meso-phenyl protons. The 1H isotropic shifts of the pyrrole-H of these chloroiron–triphenylcorrolate complexes are similar to those of the chloroiron tri-(pentafluorophenyl)corrolate complex reported previously and said to be a S=1 Fe(IV) complex bound to a simple corrolate(3−) ligand [Inorg. Chem. 39 (2000) 2704]. The 19F NMR spectrum of the latter complex shows that it has small (negative) phenyl-F isotropic shifts for all phenyl-F, which might suggest that this single compound has a different electronic structure than all other chloroiron corrolates investigated thus far. However, there have as yet been very few NMR investigations of paramagnetic metal macrocycles having fluorine substituents, and thus it is premature to conclude that the small phenyl-F isotropic shifts are definitive proof of small spin density at the meso positions of the corrolate ring. It is concluded that pyrrole-H chemical shifts alone cannot differentiate the two possible electron configurations, simple S=1 Fe(IV) (Corr3−) and antiferromagnetically coupled S=3/2 Fe(III) (Corr2−), and that based on the 1H investigations reported in this and two previous papers, all chloroiron corrolates reported thus far, with the exception of one, have the electron configuration S=3/2 Fe(III) (Corr2−), in which the corrolate unpaired electron is antiferromagnetically coupled to the three metal electrons, yielding an overall spin for the complex, S=1. The electron configuration of the one exception, the strongly electron-withdrawing tri-(pentafluorophenyl)corrolate complex of iron chloride, cannot as yet be definitively assigned.
Complex formation of (7,13-dimethyl-2,3,8,12,17,18-hexaethylcorrolato)iron chloride, [(7,13-Me(2)Et(6)C)FeCl], with cyanide ion in dimethylformamide, DMF-d(7), was studied by (1)H NMR spectroscopy. It is found that a bis-cyanide complex is formed initially, in which the electron configuration is a low-spin Fe(III) corrolate(2-*). This complex is not stable, and it is readily reduced with an excess of cyanide in the solution. The reduction occurs at the corrole ring instead of on the iron center giving the monocyanide complex of the low-spin Fe(III) corrole, [(7,13-Me(2)Et(6)C)FeCN](-). Thus, this is a case where an axial ligand serves as a reducing agent of the macrocycle and not of the metal.
The perchloratoiron(III) complexes of a series of 2,6-disubstituted tetraphenylporphyrin ligands, where the 2,6-phenyl substituents were -H, -F, -Cl, -Br, or -OMe, as well as two 2,4,6-phenyl-substituted complexes, where the substituents were -Me and -OMe, have been investigated as a function of temperature by 1H NMR spectroscopy. Curvature in the 1/T dependence was evident in most cases. Forced linear extrapolation of the temperature dependence observed over the range of the study yielded Curie plots that include negative slopes with very large positive 1/T intercepts (Cl approximately Br > Me > H) to negative slope with near zero intercept (tri-OMe) to positive slope with very large negative intercept (F, di-OMe). The NMR results were combined with EPR spectroscopic data and curve-fitting procedures based on an expanded Curie law to arrive at a consistent overview of the variety of temperature-dependence behaviors observed. This overview relies upon the premise that, in addition to the ground state observed by EPR spectroscopy, one (or more) thermally accessible excited state(s) are populated to varying degrees over the temperature range of the NMR measurements. If only one excited state is considered, the analysis is consistent with the ground state being a largely intermediate-spin state (S = 3/2) for the majority of the complexes but a largely high-spin state (S = 5/2) for ((2,6-F2)4TPP)FeOClO3 and ((2,6-(OMe)2)4TPP)FeOClO3.
The chloroiron corrolates of 2,3,7,8,12,13,17,18-octamethyl- and 7,13-dimethyl-2,3,8,12,17,18-hexaethylcorrole ([(Me8C)FeCl] and [(7,13-Me2Et6C)FeCl], respectively) and their bisimidazole complexes have been investigated by NMR spectroscopy as a function of temperature, and by EPR spectroscopy at 4.2 K. Magnetic susceptibilities were measured by the modified Evans method. It is found that the electron configuration of the chloroiron corrolates is that of a S = 3/2 Fe(III) center coupled to a corrolate pi radical, where one electron has been removed from the pi system of the corrolate. This pi radical is antiferromagnetically coupled to the unpaired electrons of the iron to yield an overall S = 1 complex, as evidenced by the very large positive shifts of the meso-H resonances (183 and 172 ppm). That this antiferromagnetic coupling is very strong is supported by the near-Curie behavior of the 1H chemical shifts. For the chloroiron corrolates in the presence of imidazole, imidazole-d4, and N-methylimidazole at temperatures of -50 degrees C and below, the mono- and bisligand complexes are formed. The NMR spectra can be assigned on the basis of chemical exchange between the chloroiron(III) parent complex and the bisligand complex at -30 degrees C, and between the bisligand complex and the monoligand complex at -50 degrees C. The bisimidazole complexes show pyrrole CH2 and CH3 resonances characteristic of low-spin Fe(III) centers (S = 1/2), but with strongly upfield-shifted meso-H resonances (delta values of -95 and -82.5 ppm for the octamethyl complex and -188 and -161 ppm for the dimethylhexaethyl complex at 203 K) characteristic of the presence of a macrocycle-centered unpaired electron. The magnetic moments of these bisligand complexes are somewhat lower than expected for overall S = 1 systems, and decrease as the temperature is lowered. The lower apparent magnetic moments (2.0-1.8 mu B between -50 and -90 degrees C) are believed to be caused by a combination of weak or no magnetic coupling between the metal and macrocycle electrons and decreasing solubility of the complex as the temperature is lowered. The non-Curie behavior of the 1H chemical shifts observed in the low-temperature (-50 to -90 degrees C) NMR spectra likely arises from a combination of the effects of weak antiferromagnetic coupling of metal and macrocycle spins, a low-lying electronic excited state, and ligand binding/loss equilibria at the highest temperatures studied (-50 degrees C).