Introduction The treatment of cardiogenic shock is a challenge of modern medicine. Anticoagulation drugs such as unfractionated heparin or low molecular weight heparins are the most common drugs used in cardiogenic shock to prevent thromboembolic complications. Despite years of experience with these substances, there is a lack of data on the effects of anticoagulation strategies with heparins on the occurrence of thrombocytopenia in the acute phase of cardiogenic shock. This study investigated the occurrence of thrombocytopenia in patients with cardiogenic shock depending on therapeutic strategies with plasmatic anticoagulation.

ObjectiveThe study comprehensively investigates the prognostic value of norepinephrine (NE) dose, lactate and heart rate in patients with sepsis and septic shock.BackgroundLimited data regarding the prognostic value of NE dose, lactate and heart rate in patients meeting the sepsis-3 criteria is available.MethodsConsecutive patients with sepsis and septic shock from 2019 to 2021 were included. The prognostic value of NE dose, lactate and heart rate was tested for 30-day all-cause mortality. Statistical analyses included univariable t-tests, Spearman's correlations, C-statistics, Kaplan-Meier analyses, as well as one-factorial repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Cox proportional regression analyses.Results339 patients with sepsis or septic shock were included. With an area under the curve (AUC) of up to 0.638 and 0.685, NE dose and lactate revealed moderate prognostic accuracy for 30-day all-cause mortality, whereas heart rate was not associated with prognosis. Very high NE doses (i.e. > 1.0 mcg/kg/min) (HR = 2.938; 95% CI 1.933 - 4.464; p = .001) and lactate levels (i.e. >= 4 mmol/l) (HR = 2.963; 95% CI 2.095 - 4.191; p = .001) on admission were associated with highest risk of death. Finally, increasing NE doses and lactate levels from day 1 to 3 indicated increased risk of death, which was consistent after multivariable adjustment.ConclusionBoth very high NE doses and lactate levels - but not heart rate - were associated with increased risk of 30-d all-cause mortality in patients with sepsis and septic shock.

The study investigates the diagnostic and prognostic value of fibrinogen and the albumin-to-fibrinogen-ratio (AFR) in patients with sepsis and septic shock. Limited data regarding the prognostic value of fibrinogen and AFR during the course of sepsis or septic shock are available. Consecutive patients with sepsis and septic shock from 2019 to 2021 were included monocentrically. Blood samples were retrieved from the day of disease onset (day 1), as well as on day 2 and 3. Firstly, the diagnostic value of fibrinogen and the AFR for the diagnosis of a septic shock was tested. Secondly, the prognostic value of fibrinogen and AFR was tested with regard to the 30-day all-cause mortality. Statistical analyses included univariable t-tests, Spearman's correlations, C-statistics, Kaplan-Meier and multivariable Cox regression analyses. Ninety-one patients with sepsis and septic shock were included. With an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.653-0.801, fibrinogen discriminated patients with septic shock from those with sepsis. In the septic shock group, fibrinogen levels were shown to decrease from day 1 to 3 (median decrease 41%). In line, fibrinogen was a reliable predictor for 30-day all-cause mortality (AUC 0.661-0.744), whereas fibrinogen levels less than 3.6 g/l were associated with an increased risk of 30-day all-cause mortality (78 vs. 53%; log rank P = 0.004; hazard ratio = 2.073; 95% confidence interval 1.233-3.486; P = 0.006), which was still observed after multivariable adjustment. In contrast, the AFR was no longer associated with the risk of mortality after multivariable adjustment. Fibrinogen was a reliable diagnostic and prognostic tool for the diagnosis of septic shock as well as for 30-day all-cause mortality and superior compared with the AFR in patients admitted with sepsis or septic shock.

