BACKGROUND:Ceftriaxone-resistant Escherichia coli infections are increasingly common, partially because of the emergence of E. coli sequence type 131 (ST131), including its subclade C2/H30Rx, which produce extended-spectrum β-lactamases. METHODS:A prospective cohort including 14 US sites, which enrolled monomicrobial ceftriaxone-resistant and susceptible E. coli bloodstream infection (BSI) cases in a 1:1 ratio, was used to compare ST131 versus non-ST131 E. coli BSI, with specific attention to E. coli ST131 C2/H30Rx. Desirability of outcome ranking was determined at 30 days after infection onset. RESULTS:This analysis included 282 patients with E. coli BSI; 43% (121/282) were E. coli ST131 and 23% (66/282) belonged to the C2/H30Rx subclade. Resistance to ceftriaxone was present in 79% (96/121) ST131, 86% (57/66) E. coli ST131 C2/H30Rx, and 27% (43/161) E. coli non-ST131. Compared to patients with non-ST131 E. coli BSI, patients with ST131 BSI were older (median 70 years, [Q1 62, Q3 76] years vs 65 years, [51, 74]; P = .005) and more often admitted from long-term care facilities (21/121 [17%] vs 7/161 [4%], P < .001). Overall and empiric carbapenem use was more frequent in the treatment of patients with ST131 BSI compared with non-ST131 BSI (overall 89/121 [74%] vs 50/161 [31%]; empiric: 58/121 [48%] vs 31/161 [19%], P < .001). Desirability of outcome ranking outcomes were similar between groups. CONCLUSIONS:Most ceftriaxone-resistant E. coli from US patients with E. coli BSI belong to ST131, particularly E. coli ST131 C2/H30Rx, serving as an important driver of carbapenem use.

