Introduction:Pectoralis major (PM) rupture is a severe injury that untreated can lead to a profound functional deficit. Early surgical repair can greatly improve outcomes and give a more predictable timetable for recovery, making this the goal of current treatment. Surgical intervention is also essential to return professional athletes to their previous level of competition. However, there is no single, reliable and easily reproducible test that can be used to establish the diagnosis. We describe 'The Cruciform Test'; a method of identifying PM rupture that can be used for initial diagnosis either in clinic or a pitch-side environment, or to assess restoration of normal anatomy and function post-operatively.Methods:We studied a series of 14 patients who underwent open PM repair in order to evaluate this method of assessment.Results:All patients had a positive test pre-operatively. 5 were formally tested at post-operative follow-up and all had a negative result.Discussion:The Cruciform Test is a simple and reproducible diagnostic tool that has potential as a clinical indicator of both PM rupture and successful repair. It can therefore contribute to earlier diagnosis, prompt surgical intervention and facilitate return to play at the earliest opportunity.

Background Repair of massive rotator cuff tears remains a challenging process with mixed success. There is a growing interest in the use of patches to augment the repair construct and the potential to enhance the strength, healing, and associated clinical outcomes. Such patches may be synthetic, xenograft, or autograft/allograft, and a variety of techniques have been tried to biologically enhance their integration and performance. The materials used are rapidly advancing, as is our understanding of their effects on rotator cuff tissue. This article aims to evaluate what we currently know about patch augmentation through a comprehensive review of the available literature. Methods We explore the results of existing clinical trials for each graft type, new manufacturing methods, novel techniques for biological enhancement, and the histological and biomechanical impact of patch augmentation. Results There are promising results in short-term studies, which suggest that patch augmentation has great potential to improve the success rate. In particular, this appears to be true for human dermal allograft, while porcine dermal grafts and some synthetic grafts have also had promising results. Conclusion However, there remains a need for high-quality, prospective clinical trials directly comparing each type of graft and the effect that they have on the clinical and radiological outcomes of rotator cuff repair.

Despite profound advancements in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (RCR) techniques, radiologic failure rates may be in excess of 60% with repairs of large and massive tears in the elderly population. One of the strategies to improve these healing rates has been "patch" augmentation of the cuff repair. At the same time, superior capsular reconstruction (SCR) has gained significant popularity as an option for irreparable rotator cuff (RC) tears. Some have also advocated performing SCR in addition to arthroscopic RCR to reinforce the repair and improve healing rates. Techniques involving the use of fascia lata, ECM patches, and long head of the biceps (LHB) for SCR to reinforce the cuff repair have all been elegantly described. In this article, we propose a technique that enables a combination of the aforementioned procedures and involves performing RCR with patch augmentation, as well as SCR using LHB. In doing so, the repaired RC is bordered by the patch over its bursal surface and the LHB on the articular surface (functioning as the superior capsule), thus giving us the name "Hamburger technique" (a 3-layered construct).

ABSTRACTWear and corrosion at the modular head–neck junction has been recognised to be a potential clinical concern, with multiple reports on adverse local tissue reactions and subsequent early failure of metal‐on‐metal hip replacements. Furthermore, reports on head–neck taper corrosion are also being described with conventional metal‐on‐polyethylene bearings. Manufacturing tolerances, surgical technique, non‐axial alignment, material combination, high frictional torque and high bending moment have all been implicated in the failure process. There is limited guidance on the force of impaction with which surgeons should assemble modular hip prostheses. This study aims to investigate the effect of impaction force on the deformation and corrosion of modular tapers. Short neck tapers with high surface roughness (average Rz = 16.58 μm, Ra = 4.14μm) and long neck tapers with low surface roughness (average Rz = 3.82 μm, Ra = 0.81μm), were assembled with CoCrMo alloy heads (smooth finish) under controlled conditions with 2, 4 or 8 kN of impaction force. Material combinations tested included CoCrMo‐head/CoCrMo‐neck and CoCrMo‐head/Ti‐6Al‐4V‐neck. Assessment of surface deformation before and after impaction was made using surface profilometry. Measurement of fretting current during sinusoidal cyclic loading evaluated mechanically assisted corrosion for each assembly load during short‐term cyclic loading (1000‐cycles) and long‐term cyclic loading (5 million‐cycles). Deformation on head and neck tapers increased with assembly load. Fretting currents during short term simulation testing showed significantly lower currents (p < 0.05), in 8 kN assemblies when compared to 2 and 4 kN, especially for the short‐rough tapers. Long‐term simulator testing demonstrated a progressive reduction in fretting corrosion for samples impacted with 4 and 8 kN; however, this reduction was greater for samples impacted at 8 kN even at the start of testing. Based on our results, surgeons could minimise mechanically assisted crevice corrosion by using higher impact loads when assembling the head to the stem in total hip arthroplasty. © 2017 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 36:405–416, 2018.