BACKGROUND:Studies investigating the diagnostic and prognostic value of D-dimer levels and the disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) score in sepsis or septic shock commonly include preselected subgroups of patients or were published prior to the current sepsis-3 criteria. Therefore, this study investigates the diagnostic and prognostic impact of D-dimer levels and the DIC score in patients with sepsis and septic shock.METHODS:Consecutive patients with sepsis and septic shock enrolled in the prospective and monocentric "MARSS" registry from 2019 to 2021 were included. First, the diagnostic value of D-dimer levels was compared to the DIC score to discriminate patients with septic shock from patients with sepsis without shock. Thereafter, the prognostic value of D-dimer levels and the DIC score was tested for 30-day all-cause mortality. Statistical analyses included univariable t-tests, Spearman´s correlations, C-statistics, Kaplan-Meier, as well as uni- and multivariable cox regression analyses.RESULTS:One hundred patients were included (n = 63 with sepsis and n = 37 with septic shock). The overall rate of all-cause mortality at 30 days was 51%. With an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.710 and 0.739, both D-dimer level and the DIC score revealed reliable diagnostic accuracy for the discrimination of septic shock. However, D-dimer levels and the DIC scores were shown to have poor to moderate prognostic accuracy (AUC 0.590 - 0.610) with regard to 30-day all-cause mortality. Specifically, very high D-dimer levels (i.e., > 30 mg/L) (HR = 2.648; 95% CI 1.147 - 6.112; p = 0.023) and a DIC scores ≥ 3 (HR = 2.095; 95% CI 1.095 - 4.009; p = 0.0258) were associated with highest risk of 30-day all-cause mortality. Finally, both higher D-dimer levels (HR = 1.032; 95% CI 1.005 - 1.060; p = 0.021) and DIC scores (HR = 1.313; 95% CI 1.106 - 1.559; p = 0.002) were associated with increased risk of 30-day all-cause mortality after multivariable adjustment.CONCLUSIONS:Both D-dimer levels and the DIC scores revealed reliable diagnostic accuracy for the discrimination of septic shock, but a poor to moderate prognostic value for the discrimination of 30-day all-cause mortality. Especially very high D-dimer levels (i.e., > 30 mg/L) and a DIC score ≥ 3 were associated with highest risk of 30-day all-cause mortality.

Objective: Despite improved risk stratification tools and identification of novel biomarkers for the diagnosis and prognosis in patients with sepsis, sepsis-related mortality has not significantly improved during the past years. This study investigates the diagnostic and prognostic role of the plasma albumin and cholinesterase (ChE) in patients with sepsis and septic shock. Methods: Consecutive patients with sepsis and septic shock from 2019 to 2021 were included at one institution. Blood samples were obtained on the day of disease onset (day 1), and on days 2, 3, 5, and 7 thereafter. The diagnostic value of ChE for the diagnosis of a septic shock was compared to albumin and the prognostic value of the albumin and the ChE for 30-day all-cause mortality was tested. Results: 239 patients were included with a median albumin level of 21.4 g/dL and a median ChE of 5004 U/L on admission. With an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.641–0.762 on days 3 and 5, the ChE was associated with moderate but better diagnostic discrimination between sepsis and septic shock than albumin. Furthermore, ChE was able to discriminate between 30-day non-survivors and survivors (range of AUC 0.612–0.686). Patients with a ChE below the median had higher rates of 30-days all-cause mortality in comparison to patients with a ChE above the median (65 vs. 42%, log rank p = 0.001; HR = 1.820; 95% CI = 1.273–2.601; p = 0.001), which was still demonstrated after multivariable adjustment. Conclusion: The level of ChE was associated with moderate diagnostic and prognostic accuracy in patients with sepsis and septic shock, whereas albumin was not.

Objective The study investigates the diagnostic and prognostic value of the aspartate aminotransferase (AST) to alanine aminotransferase (ALT) ratio in patients with sepsis and septic shock. Limited data regarding the prognostic value of the AST/ALT ratio in patients suffering from sepsis or septic shock is available. Methods Consecutive patients with sepsis and septic shock from 2019 to 2021 were included monocentrically. Blood samples were retrieved from day of disease onset (day 1), day 2, 3, 5 and 7. First, the diagnostic value of the AST/ALT ratio was tested for septic shock compared to sepsis. Second, the prognostic value of the AST/ALT ratio was tested for 30-d all-cause mortality. Statistical analyses included univariable t-test, Spearman's correlation, C-statistics, Kaplan-Meier analyses, as well as multivariable mixed analysis of variance (ANOVA), Cox proportional regression analyses and propensity score matching. Results A total of 289 patients were included, of which 55% had sepsis and 45% septic shock. The overall rate of all-cause mortality at 30 d was 53%. With an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.651 on day 1 and 0.794 on day 7, the AST/ALT ratio revealed moderate but better diagnostic discrimination of septic shock compared to bilirubin. Furthermore, the AST/ALT ratio was able to discriminate 30-d all-cause mortality (AUC = 0.624; 95% CI 0.559 - 0.689; p = 0.001). Patients with an AST/ALT ratio above the median (>1.8) had higher rates of 30-d all-cause mortality compared to lower values (mortality rate 63 vs. 43%; log-rank p = 0.001), even after multivariable adjustment (HR = 1.703; 95% CI 1.182 - 2.453; p = 0.004) and propensity score matching. Conclusions The AST/ALT was a reliable diagnostic tool for the diagnosis of septic shock as well as a reliable tool to predict 30-d all-cause mortality in patients suffering from sepsis and septic shock.