Abstract Background Drug-resistant E. coli is a leading cause of antimicrobial resistance-associated deaths globally. Specifically, resistance to ceftriaxone (CRO-R) is increasing in E. coli. High-risk clonal group ST131 and its pandemic H30 subclone are of high concern yet studies characterizing these infections are limited. We evaluated baseline characteristics and clinical outcomes associated with H30 ST131, non-H30 ST131 and non-ST131 E. coli bloodstream infections (BSI). Methods Patients with monomicrobial carbapenem-susceptible E. coli BSI that were matched 1:1 by study site (CRO-R and CRO-susceptible community-acquired and hospital onset cases) were prospectively enrolled from 14 United States hospitals between November 12, 2020 to April 28, 2021 in the multicenter Study of Highly Resistant E. coli (SHREC). Isolates underwent whole genome sequencing. The primary outcome was a 30-day Desirability of Outcome Ranking (DOOR) after index culture including clinical response to treatment and all-cause mortality. Results There were 92 (33%) H30 ST131, 29 (10%) non-H30 ST131, and 161 (57%) non-ST131 isolates in 282 E. coli BSI (Table 1). Most ceftriaxone resistance was conferred by CTX-M-15 produced by H30 ST131 isolates (Figure 1, Table 1). H30 ST131 BSI patients were older (median age [IQR] 70.5 [63,76] vs. 67 [56,77] vs 65 [51,74] years, p = 0.017), had higher Charlson comorbidity indices (3 [2,5] vs. 2 [1,4] vs. 2 [1,4], p=0.009), and were more often admitted from long-term care facilities (18/92 [20%] vs. 3/29 [10%] vs. 7/161 [4%], p = 0.003) compared to non-H30 ST131 and non-ST131 BSI patients. Among H30 ST131 isolates, high rates of antibiotic resistance were observed to cephalosporins and fluoroquinolones, resulting in significantly more carbapenem use compared with non-H30 ST131 and non-ST131 isolates (75/92 [82%] vs. 14/29 [48%] vs. 50/161 [31%], p < 0.001) (Figure 2). 30-day DOOR and hospital length of stay did not differ between groups (Table 2). Conclusion Compared with non-H30 ST131 and non-ST131 E. coli BSI, H30 ST131 E. coli BSI have a unique epidemiology with more healthcare exposures, comorbidities and antibiotic resistance and are more likely to be treated with carbapenems, though no significant difference in clinical outcomes was observed. Disclosures Yohei Doi, MD, PHD, AbbVie: Honoraria|Entasis: Grant/Research Support|Gilead: Advisor/Consultant|GSK: Advisor/Consultant|Meiji Seika: Advisor/Consultant|Moderna: Advisor/Consultant|Pfizer: Advisor/Consultant|Shionogi: Advisor/Consultant|Shionogi: Honoraria Elie Saade, MD, MPH, FIDSA, Janssen Global Services: Advisor/Consultant|Janssen Global Services: Advisor/Consultant|Janssen Research and Development: Advisor/Consultant|Janssen Research and Development: Advisor/Consultant Loren G. Miller, MD MPH, Armata: Grant/Research Support|Contrafect: Grant/Research Support|GSK: Grant/Research Support|Merck: Grant/Research Support|Paratek: Grant/Research Support Michael J. Satlin, MD, AbbVie: DSMB participant|bioMerieux: Grant/Research Support|Merck: Grant/Research Support|Selux Diagnostics: Grant/Research Support|SNIPRBiome: Grant/Research Support W. Charles Huskins, MD, MSc, ADMA Biologics: Advisor/Consultant|Bristol Myers Squibb: Stocks/Bonds (Public Company)|Pfizer: Advisor/Consultant|Pfizer: Stocks/Bonds (Public Company)|Zimmer Biomet: Stocks/Bonds (Public Company) Carol Hill, PhD, Glaxo SmithKline: Retirement Health, Cash Balance Plan|Glaxo SmithKline: Stocks/Bonds (Public Company) Robin Patel, MD, a patent on Bordetella pertussis/parapertussis PCR issued, a patent on a device/method for sonication with royalties paid by Samsung to Mayo Clinic, a: See above|MicuRx Pharmaceuticals and BIOFIRE: Grant/Research Support|PhAST, Day Zero Diagnostics, Abbott Laboratories, Sysmex, DEEPULL DIAGNOSTICS, S.L., Netflix, Oxford Nanopore Technologies and CARB-X: Advisor/Consultant|Up-to-Date and the Infectious Diseases Board Review Course.: Honoraria Vance G. Fowler, MD, MHS, Affinergy: Advisor/Consultant|ArcBio: Stocks/Bonds (Private Company)|Armata: Advisor/Consultant|Astra Zeneca: Advisor/Consultant|Astra Zeneca: Grant/Research Support|Basilea: Advisor/Consultant|Basilea: Grant/Research Support|ContraFect: Advisor/Consultant|ContraFect: Grant/Research Support|Debiopharm: Advisor/Consultant|Destiny: Advisor/Consultant|EDE: Grant/Research Support|Genentech: Advisor/Consultant|Genentech: Grant/Research Support|GSK: Advisor/Consultant|Janssen: Advisor/Consultant|Karius: Grant/Research Support|MedImmune: Grant/Research Support|Merck: Grant/Research Support|sepsis diagnostics: Patent pending|UptoDate: Royalties|Valanbuio: Stocks/Bonds (Private Company)|Valanbuio: Stocks/Bonds (Private Company) David van Duin, MD, PhD, Merck: Advisor/Consultant|Merck: Grant/Research Support|Pfizer: Advisor/Consultant|Qpex: Advisor/Consultant|Roche: Advisor/Consultant|Shionogi: Advisor/Consultant|Shionogi: Grant/Research Support

