Abstract AZD5335 is a folate receptor alpha (FRα)-targeted antibody-drug conjugate (ADC), incorporating a topoisomerase-1 inhibitor (TOP1i) payload. This ADC is currently being developed as a treatment option for FRα-expressing ovarian cancer patients (NCT#05797168-FONTANA). Since FRα has been reported to be expressed in lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD), the purpose of these studies was to pre-clinically evaluate AZD5335 efficacy within LUAD. Employing a panel of FRα-expressing lung cancer cell lines, we demonstrated target-mediated cytotoxicity of AZD5335 and correlated the in vitro sensitivities with FRα expression levels. These studies support ongoing in vivo proof-of-concept studies using cell-derived xenograft models to further define the efficacy and pharmacodynamics of AZD5335. Additional AZD5335 efficacy testing was performed within 9 FRα-expressing patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models of LUAD. Five of these 9 models responded to AZD5335 (2.5mg/kg) and exhibited a ≥ 30% reduction in tumor volumes (ORR ≈ 56%); AZD5335-related tumor stasis occurred in three additional models. These pre-clinical efforts indicated FRα is an actionable target in LUAD and supported expanding clinical assessment of AZD5335 to LUAD in FONTANA. Citation Format: Jason J. Zoeller, Ravinder Tammali, Nancy Lee, Isabella Tilmont, Judith Anderton, Shailesh Metkar, Michael Ophir, Jixin Wang, Claire Myers, Lara McGrath, Alma Andoni, Ina Bisha, Iris Dino, Xhenifer Guza, Simon Christ, Michael Lehmann, Roger Dodd, Neki Patel, Tim Brier, Marc L. Hyer, Marco Gymnopoulos, Sabina Cosulich, Alejandra Negro, Elaine Hurt, Puja Sapra. AZD5335, a folate receptor alpha-targeted ADC, exerts anti-tumor responses within lung adenocarcinoma [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2026; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2026 Apr 17-22; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2026;86(7 Suppl):Abstract nr 2661.

Camizestrant is the next-generation oral selective estrogen receptor degrader and complete estrogen receptor antagonist in Phase 3 development for hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. To investigate the impact of manufacturing changes during pivotal Phase 3 studies, this open-label, randomized crossover study of 32 postmenopausal healthy volunteers determined the relative bioavailability of a tablet used in early clinical studies (Phase 1 tablet), a tablet designed for late-phase development (prototype Phase 3 tablet), and an oral solution. Absolute oral bioavailability in the fasted state (using a [14C] camizestrant intravenous microtracer) and effects of a high-fat meal on the prototype Phase 3 tablet were also determined. The geometric mean ratios (GMRs) of the prototype Phase 3/Phase 1 tablets (% [90% CI]) for Cmax and AUC, respectively were 98.7 (87.4-111.5) and 97.4 (92.6-102.5) at 75 mg (n = 15), and 96.6 (86.9-107.5) and 100.4 (96.2-104.9) at 300 mg (n = 15). GMRs of the prototype Phase 3 tablet/oral solution for Cmax and AUC were 96.2 (85.3-108.7) and 99.5 (94.6-104.6) at 75 mg (n = 15). Fed-to-fasted Cmax and AUC GMRs were 106.2 (94.3-119.7) (n = 16) and 109.8 (104.4-115.5) (n = 15) at 75 mg (n = 16), and 115.9 (104.3-128.7) and 102.3 (98.0-106.8) at 300 mg (n = 15). Absolute oral bioavailability at 75 mg (n = 6) and 300 mg (n = 6) was 42.5% (36.8%-49.0%) and 55.1% (48.5%-62.5%). The formulations showed similar exposures, supporting the planned manufacturing changes. Camizestrant exhibited moderate bioavailability; exposures were similar under fasted and high-fat meal conditions, supporting its administration with or without food.

