IntroductionInduction intravesical Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) followed by maintenance after transurethral resection of bladder tumor, is the standard adjuvant therapy for high-risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). There is sparse evidence on the practice of intravesical BCG in Australia. Our aim was to determine the outcomes of intravesical BCG therapy in NMIBC in Southwestern Sydney.MethodsThis was a multi-center retrospective audit of NMIBC patients who received intravesical BCG between January 2008 and June 2020. Data was collected across six tertiary hospitals in South Western Sydney. Primary outcome was disease-free survival (DFS). Secondary outcomes were overall survival (OS), BCG induction and maintenance rates.ResultsOf the 200 eligible patients over 12.5 years, median age was 77 years and 83% were male. Of these, 55%, 4.5%, 35% and 5% were Tis, Ta, T1 and unknown stage, respectively. All patients received induction BCG and 56% received maintenance BCG (range 3-36 months). Completion rate of induction BCG was 91%. Only 9% ceased treatment due to intolerance. The median duration of cystoscopy follow-up was 17 months. After a median follow-up time of 37 months, 55% developed recurrence (29% non-muscle invasive, 32% muscle-invasive disease, 8% distant metastasis). The 1-year and 5-year DFS rates were 72% and 41% (median DFS: 39 months). The 1-year and 5-year OS rates were 98% and 87% (median OS: not reached).ConclusionThe DFS and OS rates were comparable to previous literature. This provides real-world data to assist future clinical trials in NMIBC.

Sleep quality commonly deteriorates in people receiving chemotherapy for breast cancer (BC). We aimed to determine feasibility and acceptability of telehealth-delivered cognitive behaviour therapy for insomnia (CBT-I) in people with early BC receiving (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy. Multi-centre, single arm, phase 2 feasibility trial. People with stage I-III BC received 4 sessions of telehealth CBT-I over 8 weeks, during chemotherapy. Participants completed Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) and other Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) at baseline, post-program (week 9) and post-chemotherapy (week 24); and an Acceptability Questionnaire at week 9. Primary endpoint was proportion completing 4 sessions of telehealth CBT-I. In total, 41 participants were recruited: mean age 51 years (range 31–73). All 4 CBT-I sessions were completed by 35 (85

PURPOSE:The aim of this randomized, placebo-controlled, two-stage, phase II/III trial was to determine the efficacy of an oral cannabis extract in adults with refractory nausea and/or vomiting during moderately or highly emetogenic, intravenous chemotherapy despite guideline-consistent antiemetic prophylaxis. Here, we report results of the prespecified combined analysis including the initial phase II and subsequent phase III components. PATIENTS AND METHODS:Study treatment consisted of oral capsules containing either tetrahydrocannabinol 2.5 mg plus cannabidiol 2.5 mg capsules (THC:CBD) or matching placebo, taken three times a day from days -1 to 5, in addition to guideline-consistent antiemetics. The primary measure of effect was the difference in the proportions of participants with no vomiting or retching and no use of rescue medications (a complete response) during hours 0-120 after the first cycle of chemotherapy on study (cycle A). RESULTS:We recruited 147 evaluable of a planned 250 participants from 2016 to 2022. Background antiemetic prophylaxis included a corticosteroid and 5-hydroxytryptamine antagonist in 97%, a neurokinin-1 antagonist in 80%, and olanzapine in 10%. THC:CBD compared with placebo improved the complete response rate from 8% to 24% (absolute difference 16%, 95% CI, 4 to 28, P = .01), with similar effects for absence of significant nausea, use of rescue medications, daily vomits, and the nausea scale on the Functional Living Index-Emesis quality-of-life questionnaire. More frequent bothersome adverse events of special interest included sedation (18% v 7%), dizziness (10% v 0%), and transient anxiety (4% v 1%). There were no serious adverse events attributed to THC:CBD. CONCLUSION:THC:CBD is an effective adjunct for chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting despite standard antiemetic prophylaxis, but was associated with additional adverse events. Drug availability, cultural attitudes, legal status, and preferences may affect implementation. Future analyses will evaluate the cost-effectiveness of THC:CBD.

Background: People living with a cancer diagnosis often experience cancer-related fatigue (CRF). Between 9% and 45% of people report CRF as moderate to severe, negatively impacting their quality-of-life (QOL). The evidence-base for managing CRF recommends exercise-related therapies over pharmaceutical interventions. One such exercise-like therapy is Baduanjin mind-body exercise (MBE), which has additional benefits. A remotely delivered program may further benefit people with CRF. The primary objective of this pilot will test study feasibility of a remotely delivered Baduanjin MBE exercise program for people living with CRF. Methods: This is a randomized wait-list controlled pilot study and will take place in Sydney, Australia. Subject to informed consent, 40 adults with moderate CRF levels and receiving or previously received adjuvant chemotherapy, will undertake a home-based 8-week Baduanjin MBE program supported by online resources and instructors. The primary feasibility outcomes are recruitment, enrollment, retention, and adherence rates; and safety as measured by tolerance and adverse-event frequency. Clinical outcomes (eg, changes in CRF, QOL, and participant perceptions) are assessed at pre-intervention, week 1, week 4, week 8, and post-intervention. Analyses follows the Intent-to-Treat (all participants as per randomization) and per-protocol (participants adhering to the protocol). Missing data will be imputed from previous data entries and regression models may be tested to predict missing outcomes. Discussion: To our knowledge, this is the first study evaluating the feasibility and effects of Baduanjin MBE on CRF using a remote delivery method. These feasibility data will inform a fully powered future trial investigating evidence of effect on CRF and QOL. Trial registration : Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR 12623000177651). Ringgold ID : 651498 Chinese Medicine Centre

