Mepolizumab, a humanized IgG1 monoclonal antibody that blocks native homodimeric interleukin-5 (IL-5) from binding to the IL-5 receptor, has recently been approved for treatment of severe eosinophilic asthma. Our initial immunogenicity assay method for phase I and II studies utilized a bridging electrochemiluminescence format with biotin and ruthenium-labelled mepolizumab linked by anti-drug antibodies (ADA). We discovered that IL-5 significantly increased in dosed subjects from a phase II study and that the increased IL-5 was in the form of a drug-bound complex. We demonstrated that the elevated drug-bound IL-5 produced false-positive response in the in vitro ADA assay, in which drug-bound IL-5 dissociated and then bridged mepolizumab conjugates to yield positive signal. To eliminate the IL-5 interference, we compared two strategies: a solid-phase immunodepletion of IL-5 and an in-solution IL-5 immunocompetition. We identified the best competitive antibody for each purpose. We found both methods demonstrated similar effectiveness in reducing the false positive signal in IL-5 spiked samples; however, the in-solution immunocompetition for IL-5 had fewer false positives in study samples. Additionally, the in-solution immunocompetition method was experimentally simpler to execute. We modified the ADA assay by adding a pre-treatment step with a mepolizumab competitive anti- IL-5 antibody. Using this new method, we retested clinical samples from two phase II studies (MEA112997 and MEA114092). The confirmed ADA positive incidence was reduced from 29% and 61% to 1% and 8% with the modified in-solution immune inhibition method. Target interference is a fairly common problem facing immunogenicity testing, and target-induced false positive cannot be distinguished from true ADA response by the commonly used drug competitive confirmation assay. The approach and method used here for resolving target interference in ADA detection will be useful for differentiating between a true ADA response and target induced false positive as well as similar challenges in other programs.

Objective: Interleukin-13 (IL-13) has been difficult to quantify within human serum due to low abundance. Available assays have not been sensitive enough to detect IL-13 at the femtogram level. Thus, there are inconsistencies within the published literature as to IL-13 concentrations in normal or disease populations. To better understand IL-13 serum concentrations, a highly sensitive immunoassay was developed and used to determine concentrations from asthmatics with varying clinical severities.Methods: A single molecule counting (SMC) method was used to analyze serum samples from a total of 145 individuals (60 severe asthma, 60 moderate asthma, 60 mild asthma and 23 healthy donors).Results: IL-13 concentrations correlated with severity of asthma, with overlapping ranges. Mean IL-13 levels were highest in severe asthma. Mean IL-13 levels in moderate asthma population were second highest followed by mild asthma with the lowest IL-13 concentration. IL-13 concentrations in healthy donors were similar to the mild asthmatic population. The average concentrations of IL-13 in severe, moderate, mild and healthy donors were 1.286 pg/mL, 0.672 pg/mL, 0.508 pg/mL and 0.155 pg/mL respectively.Conclusion: Severe asthma patients have elevated levels of IL-13. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

An electrochemiluminescent (ECL) bridging assay to detect anti-ofatumumab antibodies (ADA) in human serum samples was developed and validated. Using this assay format, clinical samples were first screened to identify potential ADA positive samples, which were then further tested by adding excess drug, confirming the positive signals as drug specific. However, when the method was implemented into clinical studies for ADA testing, a high positive rate was observed in the pre-dose samples collected from patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Since the positive signals were not associated with ofatumumab (Ofa) treatment, and diminished after treatment, it was suspected that matrix interference might be responsible, resulting in false-positive responses. We performed a series of experimental investigations to identify, characterize, minimize or eliminate the possible false-positive responses. One possible source was identified to be CD20 (the target of Ofa) present on cell membrane fragments (CMFs). The false-positive responses caused by CD20+ CMFs could be reduced by solid-phase immunodepletion, ultracentrifugation, or inhibited by adding another anti-CD20 antibody (rituximab). As a consequence, the ADA method was modified to minimize the matrix interference caused by CD20+ CMFs and, then, validated for sample testing.

