Background: Improved growth in children with CF may have resulted from advances in treatment for cystic fibrosis (CF) over the past two decades, including the implementation of newborn screening in Denmark in 2016. This observational cohort study focuses on changes in early growth in Danish children with CF born between 2000 and January 2022. Methods: Age, length/height, and weight data of children 0-5 years old were obtained from the Danish CF Cohort. Data were stratified to four birth cohorts born between 2000 and 2022. Weight-for-age (WAZ), lengthfor-age (LAZ), height-for-age (HAZ) and body-mass-index (BMZ) z-scores were computed using WHO growth curves. Cubic spline mixed effects models were used to evaluate growth over 5 years between birth cohorts. Results: We included 255 children in the analyses. Cubic spline mixed effects models show that catch-up growth improved in birth cohorts over time, with the 2016-2022 birth cohort achieving growth reference curve values in WAZ, LAZ/HAZ and BMZ the earliest. The proportion of underweight and stunting observations among children born 2000-2004 decreased by the 2016-2022 birth cohort, while the proportion of overweight, low BMZ and high BMZ observations increased. Conclusion: Advances in care for young children with CF have led to improvements in growth - with the 2016-2022 birth cohort approaching potential for overweight. Nonetheless, low BMZ remains. Immediate, individualized nutrition care throughout early childhood remain crucial in mitigating malnutrition.

BackgroundThe Danish National Patient Registry (DNPR) serves as a valuable resource for scientific research. However, to ensure accurate results in cystic fibrosis (CF) studies that rely on DNPR data, a robust case-identification algorithm is essential. This study aimed to develop and validate algorithms for the reliable identification of CF patients in the DNPR.MethodsUsing the Danish Cystic Fibrosis Registry (DCFR) as a reference, accuracy measures including sensitivity and positive predictive value (PPV) for case-finding algorithms deployed in the DNPR were calculated. Algorithms were based on minimum number of hospital contacts with CF as the main diagnosis and minimum number of days between first and last contact.ResultsAn algorithm requiring a minimum of one hospital contact with CF as the main diagnosis yielded a sensitivity of 96.1 % (95 % CI: 94.2 %; 97.4 %) and a PPV of 84.9 % (82.0 %; 87.4 %). The highest-performing algorithm required minimum 2 hospital visits and a minimum of 182 days between the first and the last contact and yielded a sensitivity of 95.9 % (95 % CI: 94.1 %; 97.2 %), PPV of 91.0 % (95 % CI: 88.6 %; 93.0 %) and a cohort entry delay of 3.2 months at the 75th percentile (95th percentile: 38.7 months).ConclusionsThe DNPR captures individuals with CF with high sensitivity and is a valuable resource for CF-research. PPV was improved at a minimal cost of sensitivity by increasing requirements of minimum number of hospital contacts and days between first and last contact. Cohort entry delay increased with number of required hospital contacts.

Sweat chloride concentration, a diagnostic feature in cystic fibrosis (CF), reflects CF transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) activity. CFTR modulator therapies, especially elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor (ETI), has improved CF outcomes. We report nationwide, real‐world data on sweat chloride concentration in people with CF (pwCF) with and without modulator therapies. All Danish pwCF with a minimum of one F508del allele were included. Sweat chloride measurements were stratified by genotype and modulator treatment. Differences were assessed using mixed‐effects models. We included 977 sweat chloride measurements from 430 pwCF, 71% of which were F508del homozygous. Heterozygous and homozygous ETI‐treated pwCF had an estimated mean sweat chloride concentration of 43 mmol/L (95% confidence interval: 39; 48) and 43 mmol/L (39; 47), respectively—48% and 59% lower than those without treatment. High variation in concentrations remained regardless of treatment status. Despite ETI treatment, 27% heterozygous and 23% homozygous pwCF had elevated concentrations (≥60 mmol/L). These real‐world data confirm a substantial decrease in sweat chloride concentration during modulator treatment, especially ETI, where mean concentrations halved. However, large variation remained, including persistently high concentrations. These findings emphasize the potential of sweat chloride concentration as a treatment response biomarker and the need to explore its heterogeneity and relationship with clinical outcomes.

BackgroundPeople living with cystic fibrosis in Denmark had early, universal access to triple modulator treatment with elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor. Close monitoring allowed us to assess the impact of treatment on lung function and progression of lung disease in an unselected nationwide cystic fibrosis population from 6 years of age.MethodsData were analysed using linear mixed-effect models to assess changes in levels and annual rates of change (slopes) in percent predicted (pp) forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1), forced vital capacity (FVC) and forced expiratory flow at 25–75% of FVC (ppFEF25–75%) between the 12 months pre-treatment and treatment periods. Subgroup analyses assessed the impact of elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor among those with/without previous modulator treatment, normal/mild/moderate/severe lung disease at treatment initiation, children/adults and birth cohorts.ResultsWe included 392 people living with cystic fibrosis with a median (interquartile range) 12 (nine to 15) spirometry measurements per person. The mean (95% CI) improvement in ppFEV1was 13.0 (11.3–14.6) 12 months after initiation of elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor treatment. The annual rate of change improved from −1.4 (−2.1 – −0.6) ppFEV1in the pre-treatment year to 2.7 (1.8–3.5) ppFEV1per year during treatment. Similarly, ppFVC increased by 8.0 (7.1–8.9) and FEF25–­75%by 19.5 (17.0–21.9).ConclusionsUsing high-resolution data from a nationwide real-world setting, our study documents the impact of elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor on lung function across subgroups based on age, disease severity and treatment history. These findings point towards a new period of consistent lung function improvement among people living with cystic fibrosis on elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor.