BACKGROUND:Eclampsia is a serious pregnancy complication and is associated with cerebral edema and infarctions. However, the underlying pathophysiology of eclampsia remains poorly explored. OBJECTIVE:This study aimed to assess the pathophysiology of eclampsia using specialized magnetic resonance imaging to measure diffusion, perfusion, and vasospasm. STUDY DESIGN:This was a cross-sectional study recruiting consecutive pregnant women between April 2018 and November 2021 at Tygerberg Hospital, Cape Town, South Africa. Women with eclampsia, preeclampsia, and normotensive pregnancies who underwent magnetic resonance imaging after birth were recruited. The main outcome measures were cerebral infarcts, edema, and perfusion using intravoxel incoherent motion imaging and vasospasm using magnetic resonance imaging angiography. The imaging protocol was established before inclusion. RESULTS:Here, 49 women with eclampsia, 20 women with preeclampsia, and 10 normotensive women were included. Cerebral infarcts were identified in 34% of women with eclampsia and 5% of women with preeclampsia (risk difference, 0.29; 95% confidence interval, 0.06-0.52; P=.012). However, no cerebral infarct was identified in normotensive controls. Women with eclampsia were more likely to have vasogenic cerebral edema than women with preeclampsia (80% vs 20%, respectively; risk difference, 0.60; 95% confidence interval, 0.34-0.85; P<.001) and normotensive women (risk difference, 0.80; 95% confidence interval, 0.47-1.00; P<.001). Diffusion was increased in women with eclampsia in the parieto-occipital white matter (mean difference, 0.02 × 10-3 mm2/s; 95% confidence interval, 0.00-0.05; P=.045) and caudate nucleus (mean difference, 0.02 × 10-3 mm2/s; 95% confidence interval, 0.00-0.04; P=.033) compared with women with preeclampsia. In addition, diffusion was increased in women with eclampsia in the frontal white matter (mean difference, 0.07 × 10-3 mm2/s; 95% confidence interval, 0.02-0.12; P=.012), parieto-occipital white matter (mean difference, 0.05 × 10-3 mm2/s; 95% confidence interval, 0.02-0.07; P=.03), and caudate nucleus (mean difference, 0.04 × 10-3 mm2/s; 95% confidence interval, 0.00-0.07; P=.028) compared with normotensive women. Perfusion was decreased in edematous regions. Hypoperfusion was present in the caudate nucleus in eclampsia (mean difference, -0.17 × 10-3 mm2/s; 95% confidence interval, -0.27 to -0.06; P=.003) compared with preeclampsia. There was no sign of hyperperfusion. Vasospasm was present in 18% of women with eclampsia and 6% of women with preeclampsia. However, no vasospasm was present in the controls. CONCLUSION:Eclampsia was associated with cerebral infarcts, vasogenic cerebral edema, vasospasm, and decreased perfusion, which are not usually evident on standard clinical imaging. This finding may explain why some patients have cerebral symptoms and signs despite having normal conventional imaging.

Background: There is no tool to accurately predict who is at risk of developing neurologic complications of preeclampsia, and there is no objective method to determine disease severity. Objective: We assessed whether plasma concentrations of the cerebral biomarkers neurofilament light, tau, and glial fibrillary acidic protein could reflect disease severity in several phenotypes of preeclampsia. Furthermore, we compared the cerebral biomarkers with the angiogenic biomarkers soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase 1, placental growth factor, and soluble endoglin. Study Design: In this observational study, we included women from the South African Preeclampsia Obstetric Adverse Events biobank. Plasma samples taken at diagnosis (preeclampsia cases) or admission for delivery (normotensive controls) were analyzed for concentrations of neurofilament light, tau, glial fibrillary acidic protein, placental growth factor, soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase 1, and soluble endoglin. The cerebrospinal fluid concentrations of inflammatory markers and albumin were analyzed in a subgroup of 15 women. Analyses were adjusted for gestational age, time from seizures and delivery to sampling, maternal age, and parity. Results: Compared with 28 women with normotensive pregnancies, 146 women with preeclampsia demonstrated 2.18-fold higher plasma concentrations of neurofilament light (95% confidence interval, 1.64-2.88), 2.17-fold higher tau (95% confidence interval, 1.49-3.16), and 2.77-fold higher glial fibrillary acidic protein (95% confidence interval, 2.06-3.72). Overall, 72 women with neurologic complications (eclampsia, cortical blindness, and stroke) demonstrated increased plasma concentrations of tau (2.99-fold higher; 95% confidence interval, 1.92-4.65) and glial fibrillary acidic protein (3.22-fold higher; 95% confidence interval, 2.06-5.02) compared with women with preeclampsia without pulmonary edema; hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, and low platelet count; or neurologic complications (n=31). Moreover, angiogenic markers were higher, but to a lesser extent. Women with hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, and low platelet count (n=20) demonstrated increased plasma concentrations of neurofilament light (1.64-fold higher; 95% confidence interval, 1.06-2.55), tau (4.44-fold higher; 95% confidence interval, 1.85-10.66), and glial fibrillary acidic protein (1.82-fold higher; 95% confidence interval, 1.32-2.50) compared with women with preeclampsia without pulmonary edema; hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, and low platelet count; or neurologic complications. There was no difference shown in the angiogenic biomarkers. There was no difference between 23 women with preeclampsia complicated by pulmonary edema and women with preeclampsia without pulmonary edema; hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, and low platelet count; or neurologic complications for any of the biomarkers. Plasma concentrations of tau and glial fibrillary acidic protein were increased in women with several neurologic complications compared with women with eclampsia only. Conclusion: Plasma neurofilament light, glial fibrillary acidic, and tau were candidate biomarkers for the diagnosis and possibly prediction of cerebral complications of preeclampsia.