Elevated expression of folate receptor alpha (FRα) in various cancers, including epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC), highlights FRα as a potential target for the development of novel therapeutics to treat FRα-expressing tumor types. AZD5335, an FRα-targeting antibody conjugated to a topoisomerase 1 inhibitor (TOP1i) payload, is currently being investigated in the FONTANA Phase I/IIa clinical trial (NCT#05797168), either as a single agent or in combination with a PARP1-selective inhibitor (saruparib). Using an FRα-expressing EOC xenograft model (OV90), we evaluate additional AZD5335-relevant combined treatment strategies and report pre-clinical assessment of AZD5335 in combination with bevacizumab, paclitaxel and/or carboplatin. Compared to monotherapy treatment, we successfully demonstrate that combination treatments with AZD5335+bevacizumab, AZD5335+paclitaxel or AZD5335+carboplatin result in significant and durable anti-tumor responses. Using the same EOC xenograft model, we extended these studies to include AZD5335+bevacizumab plus either paclitaxel or carboplatin treatments and demonstrated that these triplet combos resulted in superior and durable anti-tumor activities. Combination data in a number of additional CDX/PDX will be presented. A series of in vitro studies will also define the ADC/SOC drug interactions and further delineate underlying mechanisms driving enhanced efficacy. These studies inform our ongoing clinical development of AZD5335 in ovarian cancer. Jason J. Zoeller, Ravinder Tammali, Ana De Almeida, Shane Cronin, Nancy Lee, Alma Andoni, Claire Myers, Elaine Joseph, Michael Lehmann, Rebecca Sargeant, Ina Bisha, Simon Christ, Iris Dino, Xhenifer Guza, Jixin Wang, Lisa Godfrey, Roger Dodd, Neki Patel, Edward Rosfjord, Marco Gymnopoulos, Tim Brier, Sabina Cosulich, Elaine Hurt, Puja Sapra. AZD5335, a folate receptor alpha-targeted ADC, enhances ovarian cancer treatment with bevacizumab, paclitaxel and/or carboplatin [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2025; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2025 Apr 25-30; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2025;85(8_Suppl_1):Abstract nr 815.

PURPOSE:Folate receptor α (FRα) is expressed in most ovarian cancers. However, only patients with high expression levels are eligible for Elahere, an FRα-targeted microtubule inhibitor antibody-drug conjugate (ADC). Efficacy limitations and safety concerns underscore the need to develop next-generation FRα-targeted ADC to treat tumors expressing variable levels of FRα and incorporate different payloads to reduce safety risks. Herein, we present the characterization of AZD5335, a novel FRα-targeted topoisomerase-1 inhibitor ADC. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN:The efficacy of AZD5335 was assessed and correlated with FRα expression using cell- and patient-derived models. Focusing on models with low FRα, AZD5335 was directly compared with an Elahere analogue. Additionally, AZD5335 was evaluated in a model of acquired Elahere resistance. Combined treatments, including AZD5335 plus either standard-of-care drugs or a PARP1 inhibitor, were also explored. RESULTS:A single dose of AZD5335 (2.5 mg/kg) achieved an overall response rate of 82% in patient-derived ovarian cancer xenografts (n = 17). Antitumor responses were observed in models expressing both high and low levels of FRα. Specifically within FRα-low models, AZD5335 demonstrated superiority over an Elahere analogue. In the context of acquired Elahere resistance, AZD5335 treatments resulted in complete tumor regressions. Additionally, combining AZD5335 with standard-of-care drugs or a PARP1 inhibitor resulted in enhanced efficacy and sustained durability. Two clinical case studies that demonstrated significant AZD5335 responses in tumors exhibiting high and low FRα expression are also provided. CONCLUSIONS:AZD5335 is a promising next-generation ADC capable of targeting ovarian cancers with both high and low FRα expression. AZD5335 demonstrates efficacy in overcoming Elahere resistance and supports combined treatment strategies.

Background: SERENA-1 (NCT03616587) is a Phase 1, multi-part, open-label study of camizestrant in women with ER+/HER2− advanced breast cancer. Data for camizestrant as monotherapy and in combination with palbociclib or abemaciclib have been presented previously.1–3 Here we present data from parts I and J (dose ranging and expansion, respectively), which examined camizestrant in combination with the pan-AKT inhibitor capivasertib. Methods: The primary objective was to determine the safety and tolerability of camizestrant 75 mg once daily (QD) in combination with capivasertib 400 mg twice daily (BID; intermittent: 4 days on, 3 days off). Secondary objectives included investigation of anti-tumor response and pharmacokinetics (PK). Participants were women of any