Background/Purpose Thromboelastography's (TEG's) use in pediatric trauma patients is not widely studied. Identifying clotting cascade defects can direct decision making regarding blood product transfusion. Methods We performed a single-center retrospective review of all level 1 pediatric trauma patients. Data collected included demographics, diagnoses, Injury Severity Score, intensive care unit length of stay (ICU LOS), mortality, TEG values, and blood products received. We identified TEG values associated with mortality, ICU LOS, and need for blood product transfusion. Results A total of 237 trauma 1 patients were identified. After exclusions, 148 patients were included for analysis. Most patients were below TEG transfusion cut points. Patients with elevated reaction time, K value, and fibrinolysis at 30 minutes had increased odds of mortality with odds ratios of 1.71 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.22–2.40), 1.94 (95% CI, 1.23–3.05), and 1.15 (95% CI, 1.03–1.28), respectively. For ICU LOS, elevated reaction time, K value, and fibrinolysis at 30 minutes, α angle, and maximum amplitude demonstrated hazard ratios of 0.76 (95% CI, 0.65–0.88), 0.82 (95% CI, 0.64–1.0), 0.95 (95% CI, 0.88–0.99), 1.05 (95% CI, 1.02–1.08), and 1.04 (95% CI, 1.01–1.06), respectively. There was no association between TEG and blood product transfusion. Conclusions Coagulopathic patients based on TEG had higher mortality. All TEG values, as they moved toward transfusion-trigger cut points, were associated with increased mortality.

ABSTRACT. Diagnosis-specific mortality is a measure of pediatric healthcare quality that has been incompletely studied in sub-Saharan African hospitals. Identifying the mortality rates of multiple conditions at the same hospital may allow leaders to better target areas for intervention. In this secondary analysis of routinely collected data, we investigated hospital mortality by admission diagnosis in children aged 1–60 months admitted to a tertiary care government referral hospital in Malawi between October 2017 and June 2020. The mortality rate by diagnosis was calculated as the number of deaths among children admitted with a diagnosis divided by the number of children admitted with the same diagnosis. There were 24,452 admitted children eligible for analysis. Discharge disposition was recorded in 94.2% of patients, and 4.0% (N = 977) died in the hospital. The most frequent diagnoses among admissions and deaths were pneumonia/bronchiolitis, malaria, and sepsis. The highest mortality rates by diagnosis were found in surgical conditions (16.1%; 95% CI: 12.0–20.3), malnutrition (15.8%; 95% CI: 13.6–18.0), and congenital heart disease (14.5%; 95% CI: 9.9–19.2). Diagnoses with the highest mortality rates were alike in their need for significant human and material resources for medical care. Improving mortality in this population will require sustained capacity building in conjunction with targeted quality improvement initiatives against both common and deadly diseases.

Objective: The coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic has presented unique challenges to pediatric emergency medicine (PEM) departments. The purpose of this study was to identify these challenges and ascertain how centers overcame barriers in creating solutions to continue to provide high-quality care and keep their workforce safe during the early pandemic. Methods: This is a qualitative study based on semi-structured interviews with physicians in leadership positions who have disaster or emergency management experience. Participants were identified through purposive sampling. Interviews were recorded and transcribed electronically. Themes and codes were extracted from the transcripts by 2 independent coders. Constant comparison analysis was performed until thematic saturation was achieved. Member-checking was completed to ensure trustworthiness. Results: Fourteen PEM-trained physicians participated in this study. Communication, leadership and planning, clinical practice, and personal adaptations were the principal themes identified. Recommendations elicited include improving communication strategies; increasing emergency department (ED) representation within hospital-wide incident command; preparing for a surge and accepting adult patients; personal protective equipment supply and usage; developing testing strategies; and adaptations individuals made to their practice to keep themselves and their families safe. Conclusions: By sharing COVID-19 experiences and offering solutions to commonly encountered problems, pediatric EDs may be better prepared for future pandemics.