OBJECTIVE. The optimal surgical approach for thymoma resection is still an object of debate. The increasing experience in robotic-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) has led to the progressive affirmation of this technique as a valid alternative to Sternotomy, Thoracotomy and Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery (VATS) in this setting. The present study aims to compare the post-operative and short-term results of RATS Thymectomy for thymoma with those of other main surgical approaches (sternotomy, thoracotomy and VATS) from a high-volume single center. METHODS. Between May 2021 and September 2023, 40 consecutive patients underwent RATS Thymectomy for stage I to limited-stage III thymoma in our center. Three homogenous groups of patients who received thymoma resection through main alternative approaches (sternotomy, thoracotomy, VATS) over the last 5 years, were identified in order to perform a comparative analysis. Data including surgery duration, associated resections, conversion rate, overall morbidity, tumor size, radicality of resection, post-operative pain, length of hospital stay and cosmetic results were retrospectively collected and compared between the RATS and each control group. RESULTS. Mean tumor size was higher in the sternotomy group, but not significantly. The mean operative time of RATS interventions was significantly lower than that of sternotomy and VATS. It was significantly shorter compared to thoracotomy if excluding docking-undocking time. A higher rate of associated adjacent structures resection was reported in the sternotomy group (p = 0.005). Conversion rate was significantly higher in the VATS group (p = 0.026) compared to RATS. Post-operative pain at 24 and 48 h was significantly lower in the RATS group compared to the others. Improved cosmetics results were reported after RATS compared to sternotomy (p = 0.0001) and thoracotomy (p = 0.001) groups, with a trend towards better results compared to VATS (p = 0.05). Length of hospital stay was shorter in the RATS group with a significant difference vs. the sternotomy group (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS. These results from a single center confirm the safety and efficacy of RATS for the treatment of limited stage thymoma. An advantage in terms of operative outcomes, post-operative pain, cosmetic results and hospital stay was observed if compared to the alternative approaches. The short-term oncologic outcome was excellent based on the high complete resection rate of the tumor.

Objective: Prolonged air leak due to residual air space after lung resection is a main challenge. To date, few surgical options have been described to prevent this complication. The aim of this study is to investigate the safety and the efficacy of intraoperative phrenic nerve infiltration with long-acting anesthetics in producing transient hemidiaphragm paralysis in patients at high risk for prolonged air leak, thus improving pulmonary expansion after surgery and reducing air leaks, while controlling postoperative pain. Methods: Between January 2021 and 2023, 65 consecutive patients at risk for prolonged air leak (defined in accordance with "2019 Society of Thoracic Surgery score criteria of prolonged air leak") who underwent lung resection (lobectomy or anatomic segmentectomy) for malignancy were prospectively included in the study. They were randomly (1:2 ratio) assigned to receive (group A, 22 patients) intraoperative phrenic nerve infiltration with ropivacaine 10 mg/mL in the peri-neurotic fat on the pericardium or not to receive intraoperative phrenic nerve infiltration (group B, 43 patients). Five patients in group B were excluded because they did not undergo anatomic resection. Data on pulmonary reexpansion, prolonged air leaks, pain at 24 and 72 hours postsurgery, referred shoulder pain, length of hospital stay, and length of chest tube permanence were collected and compared. Results: Hemidiaphragm elevation (P =.006) and pulmonary expansion (P = .000) were significantly higher in group A. Patients in group A showed lower pain at 24 and 72 hours compared with group B (P = .004). Shoulder pain (0.001) and prolonged air leak (0.000) were higher in group B. Length of chest tube was longer in group B. No difference in hospital stay length was observed. Conclusions: This is the first study to investigate 2 combined effects of phrenic nerve anesthetic infiltration (hemidiaphragm elevation and pain control), with potential enhancement of a patient's recovery after surgery. Intraoperative phrenic nerve infiltration in patients with a risk for prolonged air leak appears to be a safe and effective clinical practice to improve pulmonary expansion in this set of patients, reducing postoperative air leak. This result is associated with an additional improvement in pain control, especially for shoulder pain. (JTCVS Open 2025;23:349-57)

