Studies on melanoma brain metastases (MBM) with regard to mutational status are lacking. We investigated the outcomes of MBM in molecularly characterized patients for BRAF and NRAS mutations receiving conventional treatment. We investigated associations between outcomes [competing risk of local and distant brain failure (LF, DF) and overall survival (OS)] and clinical/pathological features of patients with known mutation status following initial treatment of MBM. Competing risk analysis was performed using the methods of Fine and Gray. We identified 235 patients with MBM diagnosed from 2005 to 2011. Mutation prevalence was BRAF non-V600K 98 (42%), BRAF V600K 34 (14%), NRAS 43 (18%), and wild-type for both genes (WT) 60 (26%) patients. Six month cumulative incidence LF rates were 3% for combined SRS or surgery with adjuvant radiation, 18% for surgery, 18% for SRS, 60% for WBRT, and 67% for systemic therapy. On multivariate analysis, only mutation status and initial treatment type were found to be independent predictors of local control. As compared to WT, NRAS (HR 2.58, 95% CI 1.18–5.67, p = 0.02) and BRAF V600K (HR 2.83, 95% CI 1.23–6.47, p = 0.01) mutational status were statistically significant while BRAF non-V600K status was not statistically significant (p = 0.23). Mutation status was not associated with DF or OS. BRAF V600K and NRAS mutation status predict increased LF following conventional treatments for MBM. These data can inform the design and interpretation of future MBM trials.

Background After brain metastasis resection, whole brain radiotherapy decreases local recurrence, but might cause cognitive decline. We did this study to determine if stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) to the surgical cavity improved time to local recurrence compared with that for surgical resection alone.Methods In this randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial, we recruited patients at a single tertiary cancer centre in the USA. Eligible patients were older than 3 years, had a Karnofsky Performance Score of 70 or higher, were able to have an MRI scan, and had a complete resection of one to three brain metastases (with a maximum diameter of the resection cavity <= 4 cm). Patients were randomly assigned (1: 1) with a block size of four to either SRS of the resection cavity (within 30 days of surgery) or observation. Patients were stratified by histology of the primary tumour, metastatic tumour size, and number of metastases. The primary endpoint was time to local recurrence in the resection cavity, assessed by blinded central review of brain MRI scans by the study neuroradiologist in the modified intention-to-treat population that analysed patients by randomised allocation but excluded patients found ineligible after randomisation. Participants and other members of the treatment team (excluding the neuroradiologist) were not masked to treatment allocation. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00950001, and is closed to new participants.Findings Between Aug 13, 2009, and Feb 16, 2016, 132 patients were randomly assigned to the observation group (n=68) or SRS group (n=64), with 128 patients available for analysis; four patients were ineligible (three from the SRS group and one from the observation group). Median follow-up was 11.1 months (IQR 4.8-20.4). 12-month freedom from local recurrence was 43% (95% CI 31-59) in the observation group and 72% (60-87) in the SRS group (hazard ratio 0.46 [95% CI 0.24-0.88]; p=0.015). There were no adverse events or treatment-related deaths in either group.Interpretation SRS of the surgical cavity in patients who have had complete resection of one, two, or three brain metastases significantly lowers local recurrence compared with that noted for observation alone. Thus, the use of SRS after brain metastasis resection could be an alternative to whole-brain radiotherapy.

PURPOSE:To evaluate the outcomes in patients treated on prospective phase 1-2 protocols with postoperative stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) and identify the associated prognostic variables. METHODS AND MATERIALS:Sixty-six patients with 69 tumors were treated with SBRT on prospective phase 1-2 studies for spinal metastases between 2002 and 2010. All patients underwent SBRT after spine surgery, which included laminectomy, vertebrectomy, or a combination of these techniques. Renal cell carcinoma was the most common histology represented (n=35, 53%) followed by sarcomas (n=13, 20%). Thirty-one patients (47%) were treated with prior conventional radiation to the spine (median dose 30 Gy). Patients were followed up with spinal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies to determine the treated tumor control (TC). Pain and other symptom data were collected prospectively to determine treatment response and toxicity. RESULTS:The median follow-up time was 30 months (range, 1-145 months) for all patients and 75 months for living patients (range, 6-145 months). The actuarial 1-year rate of TC was 85%, adjacent vertebral body control was 85%, and overall survival (OS) was 74% (median 29 months). On multivariate competing-risks analysis, sarcoma histology (subhazard ratio [SHR] = 2.38, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.05-5.6, P=.04) and larger preoperative tumor volumes (SHR=1.01, 95% CI 1.0-1.01, P=.006) were significantly associated with worse TC. Karnofsky performance status was the only significant predictor for OS on multivariate analysis. There were no differences in TC between patients treated with different surgical techniques or different preoperative or postoperative Bilsky grades. There were no grade 3 or higher neurologic toxicities. CONCLUSION:This study represents a large series of prospective data available on patients treated with SBRT in the postoperative setting. The combination of surgery with SBRT can offer patients with metastatic disease to the spine the chance of durable tumor control with minimal toxicity.

