The current case series describes four previously antipsychotic-treatment naïve individuals (one had a brief prior exposure during admission) with varying background co-morbidity, presenting with first-episode psychosis/schizophrenia according to ICD-10. All received aripiprazole, brexpiprazole, or cariprazine (‘ABC’ agent) regimens early on in the course of their illness. The third generation dopamine partial agonist antipsychotics (TGA) ‘ABC’ agents have overall more benign tolerability compared to older antipsychotics but may differ in their clinical profiles and among individual patients. The case descriptions are based on retrospective medical record-derived qualitative accounts and assessments, including recurrent CGI-S ratings for semi-quantitative outcome and by the recently described Transdiagnostic Global Impression-Psychopathology (TGI-P) tool for a broadened overview of patient symptom status. The cases exemplify the diverse psychiatric and somatic comorbidities encountered in real-world clinical practice and the use of TGA already as initial treatment choice. The case series is not typical of TGA-treated patients among our outpatients but displayed a similar treatment trajectory pattern. Specifically, adverse effect (AE) issues associated with aripiprazole or brexpiprazole attempts prompted switch to cariprazine, where favourable clinical outcome was reached in all cases. It may therefore prove worthwhile trying more than one agent from this drug class even if discouraged by AE and/or poor response from a first TGA trial.

Treatment-resistant schizophrenia affects over half of individuals with schizophrenia. Clozapine is the only approved treatment in the United States but often provides limited relief. Augmenting clozapine with cariprazine (CAR) (a D3-preferring dopamine D2-D3 partial agonist) may improve outcomes. This systematic review evaluated the efficacy and safety of this combination in patients with sub-optimal response. A search of PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library yielded 52 cases from 21 eligible studies to be included in the analysis. Patient and treatment characteristics and clinical outcomes were synthesized. Cariprazine replaced another antipsychotic or was added to clozapine monotherapy in 44.2% and 34.6% of cases, respectively. Before treatment, 90% of patients had positive and 81% had negative symptoms. Combination therapy improved these symptoms in 66% and 83% of cases, respectively. In 19 patients with Positive and Negative Symptom Scale scores available before and after treatment, total scores decreased by 43.4%, with positive and negative subscale reductions of 23.0% and 59.1%. The combination was generally well tolerated; some patients experienced weight loss and reduced clozapine-related side effects. New adverse events occurred in 19% (most commonly akathisia at 6%). Cariprazine was discontinued in 17% of cases due to side effects or lack of efficacy. Overall, the combination appears safe and promising, especially for persistent negative symptoms, likely due to complementary neuroreceptor effects. Larger controlled trials are needed to confirm these findings.

Psychosis in Parkinson's disease is a common phenomenon associated with poor outcomes. To clarify the pathophysiology of this condition and the mechanisms of antipsychotic treatments, we have here characterized the neurophysiological brain states induced by clozapine, pimavanserin, and the novel prospective antipsychotic mesdopetam in a rodent model of Parkinson's disease psychosis, based on chronic dopaminergic denervation by 6-OHDA lesions, levodopa priming, and the acute administration of an NMDA antagonist. Parallel recordings of local field potentials from eleven cortical and sub-cortical regions revealed shared neurophysiological treatment effects for the three compounds, despite their different pharmacological profiles, involving reversal of features associated with the psychotomimetic state, such as a reduction of aberrant high-frequency oscillations in prefrontal structures together with a decrease of abnormal synchronization between different brain regions. Other drug-induced neurophysiological features were more specific to each treatment, affecting network oscillation frequencies and entropy, pointing to discrete differences in mechanisms of action. These findings indicate that neurophysiological characterization of brain states is particularly informative when evaluating therapeutic mechanisms in conditions involving symptoms that are difficult to assess in rodents such as psychosis, and that mesdopetam should be further explored as a potential novel antipsychotic treatment option for Parkinson psychosis.