Background The angiogenic factors soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1 (sFlt-1) and placental growth factor (PlGF) are postulated to be pathogenic disease drivers of preeclampsia. If true, then circulating levels should become more deranged with increasing disease severity. Methods and Results We investigated the association between circulating sFlt-1 and PlGF levels and severe adverse maternal outcomes among 348 women with preeclampsia. Compared with 125 women with preeclampsia without severe features, 25 women with preeclampsia and any of hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, low platelet count syndrome, disseminated intravascular coagulation, or severe renal involvement had sFlt-1 levels that were 2.63-fold higher (95% CI, 1.81-3.82), sFlt-1/PlGF levels that were 10.07-fold higher (95% CI, 5.36-18.91) and PlGF levels that were 74% lower (adjusted fold change, 0.26 [95% CI, 0.18-0.39]). Compared with 125 women with preeclampsia without severe features, 37 with eclampsia had sFlt-1 levels that were 2-fold higher (2.02 [95% CI, 1.32-3.09]), sFlt-1/PIGF levels that were 4.71-fold higher (95% CI, 2.30-9.66) and PIGF levels that were 63% lower (0.43-fold change [95% CI, 0.27-0.68]). Compared with those without severe features, preeclampsia with severe hypertension (n=146) was also associated with altered angiogenic levels (sFlt-1, 1.71-fold change [95% CI, 1.39-2.11]; sFlt/PlGF, 2.91 [95% CI, 2.04-4.15]; PlGF, 0.59 [95%CI 0.47-0.74]). We also found that sFlt-1 and PlGF levels were altered by the number of maternal complications experienced. Conclusions Further angiogenic imbalance among women with preeclampsia is likely a pathogenic disease driver responsible for the life-threatening maternal complications.

Abstract Background Few data are available on COVID-19 outcomes among pregnant women in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), where high-risk comorbidities are prevalent. We investigated the impact of pregnancy on SARS-CoV-2 infection and of SARS-CoV-2 infection on pregnancy to generate evidence for health policy and clinical practice. Methods We conducted a 6-country retrospective cohort study among hospitalized women of childbearing age between 1 March 2020 and 31 March 2021. Exposures were (1) pregnancy and (2) a positive SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR test. The primary outcome for both analyses was intensive care unit (ICU) admission. Secondary outcomes included supplemental oxygen requirement, mechanical ventilation, adverse birth outcomes, and in-hospital mortality. We used log-binomial regression to estimate the effect between pregnancy and SARS-CoV-2 infection. Factors associated with mortality were evaluated using competing-risk proportional subdistribution hazards models. Results Our analyses included 1315 hospitalized women: 510 pregnant women with SARS-CoV-2, 403 nonpregnant women with SARS-CoV-2, and 402 pregnant women without SARS-CoV-2 infection. Among women with SARS-CoV-2 infection, pregnancy was associated with increased risk for ICU admission (adjusted risk ratio [aRR]: 2.38; 95% CI: 1.42–4.01), oxygen supplementation (aRR: 1.86; 95% CI: 1.44–2.42), and hazard of in-hospital death (adjusted sub-hazard ratio [aSHR]: 2.00; 95% CI: 1.08–3.70). Among pregnant women, SARS-CoV-2 infection increased the risk of ICU admission (aRR: 2.0; 95% CI: 1.20–3.35), oxygen supplementation (aRR: 1.57; 95% CI: 1.17–2.11), and hazard of in-hospital death (aSHR: 5.03; 95% CI: 1.79–14.13). Conclusions Among hospitalized women in SSA, both SARS-CoV-2 infection and pregnancy independently increased risks of ICU admission, oxygen supplementation, and death. These data support international recommendations to prioritize COVID-19 vaccination among pregnant women.