ObjectiveThe large number of COVID-19 patients subjected to prolonged invasive mechanical ventilation has been expected to result in a significant increase of tracheal stenosis in the next years. The aim of the study was to evaluate and compare postoperative outcomes of survived COVID-19 critical illness patients who underwent tracheal resection for post-intubation/post-tracheostomy tracheal stenosis with those of non-COVID patients.MethodsIt is single-center retrospective study. All consecutive patients affected by post-intubation/post-tracheostomy tracheal stenosis who underwent tracheal resection from February 2020 to March 2022 were enrolled. A total of N=147 tracheal resections were performed: n=24 were Post-COVID patients and n=123 were Non-COVID patients. A 1:1 propensity score matching analysis was performed, considering age, gender, BMI (Body Mass Index), and length of stenosis. After matching, two groups of 24 patients each were identified: Post-COVID Group and Non-COVID Group.ResultsNo mortality after surgery was registered. Post-tracheostomy etiology of stenosis resulted more frequently in post-COVID patients (n=20 in Post-COVID Group vs n=11 in NON-COVID Group, p=0.03), as well as the ICU admission in the postoperative period (n=16 vs n=9 patients, p=0.04). Need for postoperative re-intubation for glottic edema and respiratory failure was higher in the Post-COVID Group (n=7 vs n=2 postoperative re-intubation procedures, p=0.04).Postoperative dysphonia was observed in n=11 (46%) patients of Post-COVID Group vs n=4 (16%) patients of NON-COVID Group (p=0.03).ConclusionsTracheal resection still continue to be safe and effective in COVID-19-related tracheal stenosis scenario. ICU admission rate and postoperative complications seem to be higher in post-COVID-19 patients who underwent tracheal resection compared to non-COVID-19 patients.

To evaluate efficacy and tolerance of short-course radiotherapy (SCRT) prior to possible chemotherapy (CHT) and surgery in 64 patients with locally advanced rectal cancer, in terms of acute and early late toxicity and survival outcomes with prognostic factors. Sixty-four patients affected by rectal tumor were treated from 2008 to 2023 radiation therapy, with a total dose of 25 Gy in 5 fractions. The Kaplan–Meier method was used to estimate the rates of overall survival (OS), cancer specific survival (CSS), local control (LC), disease free survival (DFS) and metastasis free survival (MFS). Univariate analysis for prognostic factors was performed with the log-rank test, and Cox proportional hazards regression was used to estimate hazard ratios. Toxicity assessment has been considered in acute and in early late for gastrointestinal (GI), genitourinary (GU) districts. Median follow-up was 49.6 months. The median OS was 65 months with 1-year, 2-year and 5-year OS at 90.6

Background: Early post-operative airway management after laryngo-tracheal surgery is crucial. Acute respiratory failure due to glottis’ edema may occur, requiring reintubation. This can prolong ventilatory assistance, jeopardizing anastomosis. To date, only judicious steroid administration and fluid management are available to avoid more invasive procedures. High-flow oxygen therapy (HFOT) is a noninvasive O2 support method providing humidification, warmed air, and Positive End-Expiratory Pressure (AIRVO2). No data about HFOT use to prevent early complications after laryngo-tracheal surgery are reported in the literature. Methods: Between September 2020 and September 2022, 107 consecutive patients who underwent laryngo-tracheal surgery received HFOT (Group A). Data and long-term results were compared with those of 80 patients operated between September 2018 and August 2020 (Group B), when HFOT was not available. All patients were operated in a single center. No pre- or post-operative settings changed, except for HFOT introduction. We analyzed and compared the risk for “delayed” reintubation (unexpected reintubation within the first 24–48 h after extubating/laryngeal mask removal) in the two groups. Results: No patients reported HFOT-related adverse events. The control group (B) presented “delayed” reintubation in 37% (p = 0.027), intensive care unit admission in 67% (p = 0.005) and longer hospital stay (p = 0.001) compared to the HFOT group (A). The minor complications’ rate was 3% in both group and overall mortality was 0%. Re-stenosis was described in 4.6% of the HFOT group, without a statistically significant difference (p = 0.7006). Conclusions: Our study is the first to investigate HFOT use in patients undergoing laryngo-tracheal surgery, potentially representing a consistent innovation in the peri-operative management of these patients. With the limitation of a retrospective series, we would suggest HFOT use for preventing post-operative reintubation rate, possibly reducing ICU admissions and hospital stays.