A 22-year-old male was admitted to an in-patient psychiatric unit for treatment, after a period of 2 years of increasing psychotic symptoms corresponding to a very severe case of schizophrenia across the entire scale of symptom disorder domains along with some drug abuse comorbidity. Previous treatments with olanzapine (OLA) and risperidone (RIS) had been at best partly successful toward his positive symptoms with no, or even worsening effects on the negative symptomatology. Given the gravity of the latter symptoms and functional impairment of our patient, he might thus have been a candidate for clozapine (CLZ) treatment. It was however decided to switch his antipsychotic treatment to cariprazine (CAR), an agent with a novel pharmacological and clinical profile, because of its favorable pharmacodynamic, pharmacokinetic, and tolerability/safety properties. In a follow-up on the patient 6 months after discharge he is not fully recovered, but the recovery attained reflects a marked functional improvement compared to before the RIS-to-CAR switch. The remarkable response to CAR observed may, speculatively, be in line with the suggestion that CAR could offer an alternative, safer, and more tolerable monotherapy approach (vs. CLZ) for patients with severe negative symptoms and functional deficiency resistant to standard antipsychotic treatment. He appears to occasionally still be taking drugs, but no worsening of positive symptoms has been noted. Whether or not he could reach full recovery if he would abstain entirely from drugs of abuse remains an open question.

BACKGROUND:Bariatric surgery in people with obesity is associated with a reduced overall cancer risk. Retrospective studies indicate that bariatric surgery specifically might reduce the risk of haematological cancers, but there is an absence of data from long-term, prospective studies. We therefore studied the association between bariatric surgery and haematological cancer in the Swedish Obese Subjects study.METHODS:The prospective controlled Swedish Obese Subjects study was designed to compare overall mortality in people who underwent bariatric surgery (n=2007) and usual care (n=2040). Participants were recruited through campaigns in mass media and at 480 primary health-care centres all over Sweden. The inclusion criteria were an age of 37-60 years and a BMI of 34 kg/m2 or more in men and 38 kg/m2 or more in women before or at the time of the examination. Haematological cancer events, including malignant lymphoma, myeloma, myeloproliferative neoplasms, as well as acute and chronic leukaemias, were captured from the Swedish Cancer Registry. The main outcome of this study was haematological cancer incidence and mortality. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01479452) and is ongoing.FINDINGS:A total of 4047 individuals with obesity were enrolled between Sept 1, 1987, and Jan 31, 2001. Overall, 34 participants in the surgery group and 51 participants in the usual care control group were diagnosed with haematological cancer during follow-up (hazard ratio [HR] 0·60; 95% CI 0·39-0·92; p=0·020). Moreover, there were three deaths by haematological cancer in the surgery group and 13 deaths in the control group (0·22; 0·06-0·76; p=0·017). Surgery was also associated with a reduced incidence of lymphoma (0·45; 0·23-0·88; p=0·020). A significant difference in treatment effect between men and women was found; bariatric surgery was associated with reduced incidence of haematological cancer in women (0·44; 0·26-0·74; p=0·002), but not in men (1·35; 0·58-3·17; p=0·489; interaction p=0·031).INTERPRETATION:Bariatric surgery is associated with a reduced incidence of haematological cancer, specifically in women. Health-care providers and policy makers working in the field of cancer prevention should consider bariatric surgery a primary prevention resource for people with obesity.FUNDING:The Swedish Research Council, the Swedish State under the agreement between the Swedish Government and the county councils, the Avtal om Läkarutbildning och Forskning agreement, the Health & Medical Care Committee of the Region Västra Götaland, the Swedish Heart Lung Foundation, Gothenburg Medical Society, and the Adlerbert Research Foundation.TRANSLATION:For the Swedish translation of the abstract see Supplementary Material section.

Even though significant efforts have been spent in recent years to understand and define the determinants of in vivo potency and clearance, important pieces of information are still lacking. By introducing target turnover into the reasoning, we open up to further the understanding of central factors important to the optimization of translational dose–concentration–response predictions. We describe (i) new (open model) expressions of the in vivo potency and efficacy parameters, which embody target turnover, binding, and complex kinetics, also capturing full, partial, and inverse agonism and antagonism; (ii) a detailed examination of open models to show what potency and efficacy parameters have in common and how they differ; and (iii) a comprehensive literature review showing that target turnover rate varies with age, species, tissue/subregion, treatment, disease state, hormonal and nutritional state, and day–night cycle. The new open model expression, which integrates system and drug properties, shows the following. Fractional turnover rates rather than the absolute target or ligand–target complex expression determine necessary drug exposure via in vivo potency. Absolute ligand–target expression determines the need of a drug, based on the transduction ρ and in vivo efficacy parameters. The free enzyme concentration determines clearance and maximum metabolic rate. The fractional turnover rate determines time to equilibrium between substrate, free enzyme, and complex.The properties of substrate, target, and the complex demonstrate nonsaturable metabolic behavior at equilibrium. Nonlinear processes, previously referred to as capacity- and time-dependent kinetics, may occasionally have been disequilibria. Finally, the open model may pinpoint why some subjects differ in their demand of drug. Significance statement Understanding the target turnover is a central tenet in many translational dose–concentration–response predictions. New open model expressions of in vivo potency, efficacy parameter, and clearance are derived and anchored onto a comprehensive literature review showing that target turnover rate varies with age, species, tissue/subregion, treatment, disease, hormonal and nutritional state, day–night cycle, and more. Target turnover concepts will therefore significantly impact fundamental aspects of pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics, thereby also the basics of drug discovery, development, and optimization of clinical dosing.