OBJECTIVES:The cerebral injury biomarkers neurofilament light chain (NfL) and tau and the glial activation biomarker glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) may reflect neurological injury in pre-eclampsia. We assessed if there was a correlation between cognitive function assessment scores and plasma concentrations of these biomarkers in pre-eclampsia. STUDY DESIGN:Women with eclampsia, pre-eclampsia and normotensive pregnancies from the South African PROVE biobank were included. Blood samples were taken at inclusion. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment was performed after delivery at the time of discharge. The correlation between cognitive assessment scores and plasma concentrations of cerebral biomarkers was analysed using Spearman correlation adjusted for time from eclamptic seizure. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES:We included 49 women with eclampsia, 16 women with pre-eclampsia complicated by pulmonary oedema, 22 women with pre-eclampsia without pulmonary oedema, HELLP or neurological complications and 18 women with normotensive pregnancies. RESULTS:There was a correlation between impaired cognitive function and increased plasma concentrations of NfL in women with eclampsia and women with pre-eclampsia and pulmonary oedema (r = -0.37, p = 0.009 and r = -0.56, p = 0.025 respectively). No correlation between impaired cognitive function and NfL in pre-eclampsia cases without pulmonary oedema, HELLP or neurological complications or normotensive pregnancies was found. No correlation with cognitive impairment was found in any groups for tau or GFAP. CONCLUSIONS:We found a correlation between impaired cognitive function assessment and plasma NfL concentrations in women with eclampsia and pre-eclampsia complicated by pulmonary oedema. These findings suggest that acute neuroaxonal injury may cause or contribute to cognitive impairment in these women.

In hospitalized African women, both SARS-CoV-2 infection and pregnancy independently increased risks of morbidity and mortality. In addition, among pregnant and nonpregnant women with SARS-CoV-2 infection, HIV, prior tuberculosis, sickle cell anemia, and nongestational diabetes increased risk of ICU admission. Background Few data are available on COVID-19 outcomes among pregnant women in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), where high-risk comorbidities are prevalent. We investigated the impact of pregnancy on SARS-CoV-2 infection and of SARS-CoV-2 infection on pregnancy to generate evidence for health policy and clinical practice. Methods We conducted a 6-country retrospective cohort study among hospitalized women of childbearing age between 1 March 2020 and 31 March 2021. Exposures were (1) pregnancy and (2) a positive SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR test. The primary outcome for both analyses was intensive care unit (ICU) admission. Secondary outcomes included supplemental oxygen requirement, mechanical ventilation, adverse birth outcomes, and in-hospital mortality. We used log-binomial regression to estimate the effect between pregnancy and SARS-CoV-2 infection. Factors associated with mortality were evaluated using competing-risk proportional subdistribution hazards models. Results Our analyses included 1315 hospitalized women: 510 pregnant women with SARS-CoV-2, 403 nonpregnant women with SARS-CoV-2, and 402 pregnant women without SARS-CoV-2 infection. Among women with SARS-CoV-2 infection, pregnancy was associated with increased risk for ICU admission (adjusted risk ratio [aRR]: 2.38; 95% CI: 1.42-4.01), oxygen supplementation (aRR: 1.86; 95% CI: 1.44-2.42), and hazard of in-hospital death (adjusted sub-hazard ratio [aSHR]: 2.00; 95% CI: 1.08-3.70). Among pregnant women, SARS-CoV-2 infection increased the risk of ICU admission (aRR: 2.0; 95% CI: 1.20-3.35), oxygen supplementation (aRR: 1.57; 95% CI: 1.17-2.11), and hazard of in-hospital death (aSHR: 5.03; 95% CI: 1.79-14.13). Conclusions Among hospitalized women in SSA, both SARS-CoV-2 infection and pregnancy independently increased risks of ICU admission, oxygen supplementation, and death. These data support international recommendations to prioritize COVID-19 vaccination among pregnant women.