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have transformed the landscape of solid cancer management. These drugs carry a risk of novel side effects, which have become known as immune-related adverse events (irAEs).Traditionally, irAEs have been managed empirically with corticosteroids. A subset of these may be steroid refractory and as more evidence emerges about their distinct pathogeneses, a more tailored approach is required. Here, we report the use of a Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor, baricitinib, in a patient with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy secondary to ICI use. We also review the current literature with regards to the use of these inhibitors in the management of irAEs.Modulation of the JAK pathway warrants further investigation in the targeted management of irAEs.

Electronically administered patient-reported outcome measures (ePROMs) are effective digital health tools for informing clinicians about cancer patients’ symptoms and facilitating timely patient-centred care. This paper describes the delivery of healthcare activities supported by the PROMPT-Care model, including ePROMs generated clinical alerts, cancer care team (CCT) response to alerts, and patients’ perceptions of the CCT response and ePROMs system. This mixed-methods study includes cancer patients from four cancer therapy centres in New South Wales, Australia. Quantitative and qualitative data were collected regarding clinical alert activity, CCT response, and patient perceptions of the CCT responses and ePROMs system. Qualitative data were thematically analysed. Of the 328 participants whose care was informed by the digital health tool, 70.8% (n = 233) generated at least one alert during the trial period, with 877 alerts generated in total. Although 43.7% (n = 383) were actioned by the CCT, at least 80% of participants found follow-up CCT phone calls beneficial, with multiple benefits confirmed in interviews. The cancer care delivery arm of the PROMPT-Care trial involving clinical alerts to the CCT was positively perceived by most participants, resulting in a diverse range of benefits. However, further work is required, informed by implementation science, to improve the percentage of actioned clinical alerts.

12008 Background: The aim of this multi-centre, randomised, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, phase 2/3 trial is to determine efficacy of addition of oral cannabis in adults with any malignancy of any stage, experiencing CINV during moderate-highly emetogenic intravenous chemotherapy, despite guideline-consistent anti-emetic prophylaxis, requiring ≥ 2 chemotherapy cycles. Here we report the crossover phase 2 component results. Methods: Treatment consisted of 1 cycle of oral THC 2.5mg/CBD 2.5mg (TN-TC11M) capsules tds days -1 to 5 and 1 cycle matching placebo in a crossover design, then blinded patient preference for a 3rd cycle. Primary end-point is difference in proportion of patients with ‘complete response’ (no emesis & no use of rescue medications) during 0-120 hours from chemotherapy between cycles. 80 patients provides 80% power with 2p of 0.1 to detect a 20% difference. Results: 81 patients recruited (2016-9). 72 completing 2 cycles are included in efficacy analyses. 78 not withdrawing consent are included in safety analyses. Median age was 55 years (range 29-80), 78% were female, 42% report historic cannabis use, 55% were treated with curative intent. Most common regimens were AC (26%), FOLFOX (17%). All received steroids & 5-HT3 antagonist, 79% received NK-1 antagonist, 4% received olanzapine. Efficacy is shown in table. 83% preferred cannabis to placebo. Most common bothersome cannabinoid-related adverse events (cannabis, placebo) were sedation (19%,4%), dizziness (10%,1%), disorientation (3%,0%). No SAEs were attributed to THC/CBD. Conclusions: Addition of oral THC/CBD to standard anti-emetics was associated with less nausea & vomiting but additional side effects. Most preferred THC/CBD to placebo. Based on these positive results, the definitive parallel phase 3 trial component continues (additional n=170). Acknowledgements: Trial participants, investigators, research staff. Funding from NSW Government Dept of Health. Clinical trial information: ACTRN12616001036404 . [Table: see text]