This patient case report describes a 45-year old white unmarried man with disability pension due to schizoaffective disorder, diagnosed at the age of 24. He lives in an apartment and has housing support. Retrospectively, the patient displayed prodromal markers of a disorder within the schizophrenia spectrum many years before the onset of frank psychosis, indeed since childhood. Over the years several symptoms and signs across schizophrenia domains have been manifest: positive, negative, cognitive, and affective, among which the negative and affective symptoms and signs were the earliest to appear. While the positive, disorganized, and catatonic symptoms responded to treatment – when duly tested and complied with – the negative and affective symptoms have been notoriously difficult to handle. We now report on the successful introduction of cariprazine (CAR) to his ongoing clozapine (CLZ) medication, the result of which has been a near-complete remission of his persistent negative and psychosocial issues. We interpret this remarkable alleviation of the patient's disease – and concomitant improvement of his quality of life – in terms of neuroreceptor target complementarity between CLZ and CAR, with particular emphasis on the contributions from the D3 and D2 receptor partial agonist components of the latter agent.

This case report describes a 30-year old male diagnosed with schizophrenia at the age of 23, and with a long history of drug abuse. He had previously received a wide range of antipsychotic drug treatment regimens, all with some degree of effect, but never with complete symptom relief. He was also suffering from persistent cognitive and negative symptoms. At the time of admission in our clinic, he was on Quetiapine (QUE) and Haloperidol (HAL). It was therefore decided to substitute HAL for Cariprazine (CAR)-an agent with a novel pharmacological and clinical profile-in the hope of gaining increased efficacy, particularly in the cognitive and negative symptom domains. Within 3 weeks of the switch from HAL to CAR the patient clearly improved, and notably so in the aforementioned symptom areas. A number of subsequent adjustments of antipsychotic dosages and adjunct medications during the ensuing months resulted in an apparently more stable alleviation of positive as well as negative and cognitive symptoms, including markedly improved personal and social capabilities. Interestingly, some time after initiating CAR treatment the patient also reported that from being a heavy smoker (60 cig/d) he had cut down and eventually ceased smoking entirely; furthermore, he has remained clean of other substance abuse since his first admission in 2020. The joint treatment with CAR in combination with QUE thus seems to have improved the patient's cognitive functioning as well as possibly his susceptibility to substance abuse.

Antipsychotic polypharmacy/drug combination treatment (APP) is a remarkably common practice in the schizophrenia context, given the lack of general support in treatment Guidelines. There is also a vast literature on APP outcomes, but a paucity of high-quality evidence-based data to guide and optimize adequate use of APP. This seems particularly true regarding many pharmacology-based considerations involved in APP treatment strategies. This paper first briefly summarizes clinical literature related to the use of APP. Against this backdrop, the pharmacological target profile features are then described of frequently used antipsychotic agents, in relation to estimated free plasma exposure levels at clinically efficacious dosing. APP strategies based on the properties of these drugs are then scrutinized and gauged within the background literature framework. The anticipated usefulness of APP from the pharmacological standpoint is detailed regarding efficacy, adverse effect (AE)/tolerability, and safety perspective, including why, when, and how it may be used to its advantage. For the purpose, a number of theoretically beneficial combinations as well as instances with suboptimal—and even futile—APP approaches are exemplified and discussed from the rational pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic pros and cons point-of-view. In this exposé, particular attention is paid to the utility and features of 3rd Generation Antipsychotic dopamine (DA) D2-D3 agonists within an APP setting.

