The Australian marine research, industry, and stakeholder community has recently undertaken an extensive collaborative process to identify the highest national priorities for wind-waves research. This was undertaken under the auspices of the Forum for Operational Oceanography Surface Waves Working Group. The main steps in the process were first, soliciting possible research questions from the community via an online survey; second, reviewing the questions at a face-to-face workshop; and third, online ranking of the research questions by individuals. This process resulted in 15 identified priorities, covering research activities and the development of infrastructure. The top five priorities are 1) enhanced and updated nearshore and coastal bathymetry; 2) improved understanding of extreme sea states; 3) maintain and enhance the in situ buoy network; 4) improved data access and sharing; and 5) ensemble and probabilistic wave modeling and forecasting. In this paper, each of the 15 priorities is discussed in detail, providing insight into why each priority is important, and the current state of the art, both nationally and internationally, where relevant. While this process has been driven by Australian needs, it is likely that the results will be relevant to other marine-focused nations.

The Australian Forum for Operational Oceanography (FOO), started in 2015, established a working group to focus on wind-waves. One of the aims of this working group was to identify the key priorities of wind-waves research. This undertaking has been driven by Australian needs, but Australia is just one part of the larger international waves community; results of this process are also relevant to other marine-focused nations. The process to identify research priorities engaged both researchers and stakeholders in a democratic, collaborative, and iterative process. The main steps were 1) soliciting possible research questions via an online survey, 2) reviewing and editing the questions at a face-to-face workshop, and 3) ranking the research questions. A total of 360 survey invitations were emailed to possible participants, with 69 respondents. Half of these were from research organizations, and the remainder from private industry, service providers, or government. The survey gathered a list of ideas that were consolidated to 155 suggestions, which were further reviewed by participants at a wind-waves research symposium and then ranked via a voting process. A second round of online voting was then undertaken that specifically targeted the industry and stakeholder community. The top five priorities were identified, and are referred to here as “tier 1” priorities. A further 10 priorities were identified, and are referred to here as “tier 2,” providing a total of 15 top-ranked priorities.