Abstract Background Several randomized controlled trials (RCT) have shown that short-course (∼7 days) antibiotic treatment is non-inferior to longer antibiotic courses (∼14 days) in patients with uncomplicated bloodstream infection (BSI) with mostly susceptible Gram-negative bacteria. Here, we evaluate short-course therapy in ceftriaxone-resistant E. coli BSI. Methods In a prospective cohort of 300 patients with E. coli BSI at 14 United States hospitals between November 2020 and April 2021, each patient with ceftriaxone-R E. coli BSI, and the next consecutive patient with a ceftriaxone-S E. coli BSI was included. Patients who received 5-8 days (“short”) or 9-21 days (“long”) of antibiotics were included in this analysis. Patients who died before day 9 were excluded. Primary outcome was a Desirability of Outcome Ranking (DOOR, Table 1) based on disposition at day 30 after collection of the index blood culture. Ceftriaxone susceptibility was centrally determined using broth microdilution for all bacterial isolates. Desirability of outcome ranking (DOOR) categories Results Of 300 patients in the original cohort, 227 were included; 44 patients (24 ceftriaxone-S, 20 ceftriaxone-R) received short (median 8 days, range 5-8 days), and 183 patients (96 ceftriaxone-S, 87 ceftriaxone-R) received long duration (median 15 days, range 9-21 days). Age (median 68 years, IQR 57-77 years), sex (125/227 [55%] female), and Charlson comorbidity index (median 2, IQR 1-4) were similar between groups. Notably, almost all patients (18/19, 95%) with solid organ or stem cell transplant were in the long duration group. The median Pitt bacteremia score was 2 (IQR 1-3) in the short duration group vs. 1 (IQR 0-3) in the long duration group (Wilcoxon Rank Sum p=0.07). DOOR outcomes were similar in both groups (Figure and Table 2). Numerically more patients in the ceftriaxone-resistant group on short treatment were in category 3; 4/20 (20%) vs 5/87 (6%) in the long duration group. These 4 patients all had unsuccessful discharge combined with renal failure (n=2), and/or lack of clinical response (n=3). Desirability of outcome ranking (DOOR) analysesFigure.DOOR outcomes Shown are the percentages of patients in each group with a specific DOOR category outcome. Conclusion Short duration of therapy was less frequently used than long duration of therapy in this prospective cohort of E. coli BSI. Further studies are needed to determine whether short-course therapy is appropriate for ceftriaxone-R E. coli BSI. Disclosures Yohei Doi, MD, PHD, bioMerieux: Advisor/Consultant|FujiFilm: Advisor/Consultant|Gilead: Advisor/Consultant|Gilead: Honoraria|GSK: Advisor/Consultant|Meiji Seika Pharma: Advisor/Consultant|Moderna: Advisor/Consultant|Moderna: Honoraria|MSD: Advisor/Consultant|MSD: Honoraria|Shionogi: Advisor/Consultant|Shionogi: Grant/Research Support|Shionogi: Honoraria Owen Albin, MD, Charles River Laboratories: Advisor/Consultant|Shionogi: Advisor/Consultant Elie Saade, MD, MPH, FIDSA, Envision Pharma: Speaker, Presenter|Johnson and Johnson: Speaker, Travel, Lodging|Protein Sciences Corp: Grant/Research Support|Sanofi Pasteur: Speaker, Travel and Lodging Loren G. Miller, MD MPH, ContraFect: Grant/Research Support|GSK: Grant/Research Support|Medline: Grant/Research Support|Merck: Grant/Research Support|Paratek: Grant/Research Support Michael J. Satlin, MD, AbbVie: IDMC member|Biomerieux: Grant/Research Support|Merck: Grant/Research Support|Shionogi: Advisor/Consultant|SNIPRBiome: Grant/Research Support Martin Krsak, MD, MSc, FASAM, AbbVie: Grant/Research Support|Melinta: Honoraria W. Charles Huskins, MD, MSc, ADMA Biologics: Advisor/Consultant|Bristol Myers Squibb: Stocks/Bonds|Pfizer: Advisor/Consultant|Pfizer: Stocks/Bonds|Zimmer Biomet: Stocks/Bonds Robin Patel, MD, Abbott Laboratories: Advisor/Consultant|Adaptive Phage Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Adaptive Phage Therapeutics: Mayo Clinic has a royalty-bearing know-how agreement and equity in Adaptive Phage Therapeutics.|BIOFIRE: Grant/Research Support|CARB-X: Advisor/Consultant|ContraFect: Grant/Research Support|Day Zero Diagnostics: Advisor/Consultant|HealthTrackRx: Advisor/Consultant|Mammoth Biosciences: Advisor/Consultant|Netflix: Advisor/Consultant|Oxford Nanopore Technologies: Advisor/Consultant|PhAST: Advisor/Consultant|See details: Patent on Bordetella pertussis/parapertussis PCR issued, a patent on a device/method for sonication with royalties paid by Samsung to Mayo Clinic|See details: continued, patent on an anti-biofilm substance issued|TenNor Therapeutics Limited: Grant/Research Support|Torus Biosystems: Advisor/Consultant|Trellis Bioscience, Inc.: Advisor/Consultant Vance G. Fowler, MD, MHS, Amphliphi Biosciences, Integrated Biotherapeutics; C3J, Armata, Valanbio; Akagera, Aridis, Roche, Astra Zeneca: Advisor/Consultant|Genentech, Regeneron, Deep Blue, Basilea, Janssen;: Grant/Research Support|Infectious Diseases Society of America: Honoraria|MedImmune, Allergan, Pfizer, Advanced Liquid Logics, Theravance, Novartis, Merck; Medical Biosurfaces; Locus; Affinergy; Contrafect; Karius;: Grant/Research Support|Novartis, Debiopharm, Genentech, Achaogen, Affinium, Medicines Co., MedImmune, Bayer, Basilea, Affinergy, Janssen, Contrafect, Regeneron, Destiny,: Advisor/Consultant|Sepsis diagnostic: Patent pending|UpToDate: Royalties|Valanbio and ArcBio: Stock Options David van Duin, MD, PhD, Entasis: Advisor/Consultant|Merck: Advisor/Consultant|Merck: Grant/Research Support|Pfizer: Advisor/Consultant|Pfizer: Honoraria|Qpex: Advisor/Consultant|Roche: Advisor/Consultant|Shionogi: Advisor/Consultant|Shionogi: Grant/Research Support|Union: Advisor/Consultant|Utility: Advisor/Consultant