IRL790 ([2-(3-fluoro-5-methanesulfonylphenoxy)ethyl](propyl)amine, mesdopetam) is a novel compound in development for the clinical management of motor and psychiatric disabilities in Parkinson disease. The discovery of IRL790 was made applying a systems pharmacology approach based on in vivo response profiling. The chemical design idea was to develop a new type of DA D3/D2 receptor type antagonist built on agonist rather than antagonist structural motifs. We hypothesized that such a dopamine antagonist with physicochemical properties similar to agonists would exert antidyskinetic and antipsychotic effects in states of dysregulated dopaminergic signaling while having little negative impact on physiologic dopamine transmission and, hence, minimal liability for side effects related to dopamine-dependent functions. At the level of in vivo pharmacology, IRL790 displays balancing effects on aberrant motor phenotypes, reducing L-DOPA-induced dyskinesias in the rodent 6-hydroxydopamine lesion model and reducing psychostimulant-induced locomotor hyperactivity elicited by pretreatment with either d-amphetamine or dizocilpine, without negatively impacting normal motor performance. Thus, IRL790 has the ability to normalize the behavioral phenotype in hyperdopaminergic as well as hypoglutamatergic states. Neurochemical and immediate early gene (IEG) response profiles suggest modulation of DA neurotransmission, with some features, such as increased DA metabolites and extracellular DA, shared by atypical antipsychotics and others, such as increased frontal cortex IEGs, unique to IRL790. IRL790 also increases extracellular levels of acetylcholine in the prefrontal cortex and ventral hippocampus. At the receptor level, IRL790 appears to act as a preferential DA D3 receptor antagonist. Computational docking studies support preferential affinity at D3 receptors with an agonist-like binding mode. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT This paper reports preclinical pharmacology along with molecular modeling results on IRL790, a novel compound in clinical development for the treatment of motor and psychiatric complications in advanced Parkinson disease. IRL790 is active in models of perturbed dopaminergic and glutamatergic signaling, including rodent 6-hydroxydopamine L-DOPA-induced dyskinesias and psychostimulant-induced hyperactivity, in a dose range that does not impair normal behavior. This effect profile is attributed to interactions at dopamine D2/D3 receptors, with a 6- to 8-fold preference for the D3 subtype.

The in vitro affinity of a compound for its target is an important feature in drug discovery, but what remains is how predictive in vitro properties are of in vivo therapeutic drug exposure. We assessed the relationship between in vitro potency and clinically efficacious concentrations for marketed small molecule drugs (n = 164) and how they may differ depending on therapeutic indication, mode of action, receptor type, target localization, and function. Approximately 70% of compounds had a therapeutic unbound plasma exposure lower than in vitro potency; the median ratio of exposure in relation to in vitro potency was 0.32, and 80% had ratios within the range of 0.007 to 8.7. We identified differences in the in vivo–to–in vitro potency ratio between indications, mode of action, target type, and matrix localization, and whether or not the drugs had active metabolites. The in vitro–assay variability contributions appeared to be the smallest; within the same drug target and mode of action the within‐variability was slightly broader; but both were substantially less compared with the overall distribution of ratios. These data suggest that in vitro potency conditions, estimated in vivo potency, required level of receptor occupancy, and target turnover are key components for further understanding the link between clinical drug exposure and in vitro potency.

Here we describe for the first time the distinctive pharmacological profile for (3S)-3-(2,3-difluorophenyl)-3-methoxypyrrolidine (IRL752), a new phenyl-pyrrolidine derivative with regioselective central nervous system transmission-enhancing properties. IRL752 (3.7-150 µmol/kg, s.c.) was characterized through extensive in vivo studies using behavioral, tissue neurochemical, and gene expression as well as microdialysis methods. Behaviorally, the compound normalized tetrabenazine-induced hypoactivity, whereas it was unable to stimulate basal locomotion in normal animals or either accentuate or reverse hyperactivity induced by amphetamine or MK-801. IRL752 induced but minor changes in monoaminergic tissue neurochemistry across noradrenaline (NA)- and dopamine (DA)-dominated brain regions. The expression of neuronal activity-, plasticity-, and cognition-related immediate early genes (IEGs), however, increased by 1.5-fold to 2-fold. Furthermore, IRL752 dose-dependently enhanced cortical catecholamine dialysate output to 600%-750% above baseline, whereas striatal DA remained unaltered, and NA rose to ∼250%; cortical and hippocampal dialysate acetylcholine (ACh) increased to ∼250% and 190% above corresponding baseline, respectively. In line with this cortically preferential transmission-promoting action, the drug was also procognitive in the novel object recognition and reversal learning tests. In vitro neurotarget affinity and functional data coupled to drug exposure support the hypothesis that 5-hydroxytryptamine 7 receptor and α2(C)-adrenoceptor antagonism are key contributors to the in vivo efficacy and original profile of IRL752. The cortical-preferring facilitatory impact on catecholamine (and ACh) neurotransmission, along with effects on IEG expression and cognition-enhancing features, are in line with the potential clinical usefulness of IRL752 in conditions wherein these aspects may be dysregulated, such as in axial motor and cognitive deficits in Parkinson disease. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: This report describes the distinctive preclinical profile of (3S)-3-(2,3-difluorophenyl)-3-methoxypyrrolidine (IRL752). Its in vivo neurochemical, behavioral, microdialysis, and gene expression properties are consistent with a cortically regioselective facilitatory impact on catecholaminergic and cholinergic neurotransmission accompanied by cognitive impairment-reversing features. The pharmacological characteristics of IRL752 are in line with the clinical usefulness of IRL752 in conditions wherein these aspects may be dysregulated, such as in axial motor and cognitive deficits in Parkinson disease.

