DAT scores and predental GPAs have made the greatest but an imperfect contribution to the reliable estimation of dental students' academic success. One variable unaddressed yet having potential in accounting for unexplained variability in dental school performance is time management behaviors (TMB), a multidimensional attribute that is critical to success in a dental curriculum. Research has indicated a relationship of TMB dimensions (Setting Goals and Priorities, Mechanics of Time Management, Preference for Organization) with undergraduate academic achievement. The purposes of this study were: 1) to ascertain the levels of TMB dimensions reflected in predental students; 2) to validate in predental students the relationship of TMB dimensions and undergraduate academic achievement; and 3) to explore the relationship of TMB dimensions of predental students as explanatory variables of their early academic achievement in the dental curriculum. All individuals who were applicants interviewed for the 1997 entering D.D.S. class and the majority of members of the 1996 entering D.D.S. class participated in this study (n = 192). Each completed the TMB scale. High levels of TMB across dimensions were observed in predental and dental students. Unlike prior research, results showed virtually no relationship of TMB dimensions with undergraduate GPA of these subjects. Though a small relationship was found between dimensions and first-year dental GPAs, no dimension explained a significant amount of variance in any of these dental GPAs beyond that of undergraduate science GPA.

Thirty clinical recall patients from the University of Missouri at Kansas City School of Dentistry participated in a 4-week study to determine the long-term effectiveness of the INTERPLAK Home Plaque-Removal Instrument compared to manual brushing and flossing. Patients were divided into two groups, with each group using the INTERPLAK device for 2 months and the manual brush for 2 months. Patients were assessed according to measured indices for plaque, bleeding, crevice depth, and calculus. The study found that both kinds of brushes significantly reduced plaque, bleeding, and crevice depth; however, only the INTERPLAK brush reduced calculus. Improvements on all indices were greater for the INTERPLAK device than they were for manual brushing and flossing. At the end of the 4 months, most patients indicated that they would continue to use the INTERPLAK device.

There have previously been no studies on the cost effectiveness of the use of a counter-rotational toothbrush (INTERPLAK Home Plaque-Removal Instrument), which has been demonstrated to be more effective than ordinary toothbrushes in reaching plaque-removal and gingival-health goals. Killoy et al studied the costs of required periodontal treatment for 32 patients with moderate periodontitis at two corporate capitation dental centers. The subjects were divided into two groups, a test group that brushed with a counter-rotational toothbrush and one that brushed with a manual toothbrush. Probing depth, attachment levels, and plaque and bleeding indexes in the test brush group were better than those in the control group. The end result was a mean reduction of $535 in the cost of periodontal treatment that had been planned before using the counter-rotational brush over 18 months, while the group using the manual brush experienced a mean increase of $11 in required treatment over original plans. Furthermore, the test group reached a state of gingival health, but the control group did not. The study concluded that the counter-rotational brush is cost effective.

This pilot study compared the effectiveness of subgingival irrigation with 0.12% chlorhexidine, 1.64% stannous fluoride, and sterile saline, in addition to scaling and root planing, on levels of Bacteroides porphyromonas and the clinical parameters bleeding tendency, probing depth, and attachment level. A convenience sample of eight patients, exhibiting 32 sites with moderate periodontal disease, was randomly assigned to receive all treatments according to a four-quadrant treatment design. Subgingival irrigation was performed at 0, 1, 2, and 3 weeks following scaling and root planing. Clinical and microbial assessments were measured at baseline, 4, 8, and 12 weeks. Data were analyzed using a two-factor repeated measure analysis of variance, and the Newman-Keuls sequential range test or Friedman test and Kruskal-Wallis test revealed statistically significant (p less than .01) improvements in probing depths, attachment levels, and Bacteroides porphyromonas for all groups at 12 weeks when compared to baseline values. No statistically significant differences occurred between any of the treatment groups at any time period. Based on the findings of this investigation, it has been concluded that four weekly irrigations with 0.12% chlorhexidine, 1.64% stannous fluoride, or saline irrigation did not enhance the beneficial effects of scaling and root planing alone.

