Abstract RB loss occurs commonly in neoplasia but its contributions to advanced cancer have not been assessed directly. Here we show that RB loss in multiple murine models of cancer produces a prometastatic phenotype. Gene expression analyses showed that regulation of the cell motility receptor RHAMM by the RB/E2F pathway was critical for epithelial–mesenchymal transition, motility, and invasion by cancer cells. Genetic modulation or pharmacologic inhibition of RHAMM activity was sufficient and necessary for metastatic phenotypes induced by RB loss in prostate cancer. Mechanistic studies in this setting established that RHAMM stabilized F-actin polymerization by controlling ROCK signaling. Collectively, our findings show how RB loss drives metastatic capacity and highlight RHAMM as a candidate therapeutic target for treating advanced prostate cancer. Cancer Res; 77(4); 982–95. ©2016 AACR.
<p>Supplemental Figure S1. RB loss promotes cell migration and invasion. Supplemental Figure S2. RB regulates RHAMM expression. Supplemental Figure S3. RB/E2F Binds on the RHAMM Promoter. Supplemental Figure S4. RHAMM overexpression drives cancer cell migration, invasion, and EMT. Supplemental Figure S5. RHAMM Inhibition Diminishes Migration and Invasion, but not Cellular Proliferation. Supplemental Figure S3. RB/E2F Binds on the RHAMM Promoter.</p>
Bivariate flow cytometry analyses of LNCaP and C4-2 cells treated with 1nM DCTX for 16 or 48h.
Dose response curves of CBTX and DCTX in LAPC4, VCaP and LNCaP-abl cells. C4-2 xenograft tumor growth response to CBTX in mice. Cleaved PARP western blot analysis of LNCaP and C4-2 cells treated with 1nM CBTX or DCTX.
Supplemental Methods from Novel Actions of Next-Generation Taxanes Benefit Advanced Stages of Prostate Cancer
<p>Supplementary Figure Legends Supplemental Figure S1. RB loss promotes cell migration and invasion. Supplemental Figure S2. RB regulates RHAMM expression. Supplemental Figure S3. RB/E2F Binds on the RHAMM Promoter. Supplemental Figure S4. RHAMM overexpression drives cancer cell migration, invasion, and EMT. Supplemental Figure S5. RHAMM Inhibition Diminishes Migration and Invasion, but not Cellular Proliferation.</p>
RB loss occurs commonly in neoplasia but its contributions to advanced cancer have not been assessed directly. Here we show that RB loss in multiple murine models of cancer produces a prometastatic phenotype. Gene expression analyses showed that regulation of the cell motility receptor RHAMM by the RB/E2F pathway was critical for epithelial-mesenchymal transition, motility, and invasion by cancer cells. Genetic modulation or pharmacologic inhibition of RHAMM activity was sufficient and necessary for metastatic phenotypes induced by RB loss in prostate cancer. Mechanistic studies in this setting established that RHAMM stabilized F-actin polymerization by controlling ROCK signaling. Collectively, our findings show how RB loss drives metastatic capacity and highlight RHAMM as a candidate therapeutic target for treating advanced prostate cancer. Cancer Res; 77(4); 982-95. ©2016 AACR.
Purpose: To improve the outcomes of patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC), there is an urgent need for more effective therapies and approaches that individualize specific treatments for patients with CRPC. These studies compared the novel taxane cabazitaxel with the previous generation docetaxel, and aimed to determine which tumors are most likely to respond. Experimental design: Cabazitaxel and docetaxel were compared via in vitro modeling to determine the molecular mechanism, biochemical and cell biologic impact, and cell proliferation, which was further assessed ex vivo in human tumor explants. Isogenic pairs of RB knockdown and control cells were interrogated in vitro and in xenograft tumors for cabazitaxel response. Results: The data herein show that (i) cabazitaxel exerts stronger cytostatic and cytotoxic response compared with docetaxel, especially in CRPC; (ii) cabazitaxel induces aberrant mitosis, leading to pyknotic and multinucleated cells; (iii) taxanes do not act through the androgen receptor (AR); (iv) gene-expression profiling reveals distinct molecular actions for cabazitaxel; and (v) tumors that have progressed to castration resistance via loss of RB show enhanced sensitivity to cabazitaxel. Conclusions: Cabazitaxel not only induces improved cytostatic and cytotoxic effects, but also affects distinct molecular pathways, compared with docetaxel, which could underlie its efficacy after docetaxel treatment has failed in patientswithCRPC. Finally, RB is identified as the first potential biomarker that could define the therapeutic response to taxanes in metastatic CRPC. This would suggest that loss of RB function induces sensitization to taxanes, which could benefit up to 50% of CRPC cases. Clin Cancer Res; 21(4); 795–807. 2015 AACR.