Our website uses cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing to use our site, or clicking "Continue," you are agreeing to our Cookie Policy | Continue JAMA Surgery HomeNew OnlineCurrent IssueFor Authors Podcast Publications JAMA JAMA Network Open JAMA Cardiology JAMA Dermatology JAMA Health Forum JAMA Internal Medicine JAMA Neurology JAMA Oncology JAMA Ophthalmology JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery JAMA Pediatrics JAMA Psychiatry JAMA Surgery Archives of Neurology & Psychiatry (1919-1959) JN Learning / CMESubscribeJobsInstitutions / LibrariansReprints & Permissions Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Accessibility Statement 2023 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved Search All JAMA JAMA Network Open JAMA Cardiology JAMA Dermatology JAMA Forum Archive JAMA Health Forum JAMA Internal Medicine JAMA Neurology JAMA Oncology JAMA Ophthalmology JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery JAMA Pediatrics JAMA Psychiatry JAMA Surgery Archives of Neurology & Psychiatry Input Search Term Sign In Individual Sign In Sign inCreate an Account Access through your institution Sign In Purchase Options: Buy this article Rent this article Subscribe to the JAMA Surgery journal

IMPORTANCE Bariatric surgery is an established treatment for obesity, but knowledge on the long-term incidence of revisional surgery is scarce. OBJECTIVE To determine the incidence and type of revisional surgery after bariatric surgery in 26 years of follow-up of participants in the Swedish Obese Subjects (SOS) study. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS The SOS study is a prospective nonrandomized controlled study comparing bariatric surgery (banding, vertical banded gastroplasty [VBG], and gastric bypass [GBP]) with usual care. The bariatric surgeries in the SOS study were conducted at 25 public surgical departments in Sweden. Men with body mass index values of 34 or higher and women with body mass indexes of 38 or higher were recruited to the surgery group of the SOS study between September 1, 1987, and January 31, 2001, and follow-up continued until December 31, 2014. Data analysis occurred from November 2016 to April 2018. INTERVENTIONS Banding, VBG, or GBP. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Revisional surgeries, analyzed using data from questionnaires, hospital records, and the Swedish National Patient register through December 31, 2014. RESULTS A total of 2010 participants underwent surgery. The age range was 37 to 60 years. A total of 376 participants underwent banding (18.7%), while 1365 had VBG (67.9%) and 266 had GBP (13.2%). During a median follow-up of 19 years, 559 participants (27.8%) underwent first-time revisional surgery, including 354 conversions to other bariatric procedures (17.6%), 114 corrective surgeries (5.6%), and 91 reversals to normal anatomy (4.5%). Revisional surgeries (conversions, corrective surgery, and reversals) were common after banding (153 of 376 [40.7%]) and VBG (386 of 1365 [28.3%]) but relatively rare after GBP (20 of 266 [7.5%]). Patients who had banding and VBG primarily underwent conversions to GBP or reversals. Incidence of reversals was 5 times higher after banding than after VBG (40.7% vs 7.5%; unadjusted hazard ratio, 5.19 [95% CI, 3.43-7.87]; P < .001). Corrective surgeries were equally common irrespective of the index surgery (72 of 1365 patients who had VBG [5.3%]; 23 of 376 patients who had banding [6.1%]; 19 of 266 patients who had GBP [7.1%]). Revisional surgery indications, including inadequate weight loss, band-associated complications (migration, stenosis, and slippage), staple-line disruptions, and postsurgical morbidity, varied depending on index surgery subgroup. Most corrections occurred within the first 10 years, whereas conversions and reversals occurred over the entire follow-up period. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Corrective surgeries occur mainly within the first 10 years and with similar incidences across all 3 surgical subgroups, but indications varied. Conversions (mainly to GBP) and reversals occurred after many years and were most frequent after banding and VBG, reflecting a higher overall revisional surgery demand after these operations.

