Purpose: Observational studies showed that frailty is common in the intensive care unit and associated with poor outcomes. However, relevant data from interventional trials are scarce, and it is unknown whether outcomes improved over time. We endeavored to estimate temporal trends of representation and outcomes of frail participants in randomized controlled trials of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Methods: We performed a secondary analysis of five ARDS Network and PETAL Network trials published between 2006 and 2019. Based on requirement for everyday assistance prior to hospitalization, we categorized participants into frail versus nonfrail. Results : Out of 3,630 participants with ARDS, 701 (19.3%) were frail. Representation of frail participants increased over time ( P = 0.001), while mortality remained stable ( P = 0.403) and as high as 39.4%. A total of 60.6% of frail participants were younger than 65 years old. Frailty was independently associated with 90-day mortality (odds ratio 1.62, 95% confidence interval 1.34-1.96, P < 0.001). Frail had fewer ventilator-free days and were more likely to have subsequent disability than nonfrail participants. Conclusion: In trials of ARDS, representation of frail participants increased, while their mortality did not improve over time. The ever-increasing vulnerable group of frail participants should be taken into consideration in the design of trials.

ABSTRACT Purpose: Trajectory of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) spans from rapidly improving cases to cases receiving prolonged mechanical ventilation (PMV). We attempted to estimate temporal trends of prevalence and mortality of PMV and to identify risk factors associated with mortality of patients with ARDS receiving PMV. Methods: We performed a secondary analysis of individual patient data from six randomized controlled clinical trials conducted by the ARDS Network. Prolonged mechanical ventilation was defined as the need for mechanical ventilation for >21 consecutive days. Results: Of 4,216 patients with ARDS, 646 (15.3%) received PMV. Prevalence of PMV gradually declined from 18.4% in the ARDS Network: Low-Tidal-Volume Trial (published in 2000) trial to 10.9% in the SAILS (2014) trial (R 2 = 0.728, P = 0.031). Ninety-day mortality of patients receiving PMV did not change over time (R 2 = 0.271, P = 0.290) and remained as high as 36.8%. Ιn the three most recent trials, risk factors associated with mortality among the 250 patients with ARDS receiving PMV included age, malignancy, pneumonia as the cause of ARDS, coagulation dysfunction, and hepatic dysfunction during the first 21 days after trial enrollment. Conclusion: Although prevalence of PMV among patients enrolled in ARDS Network trials gradually declined, mortality did not change. Risk factors associated with mortality were mostly nonmodifiable.

OBJECTIVES:Optimal timing of tracheostomy in severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) is unknown due to lack of clinical trials. We emulated a target trial to estimate the effect of early vs. delayed tracheostomy strategy on functional outcome of patients with severe TBI. DESIGN:Target trial emulation using 1:1 balanced risk-set matching. SETTING:North American hospitals participating in the TBI Hypertonic Saline randomized controlled trial of the Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium. PATIENTS:The prematching population consisted of patients with TBI and admission Glasgow Coma Scale less than or equal to 8, who were alive and on mechanical ventilation on the fourth day following trial enrollment, and stayed in the ICU for at least 5 days. Patients with absolute indication for tracheostomy and patients who died during the first 28 days with a decision to withdraw care were excluded. INTERVENTIONS:We matched patients who received tracheostomy at a certain timepoint (early group) with patients who had not received tracheostomy at the same timepoint but were at-risk of tracheostomy in the future (delayed group). The primary outcome was a poor 6-month functional outcome, defined as Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended less than or equal to 4. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS:Out of 1282 patients available for analysis, 275 comprised the prematching population, with 75 pairs being created postmatching. Median time of tracheostomy differed significantly in the early vs. the delayed group (7.0 d [6.0-10.0 d] vs. 12.0 d [9.8-18.3 d]; p < 0.001). Only 40% of patients in the delayed group received tracheostomy. There was no statistically significant difference between groups regarding poor 6-month functional outcome (early: 68.0% vs. delayed: 72.0%; p = 0.593). CONCLUSIONS:In a target trial emulation, early as opposed to delayed tracheostomy strategy was not associated with differences in 6-month functional outcome following severe TBI. Considering the limitations of target trial emulations, delaying tracheostomy through a "watchful waiting" approach may be appropriate.