Objective The study investigates the diagnostic and prognostic value of C-reactive protein (CRP) and procalcitonin (PCT) in patients with sepsis and septic shock. Background Limited data regarding the prognostic value of CRP and PCT during the course of sepsis or septic shock is available. Methods Consecutive patients with sepsis and septic shock from 2019 to 2021 were included monocentrically. Blood samples were retrieved from the day of disease onset (day 1), day 2, 3, 5, 7, and 10. Firstly, the diagnostic value of CRP and PCT for the diagnosis of a septic shock, as well as for the discrimination of positive blood cultures, was tested. Secondly, the prognostic value of the CRP and PCT was tested for 30-day all-cause mortality. Statistical analyses included univariable t -tests, Spearman’s correlations, C-statistics, and Kaplan–Meier analyses. Results A total of 349 patients were included, of which 56% had a sepsis and 44% a septic shock on day 1. The overall rate of all-cause mortality at 30 days was 52%. With an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.861 on day 7 and 0.833 on day 10, the PCT revealed a superior AUC than the CRP (AUC 0.440–0.652) with regard to the discrimination between patients with sepsis and septic shock. In contrast, the prognostic AUCs for 30-day all-cause mortality were poor. Both higher CRP (HR = 0.999; 95% CI 0.998–1.001; p = 0.203) and PCT levels (HR = 0.998; 95% CI 0.993–1.003; p = 0.500) were not associated with the risk of 30-day all-cause mortality. During the first 10 days of ICU treatment, both CRP and PCT declined irrespective of clinical improvement or impairment. Conclusion PCT was a reliable diagnostic tool for the diagnosis of septic shock compared to CRP. Both CRP and PCT were shown to have poor predictive value with regard to 30-day all-cause mortality and were not associated with the risk of all-cause mortality in patients admitted with sepsis or septic shock.

Introduction Cardiogenic shock is a complex, and hemodynamically diverse state of end-organ hypoperfusion that is associated with multiorgan failure. The extracorporal membrane oxygenation is one of the therapeutic interventions which is frequently used to stabilize the patient's condition. Despite increasing experience with this treatment, there is a lack of data on the management of some patient’s groups. This study investigated the occurrence of thrombocythopenia in patients with conservative treatment and patients receiving veno-arterial membrane oxygenation (VA ECMO) support in cardiogenic shock.

BACKGROUND:Studies investigating the diagnostic and prognostic value of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) in sepsis or septic shock commonly included preselected subgroups of patients or were published prior to the current sepsis-3 criteria. Therefore, this study investigates the diagnostic and prognostic impact of the NLR in patients with sepsis and septic shock.METHODS:Consecutive patients with sepsis and septic shock from 2019 to 2021 from the prospective "MARSS-registry" were included monocentrically. First, the diagnostic value of the NLR compared to established sepsis scores was tested for septic shock compared to sepsis. Second, the diagnostic value of the NLR with regard to positive blood cultures was tested. Thereafter, the prognostic value of the NLR was tested for 30-day all-cause mortality. Statistical analyses included univariable t-tests, Spearman´s correlations, C-statistics, Kaplan-Meier analyses, Cox proportional regression analyses as well as uni- and multivariate logistic regression models.RESULTS:A total of 104 patients were included, of which 60% were admitted with sepsis and 40% with septic shock. The overall rate of all-cause mortality at 30 days was 56%. With an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.492, the NLR was shown to have a poor diagnostic value with regard to the diagnosis of septic shock compared to sepsis. However, the NLR was shown to be a reliable parameter to discriminate between patients with negative and positive blood cultures when admitted with septic shock (AUC = 0.714). This was still evident after multivariable adjustment (OR = 1.025; 95% CI 1.000 - 1.050; p = 0.048). In contrast, the NLR revealed a poor prognostic accuracy (AUC = 0.507) with regard to 30-day all-cause mortality. Finally, a higher NLR was not associated with an increased risk of 30-day all-cause mortality (log rank p-value = 0.775).CONCLUSIONS:The NLR was a reliable diagnostic tool for the identification of patients with blood culture confirmed sepsis. Yet, the NLR was not a reliable parameter to discriminate between patients with sepsis and septic shock nor between 30-day survivors and non-survivors.