Cerebral complications in preeclampsia are leading causes of maternal mortality. Animal models suggest that an injured blood–brain barrier and neuroinflammation may be important but there is paucity of data from human studies. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate this in women with preeclampsia and eclampsia. We included women recruited to the South African Preeclampsia Obstetric Adverse Events (PROVE) biobank. Blood and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) were collected around delivery. CSF was analyzed for neuroinflammatory markers interleukin 1β, interleukin 6, interleukin-8 and tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-alpha). The CSF to plasma albumin ratio was measured to assess blood–brain barrier function. Women with eclampsia (n = 4) showed increased CSF concentrations of all pro-inflammatory cytokines and TNF-alpha compared to women with normotensive pregnancies (n = 7) and also for interleukin-6 and TNF-alpha compared to women with preeclampsia (n = 4). Women with preeclampsia also showed increases in pro-inflammatory cytokines IL-6 and IL-8 but not TNF-alpha in the CSF compared to women with normotensive pregnancies. In particular, women with eclampsia but also women with preeclampsia showed an increase in the CSF to plasma albumin ratio compared to normotensive women. In conclusion, women with preeclampsia and eclampsia show evidence of neuroinflammation and an injured blood–brain barrier. These findings are seen in particular among women with eclampsia.

Preterm preeclampsia has high rates of maternal and perinatal morbidity and mortality. No drugs have clearly shown a prolongation in gestation. Preclinical studies have identified metformin as a potential treatment. We performed a double-blind, randomised placebo-controlled trial at Tygerberg Hospital, South Africa. We randomly assigned women with preterm preeclampsia between 26+0 to 31+6 weeks gestation and undergoing expectant management to 3 grams of oral metformin XR (extended released) in divided doses, or placebo. The primary outcome was prolongation of pregnancy. Secondary outcomes included maternal and neonatal composite, and individual outcomes. Before the trial we performed metformin pharmacokinetic studies on 15 women with preterm preeclampsia. Between Feb 2018 and Mar 2020 we randomly allocated 180 participants to receive metformin (n=90) or placebo (n=90). Pharmacokinetic studies demonstrated oral metformin XR resulted in good circulating drug concentrations. The primary outcome analysis included 87 allocated to metformin and 84 assigned to placebo. The median time from randomization to delivery was 16.2 days (interquartile range (IQR), 5.2-28.8 days) in the metformin group and 9.5 days (IQR 3.4-22.7) days in the placebo group (difference of 6.7 days (95% Confidence Interval (CI) -0.17 to 13.64; P=0.056; Fig 1). In a pre-specified per protocol analysis that included only those who were compliant, the median prolongation was 16.2 (IQR 5.3-27.5; n=75) versus 7.4 (IQR 2.9-21.2; n=72) days, respectively (difference of 8.4 days, 95%CI 1.0-15.8; P=0.026). There were trends towards increased birthweight (1538g vs 1402g, difference of 136g, 95% CI-12 to 285;P=0.07) and a decreased length of stay (12 vs 18.0, difference of 6 days (95% CI-0.4 to 12.4;P=0.07) in the neonatal nursery among those in the metformin group (Table 1). There were no differences in composite maternal or neonatal outcomes or circulating concentrations of sFlt-1 or placental growth factor. In women with preterm preeclampsia, metformin prolongs gestation and may improve neonatal outcomes.View Large Image Figure ViewerDownload Hi-res image Download (PPT)

Abstract Objective To evaluate whether extended release metformin could be used to prolong gestation in women being expectantly managed for preterm pre-eclampsia. Design Randomised, double blind, placebo controlled trial. Setting Referral hospital in Cape Town, South Africa. Participants 180 women with preterm pre-eclampsia between 26+0 to 31+6 weeks’ gestation undergoing expectant management: 90 were randomised to extended release metformin and 90 to placebo. Intervention 3 g of oral extended release metformin or placebo daily, in divided doses, until delivery. Main outcome measure The primary outcome was prolongation of gestation. Results Of 180 participants, one woman delivered before taking any trial drug. The median time from randomisation to delivery was 17.7 days (interquartile range 5.4-29.4 days; n=89) in the metformin arm and 10.1 (3.7-24.1; n=90) days in the placebo arm, a median difference of 7.6 days (geometric mean ratio 1.39, 95% confidence interval 0.99 to 1.95; P=0.057). Among those who continued to take the trial drug at any dose, the median prolongation of gestation in the metformin arm was 17.5 (interquartile range 5.4-28.7; n=76) days compared with 7.9 (3.0-22.2; n=74) days in the placebo arm, a median difference of 9.6 days (geometric mean ratio 1.67, 95% confidence interval 1.16 to 2.42). Among those who took the full dosage, the median prolongation of gestation in the metformin arm was 16.3 (interquartile range 4.8-28.8; n=40) days compared with 4.8 (2.5-15.4; n=61) days in the placebo arm, a median difference of 11.5 days (geometric mean ratio 1.85, 95% confidence interval 1.14 to 2.88). Composite maternal, fetal, and neonatal outcomes and circulating concentrations of soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1, placental growth factor, and soluble endoglin did not differ. In the metformin arm, birth weight increased non-significantly and length of stay decreased in the neonatal nursery. No serious adverse events related to trial drugs were observed, although diarrhoea was more common in the metformin arm. Conclusions This trial suggests that extended release metformin can prolong gestation in women with preterm pre-eclampsia, although further trials are needed. It provides proof of concept that treatment of preterm pre-eclampsia is possible. Trial registration Pan African Clinical Trial Registry PACTR201608001752102 https://pactr.samrc.ac.za/ .