Wound biofilm infections caused by multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteria constitute a major threat to public health; acquired resistance combined with resistance associated with the biofilm phenotype makes combatting these infections challenging. Biodegradable polymeric nanoemulsions that encapsulate two hydrophobic antimicrobial agents (eugenol and triclosan) (TE-BNEs) as a strategy to combat chronic wound infections are reported here. The cationic nanoemulsions efficiently penetrate and accumulate in biofilms, synergistically eradicating MDR bacterial biofilms, including persister cells. Notably, the nanoemulsion platform displays excellent biocompatibility and delays emergence of resistance to triclosan. The TE-BNEs are active in an in vivo murine model of mature MDR wound biofilm infections, with 99% bacterial elimination. The efficacy of this system coupled with prevention of emergence of bacterial resistance highlight the potential of this combination platform to treat MDR wound biofilm infections.

Introduction: Staphylococcus aureus is the most common cause of orthopedic infections and can be challenging to treat, especially in the presence of a foreign body. The antistaphylococcal lysins exebacase and CF-296 have rapid bactericidal activity, a low propensity for resistance development, and synergize with some antibiotics. Methods: Rabbit implant-associated osteomyelitis was induced by drilling into the medial tibia followed by locally delivering exebacase, CF-296, or lysin carrier. A titanium screw colonized with methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) IDRL-6169 was inserted. Intravenous daptomycin or saline was administered and continued daily for 4 d. On day 5, rabbits were euthanized, and the tibiae and implants were collected for culture. Results were reported as log10 colony forming units (cfu) per gram of bone or log10 cfu per implant, and comparisons among the six groups were performed using the Wilcoxon rank sum test. Results: Based on implant and bone cultures, all treatments resulted in significantly lower bacterial counts than those of controls (P≤0.0025). Exebacase alone or with daptomycin as well as CF-296 with daptomycin were more active than daptomycin alone (P≤0.0098) or CF-296 alone (P≤0.0154) based on implant cultures. CF-296 with daptomycin was more active than either CF-296 alone (P=0.0040) or daptomycin alone (P=0.0098) based on bone cultures. Conclusion: Local delivery of either exebacase or CF-296 offers a promising complement to conventional antibiotics in implant-associated infections.