The aim was to prospectively evaluate the diagnostic and prognostic value of different quantitative analysis methods assessing adrenal gland parameters on contrast-enhanced CT scans in patients with septic conditions. Seventy–six patients (49 men, 27 women) received CT scans for focus search. Adrenal glands were analyzed by means of three different methods: subjective region of interest (ROI) measurement, organ segmentation and histogram analysis using semi-automated software. Univariate analyses with multiple testing thresholds and receiver operating characteristic curves were performed. Clinical endpoints were 8-days, 28-days and 6-months mortality. Forty-four CT scans were analyzed (ground truth: patients with no sepsis: n = 6; patients with sepsis: n = 15; patients in septic shock: n = 21). Left adrenal gland (LAG) values were analyzed and compared, as data variation was lower than in the right adrenal glands. In patients with septic conditions, the combination of high LAG and Inferior Vena Cava (IVC) density values was highly specific for septic shock with all three methods. Only segmentation values were significantly different between the sepsis and septic shock groups after confounder correction (p = 0.048). Total adrenal gland volume was 20% higher in the septic shock patients while a relatively small LAG volume within the septic shock subgroup was associated with higher mortality at day 8 (AUC = 0.8; p = 0.006) and at 6 months (AUC = 0.7; p = 0.035). However, time-consuming density analysis methods assessing adrenal glands do not provide additional diagnostic value in patients with septic conditions. The combination of high LAG and IVC attenuation values seems to be highly specific for septic shock, regardless of the analysis type. Adrenal gland volume reveals short- and long-term prognostic capacity.

Data regarding the prognostic value of cardiac biomarkers in patients suffering from sepsis or septic shock is scarce. Studies investigating the prognostic role of cardiac biomarkers in patients with sepsis and septic shock were commonly published prior to the sepsis-3 criteria and were often not restricted to septic patients only, too. This study investigated the diagnostic and prognostic value of the aminoterminal pro-B-type Natriuretic Peptide (NT-pro BNP) and cardiac troponin I (cTNI) in patients with sepsis and septic shock. Consecutive patients with sepsis and septic shock were included from 2019 to 2021. Blood samples were retrieved from the day of disease onset (i.e., day 1), day 2 and 3. Firstly, the diagnostic value of the NT-pro BNP and cTNI to diagnose sepsis or septic shock was tested. Secondly, the prognostic value of the NT-pro BNP and cTNI was examined with regard to the 30-day all-cause mortality. The statistical analyses included univariable t-tests, Spearman’s correlations, C-statistics, Kaplan–Meier analyses and Cox proportional regression analyses. A total of 162 patients were included prospectively, of which 57% had a sepsis and 43% a septic shock. The overall rate of all-cause mortality at 30 days was 53%. With an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.658 on day 1 and 0.885 on day 3, cTNI expressed a better diagnostic value than NT-pro BNP, especially on day 3 (ΔAUCd3 = 0.404; p = 0.022). Furthermore, cTNI displayed a moderate but slightly better prognostic value than NT-pro BNP on all examined days (AUC for cTNI, d1 = 0.635; 95% CI 0.541–0.729; p = 0.007 vs. AUC for NT-pro BNP, d1 = 0.582; 95% CI 0.477–0.687; p = 0.132). In conclusion, cTNI was a reliable diagnostic parameter for the diagnosis of sepsis and septic shock, as well as a reliable prognostic tool with regard to 30-day all-cause mortality in patients suffering from sepsis and septic shock.