Objective Hemorrhage remains the most common cause of preventable death after trauma. Prehospital blood product (PHBP) administration may improve outcomes. No data are available about PHBP use in Italian helicopter emergency medical services (HEMS). The primary aim of this survey was to establish the degree of PHBP used throughout Italy. The secondary aims were to evaluate the main indications for their use, the opinions about PHBPs, and users' experience. Methods The study group performed a telephone/e-mail survey of all 56 Italian HEMS bases. The questions concerned whether PHBPs were used in their HEMS bases, the frequency of transfusions, the PHBP used, and the perceived benefits. Results Four of 56 HEMS bases use PHBPs. Overall, 7% have prehospital access to packed red cells and only 1 to fresh plasma. In addition to blood product administration, 4 of 4 use tranexamic acid, and 3 of 4 also use fibrinogen. Seventy-five percent use PHBPs once a month and 25% once a week. The users' experience was that PHBPs are beneficial and lifesaving. Conclusion Only 4 of 56 HEMS in Italy use PHBPs. There is an absolute consensus among providers on the benefit of PHBPs despite the lack of evidence on PHBP use.

Objectives. During coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic, preoperative screening before thoracic surgery is paramount in order to protect patients and staff from undetected infections. This study aimed to determine which preoperative COVID-19 screening tool was the most effective strategy before thoracic surgery. Methods. This retrospective cohort multicenter study was performed at 3 Italian thoracic surgery centers. All adult patients scheduled for thoracic surgery procedures from 4th March until 24th April, 2020, and submitted to COVID-19 preoperative screenings were included. The primary outcome was the yield of screening of the different strategies. Results. A total of 430 screenings were performed on 275 patients; 275 anamnestic questionnaires were administered. 77 patients were screened by an anamnestic questionnaire and reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). 78 patients were selected to combine screening with anamnestic questionnaire and chest computed tomography (CT). The positive yield of screening using a combination of anamnestic questionnaire and RT-PCR was 7.8% (95% CI: 2.6–14.3), while using a combination of anamnestic questionnaire and chest CT was 3.8% (95% CI: 0–9). Individual yields were 1.1% (95% CI: 0–2.5) for anamnestic questionnaire, 5.2% (95% CI: 1.3–11.7) for RT-PCR, and 3.8% (95% CI: 0–9). Conclusions. The association of anamnestic questionnaire and RT-PCR is able to detect around 8 positives in 100 asymptomatic patients. This combined strategy could be a valuable preoperative SARS-CoV-2 screening tool before thoracic surgery.

The WHO recently declared that COVID-19 no longer constitutes a public health emergency of international concern; however, lessons learned through the pandemic should not be left behind. Lung ultrasound was largely utilized as a diagnostic tool thanks to its feasibility, easy application, and the possibility to reduce the source of infection for health personnel. Lung ultrasound scores consist of grading systems used to guide diagnosis and medical decisions, owning a good prognostic value. In the emergency context of the pandemic, several lung ultrasound scores emerged either as new scores or as modifications of pre-existing ones. Our aim is to clarify the key aspects of lung ultrasound and lung ultrasound scores to standardize their clinical use in a non-pandemic context. The authors searched on PubMed for articles related to "COVID-19", "ultrasound", and "Score" until 5 May 2023; other keywords were "thoracic", "lung", "echography", and "diaphragm". A narrative summary of the results was made. Lung ultrasound scores are demonstrated to be an important tool for triage, prediction of severity, and aid in medical decisions. Ultimately, the existence of numerous scores leads to a lack of clarity, confusion, and an absence of standardization.

INTRODUCTION: The management of thoracic paravertebral block (TPVB) and erector spine plane block (ESPB) in patients treated with anticoagulant or antiplatelet therapy is based on limited clinical data, mostly from single case reports. Scientific societies and organizations do not provide strong detailed indications about the limitations of these regional anesthesia techniques in patients receiving antithrombotic therapy. This review summarizes evidence regarding TPVB and ESPB in patients under antithrombotic therapy.EVIDENCE ACQUSITION: A literature review from PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane, Google Scholar and Web of Science databases was conducted from 1999 to 2022 to identify articles concerning TPVB and ESPB for cardio-thoracic surgery or thoracic procedures in patients under anticoagulant or antiplatelet therapy.EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: A total of 1704 articles were identified from the initial search. After removing duplicates and not-pertinent articles, 15 articles were analyzed. The results demonstrated a low risk of bleeding for TPVB and minimal or absent risk for ESPB. Ultrasound guidance was extensively used to perform ESPB, but not for TPVB.CONCLUSIONS: Although the low level of evidence available, TPVB and ESPB are reasonably safe options in patients ineligible for epidural anesthesia due to antithrombotic therapy. The few published studies suggest that ESPB offers a risk profile safer than TPVB and the use of ultrasound guidance minimizes any complication. Since the literature available does not allow us to draw definitive conclusions, future adequately-powered trials are warranted to determine the indications and the safety of TPVB and ESPB in patients receiving anticoagulant or antiplatelet therapy.