Obesity increases risk of falling, but the effect of bariatric surgery on fall-related injuries is unknown. The aim of this study was therefore to study the association between bariatric surgery and long-term incidence of fall-related injuries in the prospective, controlled Swedish Obese Subjects study. At inclusion, body mass index was ≥ 34 kg/m 2 in men and ≥38 kg/m 2 in women. The surgery per-protocol group ( n = 2007) underwent gastric bypass ( n = 266), banding ( n = 376), or vertical banded gastroplasty ( n = 1365), and controls ( n = 2040) received usual care. At the time of analysis (31 December 2013), median follow-up was 19 years (maximal 26 years). Fall-related injuries requiring hospital treatment were captured using data from the Swedish National Patient Register. During follow-up, there were 617 first-time fall-related injuries in the surgery group and 513 in the control group (adjusted hazard ratio 1.21, 95% CI, 1.07–1.36; P = 0.002). The incidence differed between treatment groups ( P < 0.001, log-rank test) and was higher after gastric bypass than after usual care, banding and vertical banded gastroplasty (adjusted hazard ratio 0.50–0.52, P < 0.001 for all three comparisons). In conclusion, gastric bypass surgery was associated with increased risk of serious fall-related injury requiring hospital treatment.

Translation across species and from in vitro to in vivo is a central tenet in drug discovery pharmacology. Successful implementation requires proper assessment of both in vivo potency and efficacy. This notwithstanding, in vivo data is typically defined mostly in terms of ligand-to-target binding affinity, similar to in vitro studies. As in vivo potency and efficacy involve a combination not only of drug, but also partitioning, target, and drug-target-complex events and processes, ignoring some of the central differences between in vivo and in vitro may result in serious miscalculations of in vivo efficacious exposure for translational predictions. We compare potency measures derived from two basic pharmacodynamic model situations: A 'closed' in vitro system defining target binding of a ligand when both concentrations remain essentially static, and an 'open' in vivo system where target turnover dynamics and elimination of the drug-target complex are also included. Corresponding equilibrium (steady-state) expressions in the central pharmacokinetic compartment are derived and presented. Three representative variants of 'open' in vivo systems are discussed, showing relationships for ligand-target complex and ligand for each of the systems and graphically illustrating corresponding shapes. The examples include i) two ligands competing for one target, ii) two targets competing for one ligand (/drug), and iii) target-ligand (/drug) interactions in a peripheral PK compartment. The expanded in vivo potency EC50 expression emphasises the contribution from target-related biology parameters that need accounting for, and particularly that 'closed' system (in vitro) properties should not be first choice when ranking compounds in vivo ('open' system).

The most common approach to in vivo pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic analyses involves sequential analysis of the plasma concentration- and response-time data, such that the plasma kinetic model provides an independent function, driving the dynamics. However, in situations when plasma sampling may jeopardize the effect measurements or is scarce, nonexistent, or unlinked to the effect (e.g., in intensive care units, pediatric or frail elderly populations, or drug discovery), focusing on the response-time course alone may be an adequate alternative for pharmacodynamic analyses. Response-time data inherently contain useful information about the turnover characteristics of response (target turnover rate, half-life of response), as well as the drug's biophase kinetics (biophase availability, absorption half-life, and disposition half-life) pharmacodynamic properties (potency, efficacy). The use of pharmacodynamic time-response data circumvents the need for a direct assay method for the drug and has the additional advantage of being applicable to cases of local drug administration close to its intended targets in the immediate vicinity of target, or when target precedes systemic plasma concentrations. This review exemplifies the potential of biophase functions in pharmacodynamic analyses in both preclinical and clinical studies, with the purpose of characterizing response data and optimizing subsequent study protocols. This article illustrates crucial determinants to the success of modeling dose-response-time (DRT) data, such as the dose selection, repeated dosing, and different input rates and routes. Finally, a literature search was also performed to gauge how frequently this technique has been applied in preclinical and clinical studies. This review highlights situations in which DRT should be carefully scrutinized and discusses future perspectives of the field.