Therapeutic proteins have the potential to elicit immune responses in animals and humans (Mire-Sluis et al., 2004; Yu et al., 2006; Shankar et al., 2008). Contributors to the response could include product related factors such as chemical modifications, impurities that co-purify with product, contaminants, formulation, aggregates, and clinical factors such as dose concentration, dosing frequency, route of drug administration, rate of administration, patient underlying disease, concomitant medication, and genetic status among others (Patten and Schellekens, 2003). Further, an immune response triggered by a therapeutic enzyme may neutralize the endogenous counterpart resulting in a decrease or depletion of the therapeutic and endogenous enzymes imposing safety concerns for patients. Therefore, monitoring of anti-drug antibody (ADA) and neutralizing antibody (NAb) responses to both the recombinant therapeutic enzyme and endogenous enzyme is important during early development and subsequent clinical studies. Testing considerations for NAb detection against therapeutic enzymes have been published mostly for lysosomal storage diseases (Wang et al., 2008). NAb cross-reactivity to the endogenous counterpart has also been characterized (Sominanda et al., 2010). Here, we describe an enzymatic NAb assay which detects neutralizing antibodies to both recombinant and endogenous angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2). NAb assay sensitivity was optimized by selecting the assay incubation time as 20 min with an enzyme concentration of 0.5 μg/mL. Four anti-ACE2 antibodies out of a commercial panel of 18 were found to have neutralizing capabilities based upon their ability to abrogate ACE2 enzymatic activity. We demonstrated assay specificity by small peptide inhibitors specific for ACE or ACE2. DX600, an ACE2 specific inhibitor did not cross-react with ACE. Conversely, captopril, an inhibitor of ACE did not inhibit ACE2. The assay specificity for ACE2 neutralizing antibodies was further demonstrated by the lack of reactivity of two species control antibodies and 14 anti-ACE2 antibodies. Moreover, we demonstrated assay specificity to human endogenous ACE2 from human epithelial cells. Three human cell lines (Calu-3, Caco-2, Huh-7) were evaluated for the cell surface expression of ACE2 by flow cytometry and Western blot. Subsequently, whole cell lysates, cell culture supernatant, and live cells were evaluated in the assay. Results demonstrated that Calu-3 had elevated levels of ACE2 compared to Caco-2 or Huh-7. Calu-3 also demonstrated elevated ACE2 enzymatic activity in all three sources and could be inhibited by the ACE2 specific inhibitor DX600 as well as the neutralizing antibodies for the recombinant ACE2. Thus, we describe here a method to detect NAb against a therapeutic enzyme and assess NAb cross-reactivity to the native endogenous enzyme. The approach of method development described here could be applied for the assessment of NAb responses to other enzymatic therapeutics.

A cell-based bioassay capable of detecting neutralizing antibodies (NAb) specific to a therapeutic anti-IL-13 monoclonal antibody was developed, validated and used to analyze normal human and asthma serum samples. At the time of this study, a neutralizing assay was unavailable for anti-IL-13 antibody therapeutics with sufficient rigor for validation. Thus, we describe here a method and considerations for validation. The assay used IL-13 responsive HEK293 cells transfected with a secreted embryonic alkaline phosphatase (SEAP) reporter gene. Cells were plated at 5.4×10(4) per assay well due to 90% confluence on the subsequent day. Optimal IL-13 and anti-IL-13 concentrations were determined to be 600 pg/mL and 900 ng/mL respectively. We demonstrated the assay's cut point, sensitivity, specificity/cross reactivity, selectivity/matrix interference, and precision. Also, we demonstrated how the drug inhibitory concentration (IC(50), IC(75), and IC(90)) can affect sensitivity and dynamic range/assay window. We characterized the differences in assay response between serum samples of normal population and asthma population. Asthma samples demonstrated an elevated OD ratio in average compared to normal samples. Thus, separate cut points were needed and calculated to be 1.78 and 2.43 for normal and asthma serum, respectively. The assay sensitivity was 670 ng/mL with the positive control (affinity purified rabbit anti-drug polyclonal antibodies). Potential false positives resulting from endogenous serum cytokines including IL-13, IL-4, and Interferon alpha (INF-α) were evaluated and the results indicated that the interfering concentrations for these cytokines are much higher than the respective physiological concentrations. Based on these data, the risk of false positive by endogenous cytokines was considered to be low. In addition, irrelevant anti-drug positive control antibodies were evaluated for assay specificity and did not demonstrate neutralizing capability. Further, no matrix interference in the intended patient population was found when using a final assay serum concentration of 16.7%. The validated assay had acceptable intra- and inter- assay precision in that all %CVs were ≤25%. Overall, this assay successfully proceeded through validation and was used to determine NAb responses within serum samples.