menopausal status (pre-menopausal women received concomitant ovarian function suppression). Prior treatment with an endocrine therapy (ET) in the advanced setting was required with no limit on the number of lines of prior ET. Prior treatment with ≤2 lines of chemotherapy in the advanced setting was permitted. Prior treatment with CDK4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) and/or fulvestrant was also permitted. Results: As of 21 March 2023, 29 patients had received camizestrant in combination with capivasertib. Patients were heavily pretreated in the advanced setting (48% prior chemotherapy, 90% prior CDK4/6i, 55% prior fulvestrant) and 72% had visceral metastases. The safety and tolerability profile of the combination of camizestrant and capivasertib was broadly consistent with that of each drug individually.4,5 In the 29 patients, adverse events considered related to camizestrant and/or capivasertib in >15% of patients (%; n grade 1/n Grade 2/n Grade >3) included diarrhea (66%; 14/2/3), visual effects (62%; all Grade 1), bradycardia (34%; all Grade 1), nausea (34%; 6/4/0), fatigue (21%; 4/2/0) maculopapular rash (17%; 0/3/2) and aspartate aminotransferase increased (17%; 3/0/2). The PK and safety data indicated no clinically relevant drug–drug interactions between camizestrant and capivasertib. The objective response rate was 29.6% (8/27), the clinical benefit rate at 24 weeks was 51.7% (15/29), and median progression–free survival was 8.3 months. Overall, 12 patients had a detectable ESR1 mutation (ESR1m) at baseline (Cycle 1, Day 1) and an evaluable Cycle 2, Day 1 (C2D1) result; of these, ESR1m was reduced by >50% at C2D1 in 91.7% of patients (11/12), including 66.7% (8/12) of patients where ESR1m was cleared. Conclusions: Camizestrant 75 mg QD in combination with capivasertib 400 mg BID was well tolerated and associated with encouraging clinical and pharmacodynamic activity. These data support further evaluation of this combination in women with ER+/HER2− advanced breast cancer. References: Capivasertib was discovered by AstraZeneca subsequent to a collaboration with Astex Therapeutics (and its collaboration with the Institute of Cancer Research and Cancer Research Technology Limited). We acknowledge Sandra Heurtaux from InterComm International who provided medical writing support funded by AstraZeneca. Anne Armstrong had not approved the final draft of the abstract at the time of submission. Citation Format: Christos Vaklavas, Mafalda Oliveira, Anne Armstrong, Irene Moreno, Chris Twelves, Ivan Victoria Ruiz, Begoña Bermejo, Maxine Ajimi, Tim Brier, Carmela Ciardullo, Lisa Gibbons, Itziar Irurzun-Arana, Tony Jack, Teresa Klinowska, Justin Lindemann, Alastair Mathewson, Christopher Morrow, Andy Sykes, Richard Baird. SERENA-1: Results from a Phase 1 study (Parts I/J) testing the next-generation oral selective estrogen receptor degrader (SERD) camizestrant (AZD9833) in combination with capivasertib in women with ER+, HER2 advanced breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO3-19-09.

BackgroundSERENA-1 (NCT03616587) is a Phase 1, multi-part, open-label study of camizestrant in pre- and post-menopausal women with ER+, HER2− advanced breast cancer. Parts A and B aim to determine the safety and tolerability of camizestrant monotherapy and define doses for clinical evaluation. Patients and Methods Women aged 18 years or older with metastatic or recurrent ER+, HER2− breast cancer, refractory (or intolerant) to therapy were assigned 25 mg up to 450 mg once daily (QD; escalation) or 75, 150, or 300 mg QD (expansion). Safety and tolerability, anti-tumor efficacy, pharmacokinetics, and impact on ESR1m circulating tumor (ct)DNA levels were assessed.ResultsBy 9 March 2021, 108 patients received camizestrant monotherapy at 25–450 mg doses. Of these, 93 (86.1%) experienced treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs), 82.4% of which were grade 1 or 2. The most common TRAEs were visual effects (56%), (sinus) bradycardia (44%), fatigue (26%), and nausea (15%). There were no TRAEs grade 3 or higher, or treatment-related serious adverse events (TRSAEs) at doses ≤150 mg.Median tmax was achieved ∼2–4 hours post-dose at all doses investigated, with an estimated half-life of 20–23 hours. Efficacy was observed at all doses investigated, including in patients with prior CDK4/6 inhibitor and/or fulvestrant treatment, with and without baseline ESR1 mutations, and with visceral disease, including liver metastases.ConclusionsCamizestrant is a next-generation oral SERD and pure ER antagonist with a tolerable safety profile. The pharmacokinetics profile supports once-daily dosing, with evidence of pharmacodynamic and clinical efficacy in heavily pre-treated patients, regardless of ESR1m. This study established 75, 150 and 300 mg QD doses for Phase 2 testing (SERENA-2, NCT04214288 and SERENA-3, NCT04588298).

