The skin tolerability of the tubulin polymerisation inhibitor LAV694 was compared to that of 5% 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and 0.5% podophyllotoxin in vitro using a human reconstructed epidermis (HRE), and in vivo using minipigs. Topical treatment of HRE for 1 or 3 days with a 0.2, 0.6 or 1% LAV694 cream or the placebo showed no signs of irritation in terms of morphology, cell viability (lactate dehydrogenase leakage) or interleukin-8 mRNA expression and release. 5-FU increased interleukin-8 production and induced morphological signs of irritation. The substances were also applied under occlusion to the back of two minipigs, twice daily, for 9 days to allow intraindividual comparison of skin effects and tolerability. Skin reactions were monitored by visual scoring, chromometry, pro-inflammatory activity, cell cycle and apoptosis by RT-PCR, laser scanning cytometry and histopathological examination of biopsies. Application of podophyllotoxin and 5-FU had to be stopped on days 4 and 8, respectively, due to severe skin lesions. LAV694 (1%) induced only moderate skin reddening after 9 days. 5-FU and podophyllotoxin, but not LAV694, increased mRNA expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines. LAV694 arrested keratinocytes in the M phase of the cell cycle and apoptosis was detected histologically in the basal layer. LAV694 increased the expression of pro-apoptotic genes in both experimental models. In conclusion, LAV694 selectively induced apoptosis, rather than necrosis, of growth-arrested keratinocytes, thus avoiding the occurrence of extensive inflammation. This resulted in an improved skin tolerability in comparison with 5-FU and podophyllotoxin.

The goal of this study was to design a model system for the assessment of phototoxic potential using a human reconstructed epidermis (HRE, SkinEthic Laboratories, Nice, France), by testing some representative phototoxic (P) and non-phototoxic (NP) compounds and finished topical products. The tissue response to 24-h application of 5-5000 microg/mL of the test agents in the presence and absence of UVA light was analyzed in terms of viability (Lactate Dehydrogenase release), pro-inflammatory activity (IL-8 release and mRNA expression) and morphology (histopathology). 8-Methoxypsoralen (P) and promethazin (P), but not sodium lauryl sulfate (NP) produced cytotoxicity concentration-response curves significantly different between irradiated and nonirradiated tissues. Only irradiated tissues showed morphological damage. Application of tetracyclin (P) in the culture medium, but not topically, induced similar signs of phototoxicity. 6-Methylcoumarine (weak P) was not cytotoxic, yet it increased IL-8 release and mRNA expression only following UVA irradiation. PUVA therapy creams containing 1% 8-Methoxy-psoralen (P) or coal tar (P) decreased viability and induced histologic damage in UVA-exposed tissues. In conclusion, the phototoxic potential of the tested agents was correctly predicted by using a tiered strategy that involves determining cytotoxicity, production of IL-8, and morphological damage following exposure of the HRE to the compounds and UVA light.