The seismicity review of Kamchatka and surrounding territories for 2015 is given. In the Kamchatka earthquake catalogue, the minimum local magnitude of completeness is MLmin=3.5, and for earthquakes with h≥350 km under the Okhotsk sea MLmin=3.6. The Kamchatka earthquake catalogue for 2015 with ML3.5, published in the Appendix to this issue, includes 1213 events. 92 earthquakes of the catalogue with ML=3.0–6.5 were felt in Kamchatka and surrounding areas with seismic intensity I=2–6 according to the MSK-64 scale. For all events with ML5.0 that occurred in 2015 in the KB GS RAS area of responsibility, an attempt to calculate the seismic moment tensor (SMT) was made. There are 32 such events in the regional catalogue. For 28 earthquakes the SMT and depth h of the equivalent point source were calculated successfully. The calculations were performed for the SMT double-couple model using a nonlinear algorithm. In 2015, a typical location of the earthquake epicenters was observed in the Kamchatka zone. In 2015, the seismicity level in all selected zones and in the region as a whole correspond to the background one according to the “SESL’09” scale. The number of recorded events with ML3.5 and strong earthquakes with ML5.0 is close to the average annual value. Anomalous and significant events were not recorded.
The February 28, 2013 earthquake (MwGCMT=6.8), which occurred on the southeast coast of Kamchatka, is discussed. The instrumental hypocenter location reported by the KB GS RAS is φ=50.67N, λ=157.77E, h=61 km. Three magnitudes were obtained: local magnitude ML=6.9, code-wave magnitude Mc=6.6, mo-ment magnitude Mw=6.7. The focal mechanisms of the February 28, 2013 earthquake and its aftershocks with ML≥6 correspond to the tectonic conditions of subhorizontal compression in the NW–SE direction. For most of these mechanisms, the shallow plane falls under Kamchatka, which corresponds to the geometry of the subduction zone. The small-focus aftershocks cloud of the February 28, 2013 earthquake has the 5828 km size and is extended in the north-east – south-west direction. The aftershock process has the three-phase character and can be considered as a stream of seismic events decreasing in time with three successive stages with different attenuation modes. The change in attenuation modes is associated with strong after-shocks. The duration of the decaying aftershock process is ~ 100 days. The February 28, 2013 earthquake was felt with intensity ranged from 2 to 5–6 on the MSK-64 scale in 33 localities (Δ=81–493 km). The mac-roseismic impact area was about 56∙103 km2. The mainshock and its four strong aftershocks have a similar picture of macroseismic manifestations: the macroseismic effect is larger on the east coast of Kamchatka; the strongest shakes has been observed in Severo-Kurilsk (Paramushir Island). The elongation of the isoseist along the Kamchatka eastern coast has been observed, which is typical for Kamchatka earthquakes. The strong ground motions from the February 28, 2008 earthquake has been recorded using the Kamchatka net-work of digital accelerographs. The level of peak amplitudes for this earthquake is consistent with average trends in the Kamchatka region. Attenuation parameters are typical for Kamchatka. The shallow layer of the seismic focal zone of the Kuriles and South Kamchatka, in which the February 28, 2013 earthquake was recorded, is one of the most active seismic areas in the North-West Pacific. Earthquakes with M>8 were re-peatedly occurred here, causing a tsunami and intensity of shakes up to 9 on the MSK-64 scale in the south of Kamchatka.
The strong (Mwreg=5.8, ML=6.2) near-surface seismic event (Ilpyrskoye earthquake) occurred at 03h12m on 13 March, in the Kamchatka Isthmus. It was the strongest earthquake between 1962 and 2013 for this area. The greatest macroseismic effect was observed at a distance of ~30 km, I=6–7 on the scale MSK-64. We used two independent methods for determining its regional focal mechanism: 1) regional moment tensor in-version using broadband waveforms; 2) solution based on polarities of the P waves. The results are similar: the focal mechanism of Ilpyrskoye earthquake is thrust faulting with strike-slip component; the compression axis is subhorizontal and is oriented in the north-east – south-west direction. The mechanisms for the two strongest aftershocks were also identified, as a result, a change in focal movements during the aftershock process was revealed.The analysis of the aftershock process which consists of two stages with different de-cay character was performed. The process lasted ~ 75 days. About 200 aftershocks ML=3.0–5.7 (КS=7.5–12.9) were recorded, hypocenter depth estimations vary from 0 to 10 km for about 80 % of them. The strongest aftershock was on May 6, 2013 with ML=5.7, Mwreg=4.8, at which the change in focal movements occurred. According to the results of near real time processing, aftershock cloud of Ilpyrskoye earthquake had a pronounced linearity and a great length, which was an artifact. The main cause of the artifact is the minimum number of stations involved in determining the hypocenters of most aftershocks and their quasi-linear disposition. The confidence areas within which solutions are equivalent are shown. We concluded that Ilpyrskoye earthquake is a serious argument that the area of compression between the Okhotsk and North American plates is extended further to the east and the border passes through the Kamchatka Isthmus