Abstract Background: SERENA-1 (NCT03616587) is a Phase 1, multi-part, open-label study of camizestrant in women with ER+/HER2− advanced breast cancer. Data for camizestrant as monotherapy and in combination with palbociclib or abemaciclib have been presented previously.1–3 Here we present data from parts I and J (dose ranging and expansion, respectively), which examined camizestrant in combination with the pan-AKT inhibitor capivasertib. Methods: The primary objective was to determine the safety and tolerability of camizestrant 75 mg once daily (QD) in combination with capivasertib 400 mg twice daily (BID; intermittent: 4 days on, 3 days off). Secondary objectives included investigation of anti-tumor response and pharmacokinetics (PK). Participants were women of any menopausal status (pre-menopausal women received concomitant ovarian function suppression). Prior treatment with an endocrine therapy (ET) in the advanced setting was required with no limit on the number of lines of prior ET. Prior treatment with ≤2 lines of chemotherapy in the advanced setting was permitted. Prior treatment with CDK4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) and/or fulvestrant was also permitted. Results: As of 21 March 2023, 29 patients had received camizestrant in combination with capivasertib. Patients were heavily pretreated in the advanced setting (48% prior chemotherapy, 90% prior CDK4/6i, 55% prior fulvestrant) and 72% had visceral metastases. The safety and tolerability profile of the combination of camizestrant and capivasertib was broadly consistent with that of each drug individually.4,5 In the 29 patients, adverse events considered related to camizestrant and/or capivasertib in >15% of patients (%; n grade 1/n Grade 2/n Grade >3) included diarrhea (66%; 14/2/3), visual effects (62%; all Grade 1), bradycardia (34%; all Grade 1), nausea (34%; 6/4/0), fatigue (21%; 4/2/0) maculopapular rash (17%; 0/3/2) and aspartate aminotransferase increased (17%; 3/0/2). The PK and safety data indicated no clinically relevant drug–drug interactions between camizestrant and capivasertib. The objective response rate was 29.6% (8/27), the clinical benefit rate at 24 weeks was 51.7% (15/29), and median progression–free survival was 8.3 months. Overall, 12 patients had a detectable ESR1 mutation (ESR1m) at baseline (Cycle 1, Day 1) and an evaluable Cycle 2, Day 1 (C2D1) result; of these, ESR1m was reduced by >50% at C2D1 in 91.7% of patients (11/12), including 66.7% (8/12) of patients where ESR1m was cleared. Conclusions: Camizestrant 75 mg QD in combination with capivasertib 400 mg BID was well tolerated and associated with encouraging clinical and pharmacodynamic activity. These data support further evaluation of this combination in women with ER+/HER2− advanced breast cancer. References: Capivasertib was discovered by AstraZeneca subsequent to a collaboration with Astex Therapeutics (and its collaboration with the Institute of Cancer Research and Cancer Research Technology Limited). We acknowledge Sandra Heurtaux from InterComm International who provided medical writing support funded by AstraZeneca. Anne Armstrong had not approved the final draft of the abstract at the time of submission. Citation Format: Christos Vaklavas, Mafalda Oliveira, Anne Armstrong, Irene Moreno, Chris Twelves, Ivan Victoria Ruiz, Begoña Bermejo, Maxine Ajimi, Tim Brier, Carmela Ciardullo, Lisa Gibbons, Itziar Irurzun-Arana, Tony Jack, Teresa Klinowska, Justin Lindemann, Alastair Mathewson, Christopher Morrow, Andy Sykes, Richard Baird. SERENA-1: Results from a Phase 1 study (Parts I/J) testing the next-generation oral selective estrogen receptor degrader (SERD) camizestrant (AZD9833) in combination with capivasertib in women with ER+, HER2 advanced breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO3-19-09.

Background: SERENA-1 (NCT03616587) is a Phase 1, multi-part, open-label study of camizestrant in women with ER+/HER2− advanced breast cancer. Parts A/B and C/D (escalation/expansion) examined camizestrant as monotherapy and in combination with palbociclib respectively and have been presented previously.1,2 Here we present data from parts G/H which examined camizestrant in combination with abemaciclib. Methods: The primary objective was to determine the safety and tolerability of camizestrant 75 mg once daily (QD) in combination with abemaciclib 150 mg twice daily (BID). Secondary objectives included investigation of anti-tumor response and pharmacokinetics (PK). Participants were previously treated women of any menopausal status (pre-menopausal women received this combination alongside ongoing ovarian function suppressors). Prior treatment with ≤2 lines of chemotherapy in the advanced setting was permitted. There was no limit on the number of lines of prior endocrine treatment in the advanced setting; previous treatment with CDK4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) and fulvestrant was permitted. Results: As of 1st June 2022, 24 patients had received