BackgroundDespite the acceptability and efficacy of e–patient-reported outcome (ePRO) systems, implementation in routine clinical care remains challenging. ObjectiveThis pragmatic trial implemented the PROMPT-Care (Patient Reported Outcome Measures for Personalized Treatment and Care) web-based system into existing clinical workflows and evaluated its effectiveness among a diverse population of patients with cancer. MethodsAdult patients with solid tumors receiving active treatment or follow-up care in four cancer centers were enrolled. The PROMPT-Care intervention supported patient management through (1) monthly off-site electronic PRO physical symptom and psychosocial well-being assessments, (2) automated electronic clinical alerts notifying the care team of unresolved clinical issues following two consecutive assessments, and (3) tailored online patient self-management resources. Propensity score matching was used to match controls with intervention patients in a 4:1 ratio for patient age, sex, and treatment status. The primary outcome was a reduction in emergency department presentations. Secondary outcomes were time spent on chemotherapy and the number of allied health service referrals. ResultsFrom April 2016 to October 2018, 328 patients from four public hospitals received the intervention. Matched controls (n=1312) comprised the general population of patients with cancer, seen at the participating hospitals during the study period. Emergency department visits were significantly reduced by 33% (P=.02) among patients receiving the intervention compared with patients in the matched controls. No significant associations were found in allied health referrals or time to end of chemotherapy. At baseline, the most common patient reported outcomes (above-threshold) were fatigue (39%), tiredness (38.4%), worry (32.9%), general wellbeing (32.9%), and sleep (24.1%), aligning with the most frequently accessed self-management domain pages of physical well-being (36%) and emotional well-being (23%). The majority of clinical feedback reports were reviewed by nursing staff (729/893, 82%), largely in response to the automated clinical alerts (n=877). ConclusionsAlgorithm-supported web-based systems utilizing patient reported outcomes in clinical practice reduced emergency department presentations among a diverse population of patients with cancer. This study also highlighted the importance of (1) automated triggers for reviewing above-threshold results in patient reports, rather than passive manual review of patient records; (2) the instrumental role nurses play in managing alerts; and (3) providing patients with resources to support guided self-management, where appropriate. Together, these factors will inform the integration of web-based PRO systems into future models of routine cancer care. Trial RegistrationAustralian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12616000615482; https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=370633 International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID)RR2-10.1186/s12885-018-4729-3

11546 Background: We sought older adults’ preferred and perceived roles in decision-making about palliative chemotherapy; their decision-making priorities; and information received and desired. Methods: Patients aged ≥65 years with incurable cancer who had discussed palliative chemotherapy with an oncologist and made a decision about whether or not to receive palliative chemotherapy were invited to complete a written questionnaire. Preferred and perceived decision-making roles were assessed by the Control Preferences Scale (CPS). Associations with preferred decision-making role were examined using Wilcoxon rank sum tests. Factors important in making a decision about chemotherapy, and receipt of and desire for information were described. Results: The 179 respondents had a median age of 74 years (range 65 to 92 years). Most were male (114, 64%) and had chosen to receive chemotherapy (148, 83%). Half (92, 52%) were vulnerable by the Vulnerable Elders Survey-13 (score ≥3). Preferred decision-making roles (n = 173) were active in 39%, collaborative in 27%, and passive in 35%. Perceived decision-making roles (n = 172) were active in 42%, collaborative in 22%, and passive in 36%, and matched the preferred role for 63% of patients. Preference for an active role was associated with being single/widowed (p = 0.004, OR 1.49) and declining chemotherapy (p = 0.02, OR 2). Factors ranked most important when making a decision about chemotherapy (n = 159) were “doing everything possible” (30%), “my doctor’s recommendation” (26%), “my quality of life” (20%), and “living longer” (15%). A minority expected chemotherapy to cure their cancer (14%). Most had discussed expectations of cure (70%), side effects (88%) and benefits (82%) of chemotherapy, though fewer had received quantitative prognostic information (49%) than desired this (67%). Conclusions: Older adults showed varied preferences for involvement in decision-making about palliative chemotherapy, and most played the role that they preferred. To facilitate shared decision-making, oncologists should seek patients’ decision-making preferences, priorities and information needs when discussing palliative chemotherapy.

OBJECTIVE:To examine risk of emergency hospital admission and survival following adjuvant chemotherapy for early breast cancer.METHODS:Linked data from New South Wales population-based and clinical cancer registries (2008-2012), hospital admissions, official death records and pharmaceutical benefit claims. Women aged ≥18 years receiving adjuvant chemotherapy for early-stage operable breast cancer in NSW public hospitals were included. Odds ratios (OR) for emergency hospitalisation within 6 months following chemotherapy initiation were estimated using logistic regression and survival using Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards methods.RESULTS:A total of 3,950 women were included and 30.6% were hospitalised. The most common principal diagnosis at admission was neutropenia (30.8%). Women receiving docetaxel/carboplatin/trastuzumab (TCH) and docetaxel/cyclophosphamide (TC) were the most frequently hospitalised. After adjustment for demographic and clinical factors, the increased risk of hospitalisation for TCH and TC remained compared with doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide 3-weekly (OR 1.71, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.24-2.37 and OR 1.47, 95% CI 1.17-1.85 respectively). Five-year overall survival was similar for women who were (92.2%, 95% CI 90.7-93.8) and were not hospitalised (93.1%, 95% CI 92.1-94.1).CONCLUSION:Emergency hospitalisations following chemotherapy for early breast cancer were relatively common, especially following docetaxel-containing protocols. Further examination of reasons for admission is needed to inform actions to improve patient safety.