The EZ-Blocker (EZB) is a "Y-shaped," semirigid endobronchial blocker used for lung isolation and one-lung ventilation during thoracic surgery. Like many medical tools, initial efforts to use this endobronchial blocker may prove challenging for the uninitiated. However, some tips and tricks can be applied fairly rapidly to aid the clinician in properly placing the device, and, furthermore, may help the clinician get the most out of this innovative device. This article focuses on some of the technical aspects of its placement that the authors have developed over time. Additionally, other facets and potential pitfalls are discussed that relate to intraprocedural issues that may sometimes arise when using this device. The following aspects of the EZB as a lung-isolation device are discussed: standard positioning techniques, alternative positioning techniques, use in pediatric patients, approaches to achieving exceptional lung isolation, advanced uses, and limitations and potential issues. Although some information was taken from the authors' rather extensive experience with using this endobronchial blocker, some of the relevant literature are also reviewed, with the goal of being to improve the reader's knowledge of the device and improve the likelihood of its successful placement. The underlying design of the EZB remains unique among commercially available bronchial blockers in improving positional stability. The Y-shaped conformation, however, can lead to challenges when positioning the device in some patients. Therefore, some very practical tips and tricks are provided to assist the clinician in correctly positioning the device and other hints to improve the quality of lung isolation and surgical conditions.

BACKGROUND:Congenital Pulmonary Malformations (CPMs) are rare benign lesions potentially causing infective complications and/or malignant transformation, requiring surgery even when asymptomatic. CPMs are rare in adulthood but potentially detected at any age. There is not a consensus on the correct extent of resection in both adults and paediatrics. This retrospective multicentric study aims to identify the appropriate surgical resection to prevent the recurrence of the related respiratory symptoms.METHODS:Between 2010 and 2020, a total of 96 patients (adults and pediatrics) underwent surgery for CPMs in 4 centers. A 2:1 propensity score matching (considering sex and lesion side) was performed, identifying 2 groups: 50 patients underwent lobectomy (group A) and 25 sub-lobar resections (group B). Clinical and histopathological characteristics, early and late complications, and symptom recurrence were retrospectively analyzed and compared between the two groups by univariate and multivariate analysis.RESULTS:Patients who underwent lobectomy had a statistically significant lower rate of recurrence (4% vs. 24% of group B, p = 0.014) and a lower rate of intraoperative complications (p = 0.014). Logistic regression identified sub-lobar resection (p = 0.040), intra- and post-operative complications (p = 0.105 and 0.022),and associated developed neoplasm (p = 0.062) as possible risk factors for symptom recurrence after surgery.CONCLUSIONS:Pulmonary lobectomy seems to be the most effective surgical treatment for CPMs, guaranteeing the stable remission of symptoms and a lower rate of intra- and postoperative complications. To our knowledge, this is one of the largest studies comparing lobectomy and sub-lobar resections in patients affected by CPMs, considering the low incidence worldwide.

Background Airway management for thoracic surgery represents a high risk setting for SARS-CoV-2 infection diffusion due to complex and invasive airway instrumentation and techniques. Results An 18-item questionnaire was submitted to the 56 members of the Thoracic subcommittee of the SIAARTI Cardio-Thoraco-Vascular Research Group to provide a snapshot of current situation and national variability of devices and procedures for airway management during the COVID-19 pandemic. The response rate was 64%. Eighty-three percent of anesthetists declared that they modified their airway management strategies. The Hospital Management considered necessary to provide a complete level 3 personal protective equipment for thoracic anesthetists only in 47% of cases. Double-lumen tube and bronchial blocker were preferred by 53% and 22% of responders to achieve one-lung ventilation respectively. Over 90% of responders considered the videolaryngoscope with separate screen and rapid sequence induction/intubation useful to minimize the infection risk. Thirty-nine percent of participants considered mandatory the bronchoscopic check of airway devices. Vivasight-DL was considered comfortable by more than 50% of responders while protective box and plastic drape were judged as uncomfortable by most of anesthetists. Conclusions The survey reveals many changes in the clinical practice due to SARS-CoV-2 outbreak. A certain diffusion of new devices such as the VivaSight-DL and barrier enclosure systems emerged too. Finally, we found that most of Italian hospitals did not recognize thoracic anesthesia as a high-risk specialty for risk of virus diffusion.