camizestrant in combination with abemaciclib with a median 7.7 month follow up. Tolerability of the combination of camizestrant and abemaciclib was consistent with that of each drug individually. No patient required camizestrant dose reduction. All camizestrant-related heart rate decreases were Grade 1 (asymptomatic). PK data for camizestrant in combination with abemaciclib were consistent with camizestrant as monotherapy and published abemaciclib steady-state PK data, indicating no clinically relevant drug-drug interaction. In these heavily pre-treated patients (46% prior chemotherapy, 75% prior CDK4/6i, 54% prior fulvestrant; all in the advanced disease setting) and of whom 67% had visceral metastases, the objective response rate was 5/19 (26.3%), the clinical benefit rate at 24 weeks was 16/24 (66.7%) and the median progression-free survival had not been reached, with 8/24 patients experiencing a progression event. These data support the use of camizestrant 75 mg QD combined with the approved abemaciclib dose. Conclusions: Camizestrant 75 mg QD in combination with abemaciclib 150 mg BID was well tolerated with encouraging clinical activity. The inclusion of this regimen in the ongoing Phase 3, SERENA-6 trial 3, of camizestrant combined with CDK4/6i versus an aromatase inhibitor, will further clarify the role of this combination in the treatment of patients with ER+/HER2− advanced breast cancer with tumors expressing ESR1 mutations. References 1. Baird R, Oliveira M, Ciruelos Gil EM, et al. SABCS 2020 Virtual Meeting. Abstract PS11-05. 2. Oliveira M, Hamilton EP, Incorvati J, et al. J Clin Oncol 40, 2022 (suppl 16; abstr 1032). 3. SERENA-6 trial. Available at https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04964934 We acknowledge Helen Heffron, PhD, from InterComm International who provided medical writing support funded by AstraZeneca. Citation Format: Nicholas Turner, Christos Vaklavas, Emiliano Calvo, Javier Garcia-Corbacho, Jason Incorvati, Manuel Ruiz Borrego, Chris Twelves, Anne Armstrong, Begoña Bermejo, Erika Hamilton, Mafalda Oliveira, Eva Ciruelos, Peter Kabos, Manish R Patel, Maria Borrell, Howard Burris, Bruno de Paula, Alejandro Falcon, Cristina Hernando, Irene Moreno, Ciara S. O’Brien, Elena Shagisultanova, Ivan Victoria Ruiz, Judy S. Wang, Mei Wei, Tim Brier, Danielle Carroll, Carmela Ciardullo, Lisa Gibbons, itziar irurzun-Arana, Tony Jack, bistra kirova, Teresa Klinowska, Justin Lindemann, Julie Maidment, Alastair Mathewson, Rhiannon Maudsley, Robert McEwen, Christopher Morrow, Andy Sykes, Richard D. Baird. SERENA-1: Updated analyses from a Phase 1 study of the next generation oral selective estrogen receptor degrader camizestrant (AZD9833) combined with abemaciclib, in women with ER-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-07-28.

Folate receptor α (FRα), a cell-surface protein encoded by the folate receptor 1 gene, is upregulated in epithelial ovarian cancers and lung adenocarcinomas. AZD5335 is an antibody-drug conjugate comprising an antibody portion that binds with high affinity to FRα conjugated to a topoisomerase 1 inhibitor (TOP1i) payload. Upon binding, AZD5335 releases TOP1i within the cell. The TOP1i payload then traps TOP1 on the replicating DNA and induces DNA double-strand breaks, ultimately resulting in cell death. AZD5335 is active in preclinical models of high-grade ovarian cancer (Gymnopoulos et al. Presented at AACR 2023; abstract LB025). FONTANA (NCT05797168) is a modular, first-in-human, open-label, multicentre study of AZD5335 in patients with advanced solid tumours. The study will evaluate AZD5335 as monotherapy in patients with ovarian cancer or lung adenocarcinoma (Module 1), or AZD5335 in combination with AZD5305, a selective poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase 1 inhibitor, in patients with ovarian cancer (Module 2). Each module consists of a dose-escalation and dose-optimisation cohort. Key features of this study include the use of randomised dose-optimisation cohorts and a Bayesian-logistic regression model-based dose escalation in Module 2. Eligible patients are aged ≥18 years, ECOG performance status 0–1, must have received prior therapy, and have adequate organ and marrow function. Asymptomatic and stable brain metastases are allowed. The primary objectives are to assess the safety and tolerability, and to establish the dose limiting toxicity. Secondary objectives include assessment of objective response rate, duration of response, disease control rate, and progression-free survival by RECIST v1.1, and overall survival; characterising the pharmacokinetics of AZD5335 when given as monotherapy or in combination; and assessing immunogenicity. The study will be open to recruitment by 25 May 2023. NCT05797168. This study was funded by AstraZeneca. Medical writing support for this abstract, under the direction of the authors, was provided by Asad Mustafa of Ashfield MedComms, an Inizio company, and was funded by AstraZeneca. AstraZeneca. AstraZeneca.

Endocrine therapy forms the backbone treatment for patients with estrogen receptor (ER) positive tumors in both the adjuvant and metastatic setting. Aromatase inhibitors (AI) are the most common endocrine treatment option. Mutation of ESR1, the gene encoding ERα, is a common mechanism of resistance to AIs which leads to ligand independent activity of ERα. Camizestrant (AZD9833) is a next generation SERD and pure ER antagonist that is in Phase 3 trials (SERENA-4: NCT04711252; SERENA-6: NCT04964934). Here we report the preclinical and clinical activity of camizestrant in patients with ESR1 wild-type (ESR1wt) and mutant (ESR1m) tumors. The binding affinities of camizestrant, fulvestrant, and estradiol to wt ERα and ERα variants with mutations in the ligand binding domain were assessed. All three compounds exhibited reduced binding to mutant forms of ERα compared with wt ERα; the Y537S mutation had the greatest impact on binding. This was reflected in requirement for greater concentrations of camizestrant and fulvestrant to degrade and antagonize mutated ERα and to impact cellular proliferation in MCF-7 cells that expressed Y537S ESR1m compared to ESR1wt MCF-7 cells. Furthermore, while a 3 mg/kg dose of camizestrant achieved a maximal anti-tumor effect in a ESR1wt patient derived xenograft model, a 10 mg/kg was required for maximal effect in a D538G ESR1m model. Considering this difference between ESR1m and ESR1wt, pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modelling of preclinical data predicted that a camizestrant dose of 75 mg would be maximally efficacious in patients with ESR1m tumors. Indeed, analysis of ESR1m circulating tumor DNA levels in patients from the SERENA-1 (NCT03616587) Phase 1 trial showed a clear effect of 14 days treatment with 75 mg camizestrant resulting in a >2-fold reduction in ESR1m variant allele frequency in 12/13 (92%) cases with complete clearance of ESR1m ctDNA in 7/13 (54%) cases. Interestingly, the clinical activity of camizestrant was higher in heavily pretreated patients with metastatic breast cancer with ESR1m tumors compared to those with no detectable mutation (ESR1m not detected). At a camizestrant dose of 75 mg, median progression-free survival was 8.3 months (maturity 12/15) in patients with ESR1m tumors compared to 5.6 months (8/9) in those with ESR1m not detected (data cut-off 6 October 2021). Camizestrant-induced ERα degradation was seen in both groups (mean reduction in H-score 42% in ESR1m tumors (n= 12 evaluable pairs) and 46% in tumors with ESR1m not detected (n=7)). Whole transcriptome analysis revealed a trend towards higher ERα activity at baseline in ESR1m tumors compared to ESR1m not detected; ERα activity reduced on treatment in both groups. Consistent with the clinical activity data, camizestrant induced more profound reductions in cell proliferation in ESR1m tumors compared to ESR1m not detected tumors (as seen by greater reductions in Ki67-positive tumor cells). These data demonstrate the activity of camizestrant in patients with ESR1m tumors. Clinical activity along with degradation and antagonism of the ERα is also seen in patients with tumors in which ESR1 mutations are not detected. In this heavily pre-treated Phase 1 patient population from SERENA-1, ESR1m may be a predictive biomarker to enrich for patients with maintained endocrine sensitivity. The SERENA-6 trial is investigating the efficacy and safety of camizestrant plus a CDK4/6 inhibitor in patients with metastatic breast cancer and detectable ESR1m. We acknowledge Helen Heffron, PhD, from InterComm International who provided medical writing support funded by AstraZeneca. Citation Format: Christopher Morrow, Larissa Carnevalli, Richard D. Baird, Tim Brier, Carmela Ciardullo, Natalie Cureton, Mandy Lawson, Robert McEwen, Myria Nikolaou, Anne Armstrong, Begoña Bermejo, Emiliano Calvo, Eva Ciruelos, Javier Garcia-Corbacho, Erika Hamilton, Jason Incorvati, Peter Kabos, Mafalda Oliveira, Manish R Patel, Manuel Ruiz-Borregó, Nicholas Turner, Chris Twelves, Christos Vaklavas, Danielle Carroll, Steven Ching, Nevena Cvetesic, Michelle DuPont, Lisa Gibbons, Alastair Mathewson, Rhiannon Maudsley, Pablo Morentin Gutierrez, Avinash Reddy, Jaime Rodriguez-Canales, Susana Ros, Dhivya Sudhan, Andy Sykes, David Whitson, Teresa Klinowska, Justin Lindemann. The next generation oral selective estrogen receptor degrader (SERD) camizestrant (AZD9833) is active against wild type and mutant estrogen receptor α [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-07-13.