In order to accurately assess positioning errors in spinal SBRT, many institutions employ bony-fusion based imaging techniques, such as the ExacTrac™ (Brain Lab) system, in conjunction with 3D verification (performed via CT-on-rails in our practice). We hypothesized that the use of implanted gold fiducial markers could improve the accuracy of patient positioning over bony fusion alone. We addressed this question prospectively, enrolling patients on an IRB-approved protocol. Gold seeds were implanted in the vertebral pedicles flanking the target level. At treatment, setup error was calculated using two methods-standard kV image fusion, and geometric fiducial-based projection, with independent CT-on-rails verification. Analyses of residual set-up error showed that fiducial-based setup agreed with fusion-based determination, but did not significantly reduce error. Offline 6D fusion of the treatment and planning CT illustrated residual rotational error using standard or fiducial based setup. We conclude that the ExacTrac and CT-on-rails platform yields highly accurate results for spinal SBRT setup, with reduced residual error than previously reported. While the addition of fiducials did not further reduce error, the bony fusion approach is now prospectively validated in comparison to implanted fiducials. Both bony fusion and fiducial marker methods are associated with residual rotational error, thus 3D verification remains an important component of spinal SBRT treatment.

Controversies in stereotactic radiosurgery : , Controversies in stereotactic radiosurgery : , کتابخانه دیجیتال جندی شاپور اهواز

OBJECT Palliative resection of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) spinal metastasis is indicated in cases of neurological compromise or mechanical instability, whereas conventional external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) is commonly used for pain control. Recently, spinal stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has emerged as a safe alternative, delivering higher therapeutic doses of radiation to spinal metastases. To better understand factors affecting survival in patients undergoing spinal SRS for metastatic RCC, the authors performed a retrospective analysis of a consecutive series of cases at a tertiary cancer center. METHODS Patients harboring contiguous sites of vertebral body involvement from metastatic RCC who received upfront spinal SRS treatment at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center between 2005 and 2012 were identified. Demographic data, pain scores, radiographic data, overall survival, complications, status of systemic disease, neurological and functional status, and time between primary diagnosis and diagnosis of metastasis (systemic and spinal) were analyzed to determine their influence on survival. RESULTS Thirty-seven patients receiving treatment for 40 distinct, contiguous sites of disease were included. The median overall survival after spinal SRS was 16.3 months (range 7.4-25.3 months). Univariate analysis revealed several factors significantly associated with improved overall survival. Local progression after spinal SRS was associated with worse overall survival compared with sustained local control (HR 3.4, 95% CI 1.6-7.4, p = 0.002). Median survival in patients with a Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) score ≥ 70 was longer than in patients with a KPS score < 70 (HR 4.7, 95% CI 2.1-10.7, p < 0.001). Patients with neurological deficits at the time of spinal SRS had a shorter median survival than those without (HR 4.2, 95% CI 1.4-12.0, p = 0.008). Individuals with nonprogressive systemic disease at the time of spinal SRS had a longer median survival than those with systemic progression at the time of treatment (HR 8.3, 95% CI 3.3-20.7, p < 0.001). Median survival in patients experiencing any metastasis < 12 months after primary RCC diagnosis was shorter than in patients experiencing any metastasis > 12 months after primary diagnosis, a difference that approached but did not attain significance (HR 1.9, 95% CI 0.90-4.1, p = 0.09). On multivariate analysis, local progression of disease after spinal SRS, metastasis < 12 months after primary, KPS score ≤ 70, and progression of systemic disease at time of spinal SRS all remained significant factors influencing survival (respectively, HR 3.7, p = 0.002; HR 2.6, p = 0.026; HR 4.0, p = 0.002; and HR 13.2, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS We identified several factors associated with survival after spinal SRS for RCC metastases, including local progression, time between first metastasis and primary RCC diagnosis, KPS score, presence of neurological deficits, and progressive metastatic disease. These factors should be taken into consideration when considering a patient for spinal SRS for RCC metastases.

