High intratumoral heterogeneity is thought to be a poor prognostic indicator. However, the source of heterogeneity may also be important, as genomic heterogeneity is not always reflected in histologic or ‘visual’ heterogeneity. We aimed to develop a predictor of histologic heterogeneity and evaluate its association with outcomes and molecular heterogeneity. We used VGG16 to train an image classifier to identify unique, patient-specific visual features in 1655 breast tumors (5907 core images) from the Carolina Breast Cancer Study (CBCS). Extracted features for images, as well as the epithelial and stromal image components, were hierarchically clustered, and visual heterogeneity was defined as a greater distance between images from the same patient. We assessed the association between visual heterogeneity, clinical features, and DNA-based molecular heterogeneity using generalized linear models, and we used Cox models to estimate the association between visual heterogeneity and tumor recurrence. Basal-like and ER-negative tumors were more likely to have low visual heterogeneity, as were the tumors from younger and Black women. Less heterogeneous tumors had a higher risk of recurrence (hazard ratio = 1.62, 95% confidence interval = 1.22–2.16), and were more likely to come from patients whose tumors were comprised of only one subclone or had a TP53 mutation. Associations were similar regardless of whether the image was based on stroma, epithelium, or both. Histologic heterogeneity adds complementary information to commonly used molecular indicators, with low heterogeneity predicting worse outcomes. Future work integrating multiple sources of heterogeneity may provide a more comprehensive understanding of tumor progression.

Purpose: We address the need for effective stain domain adaptation methods in histopathology to enhance the performance of downstream computational tasks, particularly classification. Existing methods exhibit varying strengths and weaknesses, prompting the exploration of a different approach. The focus is on improving stain color consistency, expanding the stain domain scope, and minimizing the domain gap between image batches. Approach: We introduce a new domain adaptation method, Stain simultaneous augmentation and normalization (SAN), designed to adjust the distribution of stain colors to align with a target distribution. Stain SAN combines the merits of established methods, such as stain normalization, stain augmentation, and stain mix-up, while mitigating their inherent limitations. Stain SAN adapts stain domains by resampling stain color matrices from a well-structured target distribution. Results: Experimental evaluations of cross-dataset clinical estrogen receptor status classification demonstrate the efficacy of Stain SAN and its superior performance compared with existing stain adaptation methods. In one case, the area under the curve (AUC) increased by 11.4%. Overall, our results clearly show the improvements made over the history of the development of these methods culminating with substantial enhancement provided by Stain SAN. Furthermore, we show that Stain SAN achieves results comparable with the state-of-the-art generative adversarial network-based approach without requiring separate training for stain adaptation or access to the target domain during training. Stain SAN's performance is on par with HistAuGAN, proving its effectiveness and computational efficiency. Conclusions: Stain SAN emerges as a promising solution, addressing the potential shortcomings of contemporary stain adaptation methods. Its effectiveness is underscored by notable improvements in the context of clinical estrogen receptor status classification, where it achieves the best AUC performance. The findings endorse Stain SAN as a robust approach for stain domain adaptation in histopathology images, with implications for advancing computational tasks in the field.

Post-stratification is often used to estimate treatment effects with higher efficiency. However, the majority of existing post-stratification frameworks depend on prior knowledge of the distributions of covariates and assume that the units are classified into post-strata without error. We propose a novel method to determine a proper stratification rule by mapping the covariates into a post-stratification factor (PSF) using predictive regression models. Inspired by the bootstrap aggregating (bagging) method, we utilize the out-of-bag delete-D jackknife to estimate strata boundaries, strata weights, and the variance of the point estimate. Confidence intervals are constructed with these estimators to take into account the additional variability coming from uncertainty in the strata boundaries and weights. Extensive simulations show that our proposed method consistently improves the efficiency of the estimates when the regression models are predictive and tends to be more robust than the regression imputation method.