Intrathecal sufentanil can provide labor analgesia. We investigated the efficacy of multiple injections and the maternal and neonatal effects of intrathecal sufentanil during labor. Seventeen healthy women in active labor received multiple injections of intrathecal sufentanil of 5 micrograms each through microspinal catheters. Overall maternal satisfaction of analgesia was quantified using 10 cm visual analogue scales and side effects were evaluated. Neonatal outcome was also determined. Onset of analgesia was less than 5 min after the first injection and lasted approximately 148 min. Tolerance developed for the successive injections. The mean onset times were 12.9 and 20.1 min and the durations were 76.6 and 33.9 min for the second and third injections, respectively (P < 0.05). Failure to obtain analgesia developed in all patients after the forth injection. No motor blockade was observed in any of the patients. Mild or moderate pruritus developed in 88% of the patients. Mean systolic blood pressure decreased by a maximum of 11.3% at 30 min and up to 90 min (P < 0.05) after the first injection; three patients required ephedrine treatment. No significant hemodynamic changes were observed after subsequent injections. Five patients experienced transient decrease in sensation. Neonatal status, as evaluated by Apgar scores, Neurological Adaptive Capacity Scores (NACS), fetal heart rate (FHR), and umbilical cord acid-base status, were within normal limits. Results from our study suggest that multiple small doses of sufentanil administered intrathecally provided satisfactory analgesia for parturients with short duration of labor since acute tolerance developed with multiple injections. High incidence of mild or moderate pruritus was observed during the study. Close attention should be given to hemodynamically unstable patients when this technique is applied.

Desflurane, a new volatile anesthetic agent with low blood/gas solubility, has recently been studied in clinical and animal trials but its use in obstetrics has not been adequately evaluated. This prospective study was undertaken to evaluate the maternal and neonatal effects of desflurane in obstetrical patients. Seventy-five healthy parturients undergoing primary or repeat cesarean section were randomly assigned to one of three groups of 25 each, end-tidal 3% desflurane, 6% desflurane or 0.6% enflurane, combined with 50% N2O and O2. All patients had rapid sequence induction of anesthesia with thiopentone sodium followed by succinylcholine for tracheal intubation. After delivery, anesthesia was maintained with reduced concentration of desflurane or enflurane with 67% N2O in O2, supplemented by butorphanol tartrate. Maternal hemodynamic parameters, blood loss and maternal awareness during surgery were monitored. Neonatal outcome was evaluated by Apgar scores, neurological and adaptive capacity scores (NACS), cord blood gas and acid-base status, and time to sustained respiration (TSR). Maternal blood loss did not differ significantly between the three groups and none of the patients developed intraoperative awareness. All three groups responded to psychomotor performance equally fast. Patients in all three groups developed transient hypertension and tachycardia during induction of anesthesia which returned to baseline values in approximately 5 min. Neonatal outcome was equally good in the three groups. More neonates in the 6% desflurane group had TSR > 90 s compared to the 3% desflurane group (P < 0.05).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Several studies on propofol (Diprivan) for induction of anaesthesia during caesarean section have demonstrated its safety, however, its safely during maintenance of anaesthesia is not yet fully evaluated.The present study was undertaken to compare the maternal and neonatal effects of propofol or isoflurane in 74 term parturients undergoing primary or repeat caesarean section. Patients were randomly assigned to two groups, propofol group (n = 37) received propofol 1.5–2.5 mg·kg‐1 for induction followed by a continuous infusion of propofol of 0.05–0.2 mg 4mD kg‐1· min‐1. The isoflurane group (n=37) received thiamylal 3–4 mg · kg‐1 for induction followed by isollurane 0.25–0.75% for maintenance. All patients had rapid sequence induction using suceinyl‐choline and endotracheal intubation, 50% N2O and O2 were used in all patients until delivery. After delivery N2O concentration was increased to 67% and intravenous butorphanol (Stadol) was given as needed. Patients in the propofol group had less hypertension after intubation (P<0.05) and this was also of shorter duration compared to patients in the isoflurane group (5 min vs 10 min respectively). Maternal blood loss as well as intraoperative awareness and recovery time did not differ significantly between the two groups. Neonatal status as ascertained by Apgar scores, cord acid base status and the neurological and adaptive capacity scores (NACS) was equally good in both groups. It is concluded that propofol used for induction and maintenance of anaesthesia is a safe alternative to thiamylal/isoflurane for patients undergoing caesarean section and is associated with less hypertensive response during laryngoscopy and intubation.

The use of subanaesthetic concentration of inhalational anaesthetic for vaginal delivery offers many advantages to the mother and newborn. Desflurane, with the characteristics of rapid onset and minimal metabolism, may provide better analgesia and safety for labour pain control. Eighty healthy parturients were randomly assigned to receive either desflurane 1.0-4.5% and oxygen (n = 40) or nitrous oxide 30-60% in oxygen (n = 40). Analgesia was assessed using a score from 0 (no relief) to 4+ (excellent analgesia), amnesia for the delivery, blood loss were recorded. Neonates were evaluated by Apgar scores and neurologic and adaptive capacity scores (NACS). Data were analyzed for statistical significance using Student's t-test or Chi-square when appropriate. Analgesia scores were similar for both groups with more amnesia in desflurane group (23% vs 0% P < 0.05). Blood loss did not differ significantly, 364 ml for the desflurane group and 335 ml for the nitrous oxide group. There were no significant differences for neonatal Apgar score at 1 min or at 5 min or the NACS at 2 hr or 24 hr between the two groups. We conclude that desflurane in subanaesthetic doses is safe and effective inhalation agent for normal delivery but might be associated with amnesia.