1032 Background: SERENA-1 (NCT03616587) is a Phase 1, multi-part, open-label study of camizestrant in women with ER+, HER2− advanced breast cancer (ABC). Parts A/B (escalation/expansion) assessed camizestrant monotherapy and have been presented previously. Parts C/D examine camizestrant in combination with palbociclib; here we present mature data from camizestrant 75 mg in combination with palbociclib; 75 mg being the camizestrant dose currently under investigation in the Phase 3 studies SERENA-4 (NCT04711252) and SERENA-6 (NCT04964934). Methods: The primary objective was to determine the safety and tolerability of camizestrant once daily (QD) with palbociclib. Secondary objectives included anti-tumor response and pharmacokinetics (PK). Prior treatment with < 2 lines of chemotherapy in the advanced setting was permitted. There was no limit on the number of lines of prior endocrine treatment in the advanced setting; prior treatment with CDK4/6 inhibitors and fulvestrant (F) was permitted. Results: As of 9 September 2021, 25 patients had received camizestrant 75 mg QD in combination with palbociclib. Tolerability of the combination of camizestrant 75 mg and palbociclib was consistent with that of each drug individually. No patient required camizestrant dose interruption/reduction/discontinuation due to a camizestrant-related adverse event (AE); moreover, none experienced a Grade ≥3 camizestrant-related AE. All camizestrant-related heart rate reductions were Grade 1 (asymptomatic). All camizestrant-related visual effects were Grade 1 (mild), apart from one patient who experienced transient Grade 2 (moderate) visual effects that resolved to Grade 1 without dose modification. Camizestrant-related gastrointestinal disorders were all Grade 1, except one instance of Grade 2 nausea lasting one day. PK data for camizestrant 75 mg QD and palbociclib combined were broadly consistent with camizestrant as monotherapy and published palbociclib steady-state PK data, further supporting the use of camizestrant 75 mg QD (Phase 3 dose) in combination with the approved palbociclib doses. In these heavily pre-treated patients (48% prior chemotherapy, 80% prior CDK4/6i, 68% prior F; all in advanced disease setting) and of whom 60% had visceral metastases, the clinical benefit rate at 24 weeks was 7/25 (28%). Conclusions: The PK and safety profile of camizestrant 75 mg QD in combination with palbociclib is favorable in this mature Phase 1 dataset. Despite extensive pre-treatment - including chemotherapies, CDK4/6i, and F - camizestrant 75 mg QD in combination with palbociclib exhibits encouraging clinical activity. The results from the ongoing Phase 3 studies, SERENA-4 and SERENA-6, will further elucidate the role of this combination in the treatment of patients with HR+/HER2− ABC. Clinical trial information: NCT03616587.

Abstract Background: AZD9833 is an oral selective estrogen receptor (ER) antagonist and degrader (SERD) in Phase 2 clinical development for the treatment of ER+ HER2− breast cancer. Here we report data from Parts C and D of the ongoing Phase 1 study (SERENA-1) examining AZD9833 in combination with palbociclib, together with updated data from Parts A and B examining AZD9833 monotherapy. Methods: SERENA-1 (NCT03616587) is an ongoing open-label Phase 1 study of AZD9833 in pre- and post-menopausal women with ER+, HER2− advanced breast cancer who have previously received ≥1 endocrine therapy and ≤2 prior chemotherapies. Prior treatment with fulvestrant and/or CDK4/6 inhibitors was permitted. The primary objective is to determine the safety and tolerability of once daily (QD) AZD9833, with dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) in the first 28 days defining the maximum tolerated dose. Secondary objectives include anti-tumor response (including circulating tumor [ct] DNA response) and pharmacokinetics. Parts A (escalation) and B (expansion) assess AZD9833 as a monotherapy, and Parts C (escalation) and D (expansion) assess AZD9833 in combination with palbociclib. Results: At a data cut-off of March 24 2020, 17 patients had received either 150 mg or 300 mg AZD9833 in combination with palbociclib, given according to its product labeling. Eighty patients had received AZD9833 monotherapy at doses of 25, 75, 150, 300, and 450 mg QD. In patients treated with AZD9833 and palbociclib, treatment-related adverse events (AEs; experienced by ≥10% of patients) included visual disturbances*, bradycardia*, asthenia, anemia, QTcF prolongation, nausea, neutropenia, decreased white blood cell count, and vomiting (*combined terms). All instances of AZD9833-related bradycardia were Grade 1. One DLT was observed in the 150 mg cohort: CTCAE Grade 2 visual disturbances, which began on Cycle 1 Day 8 and resolved by Cycle 1 Day 9 following dose interruption. The patient restarted treatment on Cycle 1 Day 15 at 75 mg and continued this dose until data cut-off. No causally related AEs led to discontinuation of AZD9833. The tolerability of AZD9833 with palbociclib was consistent with the observed tolerability profile of AZD9833 monotherapy, and the known tolerability profile of palbociclib. Pharmacokinetic analysis showed similar AZD9833 exposure for monotherapy and palbociclib combination therapy. Similarly, palbociclib exposure was comparable with simulations using a published population pharmacokinetic model. In Part A, ESR1 hotspot mutations were detected in ctDNA at baseline in 26/56 (46%) patients; 13/26 (50%) of these patients achieved a partial response or stable disease at 24 weeks, including 5/10 (50%) with a Y537S ESR1 mutation. Further, in patients with ESR1 mutations and samples available for longitudinal ctDNA analysis, 17/20 (85%) exhibited a reduction or loss of mutant ESR1 on treatment with AZD9833. Efficacy data to be presented include objective response rate and clinical benefit rate at 24 weeks. Of note, unconfirmed partial responses have been observed in Part C after the data cut-off for this abstract. Conclusions: AZD9833 continues to show an encouraging efficacy and dose-dependent safety profile as a monotherapy or in combination with palbociclib. A Phase 2 study comparing the efficacy and safety of three doses of AZD9833 versus fulvestrant (NCT04214288), and a Phase 2 pre-surgical ‘window of opportunity’ study (EUDRA-CT; 2019-003706-2) are ongoing. Citation Format: Richard Baird, Mafalda Oliveira, Eva Maria Ciruelos Gil, Manish R Patel, Begoña Bermejo de las Heras, Manuel Ruiz-Borrego, Javier García-Corbacho, Anne Armstrong, Udai Banerji, Chris Twelves, Valentina Boni, Jason Incorvati, Peter Kabos, Adam L Cohen, Bruno de Paula, Marta Capelán Rodríguez, Judy S Wang, Christina Hernando, Alejandro Falcón Gonzalez, Ivan Victoria Ruiz, Julia Lai-Kwon, Anosheh Afghani, Christos Vaklavas, Tim Brier, Steven Fox, Bistra Kirova, Teresa Klinowska, Chris Leach, Justin PO Lindemann, Richard Mather, Rhiannon Maudsley, Christopher J Morrow, Nitharsan Sathiyayogan, Andy Sykes, Li Zhang, Erika Hamilton. Updated data from SERENA-1: A Phase 1 dose escalation and expansion study of the next generation oral SERD AZD9833 as a monotherapy and in combination with palbociclib, in women with ER-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS11-05.