Abstract Purpose: To improve the outcomes of patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC), there is an urgent need for more effective therapies and approaches that individualize specific treatments for patients with CRPC. These studies compared the novel taxane cabazitaxel with the previous generation docetaxel, and aimed to determine which tumors are most likely to respond. Experimental design: Cabazitaxel and docetaxel were compared via in vitro modeling to determine the molecular mechanism, biochemical and cell biologic impact, and cell proliferation, which was further assessed ex vivo in human tumor explants. Isogenic pairs of RB knockdown and control cells were interrogated in vitro and in xenograft tumors for cabazitaxel response. Results: The data herein show that (i) cabazitaxel exerts stronger cytostatic and cytotoxic response compared with docetaxel, especially in CRPC; (ii) cabazitaxel induces aberrant mitosis, leading to pyknotic and multinucleated cells; (iii) taxanes do not act through the androgen receptor (AR); (iv) gene-expression profiling reveals distinct molecular actions for cabazitaxel; and (v) tumors that have progressed to castration resistance via loss of RB show enhanced sensitivity to cabazitaxel. Conclusions: Cabazitaxel not only induces improved cytostatic and cytotoxic effects, but also affects distinct molecular pathways, compared with docetaxel, which could underlie its efficacy after docetaxel treatment has failed in patients with CRPC. Finally, RB is identified as the first potential biomarker that could define the therapeutic response to taxanes in metastatic CRPC. This would suggest that loss of RB function induces sensitization to taxanes, which could benefit up to 50% of CRPC cases. Clin Cancer Res; 21(4); 795–807. ©2015 AACR.
96 Background: Loss of retinoblastoma (RB) tumor suppressor is overrepresented in castrate-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) compared to primary PCa. We previously showed using analyses of human tissue and in vitro and in vivo modeling that RB constrains androgen receptor (AR) function, and that loss of RB is sufficient promote resistance to castration and AR antagonists. Thus, novel strategies are needed to treat RB-deficient tumor. By contrast, in tumors retaining RB, suppressing enhancing RB activity would be of therapeutic advantage, and may be accomplished through next-generation Cdk4/6 inhibitors. Methods: Stable isogenic pairs of prostate cancer cell lines either retaining RB or RB depleted (by shRNA) were assessed in vitro and in xenografts for response to Cdk4/6 kinase inhibitors or the cabazitaxel. In addition, using an ex vivo explant assay, fresh tumor tissue samples from radical prostatectomy were exposed to the Cdk4/6 inhibitor or cabazitaxel for up to 7 days, and evaluated by IHC for Ki67, Caspase-3, and AR. Results: Cdk4/6 inhibition blocks tumor cell proliferation dependent on RB status. This was further confirmed ex vivo, as evidenced by a marked reduction in Ki67 staining in Cdk4/6 inhibitor treated explant tissue from two prostate cancer patients. Conversely, in vitro studies revealed a modest sensitization of RB-depleted tumors to cabazitaxel that was dramatically enhanced in vivo and after castration. Cabazitaxel, like docetaxel, targets the cell architecture and induces cell death, but also induces a distinct gene expression profile that may partially explain efficacy in docetaxel-resistant tumors. Neither taxane showed affects on AR nuclear localization using in vivoor explant studies. Conclusions: These results strongly support our hypothesis that RB status can be used as a metric to define therapeutic response to cabazitaxel, as such that loss of RB function induces sensitization taxanes, whereas RB proficient tumors give an enhanced response to Cdk4/6 kinase inhibitors.