Pre-eclampsia is a leading cause of maternal and perinatal morbidity and mortality. The burden of disease lies mainly in low-middle income countries. The aim of this project is to establish a pre-eclampsia biobank in South Africa to facilitate research in the field of pre-eclampsia with a focus on phenotyping severe disease.The approach of our biobank is to collect biological specimens, detailed clinical data, tests, and biophysical examinations, including magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain, MRI of the heart, transcranial Doppler, echocardiography, and cognitive function tests.Women diagnosed with pre-eclampsia and normotensive controls are enrolled in the biobank at admission to Tygerberg University Hospital (Cape Town, South Africa). Biological samples and clinical data are collected at inclusion/delivery and during the hospital stay. Special investigations as per above are performed in a subset of women. After two months, women are followed up by telephonic interviews. This project aims to establish a biobank and database for severe organ complications of pre-eclampsia in a low-middle income country where the incidence of pre-eclampsia with organ complications is high. The study integrates different methods to investigate pre-eclampsia, focusing on improved understanding of pathophysiology, prediction of organ complications, and potentially future drug evaluation and discovery.

Introduction We aimed to assess cognitive function in women with preeclampsia stratified by severity, before and after onset of disease. Material and methods Prospective study performed at a referral hospital in Cape Town, South Africa. Pregnant women between 20 and 42 weeks of gestation with eclampsia, pulmonary edema and preeclampsia without severe features, and a normotensive pregnancy were approached. Women were included at diagnosis of preeclampsia or at admission for delivery (women with normotensive pregnancies). Two cognitive assessments, the Cognitive Failure Questionnaire to assess the cognitive function subjectively before inclusion in the study, and Montreal Cognitive Assessment to assess the current cognitive function objectively before discharge from the hospital after delivery, were performed. Results We included 61 women with eclampsia, 28 with preeclampsia complicated by pulmonary edema, 38 with preeclampsia without severe features, and 26 with normotensive pregnancies. There was no difference in cognitive function from early pregnancy between groups. Women with eclampsia and preeclampsia complicated by pulmonary edema scored lower on the Montreal Cognitive Assessment at time of discharge compared with women with normotensive pregnancies. The results were attenuated in pulmonary edema after adjustment for confounders. Conclusions Women with preeclampsia complicated by pulmonary edema and in particular eclampsia had impaired cognitive function after onset of disease compared with women with normotensive pregnancies. The impairment did not seem to be present before onset of disease. Women with preeclampsia without severe features did not have impaired cognitive function.

Objectives We aimed to assess cognitive function in women with pre-eclampsia stratified by severity, before and after onset of disease. Design Prospective case control study Setting Single center study at a referral hospital in Cape Town, South Africa. Population Pregnant women between 20 and 42 weeks gestation with eclampsia, pulmonary oedema, pre-eclampsia without severe features a normotensive pregnancy. Methods Women were included at diagnosis (cases) or at admission for delivery (controls). Two cognitive assessments, the Cognitive Failure Questionnaire (CFQ) to assess the cognitive function subjectively before inclusion in the study, and Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) to assess the current cognitive function objectively before discharge from the hospital after delivery were performed. Main outcome measures Total- and subscores from the CFQ and MoCa tests. Results We included 61 women with eclampsia, 28 with pre-eclampsia complicated by pulmonary oedema, 38 with pre-eclampsia without severe features and 26 with normotensive pregnancies. There was no difference in cognitive function from early pregnancy between groups. Women with eclampsia and pre-eclampsia complicated by pulmonary oedema scored lower on the MoCA assessment at time of discharge compared to women with normotensive pregnancies. The results were attenuated in pulmonary oedema after adjustment for confounders. Conclusion Women with pre-eclampsia complicated by pulmonary oedema and in particular eclampsia had impaired cognitive function after onset of disease compared to normotensive pregnant controls. The impairment did not seem to be present before onset of disease. Women with pre-eclampsia without severe features did not have impaired cognitive function.