Butorphanol tartrate, a synthetically derived opioid agonist-antagonist analgesic was evaluated for postepisiotomy pain relief when administered as a nasal spray. In this double-blind, parallel-group, dose-response study, 150 women with moderate to severe episiotomy pain were randomly assigned to receive a single dose of transnasal butorphanol (0.25, 0.5, 1, or 2 mg) or placebo. Pain relief was evaluated for 6 hours. The 2-mg dose of butorphanol was associated with a rapid onset of analgesia and a greater efficacy than placebo, as determined by using several markers including pain intensity differences, pain relief, pain half gone, sum of pain intensity differences, sum of pain relief, observer global assessment, and the time to remedication. As a result of the high placebo response, the 0.25-mg, 0.5-mg, and 1-mg doses did not differ significantly from placebo. The drug was well tolerated, with somnolence and dizziness the most frequently reported side effects. These were dose related.

This was a prospective, non-randomized, multicentre study of rocuronium (Org 9426) in 40 elective Caesarean section patients at full term without fetal distress. Anaesthesia was induced with thiopentone 4-6 mg kg-1 i.v. and rocuronium 0.6 mg kg-1 and maintained with isoflurane and nitrous oxide in oxygen. Monitors included ECG, arterial pressure, pulse oximeter and train-of-four (TOF) produced by ulnar nerve stimulation. In all patients, full neuromuscular block at the hand indicating the maximum effect of rocuronium (T1 = 0) occurred at a mean time of 98.1 (SE 9.4) s. However, after 79.3 (2.9) s, excellent to good intubating conditions were achieved in 90% of patients. Injection to delivery time was 12.7 (0.9) min and the surgical procedure lasted 53.1 (3.5) min. After administration of rocuronium, T2 appeared after 32.7 (1.8) min (indicating duration of effect). At the end of the surgical procedure in 39 patients, glycopyrronium 0.2 mg and neostigmine 1 mg were given every 5 min to antagonize residual neuromuscular effect. The mean dose of neostigmine required was 1.54 (0.1) mg. Rocuronium had no clinically significant effect on maternal heart rate or arterial pressure. After administration of thiopentone and rocuronium in two patients, temporary erythema occurred, one along the site of injection and the other on the chest wall. Rocuronium had no untoward effects on the neonates, evaluated by 1- and 5-min Apgar scores, time to sustained respiration, total and muscular neuroadaptive capacity scores, acid-base status and blood-gas tensions in umbilical arterial and venous blood.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Background and Objectives. The addition of fentanyl to hyperbaric local anesthetics has been shown to reduce the incidence of post dural puncture headache in the obstetric patient. This study was undertaken to evaluate the effects of subarachnoid morphine on the incidence of headache. Methods. Eighty-two healthy patients undergoing cesarean delivery with spinal anesthesia were studied. All patients were hydrated with 1500 ml lactated Ringer's solution. Patients were randomly assigned to receive, in a double-blind fashion, 0.2 mg of either morphine (Group 1, n = 40) or saline (Group 2, n = 42) in 0.2 ml volume mixed with 0.75% bupivacaine in 8.25% dextrose plus 0.2 ml 1:1000 epinephrine. Spinal anesthesia was induced using a 25-gauge spinal needle at L34 interspace with the bevel, in most cases, parallel to the dural fibers. Patients were followed for three days to evaluate the incidence and severity of headache using a four-category rank scale (none, mild, moderate, severe). Data were analyzed for statistical significance using Student's t-test or chi-square test as appropriate. A p value less than 0.05 was considered significant. Results. The incidence of post dural puncture headache did not differ significantly between groups. Eight patients in Group 1 versus nine patients in Group 2 developed headache (p > 0.05). Similarly, the use of blood patch or intravenous caffeine sodium benzoate to treat the headache did not differ significantly between groups. Conclusion. It is concluded from our study that subarachnoid morphine did not decrease the incidence of post dural puncture headache in the obstetric patient.

To determine the efficacy and safety of epidural butorphanol combined with lidocaine, 50 healthy parturients were studied during labor and delivery. All patients received a test dose of 3 ml 1.5% lidocaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine. Patients were then randomly assigned to receive 7 ml of one of two epidural regimens in a double-blind fashion: Group 1 patients received 1.5% lidocaine plus 1 mg butorphanol plus 1:300,000 epinephrine; Group 2 patients received 1.5% lidocaine plus 1:300,000 epinephrine. Each group consisted of 25 patients. The study ended at the time of redosing. All subsequent epidural injections were made with one bolus of plain 0.25% bupivacaine followed by continuous infusion of 0.125% bupivacaine. Duration of anesthesia was significantly longer for Group 1 compared to Group 2 (p less than 0.01), 124 +/- 8 minutes versus 99 +/- 6 minutes (mean +/- SEM). There were no difference between groups in duration of first and second stages of labor, method of delivery or neonatal outcome. Umbilical cord acid-base status and neurologic adaptive capacity scores did not differ significantly between the two groups. The authors conclude that adding small doses of butorphanol to epidural lidocaine during labor is effective and safe.