Abstract Background: All antibodies approved for the treatment of cancer are monoclonal IgGs, and no IgE therapy has yet been tested in humans. The biology of IgE, compared with IgG, offers potential for enhanced immune surveillance and superior effector cell potency against tumor cells. IgE antibodies in preclinical cancer models are not associated with allergic toxicity even in immunocompetent animals, and in vivo efficacy compares favorably with equivalent IgGs. Methods: We conducted a first-in-human first-in-class trial of MOv18, a chimeric monoclonal IgE, in patients with solid tumors expressing folate receptor-alpha, the antigen recognized by this antibody. Antigen expression was deemed positive in the presence of >5% membrane staining of any intensity using the mouse clone BN3.2. Intravenous treatment was administered weekly for 6 weeks, then two-weekly. The trial incorporated pre-treatment skin prick testing with MOv18 IgE, and an ex vivo basophil activation test (BAT) using patient whole blood, with the aim of predicting systemic allergic toxicity and excluding patients at potential risk. Safety, efficacy, markers of immune response, and pharmacokinetics have been evaluated in 24 patients to date, at total doses ranging from 0.07 to 3.0mg. Results: Treatment was well tolerated in almost all patients. The most common toxicity was readily manageable urticaria, without systemic symptoms, signs or tryptase elevation. One patient treated at the 0.5mg dose experienced anaphylaxis, with tryptase elevation, despite a negative pre-dose skin prick test. This was the only patient in the trial with baseline circulating basophils that could be activated by ex vivo exposure to MOv18 IgE. This BAT assay was subsequently used to ensure no further patient with reactive basophils was exposed. Maximum tolerated dose has not yet been reached. Dose-dependent increases in Cmax were observed, and plasma concentrations of 70-100ng/mL achieved at the 1.5mg dose are comparable to typical levels of endogenous IgE. No consistent anti-drug antibody response has been detected. Preliminary evidence of anti-tumor activity was seen in a patient with ovarian cancer at a total MOv18 IgE dose of 0.7mg. Shrinkage of peritoneal metastases was accompanied by a tumor marker reduction meeting Gynecologic Cancer InterGroup criteria for response. Conclusions: These results support for the first time the safety of IgE as a treatment for cancer, and provide preliminary evidence for anti-tumor efficacy of this new therapeutic class. The mechanism of cutaneous toxicity is being investigated. Clinical testing of class-switched IgE versions of approved IgG-based therapeutic antibodies is warranted. Citation Format: James Spicer, Bristi Basu, Ana Montes, Udai Banerji, Rebecca Kristeleit, Gareth J. Veal, Christopher Corrigan, Stephen Till, George Nintos, Timothy Brier, Ionut G. Funingana, Joo Ern Ang, Kam Zaki, Annie Griffin, Claire Barton, Paul Jones, Sarah Mellor, Susan Brook, Katie Stoddart, Christopher Selkirk, Simon Carroll, Heike Lentfer, Natalie Woodman, Amy Pope, Giulia Pellizzari, Mano Nakamura, Kristina M. Ilieva, Atousa Khiabany, Chara Stavraka, Hannah Gould, Jitesh Chauhan, Heather Bax, Sarah Pinder, Debra Josephs, Sophia Karagiannis. Phase 1 trial of MOv18, a first-in-class IgE antibody therapy for cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research 2020; 2020 Apr 27-28 and Jun 22-24. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(16 Suppl):Abstract nr CT141.