Study objective: Despite the almost universal administration of supplemental oxygen in patients presenting in the emergency department (ED) with severe traumatic brain injury, optimal early oxygenation levels are unknown. Therefore, we aimed to examine the effect of different early oxygenation levels on the clinical outcomes of patients presenting in the emergency department with severe traumatic brain injury. Methods: We performed a secondary analysis of the Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium Traumatic Brain Injury Hypertonic Saline randomized controlled trial by including patients with Glasgow Coma Scale <8. Early oxygenation levels were assessed by the worst value of arterial partial pressure of oxygen (PaO2) during the first 4 hours of presentation in the emergency department. The primary outcome was 6-month neurologic status, as assessed by the Extended Glasgow Outcome Scale. A binary logistic regression was utilized, and an odds ratio (OR) with 95% (95% confidence intervals) was calculated. Results: A total of 910 patients were included. In unadjusted (crude) analysis, a PaO2 of 101 to 250 mmHg (OR, 0.59 [0.38 to 0.91]), or 251 to 400 mmHg (OR, 0.53 [0.34 to 0.83]) or >= 401 mmHg (OR, 0.31 [0.20 to 0.49]) was less likely to be associated with poor neurologic status when compared with a PaO2 of <= 100 mmHg. This was also the case for adjusted analyses (including age, pupillary reactivity, and Revised Trauma Score). Conclusion: High oxygenation levels as early as the first 4 hours of presentation in the emergency department may not be adversely associated with the long-term neurologic status of patients with severe traumatic brain injury. Therefore, during the early phase of trauma, clinicians may focus on stabilizing patients while giving low priority to the titration of oxygenation levels.

Background: Acute respiratory distress syndrome is a potentially fatal postoperative complication. We aimed to estimate temporal trends of the representation of patients with postoperative acute respiratory distress syndrome in clinical trials, determine their distinct clinical features, and identify predictors of mortality. Methods: This is a secondary analysis of 7 randomized controlled clinical trials conducted by the Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Network and the Clinical Trials Network for the Prevention and Early Treatment of Acute Lung Injury. Patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome were classified into a postoperative acute respiratory distress syndrome group (ie, patients who had undergone elective sur-gery in the immediate period before trial enrollment) and a non-postoperative acute respiratory distress syndrome group. Results: Out of 5,316 patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome, 256 (4.8%) had postoperative acute respiratory distress syndrome. Representation of postoperative acute respiratory distress syn-drome in trials gradually declined from 2000 to 2011, but it remained stable afterward at 2.7%. Post-operative acute respiratory distress syndrome was associated with lower 90-day mortality (24.6% vs 30.9%, P 1/4 .032) than non-postoperative acute respiratory distress syndrome, even after adjusting for age, acute respiratory distress syndrome severity, usage of vasopressors at baseline, and the study publication year (hazard ratio 0.63, 95% confidence interval 0.49-0.82). Age (odds ratio 1.07, 95% confidence interval 1.04-1.09), immunosuppression (odds ratio 4.12, 95% confidence interval 1.43-11.86), and positive fluid balance (odds ratio 1.09, 95% confidence interval 1.04-1.14) were associated with 90-day mortality among patients with postoperative acute respiratory distress syndrome. Conclusion: Representation of postoperative acute respiratory distress syndrome in trials of the Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Network and the Clinical Trials Network for the Prevention and Early Treatment of Acute Lung Injury gradually declined from 2000 to 2011 but remained stable afterward. Postoperative acute respiratory distress syndrome was associated with lower mortality than non -postoperative acute respiratory distress syndrome. These findings may put both temporal trends and the prognosis of postoperative acute respiratory distress syndrome in perspective. Also, positive fluid balance was associated with the mortality of patients with postoperative acute respiratory distress syndrome.(c) 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

IMPORTANCE Although vaccination substantially reduces the risk of severe COVID-19, it is yet unknown whether vaccinated patients who develop COVID-19 and require invasive mechanical ventilation have lower mortality than controls. OBJECTIVE To examine the association between COVID-19 vaccination status and mortality among critically ill patients who require invasive mechanical ventilation owing to acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) related to COVID-19. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This multicenter cohort study was performed between June 7, 2021, and February 1, 2022, among 265 consecutive adult patients with COVID-19 in academic intensive care units who underwent invasive mechanical ventilation owing to ARDS. EXPOSURES Patients in the full vaccination group had completed the primary COVID-19 vaccination series more than 14 days but less than 5 months prior to intubation. This time threshold was chosen because guidelines from the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommend a booster dose beyond that time. The remaining patients (ie, those who were unvaccinated, partially vaccinated, or fully vaccinated <14days or >5 months before intubation) comprised the control group. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary outcome was time from intubation to all-cause intensive care unit mortality. A Cox proportional hazards regression model including vaccination status, age, comorbid conditions, and baseline Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score on the day of intubation was used. RESULTS A total of 265 intubated patients (170 men [64.2%]; median age, 66.0 years [IQR, 58.0-76.0 years]; 26 [9.8%] in the full vaccination group) were included in the study. A total of 20 patients (76.9%) in the full vaccination group received the BNT162b2 vaccine, and the remaining 6 (23.1%) received the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine. Patients in the full vaccination group were older (median age, 72.5 years [IQR, 62.8-80.0 years] vs 66.0 years [IQR, 57.0-75.0 years]) and more likely to have comorbid conditions (24 of 26 [92.3%] vs 160 of 239 [66.9%]), including malignant neoplasm (6 of 26 [23.1%] vs 18 of 239 [7.5%]), than those in the control group. Full vaccination status was significantly associated with lower mortality compared with controls (16 of 26 patients [61.5%] died in the full vaccination group vs 163 of 239 [68.2%] in the control group; hazard ratio, 0.55 [95% CI, 0.32-0.94]; P = .03). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In this cohort study, full vaccination status was associated with lower mortality compared with controls, which suggests that vaccination might be beneficial even among patients who were intubated owing to COVID-19-related ARDS. These results may inform discussions with families about prognosis.