Abstract Background This study evaluates cardiac diseases and prognosis in young adults and adults presenting with ventricular tachyarrhythmias (VTA). Methods The present longitudinal, observational, registry-based, monocentric cohort study includes all consecutive patients 45 years old or younger presenting with VTA at admission from 2002 to 2016. Rates of coronary angiography, coronary artery disease (CAD) and need for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), cardiac diseases associated with VTA, and differences in long-term prognostic endpoints for young adults (20–34 years old) were analyzed and compared to those of adults (35–45 years old), for whom multivariable risk prediction models were developed. Kaplan–Meier analyses were performed according to age and type of VTA. Results A total of 259 consecutive patients were included in the study (36% young adults and 64% adults). At admission, 38% of young adults had VTA due to CAD that required PCI. Furthermore, VTA in young adults was commonly idiopathic (27%), or had underlying channelopathies (18%), primary cardiomyopathies (13%) or acute myocardial infarction (AMI, 11%). In adults, VTA was mostly associated with AMI (28%), though the rate of idiopathy was still high (20%). A total 41% of all patients received cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), for whom AMI (STEMI 17%, NSTEMI 24%) was most frequently observed. Irrespective of the type of VTA, all-cause mortality was similar for young adults and adults. In young adults, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) < 35% (HR = 33.590) was associated with increased long-term all-cause mortality. Conclusion Despite high rates of idiopathic ventricular tachyarrhythmias, CAD and AMI are common causes of VTA and CPR in adults 45 years old and younger. Young adults and adults had comparable survival at index hospitalization and after 2.5 years irrespective of the type of VTA. Clinical trial registration clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT02982473.

ObjectiveThe study investigates the diagnostic and prognostic significance of the prothrombin time/international normalized ratio (PT/INR) in patients with sepsis and septic shock. BackgroundSepsis may be complicated by disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC). While the status of coagulopathy of septic patients is represented within the sepsis-3 definition by assessing the platelet count, less data regarding the prognostic impact of the PT/INR in patients admitted with sepsis and septic shock is available. MethodsConsecutive patients with sepsis and septic shock from 2019 to 2021 were included. Blood samples were retrieved from day of disease onset (ie, day 0), as well as on day 1, 2, 4, 6 and 9 thereafter. Firstly, the diagnostic value of the PT/INR in comparison to the activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) was tested for septic shock compared to sepsis without shock. Secondly, the prognostic value of the PT/INR for 30-day all-cause mortality was tested. Statistical analyses included univariable t-tests, Spearman's correlations, C-statistics, Kaplan-Meier analyses and Cox proportional regression analyses. Results338 patients were included (56% sepsis without shock, 44% septic shock). The overall rate of all-cause mortality at 30 days was 52%. With an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.682 (p= .001) on day 0, the PT/INR revealed moderate discrimination of septic shock and sepsis without shock. Furthermore, PT/ INR was able to discriminate non-survivors and survivors at 30 days (AUC = 0.612; p = .001). Patients with a PT/INR >1.5 had higher rates of 30-day all-cause mortality than patients with lower values (mortality rate 73% vs 48%; log rank p = .001; HR = 2.129; 95% CI 1.494-3.033; p = .001), even after multivariable adjustment (HR = 1.793; 95% CI 1.343-2.392; p = .001). Increased risk of 30-day all-cause mortality was observed irrespective of concomitant thrombocytopenia. ConclusionThe PT/INR revealed moderate diagnostic accuracy for septic shock but was associated with reliable prognostic accuracy with regard to 30-day all-cause mortality in patients admitted with sepsis and septic shock.

Abstract Objectives. Galectin-3 (gal-3) is a mediator of extracellular matrix metabolism and reflects an ongoing cardiac fibrotic process. The aim of this study was to determine the potential use of gal-3 in evaluating the structural and functional parameters of the right ventricle as determined by echocardiography. Design. Ninety-one patients undergoing routine echocardiography were prospectively enrolled in this monocentric study. Serum samples for gal-3 and aminoterminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) were collected within 24 h of echocardiographic examination. Patients were arbitrarily divided into subgroups based on right ventricular function as measured by tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE) and these included TAPSE >24 mm (n = 23); TAPSE 18–24 mm (n = 55); TAPSE ≤17 mm (n = 13); permitting the detailed statistical analysis of derived data. Results. Serum levels of gal-3 in all patients correlated with age (r = 0.36. p < .001), creatinine (r = 0.60, p < .001), NT-proBNP (r = 0.53, p < .001), RA area (r = 0.38, p < .001) and TAPSE (r = −0.3. p < .01). The distribution of echocardiographic indices according to TAPSE subgroups revealed an association between gal-3 and its ability to identify patients with right ventricular failure (RVF) as diagnosed by a TAPSE ≤17 mm (r = 0.04, p < .001). The multivariable logistic regression model with adjusted odds ratio showed the ability of gal-3 to identify RVF when adjusted to age and gender (adjusted odds ratio 3.60, 95% CI 1.055–12.282, p < .05). Conclusion. Gal-3 correlated with echocardiographic indices of RVF and could effectively diagnose these patients. The supplementary use of NT-proBNP strengthened the diagnostic capability of each biomarker. Trial Registration: The ‘Cardiovascular Imaging and Biomarker Analyses’ (CIBER Study), clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT03074253. Registered 3/8/2017. https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03074253

