In mouse the cannabinoid receptor 2 (CB2) agonists L768242 and (+)-AM1241, at doses of 30 mg/kg i.p. and 1 and 3 mg/kg i.v., respectively, reduced the second phase of nocifensive behaviors elicited by formalin intraplantar injection. This effect was counteracted by the selective CB2 antagonist SR144528 (1 mg/kg i.p.). In rat (+)-AM1241 (3 and 6 mg/kg i.v.) and L768242 (30 mg/kg i.p.) reduced allodynia elicited by L5-L6 spinal nerve ligation. SR144528 reverted these effects, supporting a CB2-mediated action. To clarify the mechanisms underlying these effects we investigated CB2 gene expression and function in the nervous system. CB2 mRNA was expressed in spinal cord and dorsal root ganglia (DRG) of both sham and neuropathic rats and was up-regulated in the ipsilateral spinal cord of neuropathic rats. Expression studies demonstrated the presence of CB2 mRNA in culture of spinal cord microglia. A biomarker, CGRP, was used to investigate modulation of DRG primary afferents by CB2 agonists. Both L768242 and (+)-AM1241 dose dependently (EC50 of 3.6 and 4.5 nM, respectively) reduced capsaicin-induced calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) release. Coadministration of SR144528 resulted in a rightforward shift (pKB 8.1 and 8.2 for (+)-AM1241 and L768242, respectively) of the dose-response curve. Experiments on capsaicin-induced CGRP release in tissue from CB1-/- mice ruled out a CB1-mediated effect. These results confirm that CB2 is present in the central nervous system and suggest that CB2 agonists may elicit their analgesic effect by acting not only at non-neuronal peripheral sites but also at neural level, making CB2 an attractive target for chronic pain treatment.

A number of studies suggest melanocortin (MC) system involvement in nociceptive modulation. Although the mechanism through which this occurs is still unknown, experimental evidence would suggest a primary role of MC4 receptors. To further investigate the implication of this MC receptor subtype in chronic pain, we have studied the effects of several MC antagonists on spinal nerve ligation-induced nociceptive behavior in rats. The intrathecal injection of synthetic antagonists with different selectivity to MC4 receptor and of an endogenous antagonist (Agouti related protein; AgRP) reduced mechanical allodynia in neuropathic rats, as measured by von Frey hair test. Treatments produced an anti-allodynic effect at the dose of 1.5 nmol (25–30% maximum possible effect, MPE, P < 0.05). To further investigate the possible physiological role of AgRP in pain modulation we studied its expression in both sham and neuropathic rat spinal cord and dorsal root ganglia (DRG) by quantitative real time PCR and immunohistochemistry. AgRP was present in both spinal cord and DRG, and its expression, was unchanged in neuropathic animals. In conclusion MC4 receptor antagonists with different selectivity profile, induce anti-allodynic effects in one of the most relevant neuropathic pain model. In addition the expression of AgRP in spinal cord and DRG suggests an endogenous tonic inhibitory control on MC system activity. In pathological conditions this steady control could be insufficient to cope with an over activated MC system leading to increase in nociception. These data suggest that targeting MC4 with synthetic antagonists could restore the balance and hence reduce nociception.

The melanocortin (MC) system is involved in several biological functions. Its possible role in nociception has recently attracted attention in the field. Published data suggest that melanocortin antagonists are analgesic and agonists are hyperalgesic. Gene expression information about the MC system components (receptor, agonist and antagonist) in pain relevant areas is at present limited. To deepen our knowledge, we studied the expression of MC system components in nai;ve, sham and neuropathic rat spinal cord and dorsal root ganglia (DRG) by PCR and quantitative real-time PCR. MC4 receptor, proopiomelanocortin (POMC) and agouti-related protein (AgRP) transcripts were detected in both spinal cord and DRG, whereas MC3 receptor was detected only in the spinal cord. To study the relationship between the MC system and chronic pain, we used the chronic constriction injury model and gene expression analysis was performed in rats showing both tactile allodynia and thermal hyperalgesia. MC4 and POMC transcript were upregulated in the spinal cord of neuropathic rats, whereas MC3 and AgRP expression were unaffected. Thus, this study demonstrates for the first time the presence of AgRP in the spinal cord and DRG, suggesting that it could play a role in the regulation of MC system activity. In addition, the upregulation of POMC and MC4, in parallel with the presence of tactile allodynia and thermal hyperalgesia, further supports the idea of MC system involvement in nociception.

To investigate the role of A(2A) adenosine receptors in adaptive responses to chronic intermittent dopamine receptor stimulation, we compared the behavioral sensitization elicited by repeated l-DOPA treatment in hemiparkinsonian wild-type (WT) and A(2A) adenosine receptor knock-out (A(2A) KO) mice. Although the unilateral nigrostriatal lesion produced by intrastriatal injection of 6-hydroxydopamine was indistinguishable between WT and A(2A) KO mice, they developed strikingly different patterns of behavioral sensitization after daily treatment with low doses of l-DOPA for 3 weeks. WT mice initially displayed modest contralateral rotational responses and then developed progressively greater responses that reached a maximum within 1 week and persisted for the duration of the treatment. In contrast, any rotational behavioral sensitization in A(2A) KO mice was transient and completely reversed within 2 weeks. Similarly, the time to reach the peak rotation was progressively shortened in WT mice but remained unchanged in A(2A) KO mice. Furthermore, daily l-DOPA treatment produced gradually sensitized grooming in WT mice but failed to induce any sensitized grooming in A(2A) KO mice. Finally, repeated l-DOPA treatment reversed the 6-OHDA-induced reduction of striatal dynorphin mRNA in WT but not A(2A) KO mice, raising the possibility that the A(2A) receptor may contribute to l-DOPA-induced behavioral sensitization by facilitating adaptations within the dynorphin-expressing striatonigral pathway. Together these results demonstrate that the A(2A) receptor plays a critical role in the development and particularly the persistence of behavioral sensitization to repeated l-DOPA treatment. Furthermore, they raise the possibility that the maladaptive dyskinetic responses to chronic l-DOPA treatment in Parkinson's disease may be attenuated by A(2A) receptor inactivation.

Of the four known adenosine receptors, the A(2A) receptor has received much attention over the last few years. The discovery of high-affinity and selective A(2A) adenosine receptor antagonists, together with the development of different genetic lines of mice lacking A(2A) receptors, have greatly contributed to the new insights into the mechanisms whereby A(2A) receptors modulate central nervous system functions. Efforts made using the prototypic A(2A) receptor antagonists, e.g., the 8-styrylxanthine KW 6002 and the pyrazolotriazolopyrimidine SCH 58261, have shown that these drugs are effective in different models of motor impairment mimicking the main features of Parkinson's disease. Moreover, these drugs show neuroprotective properties in models of brain injury. Consistent with pharmacology, A(2A) receptor knockout mice have been found to be less sensitive to both motor impairment and neurochemical changes relevant to neurodegenerative disorders. The main effect of A(2A) receptor blockade or inactivation is related to selective interaction with dopamine-mediated function in the striatum. However, there are responses which appear to be independent of dopamine receptors while the mechanisms underlying neuroprotection remain to be elucidated. Overall, there are now compounds that appear to be promising for treatment of Parkinson's disease and related neurodegenerative disorders. The efforts currently ongoing to understand their efficacy in patients will make it possible to assess whether A(2A) receptor blockers are a new interesting class of antiparkinsonian agents. Drug Dev. Res. 52:379-386, 2001. (C) 2001 Wiley-Liss, Inc.