Background: It is unknown what the impact of sole hardness is on young children's gait. Yet, this feature is commonly marketed as having differing benefits for young children's walking and development. Research question: What are the differences in spatiotemporal measures of gait during walking and running in three common types of young children's footwear with a soft sole, compared to a hard sole? Methods: The study used a quasi-experimental design, with the condition order randomised using a Latin square sequence. Forty-seven children were recruited (aged 2-4 years). Participants walked or ran the length of a GAITRite mat in a randomized order in a soft (Shore 48-53) or hard soled (Shore 60-65) sneaker, boot and sandal condition. Linear regression analyses were used to investigate the difference between footwear for the different gait parameters including velocity, cadence, step time, swing percentage, stance percentage, double support time and the toe in/out angle. Results: Children walked with a shorter stride length in the hard-soled sandals compared to the soft- soled sandals (p < 0.05). There were no other differences in spatiotemporal variables in the soft versus hard soled sandals during walking or running (p > 0.05). There were no differences in any spatiotemporal gait variables during walking or running in soft versus hard- soled runners and no differences in walking or running in soft versus hard-soled boots (p > 0.05). Significance: There were few differences in spatiotemporal parameters between soft and hard-soled footwear in both walking and running in three different types of footwear. This may be a positive finding for footwear designers and manufacturers, as a harder sole appeared to have limited impact on spatiotemporal gait parameters.

BACKGROUND:Clinicians and footwear manufacturers often advise young children to wear soft-soled footwear when they are first learning to walk. There is limited evidence as to why this advice is given, and if soft-soled shoes are as close to barefoot as thought. RESEARCH QUESTION:What are the differences in spatiotemporal measures of gait during walking and running in three common types of children's footwear with a soft-soled compared to barefoot in young children? METHODS:The study used a quasi-experimental design, with the condition order randomised using a Latin square sequence. Forty-seven children were recruited (2 - 4 years). Participants walked or ran the length of a GAITrite mat in a randomized order for barefoot and soft-soled sneaker, boot and sandal conditions. Linear regression analyses were used to investigate the main effect of each soft-soled footwear compared to bare feet in the different gait parameters. RESULTS:For walking and running trials, cadence decreased whereas step time and stride length increased in all footwear types compared to the barefoot condition. While wearing sneakers and sandals increased the stance percentage for walking and running trials, compared to barefoot, this difference was only apparent during the running trial for the boots. Likewise, although double support time increased for both the boots and sneakers in walking and running, compared to barefoot, this difference was only observed in the sandals during walking. SIGNIFICANCE:This research found that various types of soft-soled footwear impacted gait compared to the barefoot condition, with some differences seen between walking and running trials. These findings challenge the assumption that soft-soled footwear facilitate a similar gait to barefoot walking and running, although the clinical significance of these differences is unknown.

After publication of our article [1] we were notified that Figure 1 was incorrectly published as a duplicate of Table 1.

There is limited evidence of shoe impact in younger children, particularly in the context of immature gait patterns. It is unclear if the impact from shoes in younger children is similar to what has been seen in older children. This systematic review aims to identify any impact of shoe features on younger children’s gait, and if there are any differences between shoe sole flexibility compared to barefoot. Study inclusion criteria included: typically developing children aged ≤6 years; comparison of barefoot and shod conditions (walking and/or running) with shoe features or style of shoe described; sample size > 1. Novelty types of footwear were excluded, as was any mention of in shoe support or modifications. Studies were located from six databases. Study methodology was assessed using the McMasters critical review form. Sample size weighted standardized mean differences (SMD) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated. Four studies were included. Participant age ranged from 15.2 to 78.7 months, with 262 participants across all studies. All studies had limited methodological bias based on their design type. Compared to barefoot walking, shoes increased velocity, step time and step length. Shod walking decreased cadence. Peak plantar pressure was generally lower in the stiff shoe design and there was a higher peak plantar pressure in the Ultraflex shoes. No studies were found investigating muscle activation. Shoes affect younger children’s gait in spatiotemporal gait aspects, similar to those seen in older children. There is limited evidence on effects of particular shoe features such as sole hardness, on gait, and no evidence of any changes in muscle activation patterns. Further research is required to evaluate the impact of different types of shoe and shoe features in this population to provide clinical advice on the type of shoe that is appropriate in this age group.

There is increasing interest in shoe sole softness in children’s footwear. Industry and health professionals have limited evidence to guide their recommendations on footwear for young children. Older children have demonstrated increased stride and step length when walking in footwear compared to walking barefoot. Older children have also demonstrated decreased cadence, with an increase in double support time and a longer stance time while wearing footwear (Wegener, Hunt, Vanwanseele, Burns, & Smith, 2011). Furthermore, another study examined the effects of the different footwear torsional flexibilities on gait in newly walking toddlers. It found that increased flexibility of the footwear sole resulted in a shorter stance time compared to barefoot. However, velocity and step length did not differ across different shoe flexibilities (Buckland, Slevin, Hafer, Choate, & Kraszewski, 2014). Clinicians only have these studies to guide their advice when recommending footwear for children under the age of six.

Paediatric gait and lower limb assessments are frequently undertaken in podiatry and physiotherapy clinical practice and this is a growing area of expertise within Australia. No concise paediatric standardised recording proforma exists to assist clinicians in clinical practice. The aim of this study was to develop a gait and lower limb standardised recording proforma guided by the literature and consensus, for assessment of the paediatric foot and lower limb in children aged 0–18 years.