Residency recruitment practices have undergone significant changes in the last several years. Interviews are now conducted fully virtually leading to both positive and negative downstream effects, including decreased cost to applicants and programs, decreased time away from clinical activities, flexibility in scheduling, and increased applications for applicants and program directors. In response to these changes, the Association of Academic Physiatrists Residency and Fellowship Program Directors Council convened a workgroup consisting of program directors, program coordinators, residents, and medical students who reviewed the available literature to provide an evidence-based set of best practices for program leaders and applicants. Available data from the Association of American Medical Colleges and its relevance to future recruitment cycles are also discussed.

The increased use of musculoskeletal ultrasound (MSKUS) in clinical practice warrants achieving competency earlier in physiatrists’ careers. Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (PM&R) residency programs have started incorporating formal MSKUS training in their curricula; however, significant heterogeneity remains in MSKUS education. Numerous barriers contribute to the lack of consensus for MSKUS training during residency, but the COVID-19 pandemic severely disrupted in-person learning. As an adjunct or alternative to in-person learning, teleguided technology is being utilized. This curriculum demonstrates the role of a hybrid MSKUS training with interinstitutional collaboration. Twenty PM&R learners, from two institutions, were divided into a fundamental or advanced track. Virtual didactic sessions alternated weekly with hands-on ultrasonographic scanning sessions. Following a 12-month longitudinal curriculum, an end-of-year practical examination was used for competency assessment, in addition to a survey assessing resident perceptions and feedback. To our knowledge, this is the first collaborative and hybrid MSKUS curriculum for PM&R learners that can be easily reproduced at most training institutions and circumvent some of the barriers amplified by the COVID-19 pandemic.

There is limited literature specific to neuropathic pain in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)-induced acute inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (AIDP). We present a unique case of a 20-year-old vaccinated female with a past medical history of chronic hepatitis B virus and untreated anxiety who presented to the emergency department due to an intractable headache and horizontal diplopia in the setting of active COVID-19 infection. During acute hospitalization, the patient was diagnosed with the Miller-Fisher variant of Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS), a disease with a known association with COVID-19. While in the ICU, the patient developed severe, 10/10-rated, distal, symmetric burning pain with associated allodynia requiring a multimodal regimen with combinations of intravenous narcotics, neuropathic medications, topical agents, and desensitization training to attempt to control her pain. Rehabilitation psychology was consulted while she was in chronic ventilatory rehabilitation for supplementation of behavioral pain management strategies with pharmacological approaches for continued pain. After several months and completion of a comprehensive inpatient rehabilitation program, the patient was weaned off intravenous narcotics and prescribed oral pain medications. This patient had the optimal response to amitriptyline, which likely aided in the co-treatment of psychological manifestations of COVID-19 and prolonged hospitalization. This study highlights the pathogenicity of COVID-19-induced AIDP, its potential severity, and the importance of a multidisciplinary approach to managing it.

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic is having a profound effect on the provision of medical care. As the curve progresses and patients are discharged, the rehabilitation wave brings a high number of postacute COVID-19 patients suffering from physical, mental, and cognitive impairments threatening their return to normal life. The complexity and severity of disease in patients recovering from severe COVID-19 infection require an approach that is implemented as early in the recovery phase as possible, in a concerted and systematic way. To address the rehabilitation wave, we describe a spectrum of interventions that start in the intensive care unit and continue through all the appropriate levels of care. This approach requires organized rehabilitation teams including physical therapists, occupational therapists, speech-language pathologists, rehabilitation psychologists or neuropsychologists, and physiatrists collaborating with acute medical teams. Here, we also discuss administrative factors that influence the provision of care during the COVID-19 pandemic. The services that can be provided are described in detail to allow the reader to understand what services may be appropriate locally. We have been learning and adapting real time during this crisis and hope that sharing our experience facilitates the work of others as the pandemic evolves. It is our goal to help reduce the potentially long-lasting challenges faced by COVID-19 survivors.

INTRODUCTION: Among survivors of intensive care, many remain dependent on mechanical ventilation and are discharged to long-term chronic ventilator units or to skilled nursing facilities. Few long-term outcome data are available on patients transferred from long-term chronic ventilator units. METHODS: We retrospectively followed subjects discharged from a long-term chronic ventilator unit from 2010-2012. We determined where these subjects went, evaluating whether location of discharge had an effect on mortality. RESULTS: We followed 79 subjects who were 64.9 +/- 15.9 y old. Average stay in the long-term chronic ventilator unit was 38.5 +/- 20.1 d. Within the first year after discharge, 24 (30.3%) subjects died: 17 in a skilled nursing facility, 7 at home. Of those who survived the first year, 28 had been discharged to a skilled nursing facility and 27 to home. Survivors were younger (62.6 +/- 12.4 vs 70.4 +/- 13.1 y, P = .03), had shorter intensive care unit lengths of stay (10.4 +/- 5.0 vs 16.4 +/- 11.5 d, P = .03), and were more likely discharged home from long-term chronic ventilator unit (49.0% vs 29.1%, P =.040). CONCLUSIONS: Subjects discharged from an long-term chronic ventilator unit and were alive at 1 y had shorter stays in the ICU and were more likely to be discharged home. Further attention is warranted to assure the survival of critical care patients once they are discharged from intensive care units.

PM&RVolume 5, Issue 9S p. S267-S267 Neurological Rehabilitation Esophageal Perforation, Epidural Abscess, and Incomplete Paraplegic Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) from Fish Bone Ingestion: A Case Report Tracy Friedlander MD, Tracy Friedlander MD Sinai Hospital of Baltimore, Baltimore, MD, United StatesSearch for more papers by this authorHenry S. York MD, Henry S. York MD Sinai Hospital of Baltimore, Baltimore, MD, United StatesSearch for more papers by this author Tracy Friedlander MD, Tracy Friedlander MD Sinai Hospital of Baltimore, Baltimore, MD, United StatesSearch for more papers by this authorHenry S. York MD, Henry S. York MD Sinai Hospital of Baltimore, Baltimore, MD, United StatesSearch for more papers by this author First published: 17 September 2013 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmrj.2013.08.456Citations: 1Read the full textAboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditWechat No abstract is available for this article.Citing Literature Volume5, Issue9SSeptember 2013Pages S267-S267 RelatedInformation

PM&RVolume 4, Issue 10S p. S352-S352 2012 AAPM&R Annual Assembly Abstract Poster 473 Traumatic Globe Rupture Resulting from Halo Bolt Dislodgement from Pedestrian Versus Motor Vehicle Collision: A Case Report Tracy Friedlander MD, Tracy Friedlander MD Sinai Hospital of Baltimore, Baltimore, MD, United StatesSearch for more papers by this authorHenry S. York MD, Henry S. York MD Sinai Hospital of Baltimore, Baltimore, MD, United StatesSearch for more papers by this author Tracy Friedlander MD, Tracy Friedlander MD Sinai Hospital of Baltimore, Baltimore, MD, United StatesSearch for more papers by this authorHenry S. York MD, Henry S. York MD Sinai Hospital of Baltimore, Baltimore, MD, United StatesSearch for more papers by this author First published: 23 October 2012 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmrj.2012.09.1077Read the full textAboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat No abstract is available for this article. Volume4, Issue10SOctober 2012Pages S352-S352 RelatedInformation