Background Data is limited evaluating novel biomarkers in right ventricular dysfunction. Normal right heart function improves the prognosis of patients with heart failure. Therefore, this study investigates the association between the novel biomarker copeptin and right heart function compared to NT-proBNP. Methods Patients undergoing routine echocardiography were enrolled prospectively. Right ventricular function was assessed by tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE) and further right ventricular and atrial parameters. Exclusion criteria were age under 18 years, left ventricular ejection fraction < 50% and moderate to severe valvular heart disease. Blood samples were taken for biomarker measurements within 72 h of echocardiography. Results Ninety-one patients were included. Median values of copeptin increased significantly according to decreasing values of TAPSE ( P = 0.001; right heart function grade I: tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion; TAPSE > 24 mm: 5.20 pmol/L; grade II: TAPSE 18–24 mm: 8.10 pmol/L; grade III: TAPSE < 18 mm: 26.50 pmol/L). Copeptin concentrations were able to discriminate patients with decreased right heart function defined as TAPSE < 18 mm (area under the curves [AUC]: copeptin: 0.793; P = 0.001; NT-proBNP: 0.805; P = 0.0001). Within a multivariable linear regression model, copeptin was independently associated with TAPSE (copeptin: T: –4.43; P = 0.0001; NT-proBNP: T: –1.21; P = 0.23). Finally, copeptin concentrations were significantly associated with severely reduced right heart function (TAPSE < 18 mm) within a multivariate logistic regression model (copeptin: odds ratio: 0.94; 95% confidence interval: 0.911–0.975; P = 0.001). Conclusions This study demonstrates that the novel biomarker copeptin reflects longitudinal right heart function assessed by standardized transthoracic echocardiography compared with NT-proBNP.

Background: Lupus anticoagulant (LA) owns procoagulant properties in vivo and prolongs phospholipid-dependent clotting times in vitro. The prolonged in vitro clotting time can be misinterpreted as a bleeding disorder. In some cases, it is necessary to differentiate LA-associated in vitro changes from in vivo coagulation factor deficiency. In this case, we used different laboratory testing in a patient with ischemic stroke and reduced prothrombin time (PT) to identify an in-vitro effect of LA excluding an in-vivo bleeding disorder. Methods: The activity of various coagulation factors was evaluated both with recombinant thromboplastin Innovin (Siemens Healthcare) and reagent tissue extracted thromboplastin Thromborel® (Siemens Healthcare). Moreover, a 1:1 plasma mixing test with standard plasma was performed. In order to exclude the interaction of tromboplastin and LA thromboplastin, an independent global coagulation test, thromboelastography, was used. Diluted-Russel-Viper-Venom (dRVVT) assay was applied to detect the presence of LA detection. Results: The activity of several coagulation factors measured with recombinant thromboplastin Innovin (Siemens Healthcare) showed a reduced activity of the following coagulation factors: Factor V (20.9%), Factor VII (23.8%), Factor X (19.7%) and international normalized ratio (INR) of 2.33. Re-assessment of the factor's activity with another reagent tissue extracted thromboplastin Thromborel® (Siemens Healthcare) showed a normalization of INR and factor's activity in comparison to thromboplastin reagent Innovin®: Factor V (77%), Factor VII (45.4%), Factor X (64.2%), and INR of 1.28. A plasma mixing study with 1:1 standard plasma revealed reduced (<50%) normalization of INR as well as coagulation factor's activity confirming a LA-inhibitor in the patient plasma. Diagnostic LA testing was also performed with dRVVT assay showing a significantly prolonged (112.8 s) test time. Thromboelastography revealed no abnormalities. Conclusions: Different thromboplastin reagents and plasma mixing tests as well as thromboplastin independent coagulation tests may be helpful to differentiate LA and in vitro changes from in vivo factor deficiency in patients with LA.