OBJECTIVE:Pectus excavatum (PE) repair is burdened by severe postoperative pain. This retrospective study aimed to determine whether the analgesic effect of ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block (ESPB) plus standard intravenous analgesia (SIVA) might be superior to SIVA alone in pain control after PE surgical repair via Ravitch or Nuss technique.DESIGN:A retrospective cohort study.SETTING:At a university hospital.PARTICIPANTS:All participants were scheduled for surgical repair of PE.INTERVENTIONS:From January 2017 to December 2019, all patients who received ESPB plus SIVA or SIVA alone were investigated retrospectively. A 2:1 propensity-score matching analysis considering preoperative variables was used to compare analgesia efficacy in 2 groups. All patients received a 24-hour continuous infusion of tramadol, 0.1 mg/kg/h, and ketorolac, 0.05 mg/kg/h, via elastomeric pump, and morphine, 2 mg, intravenously as a rescue drug. The ESPB group received preoperative bilateral ESPB block. Postoperative pain, reported using a numerical rating scale at 1, 12, 24, and 48 hours after surgery; the number of required rescue doses; total postoperative morphine milligram equivalents consumption; and the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomit were analyzed.MEASUREMENT AND MAIN RESULTS:A total of 105 patients were identified for analysis. Propensity-score matching resulted in 38 patients in the SIVA group and 19 patients in the ESPB group. Postoperative pain, the number of rescue doses, and postoperative nausea and vomit incidences were lower in the ESPB group (p < 0.005).CONCLUSIONS:Erector spinae plane block may be an effective option for pain management after surgical repair of PE as part of a multimodal approach. This study showed good perioperative analgesia, opioid sparing, and reduced opioid-related adverse effects.

BACKGROUND:Acute kidney injury (AKI) represents a frequent complication after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). This study aimed to evaluate early postoperative AKI incidence during the first 72 h after OLT, perioperative risk factors, and AKI impact on survival.METHODS:From January 2011 to December 2013, 1681 patients underwent OLT in 19 centers and were enrolled in this prospective cohort study.RESULTS:According to RIFLE criteria, AKI occurred in 367 patients, 21.8% (R: 5.8%, I: 6.4%, F: 4.8%, L: 4.8%). Based on multivariate analysis, intraoperative risk factors for AKI were: administration of 5-10 RBCs (OR 1.8, 95% CI 1.3-2.7), dopamine use (OR 1.6, 95% CI 1.2-2.3), post-reperfusion syndrome (OR 1.5, 95% CI 1.0-2.3), surgical complications (OR 2.0, 95% CI 1.3-3.0), and cardiological complications (OR 2.2, 95% CI 1.2-4.0). Postoperative risk factors were: norepinephrine (OR 1.4, 95% CI 1.0-2.0), furosemide (OR 4.2, 95% CI 3.0-5.9), more than 10 RBCs transfusion, (OR 3.7, 95% CI 1.4-10.5), platelets administration (OR 1.6, 95% CI 1.1-2.4), fibrinogen administration (OR 3.0, 95% CI, 1.5-6.2), hepatic complications (OR 4.6, 95% CI 2.9-7.5), neurological complications (OR 2.4, 95% CI 1.5-3.7), and infectious complications (OR 2.7, 95% CI 1.8-4.3). NO-AKI patients' 5-year survival rate was higher than AKI patients (68.06, 95% CI 62.7-72.7 and 81.2, 95% CI 78.9-83.3, P<0.001).CONCLUSIONS:AKI still remains an important risk factor for morbidity and mortality after OLT. Further research to develop new strategies aimed at preventing or minimizing post-OLT AKI is needed.

Pectus excavatum (PE), a congenital deformity of the chest wall, can lead to cardiac compression and related symptoms. PE surgical repair can improve cardiac function. Intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) has been successfully employed to assess intraoperative hemodynamic variations in patients undergoing PE repair. FloTrac/Vigileo™ system (Edwards Life-sciences Irvine, CA) (FT/V) is a minimally invasive cardiac output monitoring system. This retrospective study aimed to assess hemodynamic changes in surgical repair of PE using FT/V and concordance with parameters measured by TEE. N=19 patients submitted to PE repair via Ravitch or Nuss technique were enrolled. Intraoperative cardiac assessments simultaneously obtained via TEE and FT/V system were investigated. The agreement between TEE-derived cardiac output (CO-TEE) and FT/V system parameter (COAP) was evaluated. The relationship between COTEE and COAP was analyzed for all data using linear regression analysis. A significant correlation between COAP and COTEE values (R = 0.65, p < 0.001) was found. Bland-Altman analysis of COAP and COTEE showed a bias of 0.13 L/min and a limit of agreement of − 2.33 to 2.58 L/min, with a percentage error of 48%. Intraoperative measurements by TEE and FT/V both showed a significant increase in CO after surgical correction of PE (p < 0.005). FT/V system compared to TEE in hemodynamic monitoring during PE surgery yielded clinically unacceptable results due to a high percentage error. After surgical correction of PE, CO, measured by TEE and FT/V, significantly improved.