Pediatric and adolescent gynecology presents unique barriers regarding the adoption of remote counseling. In this study, the authors assessed the feasibility and satisfaction of a hybrid telemedicine model which showed promising potential.

Previous studies have reported that CD44 variant 6 (CD44v6) and metastasis-associated protein 1 (MTA1) are contributing factors to cancer progression. The present study aimed to evaluate the expression profiles for associations with patients' demographic data, clinicopathological characteristics, the presence of partial epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (pEMT), metastatic potential based on the presence of CK20+ CEA+ CXCR4+ circulating tumor cells (CTCs) and prognosis (median follow-up, 45 months). Thus, frozen tissue samples from 31 patients with stage I-III colorectal cancer (CRC), 15 benign colorectal polyps and seven normal colorectal tissues were analyzed to detect membranous (m)CD44v6 and MTA1 expression via flow cytometry. The results demonstrated that the mCD44v6 and MTA1 expression profiles were significantly correlated (rs=+0.786, P<0.001). Notably, MTA1 expression was not associated with any of the clinicopathological characteristics assessed. The percentage of mCD44v6-positive cells within tumors was higher in the right-sided cancer lesions (P=0.014), suggesting that proximal and distal CRCs are distinct clinicopathological entities. Furthermore, downregulated mCD44v6 expression was significantly associated with the presence of CTCs (P=0.017). This association was stronger for pEMT (co-expression of N- and E-cadherin mRNAs) primary lesions (P=0.009). In addition, patients with CRC with low levels of mCD44v6 had unfavorable survival outcomes (P=0.037). Taken together, these results suggest that targeted analysis of membranous CD44v6 as opposed to membranous-cytoplasmic expression is important in determining the prognosis of patients with CRC. Furthermore, downregulated mCD44v6 expression in malignancies presenting CTCs reinforces the importance of tumor-stroma reciprocal influence during the metastatic process and encourages the assessment of relevant therapeutic strategies.

Cell senescence constitutes a physiological process that serves as protection from malignant transformation of cells. However, recent scientific discoveries also identify cell senescence as pivotal in hepatocellular cancer (HCC) biology. The review herein aimed to accumulate evidence on senescence as a mediator of HCC occurrence in hepatitis B (HBV), C (HCV) virus infections, and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). In HBV infection, the carcinogenic HBV X protein frequently mutates during chronic infection, and subsequently exhibits different effects on senescence. In HCV infection, senescent non-functional T-cells do not effectively clear pre-malignant hepatocytes. Furthermore, the HCV Core protein inhibits the occurrence of normal stress-induced hepatocyte senescence, allowing damaged cells to maintain their proliferative potential. In NAFLD-mediated HCC, current data point towards the gut microbiome and hepatic stellate cell senescence. Additionally, senescence contributes in the development of resistance in targeted therapies, such as sorafenib. Finally, the promising role of senotherapeutics in HCC was also explored. Overall, although we may still be at a primitive stage in fully unraveling the role of senescence in cancer, it seems that understanding and harnessing senescence may have the potential to revolutionize the way we treat hepatocellular cancer.

Background Although several international guidelines recommend early over late intubation of patients with severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), this issue is still controversial. We aimed to investigate the effect (if any) of timing of intubation on clinical outcomes of critically ill patients with COVID-19 by carrying out a systematic review and meta-analysis. Methods PubMed and Scopus were systematically searched, while references and preprint servers were explored, for relevant articles up to December 26, 2020, to identify studies which reported on mortality and/or morbidity of patients with COVID-19 undergoing early versus late intubation. “Early” was defined as intubation within 24 h from intensive care unit (ICU) admission, while “late” as intubation at any time after 24 h of ICU admission. All-cause mortality and duration of mechanical ventilation (MV) were the primary outcomes of the meta-analysis. Pooled risk ratio (RR), pooled mean difference (MD) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using a random effects model. The meta-analysis was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42020222147). Results A total of 12 studies, involving 8944 critically ill patients with COVID-19, were included. There was no statistically detectable difference on all-cause mortality between patients undergoing early versus late intubation (3981 deaths; 45.4% versus 39.1%; RR 1.07, 95% CI 0.99–1.15, p = 0.08). This was also the case for duration of MV (1892 patients; MD − 0.58 days, 95% CI − 3.06 to 1.89 days, p = 0.65). In a sensitivity analysis using an alternate definition of early/late intubation, intubation without versus with a prior trial of high-flow nasal cannula or noninvasive mechanical ventilation was still not associated with a statistically detectable difference on all-cause mortality (1128 deaths; 48.9% versus 42.5%; RR 1.11, 95% CI 0.99–1.25, p = 0.08). Conclusions The synthesized evidence suggests that timing of intubation may have no effect on mortality and morbidity of critically ill patients with COVID-19. These results might justify a wait-and-see approach, which may lead to fewer intubations. Relevant guidelines may therefore need to be updated.