Omadacycline, vancomycin, and rifampin, as well as rifampin combination therapies, were evaluated in an experimental rat model of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) osteomyelitis. All treatment groups had less MRSA recovered than saline-treated animals. The emergence of rifampin resistance was observed in 3 of 16 animals with rifampin monotherapy and none with rifampin combination therapy. After treatment, the median tibial bacterial loads were 6.04, 0.1, 4.81, and 5.24 log10 CFU/g for saline-, rifampin-, vancomycin-, and omadacycline-treated animals, respectively. Omadacycline or vancomycin administered with rifampin yielded no detectable MRSA. Omadacycline administered with rifampin deserves evaluation in humans as a potential treatment for osteomyelitis.

Background:Ceftriaxone-resistant (CRO-R) Escherichia coli bloodstream infections (BSIs) are common. Methods:This is a prospective cohort of patients with E coli BSI at 14 United States hospitals between November 2020 and April 2021. For each patient with a CRO-R E coli BSI enrolled, the next consecutive patient with a ceftriaxone-susceptible (CRO-S) E coli BSI was included. Primary outcome was desirability of outcome ranking (DOOR) at day 30, with 50% probability of worse outcomes in the CRO-R group as the null hypothesis. Inverse probability weighting (IPW) was used to reduce confounding. Results:Notable differences between patients infected with CRO-R and CRO-S E coli BSI included the proportion with Pitt bacteremia score ≥4 (23% vs 15%, P = .079) and the median time to active antibiotic therapy (12 hours [interquartile range {IQR}, 1-35 hours] vs 1 hour [IQR, 0-6 hours]; P < .001). Unadjusted DOOR analyses indicated a 58% probability (95% confidence interval [CI], 52%-63%) for a worse clinical outcome in CRO-R versus CRO-S BSI. In the IPW-adjusted cohort, no difference was observed (54% [95% CI, 47%-61%]). Secondary outcomes included unadjusted and adjusted differences in the proportion of 30-day mortality between CRO-R and CRO-S BSIs (-5.3% [95% CI, -10.3% to -.4%] and -1.8 [95% CI, -6.7% to 3.2%], respectively), postculture median length of stay (8 days [IQR, 5-13 days] vs 6 days [IQR, 4-9 days]; P < .001), and incident admission to a long-term care facility (22% vs 12%, P = .045). Conclusions:Patients with CRO-R E coli BSI generally have poorer outcomes compared to patients infected with CRO-S E coli BSI, even after adjusting for important confounders.

The overuse of antibiotics in medicine has led to concerns over management of wound infections where antibiotic-resistant bacteria are involved. Wound infections exhibit both acquired and biofilm-associated antibiotic resistance; innovative non-antibiotic therapeutic and preventive treatments are needed to limit emergence of conventional antimicrobial resistance and to address biofilm-associated resistance. Toward this goal, natural antibacterial clays have been identified that are effective at killing drug-resistant human pathogens in planktonic and biofilm states, in vitro. To move toward clinical testing of antibacterial clays, the present study was conducted to evaluate the topical application of a natural antibacterial clay to wounds in mice experimentally infected with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Five preliminary animal trials were conducted to test various methods of applying hydrated antibacterial clay to infected wounds. None of the experiments yielded significantly reduced MRSA infection in vivo, compared to controls. Several hypotheses were tested to explore the diminished clay antibacterial activity in vivo including: (1) pH and Eh of mineral-bacterial suspensions may differ in wound fluids compared to growth media; (2) antibacterial reactants may complex with components of the wound; (3) hydrated clays may dry out in the wound; and (4) limited dissolved oxygen may reduce Fenton reactions. Ancillary in vitro tests were performed to explore these hypotheses. Results indicate that the clay application to wounds may require enhanced oxidation and possibly a longer treatment regimen. The experimental results foster understanding of the natural clay–bacterial interactions in wounds and may improve designs for medicinal applications.