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has spread worldwide causing a global pandemic. In this context, lung ultrasound (LUS) has played an important role due to its high diagnostic sensitivity, low costs, simplicity of execution and radiation safeness. Despite computed tomography (CT) being the imaging gold standard, lung ultrasound point of care exam is essential in every situation where CT is not readily available nor applicable. The aim of our review is to highlight the considerable versatility of LUS in diagnosis, framing the therapeutic route and follow-up for SARS-CoV-2 interstitial syndrome.

Breast cancer surgery is usually managed using opioid-inclusive anesthesia (OIA), although opioids are associated with several adverse events, including nausea, vomiting, and constipation. Multimodal opioid-free anesthesia (OFA) has been introduced to reduce the incidence of these side effects. In this single-center retrospective study, we investigated whether ketamine, combined with magnesium and clonidine, could effectively control postoperative pain in patients undergoing quadrantectomy, while reducing postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV). A total of 89 patients submitted to quadrantectomy were included and divided into an OFA group (38 patients) and an OIA group (51 patients) according to the received anesthetic technique. Analgesia in the OIA group was based on an intraoperative infusion of remifentanil, and analgesia in the OFA consisted of an intraoperative infusion of ketamine and magnesium sulfate. Postoperative pain in both groups was managed with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and paracetamol. Postoperative pain, assessed with the numeric rating scale (NRS), requirements for additional analgesics, the incidence of PONV, and patient satisfaction evaluated using a QoR-40 questionnaire were compared between the two groups. Levels of pain at 30 min and 6, 12, and 24 h after surgery; number of paracetamol rescue doses; and the incidence of PONV were lower in the OFA group (p <0.05). Patient satisfaction was comparable in the two groups. A combination of ketamine, magnesium, and clonidine could be more effective than opioid-based analgesia in reducing postoperative pain and lowering PONV occurrence after quadrantectomy for breast cancer.

OBJECTIVES:The endotracheal tube (ETT) and the laryngeal mask airway (LMA) are possible strategies for airway management during tracheal resection and reconstruction for tracheal and laryngotracheal stenosis. The goal of the study was to analyse and compare outcomes in the LMA and ETT groups.METHODS:Between 2003 and 2020, a total of 184 patients affected by postintubation, post-tracheostomy and idiopathic stenosis who had tracheal or laryngotracheal resections and reconstructions via a cervicotomy were retrospectively enrolled in this single-centre study. In 29 patients, airway management was achieved through LMA during tracheal surgery, whereas in 155 patients, it was achieved through ETT. A case-control matching analysis was performed with a 1:1 ratio, according to age, gender, body mass index, aetiology and length of stenosis (1-4 cm), resulting in 22 patients managed through LMA (LMA group) matched with 22 patients managed through ETT (ETT group).RESULTS:No significant differences were found in the reintubation rate, 30-day mortality and postoperative length of stay. Operative time was shorter in patients with LMA (96.23 ± 34.72 min in the ETT group vs 76.14 ± 26.94 min in the LMA group; P = 0.043). Intensive care unit (ICU) admission rate and stay were lower in the LMA group [18 in the ETT group vs 8 in the LMA group, odds ratio = 10.17, confidence interval (CI) 95% 1.79-57.79; P = 0. 009; 22.77 ± 16.68 h in ETT group vs 9.23 ± 13.51 h in LMA group; P = 0.005]. Dysphonia was more frequent in the ETT group than in the LMA group (20 in the ETT group vs 11 in the LMA group, odds ratio = 13.79, CI 95% 1.86-102; P = 0.010).CONCLUSIONS:LMA is a feasible option for airway management in tracheal surgery, with lower operative time, ICU admission rate, ICU length of stay and postoperative dysphonia occurrence.