Initial investigations have demonstrated the effectiveness of a new contra-rotary powered electric toothbrush in removing plaque supragingivally, subgingivally, and interproximally following a single use. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a counter-rotary toothbrush following 1) one time instruction, 2) reinstruction and 1 week practice; and 3) a third instruction and 3 weeks of practice and home use. Twenty-four patients were studied; 12 using the counter-rotary toothbrush and 12 using a conventional toothbrush. Using O'Leary and Turesky plaque indices, both brushes significantly reduced supragingival plaque from baseline at all intervals. The counter-rotary brush, however, was more efficient than the conventional brush at all intervals (P less than 0.01). Using a Surface Area Plaque Index, both brushes significantly reduced supragingival plaque from baseline at all intervals but there were no significant differences between brushes. A timed bleeding index showed significant reduction in gingival bleeding following 28 days of brushing with both brushes. Again, the counter-rotary toothbrush was superior to the conventional toothbrush (P less than 0.01).

Nothing to date has appeared in the literature addressing the relationship of specific bevel dimension and clinical sharpness of curette blades. This study investigated the degree of clinical sharpness of Gracey curettes following four periods of simulated root planning and, using the scanning electron microscope (SEM), determined the approximate number of strokes at which loss of clinical sharpness became apparent. Seventy-five new stainless steel curette blades were standardized and randomly assigned to one of five groups: control, 30-stroke, 50-stroke, 70-stroke, and 90-stroke. With the exception of the control group, blades underwent a simulated root-planing procedure, on extracted, periodontally involved teeth, which employed a device to standardize pressure and stroke length. Blades were then tested for clinical sharpness using light reflection, with two degrees of magnification; and plastic stick, a tactile evaluation. Blades were photographed under the SEM at a magnification of x1,000. Bevel width was measured at 10 standardized locations on the photomicrographs, and a mean was calculated. Nonparametric data were analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis statistical test and SEM parametric data using ANOVA and post hoc Newman-Kuels tests. Results showed no significant differences among treatment groups when either tactile or magnification sharpness tests were used. Analysis of the SEM data showed no statistically significant differences among bevel dimensions for any of the five groups. A Spearman rank order correlation, used to compare the clinical data to the SEM bevel measurements, showed no correlation of clinical sharpness and SEM-determined bevel dimension.

Journal of Dental EducationVolume 52, Issue 5 p. 265-270 Article A six-year combined B.A./D.D.S. degree curricular program DE Tira, DE TiraSearch for more papers by this authorWE Mayberry, WE MayberrySearch for more papers by this authorMJ Reed, MJ ReedSearch for more papers by this authorPF Fedi, PF FediSearch for more papers by this author DE Tira, DE TiraSearch for more papers by this authorWE Mayberry, WE MayberrySearch for more papers by this authorMJ Reed, MJ ReedSearch for more papers by this authorPF Fedi, PF FediSearch for more papers by this author First published: 01 May 1988 https://doi.org/10.1002/j.0022-0337.1988.52.5.tb02205.xAbout ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat No abstract is available for this article. Volume52, Issue5May 1988Pages 265-270 RelatedInformation

Journal of Dental EducationVolume 36, Issue 12 p. 16-21 Article Relation between selected predictor variables and grades in fixed prosthodontics laboratory ND Bellanti, ND BellantiSearch for more papers by this authorWE Mayberry, WE MayberrySearch for more papers by this authorDE Tira, DE TiraSearch for more papers by this author ND Bellanti, ND BellantiSearch for more papers by this authorWE Mayberry, WE MayberrySearch for more papers by this authorDE Tira, DE TiraSearch for more papers by this author First published: 01 December 1972 https://doi.org/10.1002/j.0022-0337.1972.36.12.tb00619.xCitations: 8About ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat No abstract is available for this article.Citing Literature Volume36, Issue12December 1972Pages 16-21 RelatedInformation