Staphylococcal osteomyelitis is a complex, costly disease that is difficult to treat, with high failure rates and oftentimes poor outcomes (1, 2).….

Prodrug strategies use chemical modifications to improve the pharmacokinetic properties and therefore therapeutic effects of parent drugs. Traditional prodrug approaches use endogenous enzymes for activation. Bioorthogonal catalysis uses processes that endogenous enzymes cannot access, providing a complementary strategy for prodrug uncaging. Site-selective activation of prodrugs to drugs (uncaging) using synthetic catalysts is a promising strategy for localized drug activation. We discuss here recent studies that incorporate metal catalysts into polymers and nanoparticle scaffolds to provide biocompatible “enzyme-like” catalysts that can penetrate bacterial biofilms and activate prodrug antibiotics in situ , affording a new strategy to treat bacterial biofilm infections with the potential for reduced off-target effects.

This study aimed to determine whether agar dilution, research-use-only disk diffusion (Mast Group Ltd., Bootle Merseyside, UK), Etest (bioMérieux, Inc., Durham, NC), and MIC test strip (MTS) (Liofilchem, Inc., Waltham, MA) methods yield equivalent results to those of broth microdilution (BMD) for imipenem-relebactam susceptibility testing using a collection of 297 Gram-negative bacilli, including members of the order Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa , enriched for drug resistance.

Abstract Background Perirosthetic joint infections (PJIs) are costly and difficult to treat. The most common causes of PJIs are Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis. Eravacycline is a newer tetracycline with promising activity against Gram-positive and negative bacteria which is approved for treatment of complicated intraabdominal infections. Here, the in vitro activity of eravacycline was assessed against bacteria associated with PJI. Methods 185 staphylococcal isolates, including 38 methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA), 64 methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA), 62 methicillin-resistant S. epidermidis (MRSE) and 21 methicillin-susceptible S. epidermidis (MSSE) strains were studied. Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were determined according to Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines (range of 0.06-64 µg/ml tested). Results were analyzed using susceptible breakpoints from EUCAST (≤0.25 µg/ml) and the FDA (≤0.06 µg/ml). Minimum biofilm bactericidal concentrations (MBBCs) were determined using a modification of the Calgary biofilm method. Briefly, biofilms were formed on pegged lids in trypticase soy broth, after which the pegged lids were rinsed in phosphate buffered saline (PBS), transferred to a plate containing dilutions of eravacycline in cation-adjusted Mueller Hinton broth (CAMHB) and incubated for 20-24h. Finally, the pegged lids were again rinsed in PBS and transferred to a plate containing CAMHB and incubated for 24h. The MBBC was the lowest concentration with no visible growth. Results MIC50/90 (range) in µg/ml for MRSA, MSSA, MRSE, and MSSE were 0.125/0.125 (≤0.06-0.25), ≤0.06/0.125 (≤0.06-0.25). 0.125/1 (≤0.06-2), and 0.25/1 (≤0.06-1), respectively. Using the EUCAST susceptible breakpoint, 100% of isolates would be considered susceptible, whereas only 54% would be considered susceptible using the FDA breakpoint. MBBC50/90 (range) in µg/ml for MRSA and MSSA were both 8/16 (4-16); for MRSE and MSSE, the values were 4/16 (2-32) and 8/16 (2-32), respectively. Conclusion Our data suggest that the FDA susceptible breakpoint may need re-evaluation. Eravacycline has low anti-staphylococcal biofilm activity. Disclosures Robin Patel, MD, Accelerate Diagnostics (Grant/Research Support)CD Diagnostics (Grant/Research Support)Contrafect (Grant/Research Support)Curetis (Consultant)GenMark Diagnostics (Consultant)Heraeus Medical (Consultant)Hutchison Biofilm Medical Solutions (Grant/Research Support)Merck (Grant/Research Support)Next Gen Diagnostics (Consultant)PathoQuest (Consultant)Qvella (Consultant)Samsung (Other Financial or Material Support, Dr. Patel has a patent on Bordetella pertussis/parapertussis PCR issued, a patent on a device/method for sonication with royalties paid by Samsung to Mayo Clinic, and a patent on an anti-biofilm substance issued.)Selux Dx (Consultant)Shionogi (Grant/Research Support)Specific Technologies (Consultant)

Antibiotic-resistant bacterial infections arising from acquired resistance and/or through biofilm formation necessitate the development of innovative ‘outside of the box’ therapeutics. Nanomaterial-based therapies are promising tools to combat bacterial infections that are difficult to treat, featuring the capacity to evade existing mechanisms associated with acquired drug resistance. In addition, the unique size and physical properties of nanomaterials give them the capability to target biofilms, overcoming recalcitrant infections. In this Review, we highlight the general mechanisms by which nanomaterials can be used to target bacterial infections associated with acquired antibiotic resistance and biofilms. We emphasize design elements and properties of nanomaterials that can be engineered to enhance potency. Lastly, we present recent progress and remaining challenges for widespread clinical implementation of nanomaterials as antimicrobial therapeutics. In this Review, Rotello and colleagues discuss the mechanisms by which nanomaterials can be used to target antibiotic-resistant bacterial infections, highlight design elements and properties of nanomaterials that can be engineered to enhance potency, and explore recent progress and remaining challenges for clinical implementation of nanomaterials as antimicrobial therapeutics.

BACKGROUNDOwing to patient intolerance or drug interactions, alternative agents to rifampin are needed for management of staphylococcal periprosthetic joint infection. In the current study, we evaluated rifabutin, rifapentine and rifampin, with and without vancomycin, in a rat model of foreign body osteomyelitis.METHODSProximal tibiae were inoculated with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and a Kirschner wire (K-wire) implanted in each. After 4 weeks of infection, rifampin, rifabutin, or rifapentine were administered, alone or with vancomycin. Tibiae and K-wires were cultured, and medians were reported as log10 colony-forming units (CFUs) per gram of bone or log10 CFUs per K-wire, respectively.RESULTSRifampin, rifabutin or rifapentine administered with vancomycin yielded less MRSA from bones (0.10, 3.02, and 0.10 log10 CFUs/g, respectively) than did no treatment (4.36 log10 CFUs/g) or vancomycin alone (4.64 log10 CFUs/g) (both P ≤ .02). The K-wires of animals receiving no treatment or vancomycin monotherapy recovered medians of 1.76 and 2.91 log10 CFUs/g per K-wire, respectively. In contrast, rifampin, rifabutin and rifapentine administered with vancomycin yielded medians of 0.1 log10 CFUs per K-wire, respectively. Rifampin resistance was detected in a single animal in the rifampin monotherapy group.CONCLUSIONSRifabutin or rifapentine with vancomycin were as active as rifampin with vancomycin against MRSA in rat foreign body osteomyelitis, suggesting that rifabutin and/or rifapentine may be alternatives to rifampin in the clinical management of staphylococcal periprosthetic joint infections.

Biofilm infections are a global public health threat, necessitating new treatment strategies. Biofilm formation also contributes to the development and spread of multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacterial strains. Biofilm-associated chronic infections typically involve colonization by more than one bacterial species. The co-existence of multiple species of bacteria in biofilms exacerbates therapeutic challenges and can render traditional antibiotics ineffective. Polymeric nanoparticles offer alternative antimicrobial approaches to antibiotics, owing to their tunable physico-chemical properties. Here, we report the efficacy of poly(oxanorborneneimide) (PONI)-based antimicrobial polymeric nanoparticles (PNPs) against multi-species bacterial biofilms. PNPs showed good dual-species biofilm penetration profiles as confirmed by confocal laser scanning microscopy. Broad-spectrum antimicrobial activity was observed, with reduction in both bacterial viability and overall biofilm mass. Further, PNPs displayed minimal fibroblast toxicity and high antimicrobial activity in an in vitro co-culture model comprising fibroblast cells and dual-species biofilms of Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. This study highlights a potential clinical application of the presented polymeric platform.

