Background Thymidine kinase 1 (TK1) is an intracellular protein associated with DNA synthesis, expressed during the G1 phase and remained elevated through the M phase, with a potential as a biomarker for cell proliferation. In this study, we explore the possible use of TK1 in Hodgkin lymphoma (HL). Methods Serum concentrations of TK1 (S-TK1) were measured in 46 newly diagnosed HL patients using prospectively collected biobanked serum samples. The samples were analyzed using a novel antibody-based TK1 immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Results The concentrations of S-TK1 were elevated in HL patients compared with healthy controls (median 0.32 μg/L vs. 0.24 μg/L, P = 0.003). A further increase in S-TK1 was observed during the treatment. The S-TK1 concentrations were higher in patients with advanced stage disease, low B-Hb, elevated P-LD and in those with B-symptoms. A high ESR correlated with low S-TK1. Conclusions The study results suggest that S-TK1, measured using a novel antibody-based assay, has the potential to be a biomarker in HL. However, while S-TK1 levels are elevated at baseline compared with healthy controls, a limited number of patients and comparatively short follow-up time render reliable conclusions difficult.

Thymidine kinase 1 (TK1) is an enzyme involved in DNA precursor synthesis that has been used as a biomarker for prognosis and monitoring of different malignancies. In this study, we compared two immunoassays for measuring TK1 protein concentrations: the TK 210 ELISA (AroCell AB) and TK1 ELISA from Abcam. Overall, the TK 210 ELISA showed higher sensitivity than the Abcam TK1 ELISA for differentiating hematological malignancies (sensitivity of 0.77 vs 0.45) as well as for distinguishing sera of patients with solid tumors from those of apparently healthy individuals (0.61 vs 0.20). There was no significant difference in the TK1 protein levels determined with the TK 210 ELISA between different age groups from apparently healthy individuals. These results strongly indicate that the AroCell TK 210 ELISA is accurate and sensitive enough to be a valuable tool in cancer management.

Objectives: The distinction between bacterial and viral causes of acute infections is a major clinical challenge. In this report we investigate the diagnostic performance in this regard of nine candidate biomarkers together with HNL (Human Neutrophil Lipocalin). Methods: Blood was obtained from patients with symptoms of infectious (n = 581). HNL was measured in whole blood (B-HNL) after pre-activation with the neutrophil activator fMLP or in plasma (P-HNL). Azurocidin also known as heparin-binding protein (HBP), Calprotectin, PMN-CD64, CRP (C-reactive protein), IP-10 (Interferon gamma-induced Protein 10 kDa), PCT (Procalcitonin), TK1 (Thymidine kinase 1), TRAIL (TNF-related apoptosis-inducing ligand) were measured in plasma/serum. Area under the ROC (receiver operating characteristics) curve (AuROC) was used for the evaluation of the clinical performance of the biomarkers. Results: Side-by-side comparisons of the ten biomarkers showed large difference in the AuROC with B-HNL being the superior biomarker (0.91, 95% CI 0.86-0.95) and with the other nine biomarkers varying from AuROC of 0.63-0.79. The combination of B-HNL with IP-10 and/or TRAIL increased the diagnostic performance further to AuROCs of 0.94-0.97. The AuROCs of the combination of CRP with IP-10 and/or TRAIL were significantly lower than combinations with B-HNL 0.87 (95% CI 0.83-0.91). Conclusion: The diagnostic performance of whole blood activated HNL was superior in the distinction between bacterial or viral infections. The addition of IP-10 and/or TRAIL to the diagnostic algorithm increased the performance of B-HNL further. The rapid analysis of HNL, reflecting bacterial infections, together with biomarkers reflecting viral infections may be the ideal combination of diagnostic biomarkers of acute infections.