BACKGROUND: Local failure after definitive chemoradiation therapy for unresectable esophageal cancer remains problematic. Little is known about the failure pattern based on modern-day radiation treatment volumes. We hypothesized that most local failures would be within the gross tumor volume (GTV), where the bulk of the tumor burden resides. METHODS: We reviewed treatment volumes for 239 patients who underwent definitive chemoradiation therapy and compared this information with failure patterns on follow-up positron emission tomography (PET). Failures were categorized as within the GTV, the larger clinical target volume (CTV, which encompasses microscopic disease), or the still larger planning target volume (PTV, which encompasses setup variability) or outside the radiation field. RESULTS: At a median follow-up time of 52.6 months (95% confidence interval, 46.1-56.7 months), 119 patients (50%) had experienced local failure, 114 (48%) had distant failure, and 74 (31%) had no evidence of failure. Of all local failures, 107 (90%) were within the GTV, 27 (23%) were within the CTV, and 14 (12%) were within in the PTV. On multivariate analysis, GTV failure was associated with tumor status (T3/T4 vs T1/T2; odds ratio, 6.35; P = .002), change in standardized uptake value on PET before and after treatment (decrease >52%: odds ratio, 0.368; P = .003), and tumor size (>8 cm, 4.08; P = .009). CONCLUSIONS: Most local failures after definitive chemoradiation for unresectable esophageal cancer occur in the GTV. Future therapeutic strategies should focus on enhancing local control. Cancer 2011;. (c) 2011 American Cancer Society.

8584 Background: The management of melanoma has evolved rapidly with the identification of activating mutations in the majority of patients (pts). We reviewed characteristics and outcomes of molecularly characterized melanoma pts with brain metastasis (BM) to help design and interpret future clinical trials. Methods: We reviewed clinical and pathologic features of melanoma pts with known BRAF and NRAS mutation status and BM. Pt demographics, intra- (IC) and extra-cranial (EC) tumor characteristics, and IC/EC disease treatments were correlated to BM treatment outcomes (local and distant brain control [LC, DC]) and overall survival (OS). Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify significant associations between mutation status and outcome. Results: We identified 296 pts with melanoma BM and known BRAF/NRAS mutation status diagnosed from 2005 to 2011. Mutation prevalence was BRAF 57%, NRAS 17%, and wild-type for both genes (WT) 26%. The initial treatments given for BM were surgery/radiosurgery (SRS) 60%, surgery/SRS + whole brain radiation (WBRT) 7%, WBRT alone 19%, systemic therapy alone 9%, and no treatment 5%. Mutation status was not significantly associated with sex, performance status, EC disease status, number of brain lesions, or BM treatment. Pts with mutations were younger (p<0.0001) and more likely to have symptomatic BM (p=0.0003) than WT pts. In univariate analysis, BM treatment strategy (p<0.001) and mutation status predicted for poor LC, with 6 month LC rates of 70% for any mutation and 88% for WT (HR=1.86, p=0.048). Compared to systemic agents alone, use of radiation (SRS or WBRT) improved LC for pts with a mutation (HR 0.23, p=0.0006). Subsequent multivariate analysis identified mutation status and radiation treatment as independent predictors of LC (HR 2.5 and 0.25, respectively). Mutation status did not predict for DC or OS. Conclusions: The presence of BRAF and NRAS mutations predicts worse LC following conventional treatments for melanoma BM. Radiation may improve LC in pts with a mutation. This data suggest a role for combining radiation with targeted therapies in melanoma pts with activating BRAF or NRAS mutations in the treatment of BM.

BACKGROUND:Assays of multiple tumor samples frequently reveal recurrent genomic aberrations, including point mutations and copy-number alterations, that affect individual genes. Analyses that extend beyond single genes are often restricted to examining pathways, interactions and functional modules that are already known.METHODS:We present a method that identifies functional modules without any information other than patterns of recurrent and mutually exclusive aberrations (RME patterns) that arise due to positive selection for key cancer phenotypes. Our algorithm efficiently constructs and searches networks of potential interactions and identifies significant modules (RME modules) by using the algorithmic significance test.RESULTS:We apply the method to the TCGA collection of 145 glioblastoma samples, resulting in extension of known pathways and discovery of new functional modules. The method predicts a role for EP300 that was previously unknown in glioblastoma. We demonstrate the clinical relevance of these results by validating that expression of EP300 is prognostic, predicting survival independent of age at diagnosis and tumor grade.CONCLUSIONS:We have developed a sensitive, simple, and fast method for automatically detecting functional modules in tumors based solely on patterns of recurrent genomic aberration. Due to its ability to analyze very large amounts of diverse data, we expect it to be increasingly useful when applied to the many tumor panels scheduled to be assayed in the near future.

Primary brain tumors are a heterogeneous group of malignancies with highly variable outcomes, and diagnosis is largely based on the histological appearance of the tumors. However, the diversity of primary brain tumors has made prognostic determinations based purely on clinicopathologic variables difficult. There is an increasing body of data suggesting a significant amount of molecular diversity accounts for the heterogeneity of clinical observations, such as response to treatment and time to progression. The last decade has witnessed an explosive advance in our knowledge of the molecular genetics of brain tumors, due in large part to the availability of high-throughput profiling techniques and to the completion of the human genome sequencing project. The large amount of data generated by these efforts has enabled the identification of prognostic and predictive factors and helping to identify pathways which are driving tumor growth. Identification of biomarkers will enable better patient stratification and individualization of treatment.