An 81-year-old woman was admitted to the emergency department with reduced general condition and diarrhea for 2 weeks. Physical examination, sonography of the abdomen and ECG showed no pathologies. Fever was not present. Peripheral O2-saturation was 86%. Laboratory test showed an infection constellation. A non-enhanced (NE) chest CT revealed peripheral ground-glass opacity (GGO) with visible intralobular lines ("crazy-paving") of the left upper lobe (Figure 1A/B). Although this is a typical infiltrate pattern of COVID-19 pneumonia, the unilateral changes were consistent with an intermediate appearance of COVID-19 pneumonia according to the recently published RSNA COVID-19 reporting consensus statement, where the intermediate appearance is defined as presence of multifocal, diffuse, perihilar, or unilateral GGO (…) and absence of typical features, in our case the missing bilaterality (Simpson et al., 2020Simpson S. Kay F.U. Abbara S. Bhalla S. Chung J.H. Chung M. et al.Radiological society of North America expert consensus statement on reporting chest CT findings related to COVID-19. Endorsed by the society of thoracic radiology, the American college of radiology, and RSNA.J. Thorac. Imaging. 2020; Crossref PubMed Scopus (434) Google Scholar). As further testing revealed elevated D-Dimer as well as a negative RT-PCR regarding Covid-19, a contrast-enhanced (CE) chest CT was indicated 2 days after initial NE-chest CT. In this CE-chest CT the aforementioned ground-glass opacity can be depicted as dome-shaped, pleural-based opacification, consistent with a post-infarction pneumonia (Figure 1 C) due to pulmonary embolism (PE) (Figure 1 D). The patient was admitted to ICU because of progressive right heart compromise. The PE was treated with low-molecular-weight heparin. This image shows that structured reporting of possible COVID-19 CT findings can lead the clinician to e.g. further testing and has potential to accelerate managing of patients through the workup during these difficult times, especially under the ongoing discussion of the value of D-dimer in COVID-19 patients (Grillet et al., 2020Grillet F. Behr J. Calame P. Aubry S. Delabrousse E. Acute pulmonary embolism associated with COVID-19 pneumonia detected by pulmonary CT angiography.Radiology. 2020; 201544Crossref PubMed Scopus (396) Google Scholar). The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest. There is no Funding Source for the present manuscript.

Bleedings represent most relevant complications being correlated with significant rates of adverse clinical outcomes in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). To reduce bleeding and improve prognosis various types of vascular closure devices (VCD) are frequently applied. This study aims to compare directly one specific femoral closure (FC) to one specific radial compression (RC) device in patients after PCI focusing on overall and access-site bleedings as well as major adverse cardiac events (MACE). This single-center, prospective, and observational study included consecutive patients either treated by the FC (StarClose SE) or RC (TR Band) device following PCI. The primary outcome was bleeding; the secondary outcomes were MACE at 30days of follow-up. Two hundred patients in each group were enrolled following PCI. Access-site bleeding was significantly higher in the FC (43%) compared to the RC (30%) group (P=.001). Most common type of access-site bleeding consisted of hematomas. Of these, small and large hematomas were significantly higher in the FC group (P<.05). No significant differences of MACE were observed in both groups. In multivariable logistic regression models no consistent significant association of any risk factor with bleeding complications was identified. Despite the use of VCD, transfemoral arterial access is still associated with a higher rates of access site bleeding consisting mostly of hematomas compared to trans-radial access, whereas no differences of MACE were observed between FC and RC patients at 30 days follow-up.

Background This study evaluates the associations between high-sensitivity troponin I and T (hs-TnI/hs-TnT) and the stages of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF)/diastolic dysfunction. Methods Blood samples for biomarker measurements (hs-TnI/hs-TnT/NT-proBNP) were collected within 24 h of routine echocardiographic examination. Patients with left ventricular ejection fraction <50%, right ventricular dysfunction and moderate-to-severe valvular heart disease were excluded. Graduation of diastolic dysfunction was determined according to current guidelines. Results A total of 70 patients were included. Hs-TnT concentrations increased significantly according to the progression of diastolic dysfunction ( P = 0.024). Hs-TnT was able to discriminate patients with diastolic dysfunction grade III (AUC = 0.737; P = 0.013), while NT-proBNP revealed a greater AUC (AUC 0.798; P = 0.002). Concentrations of hs-TnI increased only numerically according to the increasing stages of diastolic dysfunction ( P = 0.353). In multivariable logistic regression models, hs-TnT concentrations > 28 ng/L were associated with diastolic dysfunction grade III (OR = 4.7, P = 0.024), even after adjusting for NT-proBNP. Conclusion Increasing concentrations of hs-TnT may reflect the stages of diastolic dysfunction being assessed by echocardiography, whereas hs-TnI does not show any association with diastolic dysfunction.