ABSTRACTBackgroundInterest in point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) and lung ultrasound (LUS) is growing in the nephrology and dialysis field, and the number of nephrologists skilled in what is proving to be the “5th pillar of bedside physical examination” is increasing. Patients on hemodialysis (HD) are at high risk of contracting severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-COV-2) and developing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) serious complications. Despite this, to our knowledge there are no studies to date that show the role of LUS in this setting, while there are many in the emergency room, where LUS proved to be an important tool, providing risk stratification and guiding management strategies and resource allocation. Therefore, it is not clear whether the usefulness and cut-offs of LUS highlighted in studies in the general population are reliable in dialysis, or whether variations, precautions and adjustments to this specific situation are necessary.MethodsThis was a 1-year monocentric prospective observational cohort study of 56 HD patients with COVID-19. Patients underwent a monitoring protocol that included at first evaluation bedside LUS, using a 12-scan scoring system, by the same nephrologist. All data were prospectively and systematically collected. Outcomes. hospitalization rate, combined outcome [non-invasive ventilation (NIV + death)], mortality. Descriptive variables are presented as medians (interquartile range), or percentage. Univariate and multivariate analysis, as well as Kaplan–Meier (K-M) survival curves, were carried out. P was fixed at .05.ResultsMedian age was 78 years, 90% had at least one comorbidity (46% diabetics), 55% were hospitalized and 23% deaths. Median duration of disease was 23 days (14–34). A LUS score ≥11 represented a 13-fold risk of hospitalization, a 16.5-fold risk of combined outcome (NIV + death) vs risk factors such as age [odds ratio (OR) 1.6], diabetes (OR 1.2), male sex (OR 1.3) and obesity (OR 1.25), and a 7.7-fold risk of mortality. In the logistic regression, LUS score ≥11 is associated with the combined outcome with a hazard ratio (HR) of 6.1 vs inflammations indices such as CRP ≥9 mg/dL (HR 5.5) and interleukin-6 (IL-6) ≥62 pg/mL (HR 5.4). In K-M curves, survival drops significantly with LUS score above 11.ConclusionsIn our experience of COVID-19 HD patients, LUS appeared to be an effective and easy tool, predicting the need for NIV and mortality better than “classic” known COVID-19 risk factors such as age, diabetes, male sex and obesity, and even better than inflammations indices such as CRP and IL-6. These results are consistent with those of the studies in the emergency room setting, but with a lower LUS score cut-off (11 vs 16–18). This is probably due to the higher global frailty and peculiarity of HD population, and emphasizes how nephrologists should themselves use LUS and POCUS as a part of their everyday clinical practice, adapting it to the peculiarity of the HD ward.

The COVID-19 pandemic has caused millions of infections and deaths so far. After recovery, the possibility of reinfection has been reported. Patients on hemodialysis are at high risk of contracting SARS-CoV-2 and developing serious complications. Furthermore, they are a relatively hypo-anergic population, in which the development and duration of the immune and antibody response is still partially unknown. This may play a role in the possible susceptibility to reinfection. To date, only 3 cases of SARS-CoV-2 reinfection from strains prior to the Omicron variant in patients on chronic hemodialysis have been reported in literature. In all of them, the first infection was detected by screening in the absence of symptoms, potentially indicating a poor immune response, and there are no data about the antibody titre developed. We report a case of recurrence of COVID-19 in 2020 - first infection likely from Wuhan strain; reinfection likely from English variant (Alpha) after 7 months - in a hemodialysis patient with clinical symptoms and pulmonary ultrasound abnormalities. Swabs were negative in the interval between episodes (therefore excluding any persistence of positivity) and the lack of antibody protection after the first infection was documented by the serological test. The role of the potential lack - or rapid loss - of immune protection following exposure to SARS-CoV-2 in hemodialysis patients needs to be better defined, also in consideration of the anti-COVID vaccination campaign and the arrival of the Omicron variant, which appears to elude the immunity induced by vaccines and by previous variants. For this purpose, prospective multicenter studies are in progress in several European countries. This case also highlights the need for a careful screening with nasopharyngeal swabs in dialysis rooms, even after patients overcome infection and/or are vaccinated.

Acute Kidney Injury (AKI) is a frequent complication of multiple myeloma (MM) with unfavorable prognostic significance. Light chains removal, combined with hematological therapy (CT) seems to offer significant benefits to renal function recovery (RFR). The SUPRA HFR, through the combination of high cut-off membrane without albumin loss and adsorbent cartridge, represents one of the "emerging" light chain removal methods. We report our multicentric retrospective experience with SUPRA HFR in 7 MM patients. At the end of the treatment with SUPRA HFR a significant reduction in serum free light chains compared to baseline was observed (min 24%; max 90%; median 74%). Despite a not always early start of the treatment, all patients recovered renal function with withdrawal from dialysis in 6/7 cases. Our preliminary experience of a combination of SUPRA HFR treatment with CT in 7 MM patients with AKI showed a significative renale functional recovery, with favourable cost/benefit ratio and a simple treatment schedule. These encouraging data suggest to further extend such treatment option, waiting for larger studies in this field.