Asthma exacerbations are a common cause of ED visits and can be life-threatening for patients with asthma. Identification of these patients characteristics could help improve their management and reduce exacerbations rate. We called for a 3-month follow-up visit patients that visited ED and were initially diagnosed with asthma exacerbation. Patients with a definite diagnosis of asthma were finally assessed in terms of the following parameters (Table 1a). 100 patients were enrolled, with 34% being newly diagnosed with asthma. The majority of them had mild asthma, outreaching 72.6% in GINA stages I and II. 13.7% were classified in stage III and 13.7% in stages IV/V. Prior to ED visit treatment included ICS/LABA(32.3%), SABA as needed(24.2%), ICS/LABA plus LAMA(19.4%), ICS/LABA as needed(9.7%) and 8.1% did not receive any treatment. 62.3% were adherent at prescribed treatment. Active smoking was self-reported by 40.4% and passive smoking outreached 31% in non-smokers. Following HAD’s score evaluation 31.2% showed anxiety and 12.5% showed depression (cutoffs>11). See all characteristics on Table 1b. Conclusively, 1/3 of patients visiting ED with asthma exacerbation, were newly diagnosed with asthma. Most of patients were classified in stages I and II and a significant proportion used SABA monotherapy prior to visit. Smoking, poor adherence, psychopathology and commorbidities were highly prevalent characteristics among participants.

We conducted a retrospective observational study to assess the hospitalization rates for acute exacerbations of asthma and COPD (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease) during the first imposed lockdown in Athens, Greece. Patient characteristics and the concentration of eight air pollutants [namely, NO (nitrogen monoxide), NO2 (nitrogen dioxide), CO (carbon monoxide), PM2.5 (particulate matter 2.5), PM10 (particulate matter 10), O3 (ozone), SO2 (sulfur dioxide) and benzene] were considered. A total of 153 consecutive hospital admissions were studied. Reduced admissions occurred in the Lockdown period compared to the Pre-lockdown 2020 (p < 0.001) or the Control 2019 (p = 0.007) period. Furthermore, the concentration of 6/8 air pollutants positively correlated with weekly hospital admissions in 2020 and significantly decreased during the lockdown. Finally, admitted patients for asthma exacerbation during the lockdown were younger (p = 0.046) and less frequently presented respiratory failure (p = 0.038), whereas patients with COPD presented higher blood eosinophil percentage (p = 0.017) and count (p = 0.012). Overall, admissions for asthma and COPD exacerbations decreased during the lockdown. This might be partially explained by reduction of air pollution during this period while medical care avoidance behavior, especially among elderly patients cannot be excluded. Our findings aid in understanding the untold impact of the pandemic on diseases beyond COVID-19, focusing on patients with obstructive diseases.

Background: COVID-19 pandemic has the potential to significantly affect the mental health of healthcare workers (HCWs), who stand in the frontline of this crisis. It is, therefore, an immediate priority to monitor rates of mood, sleep and other mental health issues in order to understand mediating factors and inform tailored interventions. The aim of this review is to synthesize and analyze existing evidence on the prevalence of depression, anxiety and insomnia among HCWs during the Covid-19 outbreak. Methods: A systematic search of literature databases was conducted up to April 17th, 2020. Two reviewers independently assessed full-text articles according to predefined criteria. Risk of bias for each individual study was assessed and data pooled using random-effects meta-analyses to estimate the prevalence of specific mental health problems. The review protocol is registered in PROSPERO and is available online. Findings: Thirteen studies were included in the analysis with a combined total of 33,062 participants. Anxiety was assessed in 12 studies, with a pooled prevalence of 23.2% and depression in 10 studies, with a prevalence rate of 22.8%. A subgroup analysis revealed gender and occupational differences with female HCPs and nurses exhibiting higher rates of affective symptoms compared to male and medical staff respectively. Finally, insomnia prevalence was estimated at 38.9% across 5 studies. Interpretation: Early evidence suggests that a considerable proportion of HCWs experience mood and sleep disturbances during this outbreak, stressing the need to establish ways to mitigate mental health risks and adjust interventions under pandemic conditions.