MIC and minimum biofilm bactericidal concentration (MBBC) values of eravacycline against 185 staphylococci from periprosthetic joint infections were determined. Staphylococcus aureus had MICs of ≤0.25 μg/ml. MICs for methicillin-susceptible and -resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis were ≤1 and ≤2 μg/ml, respectively. S. aureus and S. epidermidis MBBC 50 and MBBC 90 values were 8 and 16 μg/ml for each, showing poor anti-staphylococcal biofilm activity using the method studied.

Staphylococci are the most common causes of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). TNP-2092 is an investigational hybrid drug composed of rifamycin and quinolizinone pharmacophores conjugated via a covalent linker. We determined minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC), minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC), and minimum biofilm bactericidal concentration (MBBC) values of TNP-2092 against 80 PJI-associated Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis isolates compared to ciprofloxacin and rifampin alone and in combination, alongside daptomycin and vancomycin. TNP-2092 exhibited the following activity against S. aureus: MIC50/MIC90, ≤0.0075/0.015 μg/mL; MBC50/MBC90, 0.5/4 μg/mL; and MBBC50/MBBC90, 0.5/2 μg/mL, and the following activity against S. epidermidis: MIC50/MIC90, ≤0.0075/0.015 μg/mL; MBC50/MBC90, 0.015/0.125 μg/mL; and MBBC50/MBBC90, 0.06/0.25 μg/mL. TNP-2092 MIC, MBC, and MBBC values were >8 μg/mL for 1 isolate, while MIC values were ≤0.25 μg/mL and MBC and MBBC values were ≤4 μg/mL for all other isolates. Results of this study show that TNP-2092 has promising in vitro activity against PJI-associated staphylococci.

Polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) is used for local antimicrobial delivery in orthopedic infection. Oritavancin is a long half-life lipoglycopeptide with broad activity against Gram-positive bacteria. Herein, we addressed if 7.5% w/w oritavancin mixed into PMMA affects PMMA strength and whether it elutes from PMMA, compared to vancomycin.

Abstract Background Orthopedic foreign body-associated infection can be difficult to treat due to the formation of biofilms protecting microorganisms from both antimicrobials and the immune system. Exebacase (EXE) is a phage-derived lysin which acts as a direct lytic agent by hydrolyzing the peptidoglycan cell wall of Staphylococcus aureus. In this study, the activity of EXE was evaluated in comparison to daptomycin against MRSA biofilms on orthopedic Kirschner wires (K-wires). Methods MRSA strain IDRL-6169 was studied; it has a MIC of 0.5 µg/mL for both daptomycin (DAP) and EXE. Biofilms were formed in 1 mL of 106 cfu/mL tryptic soy broth on 0.5x0.1 mm threaded stainless steel K-wires for 10 hours, after which the wires were removed from the media and placed into 0.04 mL of either DAP or EXE at 0 (vehicle only), 0.098, 0.98, or 9.8 mg/mL. DAP+EXE was also tested, each at 0.098 mg/mL. Bacteria were quantified after 0, 2, 4, 8, and 12 hours of incubation at 37ºC. Testing was performed in triplicate. Results were reported as log10 cfu/K-wire reduction relative to vehicle alone. A 3-log10 cfu/K-wire reduction was considered bactericidal. P-values were calculated using Kruskal–Wallis. Results The bacterial burden of vehicle alone ranged from 5.49- to 6.33-log10 cfu/K-wire at all time points. Bacterial reductions for each treatment compared with carrier solution are shown in the table. DAP showed no bactericidal activity. EXE showed bactericidal activity at all concentrations at all time points studied except 0.098 mg/mL at 8 hours. There was no significant difference between EXE at 0.098 and 0.98 mg/mL at any time point but EXE at 9.8 mg/mL did show superiority over the lower concentrations. DAP+EXE 0.098 mg/mL was bactericidal at all time points. Conclusion EXE showed a rapid effect against MRSA biofilms on orthopedic K-wires apparent within the first 2 hours of exposure and was more active than daptomycin alone at the same concentrations. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.